Ask the Scholar
Page 52 of 57
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
A 1995 article in the American Journal of Public Health estimated that a 25 cent increase in
the California cigarette tax reduced sales in the state by 819 million packs over a two and a
half year period. 14
A study in the Journal of the American Medical Association revealed that a comprehensive
youth access program in Woodridge, Illinois, reduced sales to minors from 70 percent to less
than 5 percent over a year and a half, with a corresponding decrease in regular tobacco use
among youth of over 50 percent. 15
Researchers in California conducted a study that showed that nonsmoker exposure to tobacco
smoke at work ranged from 24.5 percent in areas with strong local tobacco control ordinances
to 34.8 percent in areas with no ordinance. The percentage of indoor workers working in a
smoke-free workplace decreased from 40.3 percent for those covered by a strong ordinance to
31.1 percent where there was no ordinance. 16
Two studies, using data drawn from the National Health Interview Survey, found significant
reductions in cigarette consumption in areas where clean indoor air laws were in effect. 17-18
Public support:
Polls by Americans for Non-Smokers' Rights and the Coalition on Smoking or Health found that
81 percent of Americans want communities to have "the option of passing laws to protect people
from secondhand smoke and protect children from tobacco." 19
1 Siegel M, Carol J, Jordan J, Hobart R, Schoenmarklin S, DuMelle F, Fisher P. "Preemption in Tobacco Control:
Review of an Emerging Public Health Problem." JAMA. 1997; 278:858-863.
2-7 2 Conlisk E, Siegel M, Langerich E, MacKenzie W, Malek S, Eriksen M. "The Status of Local Smoking
Regulations in North Carolina Following a State Preemption Bill." JAMA. 1995; 273:805-807.
3 Skolnick AA. "Cancer Converts Tobacco Lobbyist: Victor L. Crawford Goes on the Record." JAMA. 1995;
274:199-202.
4 Fielding JE. "Revealing and Reversing Tobacco Industry Strategies." Am J Public Health. 1996; 86:1073-1075.
5 Bearman NS, Goldstein AO, Bryan DG. "Legislating Clean Air: Politics, Preemption, and the Health of the
Public." NC Med J. 1995; 56:14-19.
6 Freyman R. "Butting in: The Tobacco Lobby Shows No Sign of Flickering in its Push to Move Smoking
Regulation Out of City Halls and Into Statehouses." Governing. November 1995; 9:55-57.
7 Jordan J, Pertschuk M, Carol J. "Preemption in Tobacco Control: History, Current Issues, and Future Concerns."
Berkeley, CA: Western Consortium for Public Health, 1994.
8-12 8 Califano JA Jr. "Revealing the Link Between Campaign Financing and Deaths Caused by Tobacco." JAMA.
1994; 272:1217-1218.
9 Wright JR. "Contributions, Lobbying and Committee Voting in the US House of Representatives." Am Polit Sci
Rev. 1990; 84:417-438.
10 Glantz SA, Begay ME. "Tobacco Industry Campaign Contributions are Affecting Tobacco Control
Policymaking in California." JAMA. 1994; 272:1176-1182.
11 Monardi FM, Glantz SA. "Tobacco Industry Political Activity and Tobacco Control Policymaking in
Page data
- Page
- 52
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- ad01f3ac5b1c7563
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 26413531
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "26413531",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26413531",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Tobacco Effective National Action to Control Tobacco (ENACT) [2]",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26413531",
"collections": [
"Records of the Domestic Policy Council (Clinton Administration)",
"Bruce Reed's Tobacco Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/31/4135/26413531/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-Tobacco/2011-0299-S-Tobacco-JPG/Box_265/42-t-7367462-20110299S-265-010-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_265_010_2015_Page_001.JPG",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/31/4135/26413531/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-Tobacco/2011-0299-S-Tobacco-JPG/Box_265/42-t-7367462-20110299S-265-010-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_265_010_2015_Page_001.JPG",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/31/4135/26413531/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-Tobacco/2011-0299-S-Tobacco-JPG/Box_265/42-t-7367462-20110299S-265-010-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_265_010_2015_Page_001.JPG",
"imageCount": 57,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "26413531",
"label": "Tobacco Effective National Action to Control Tobacco (ENACT) [2]",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26413531"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "26413531",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26413531",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Tobacco Effective National Action to Control Tobacco (ENACT) [2]",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26413531",
"collections": [
"Records of the Domestic Policy Council (Clinton Administration)",
"Bruce Reed's Tobacco Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/31/4135/26413531/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-Tobacco/2011-0299-S-Tobacco-JPG/Box_265/42-t-7367462-20110299S-265-010-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_265_010_2015_Page_001.JPG",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/31/4135/26413531/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-Tobacco/2011-0299-S-Tobacco-JPG/Box_265/42-t-7367462-20110299S-265-010-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_265_010_2015_Page_001.JPG",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/31/4135/26413531/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-Tobacco/2011-0299-S-Tobacco-JPG/Box_265/42-t-7367462-20110299S-265-010-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_265_010_2015_Page_001.JPG",
"imageCount": 57,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26413531",
"naId": 26413531,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"otherTitles": [
"42-t-7367462-20110299S-265-010-2015"
],
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 52,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/31/4135/26413531/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-Tobacco/2011-0299-S-Tobacco-JPG/Box_265/42-t-7367462-20110299S-265-010-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_265_010_2015_Page_052.JPG",
"mediaId": "ad01f3ac5b1c7563",
"ocrText": "A 1995 article in the American Journal of Public Health estimated that a 25 cent increase in\nthe California cigarette tax reduced sales in the state by 819 million packs over a two and a\nhalf year period. 14\nA study in the Journal of the American Medical Association revealed that a comprehensive\nyouth access program in Woodridge, Illinois, reduced sales to minors from 70 percent to less\nthan 5 percent over a year and a half, with a corresponding decrease in regular tobacco use\namong youth of over 50 percent. 15\nResearchers in California conducted a study that showed that nonsmoker exposure to tobacco\nsmoke at work ranged from 24.5 percent in areas with strong local tobacco control ordinances\nto 34.8 percent in areas with no ordinance. The percentage of indoor workers working in a\nsmoke-free workplace decreased from 40.3 percent for those covered by a strong ordinance to\n31.1 percent where there was no ordinance. 16\nTwo studies, using data drawn from the National Health Interview Survey, found significant\nreductions in cigarette consumption in areas where clean indoor air laws were in effect. 17-18\nPublic support:\nPolls by Americans for Non-Smokers' Rights and the Coalition on Smoking or Health found that\n81 percent of Americans want communities to have \"the option of passing laws to protect people\nfrom secondhand smoke and protect children from tobacco.\" 19\n1 Siegel M, Carol J, Jordan J, Hobart R, Schoenmarklin S, DuMelle F, Fisher P. \"Preemption in Tobacco Control:\nReview of an Emerging Public Health Problem.\" JAMA. 1997; 278:858-863.\n2-7 2 Conlisk E, Siegel M, Langerich E, MacKenzie W, Malek S, Eriksen M. \"The Status of Local Smoking\nRegulations in North Carolina Following a State Preemption Bill.\" JAMA. 1995; 273:805-807.\n3 Skolnick AA. \"Cancer Converts Tobacco Lobbyist: Victor L. Crawford Goes on the Record.\" JAMA. 1995;\n274:199-202.\n4 Fielding JE. \"Revealing and Reversing Tobacco Industry Strategies.\" Am J Public Health. 1996; 86:1073-1075.\n5 Bearman NS, Goldstein AO, Bryan DG. \"Legislating Clean Air: Politics, Preemption, and the Health of the\nPublic.\" NC Med J. 1995; 56:14-19.\n6 Freyman R. \"Butting in: The Tobacco Lobby Shows No Sign of Flickering in its Push to Move Smoking\nRegulation Out of City Halls and Into Statehouses.\" Governing. November 1995; 9:55-57.\n7 Jordan J, Pertschuk M, Carol J. \"Preemption in Tobacco Control: History, Current Issues, and Future Concerns.\"\nBerkeley, CA: Western Consortium for Public Health, 1994.\n8-12 8 Califano JA Jr. \"Revealing the Link Between Campaign Financing and Deaths Caused by Tobacco.\" JAMA.\n1994; 272:1217-1218.\n9 Wright JR. \"Contributions, Lobbying and Committee Voting in the US House of Representatives.\" Am Polit Sci\nRev. 1990; 84:417-438.\n10 Glantz SA, Begay ME. \"Tobacco Industry Campaign Contributions are Affecting Tobacco Control\nPolicymaking in California.\" JAMA. 1994; 272:1176-1182.\n11 Monardi FM, Glantz SA. \"Tobacco Industry Political Activity and Tobacco Control Policymaking in"
}