Ask the Scholar

Page 75 of 101
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 75

OCR

02/11/98 11:04 202 347 9881 BLOOMBERG/CONUS 003 Standard and Poor's 500 index in afternoon trading. Philip Morris shares fell 5/16 to 43 7/16, while RJR Nabisco Holdings Corp. shares fell 5/8 to 33 1/4. In contrast, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 122 points in afternoon trading to go above 8300. Constitutional Questions Koop and Kessler argued in their letter sent yesterday to a number of health organizations and lawmakers that Congress can pass effective legislation without the industry. Congress has the opportunity to make fundamental changes in tobacco policy based solely and exclusively on what is good for the public health without itself engaging in negotiations with the tobacco industry, they said. Others disagree. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch, contends liability limits are needed to get comprehensive legislation and said Congress and the White House need to find common ground. Sooner or later we're are going to have a bipartisan coalition get together and get this done, Hatch said in an interview. Adelman said the impact of legislation would be far broader with the industry's cooperation. Raising cigarette prices is the best way to cut youth smoking but it's not the only way, Adelman said. The voluntary advertising restrictions would help a great deal Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. tobacco analyst Gary Black took a stronger view. If you are not going to give the industry something, you are not going to change their behavior, he said. I have to believe that Clinton knows this, and will eventually end up supporting a more realistic bill Floyd Abrams, a New York City attorney and a scholar on constitutional issues, told the Senate Judiciary Committee that Congress can't force the industry to accept the advertising restrictions contained in the settlement. ''If the proposed settlement were enacted into law, I believe it would be held to violate the First Amendment, Abrams said. Richard Daynard, a law professor at Northeastern University School of Law, disagreed, testifying that existing law governing commercial speech allows the government to restrict tobacco advertising without violating the Constitution. Class Action Lawsuits Sen. Richard Durbin, an Illinois Democrat and a foe of any form of legal protection for cigarette makers, said, We should do what is right [or the public health whether the industry likes it or not The most controversial provisions in the settlement have long been those that would ban class action lawsuits against the industry and cap payments for other lawsuits. Most members of Congress already oppose those provisions and the push by Koop and Kessler will only increase the opposition. Obviously, their views are highly valued, and they will have impact, said Commerce Committee Chairman John McCain of

Page data

Page
75
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
7a1d3c3c58067aeb
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
26413612
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "26413612",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26413612",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Tobacco Liability [1]",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26413612",
    "collections": [
        "Records of the Domestic Policy Council (Clinton Administration)",
        "Bruce Reed's Tobacco Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/12/4136/26413612/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-Tobacco/2011-0299-S-Tobacco-JPG/Box_270/42-t-7367462-20110299S-270-013-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_270_013_2015_Page_001.JPG",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/12/4136/26413612/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-Tobacco/2011-0299-S-Tobacco-JPG/Box_270/42-t-7367462-20110299S-270-013-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_270_013_2015_Page_001.JPG",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/12/4136/26413612/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-Tobacco/2011-0299-S-Tobacco-JPG/Box_270/42-t-7367462-20110299S-270-013-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_270_013_2015_Page_001.JPG",
    "imageCount": 101,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "26413612",
    "label": "Tobacco Liability [1]",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26413612"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "26413612",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26413612",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Tobacco Liability [1]",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26413612",
    "collections": [
        "Records of the Domestic Policy Council (Clinton Administration)",
        "Bruce Reed's Tobacco Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/12/4136/26413612/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-Tobacco/2011-0299-S-Tobacco-JPG/Box_270/42-t-7367462-20110299S-270-013-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_270_013_2015_Page_001.JPG",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/12/4136/26413612/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-Tobacco/2011-0299-S-Tobacco-JPG/Box_270/42-t-7367462-20110299S-270-013-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_270_013_2015_Page_001.JPG",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/12/4136/26413612/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-Tobacco/2011-0299-S-Tobacco-JPG/Box_270/42-t-7367462-20110299S-270-013-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_270_013_2015_Page_001.JPG",
    "imageCount": 101,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26413612",
    "naId": 26413612,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "otherTitles": [
        "42-t-7367462-20110299S-270-013-2015"
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 75,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/12/4136/26413612/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-Tobacco/2011-0299-S-Tobacco-JPG/Box_270/42-t-7367462-20110299S-270-013-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_270_013_2015_Page_075.JPG",
    "mediaId": "7a1d3c3c58067aeb",
    "ocrText": "02/11/98\n11:04\n202 347 9881\nBLOOMBERG/CONUS\n003\nStandard and Poor's 500 index in afternoon trading. Philip Morris\nshares fell 5/16 to 43 7/16, while RJR Nabisco Holdings Corp.\nshares fell 5/8 to 33 1/4. In contrast, the Dow Jones Industrial\nAverage rose 122 points in afternoon trading to go above 8300.\nConstitutional Questions\nKoop and Kessler argued in their letter sent yesterday to a\nnumber of health organizations and lawmakers that Congress can\npass effective legislation without the industry. Congress has\nthe opportunity to make fundamental changes in tobacco policy\nbased solely and exclusively on what is good for the public\nhealth without itself engaging in negotiations with the tobacco\nindustry, they said.\nOthers disagree. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Orrin\nHatch, contends liability limits are needed to get comprehensive\nlegislation and said Congress and the White House need to find\ncommon ground. Sooner or later we're are going to have a\nbipartisan coalition get together and get this done, Hatch said\nin an interview.\nAdelman said the impact of legislation would be far broader\nwith the industry's cooperation. Raising cigarette prices is\nthe best way to cut youth smoking but it's not the only way,\nAdelman said. The voluntary advertising restrictions would help\na great deal\nSanford C. Bernstein & Co. tobacco analyst Gary Black took a\nstronger view. If you are not going to give the industry\nsomething, you are not going to change their behavior, he said.\nI have to believe that Clinton knows this, and will eventually\nend up supporting a more realistic bill\nFloyd Abrams, a New York City attorney and a scholar on\nconstitutional issues, told the Senate Judiciary Committee that\nCongress can't force the industry to accept the advertising\nrestrictions contained in the settlement. ''If the proposed\nsettlement were enacted into law, I believe it would be held to\nviolate the First Amendment, Abrams said.\nRichard Daynard, a law professor at Northeastern University\nSchool of Law, disagreed, testifying that existing law governing\ncommercial speech allows the government to restrict tobacco\nadvertising without violating the Constitution.\nClass Action Lawsuits\nSen. Richard Durbin, an Illinois Democrat and a foe of any\nform of legal protection for cigarette makers, said, We should\ndo what is right [or the public health whether the industry\nlikes it or not\nThe most controversial provisions in the settlement have\nlong been those that would ban class action lawsuits against the\nindustry and cap payments for other lawsuits. Most members of\nCongress already oppose those provisions and the push by Koop and\nKessler will only increase the opposition.\nObviously, their views are highly valued, and they will\nhave impact, said Commerce Committee Chairman John McCain of"
}