Ask the Scholar

Page 102 of 165
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 102

OCR

PPI Intern1 - feb29fsregs_access.doc Page 52 current rule as set out above. C Child support payments received. Current section 273.12(a)(1)(i) exempts households from having to report changes in their cash assistance benefits because the welfare office has prior knowledge of those changes. Although USDA is not specifically proposing any changes to this provision, comments should recommend that it be expanded to cover child support payments received from the state's child support enforcement (CSE) agency. Because of irregular payments by absent parents and processing delays at CSE agencies, child support income is among the most volatile types received by low-income families. Current rules require many recipient families to report and verify changes almost every month. This should be unnecessary now that most child support payments to low-income families are being made through states' CSE agencies, which are required by law to have effective computer systems. States should be required to obtain information about child support from their CSE systems; households should only be required to report changes in child support received outside the CSE system. C Physical or mental incapacities. Current section 273.2(f)(1)(xii) addresses the method of verifying that an individual is physically or mentally unfit if he or she claims exemption from the Program's restrictions on college students' eligibility on that basis. USDA proposes to remove this paragraph, allowing states to dispense with verification of students' incapacity except where the household's statement is questionable. 65 Fed. Reg. 10868. Comments should support this modest reduction of the verification burden imposed on households and food stamp offices. E. Burdensome Forms States have broad discretion in how their food stamp application forms are designed. States wishing to have short, simple, accessible forms typically include a few general questions and then follow-up in the application interview where the household's answers indicate that more information is needed. For example, a single question might ask the household if it owns any of a long list of assets, such as boats, airplanes, snowmobiles, vacation homes, stocks, bonds, mutual funds, etc. If the household answers "yes," the eligibility worker obtains the details during the interview. Tennessee has a joint TANF-food stamp-Medicaid application that is one page, front and back. At the other extreme, some states have application forms that exceed twenty pages. C Review of state forms. PRWORA eliminated the requirement that USDA approve all states' food stamp application forms in advance. Comments should urge, however, that the rules make clear that states must submit copies of all application forms to USDA and that the Department has the authority to require changes where an application form is so confusing, intrusive, or burdensome that it violates the "timely, accurate, and fair service" requirement of section 11(e)(2)(B)(i) of the Act (7 U.S.C. § 2020(e)(2)(B)(i)). 52

Page data

Page
102
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
79aa6ca27977251c
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
565363968
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "565363968",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/565363968",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Food Stamps - Regulations",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/565363968",
    "collections": [
        "Records of the Domestic Policy Council (Clinton Administration)",
        "Margy Waller's Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-010-006-2025/7367483-20200317S-010-006-2025-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-010-006-2025/7367483-20200317S-010-006-2025-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-010-006-2025/7367483-20200317S-010-006-2025-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 165,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "565363968",
    "label": "Food Stamps - Regulations",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/565363968"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "565363968",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/565363968",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Food Stamps - Regulations",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/565363968",
    "collections": [
        "Records of the Domestic Policy Council (Clinton Administration)",
        "Margy Waller's Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-010-006-2025/7367483-20200317S-010-006-2025-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-010-006-2025/7367483-20200317S-010-006-2025-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-010-006-2025/7367483-20200317S-010-006-2025-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 165,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/565363968",
    "naId": 565363968,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "otherTitles": [
        "7367483-20200317S-010-006-2025"
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 102,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-010-006-2025/7367483-20200317S-010-006-2025-102.jpg",
    "mediaId": "79aa6ca27977251c",
    "ocrText": "PPI Intern1 - feb29fsregs_access.doc\nPage 52\ncurrent rule as set out above.\nC\nChild support payments received. Current section 273.12(a)(1)(i) exempts\nhouseholds from having to report changes in their cash assistance benefits because\nthe welfare office has prior knowledge of those changes. Although USDA is not\nspecifically proposing any changes to this provision, comments should\nrecommend that it be expanded to cover child support payments received from the\nstate's child support enforcement (CSE) agency. Because of irregular payments\nby absent parents and processing delays at CSE agencies, child support income is\namong the most volatile types received by low-income families. Current rules\nrequire many recipient families to report and verify changes almost every month.\nThis should be unnecessary now that most child support payments to low-income\nfamilies are being made through states' CSE agencies, which are required by law\nto have effective computer systems. States should be required to obtain\ninformation about child support from their CSE systems; households should only\nbe required to report changes in child support received outside the CSE system.\nC\nPhysical or mental incapacities. Current section 273.2(f)(1)(xii) addresses the\nmethod of verifying that an individual is physically or mentally unfit if he or she\nclaims exemption from the Program's restrictions on college students' eligibility on\nthat basis. USDA proposes to remove this paragraph, allowing states to dispense\nwith verification of students' incapacity except where the household's statement is\nquestionable. 65 Fed. Reg. 10868. Comments should support this modest\nreduction of the verification burden imposed on households and food stamp\noffices.\nE.\nBurdensome Forms\nStates have broad discretion in how their food stamp application forms are designed.\nStates wishing to have short, simple, accessible forms typically include a few general questions\nand then follow-up in the application interview where the household's answers indicate that more\ninformation is needed. For example, a single question might ask the household if it owns any of a\nlong list of assets, such as boats, airplanes, snowmobiles, vacation homes, stocks, bonds, mutual\nfunds, etc. If the household answers \"yes,\" the eligibility worker obtains the details during the\ninterview. Tennessee has a joint TANF-food stamp-Medicaid application that is one page, front\nand back. At the other extreme, some states have application forms that exceed twenty pages.\nC\nReview of state forms. PRWORA eliminated the requirement that USDA\napprove all states' food stamp application forms in advance. Comments should\nurge, however, that the rules make clear that states must submit copies of all\napplication forms to USDA and that the Department has the authority to require\nchanges where an application form is so confusing, intrusive, or burdensome that\nit violates the \"timely, accurate, and fair service\" requirement of section\n11(e)(2)(B)(i) of the Act (7 U.S.C. § 2020(e)(2)(B)(i)).\n52"
}