Ask the Scholar
Page 6 of 122
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
PHOTOCOPY
PRESERVATION
Old Page
New Page
Comment
10
Please make change
date: it should be 12/6/99. That was the date of
the POTUS annour:
ent.
29-30
Who were the
comm crs who commended efforts to encourage State
initiative in family formation?
73
Using the "earnings gain measure" to illustrate the improvement rate is
confusing since it is a component of the "success in the workforce
measure." Perhaps one of the stand-alone measures would be simpler.
84
82
Suggested change: " ..although the rate of decline has slowed. by two
percentage points in each of the last two years
Including the words "under certain circumstances, child care and
transportation onfu mg. Suggest instead: "two thirds of whom do
not receive TANF assistance (primarily cash assistance).
In other contexts, the comparison of the fall in food stamps
participation to poverty has been based on the decline in the rate, rather
than the decline in absolute participation. Why did you base this
statement on absolute participation?
89
87
The changes to the paragraph about using 130 percent of poverty as a
proxy for food stamp eligibility still does not reflect the fact that states
may differ as to the percent of families who are NOT in fact eligible
because of differences between states as to vehicle asset limits. Can we
point out that a state can improve by raising or eliminating the VAL for
food stamps?
100
Are the threshold measures likely to be included in current year
guidance?
125
Need to revise to justify looking at leavers in the context of Medicaid
but not Food Stamps.
128
120
The sentence that's been deleted actually appeared in the original
version on page 122 and was not of concern. The paragraph that
Page data
- Page
- 6
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 6878bc1d68e1370b
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 565374850
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "565374850",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/565374850",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "TANF [Temporary Assistance for Needy Families] - High Performance Bonus - Final Rule [binder] [1]",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/565374850",
"collections": [
"Records of the Domestic Policy Council (Clinton Administration)",
"Margy Waller's Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-023-008-2025/7367483-20200317S-023-008-2025-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-023-008-2025/7367483-20200317S-023-008-2025-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-023-008-2025/7367483-20200317S-023-008-2025-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 122,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "565374850",
"label": "TANF [Temporary Assistance for Needy Families] - High Performance Bonus - Final Rule [binder] [1]",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/565374850"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "565374850",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/565374850",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "TANF [Temporary Assistance for Needy Families] - High Performance Bonus - Final Rule [binder] [1]",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/565374850",
"collections": [
"Records of the Domestic Policy Council (Clinton Administration)",
"Margy Waller's Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-023-008-2025/7367483-20200317S-023-008-2025-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-023-008-2025/7367483-20200317S-023-008-2025-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-023-008-2025/7367483-20200317S-023-008-2025-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 122,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/565374850",
"naId": 565374850,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"otherTitles": [
"7367483-20200317S-023-008-2025"
],
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 6,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-023-008-2025/7367483-20200317S-023-008-2025-006.jpg",
"mediaId": "6878bc1d68e1370b",
"ocrText": "PHOTOCOPY\nPRESERVATION\nOld Page\nNew Page\nComment\n10\nPlease make change\ndate: it should be 12/6/99. That was the date of\nthe POTUS annour:\nent.\n29-30\nWho were the\ncomm crs who commended efforts to encourage State\ninitiative in family formation?\n73\nUsing the \"earnings gain measure\" to illustrate the improvement rate is\nconfusing since it is a component of the \"success in the workforce\nmeasure.\" Perhaps one of the stand-alone measures would be simpler.\n84\n82\nSuggested change: \" ..although the rate of decline has slowed. by two\npercentage points in each of the last two years\nIncluding the words \"under certain circumstances, child care and\ntransportation onfu mg. Suggest instead: \"two thirds of whom do\nnot receive TANF assistance (primarily cash assistance).\nIn other contexts, the comparison of the fall in food stamps\nparticipation to poverty has been based on the decline in the rate, rather\nthan the decline in absolute participation. Why did you base this\nstatement on absolute participation?\n89\n87\nThe changes to the paragraph about using 130 percent of poverty as a\nproxy for food stamp eligibility still does not reflect the fact that states\nmay differ as to the percent of families who are NOT in fact eligible\nbecause of differences between states as to vehicle asset limits. Can we\npoint out that a state can improve by raising or eliminating the VAL for\nfood stamps?\n100\nAre the threshold measures likely to be included in current year\nguidance?\n125\nNeed to revise to justify looking at leavers in the context of Medicaid\nbut not Food Stamps.\n128\n120\nThe sentence that's been deleted actually appeared in the original\nversion on page 122 and was not of concern. The paragraph that"
}