Ask the Scholar

Page 81 of 212
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 81

OCR

1996, published on . Please refer to that rule for a complete understanding of the final provisions. In addition to making the changes to 7 CFR 273.2(i) mandated by PRWORA, we also proposed to amend the section by removing repetitive definitions and simplifying the procedures for providing expedited service. Comments received on the proposed discretionary changes were mixed. Some commenters, while supporting the increased flexibility provided under the revised regulations, thought the Department should go still farther in simplifying expedited service requirements for State agencies. For example, one commenter opposed the regulations at the renumbered paragraph (i)(6), which provide no limit on the number of times a household can be certified under expedited service procedures. The commenter saw no logical reason why households that fail to submit timely recertification applications should be rewarded with the ability to receive benefits expeditiously, and preferred that expedited service be reserved to households newly applying and those who have been off the program for a month. Other commenters felt that the revised regulations failed to contain sufficient provisions protecting customer rights. One commenter thought that the food stamp office should be required to contact households that submit incomplete applications promptly to request more information and to inform them that they may be eligible for expedited issuance based on gross income, liquid resources, and shelter costs. In addition, the commenter thought that application forms should be required to have a prominent place on or near the front where the household

Page data

Page
81
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
0de7715a677dbed7
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
565365149
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "565365149",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/565365149",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "FSP: Non-Citizen Eligibility and Certification Provisions of Public Law 104-193 Binder II [1]",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/565365149",
    "collections": [
        "Records of the Domestic Policy Council (Clinton Administration)",
        "Margy Waller's Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-011-005-2025/7367483-20200317S-011-005-2025-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-011-005-2025/7367483-20200317S-011-005-2025-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-011-005-2025/7367483-20200317S-011-005-2025-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 212,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "565365149",
    "label": "FSP: Non-Citizen Eligibility and Certification Provisions of Public Law 104-193 Binder II [1]",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/565365149"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "565365149",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/565365149",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "FSP: Non-Citizen Eligibility and Certification Provisions of Public Law 104-193 Binder II [1]",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/565365149",
    "collections": [
        "Records of the Domestic Policy Council (Clinton Administration)",
        "Margy Waller's Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-011-005-2025/7367483-20200317S-011-005-2025-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-011-005-2025/7367483-20200317S-011-005-2025-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-011-005-2025/7367483-20200317S-011-005-2025-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 212,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/565365149",
    "naId": 565365149,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "otherTitles": [
        "7367483-20200317S-011-005-2025"
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 81,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-011-005-2025/7367483-20200317S-011-005-2025-081.jpg",
    "mediaId": "0de7715a677dbed7",
    "ocrText": "1996, published on\n.\nPlease refer to that rule for a complete understanding of the\nfinal provisions.\nIn addition to making the changes to 7 CFR 273.2(i) mandated by PRWORA, we\nalso proposed to amend the section by removing repetitive definitions and simplifying the\nprocedures for providing expedited service.\nComments received on the proposed discretionary changes were mixed. Some\ncommenters, while supporting the increased flexibility provided under the revised\nregulations, thought the Department should go still farther in simplifying expedited\nservice requirements for State agencies. For example, one commenter opposed the\nregulations at the renumbered paragraph (i)(6), which provide no limit on the number of\ntimes a household can be certified under expedited service procedures. The commenter\nsaw no logical reason why households that fail to submit timely recertification\napplications should be rewarded with the ability to receive benefits expeditiously, and\npreferred that expedited service be reserved to households newly applying and those who\nhave been off the program for a month. Other commenters felt that the revised\nregulations failed to contain sufficient provisions protecting customer rights. One\ncommenter thought that the food stamp office should be required to contact households\nthat submit incomplete applications promptly to request more information and to inform\nthem that they may be eligible for expedited issuance based on gross income, liquid\nresources, and shelter costs. In addition, the commenter thought that application forms\nshould be required to have a prominent place on or near the front where the household"
}