Images (41)
Document
| id |
id
26413674
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 41Evaluating the Proposed Settlement: A Side-by-Side Comparison with
the Koop-Kessler Report, and the Status Quo
developed by the Advocacy Institute
DRAFT -- 7/30/97 Melanne Verveer
Table of Contents
Bruce - -
Introduction (p. 2)
Fy, - in
Why Consider a Settlement? (p. 2)
Overview of the Settlement Proposal (p. 3)
Case you didn't
Advertising/Promotion Restrictions (p. 5)
fee Mr. my
Warnings on Packages and in Advertising (p. 8)
Restrictions on Youth Access to Tobacco; Licensing of Tobacco Retailers (p. 10)
FDA Authority over Tobacco (including Nicotine); Disclosure of Industry Documents (p. 13)
FDA Authority over Non-Tobacco Ingredients in Tobacco Products (Safety and Disclosure) (p. 18)
Changing Tobacco Industry Behavior and "Corporate Culture" (p. 20)
"Look Back" Incentives to Reduce Consumption, Maintain State Enforcement Effort (p. 22)
Enforcement of Settlement Provisions; Industry Consent to Regulation; Provisions for Non-participating
Tobacco Firms (p. 25)
Reducing Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke (p. 28)
Changes in FDA/FTC Authority; Preemption Issues (p. 30)
Overall Industry Payment Structure (p. 31)
Industry Funding for Public Health Measures (p. 34)
Changes in the Tobacco Industry's Civil Liability for Tobacco-Related Damages (p. 37)
Other Sections of the Proposed Settlement Not Directly Addressed in This Document (p. 40)
Melanne Verveer
To Bruel Reed
Advocacy Institute Draft 7/30/97
1
Relations
belongs_to