Ask the Scholar
Page 60 of 104
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
A Preliminary Report
Figure 1
State Social Services Spending
as a Percent of State Budget
State Fiscal Years 1995 and 1999
20
15
10
:
0
CA
GA
MO
WI
1995 1999
Sources: National Association of State Budget Officers and Rockefeller Institute of Government.
Table 2
Changes in Cash Assistance Spending and Caseloads
State Fiscal Year 1995 to State Fiscal Year 1999
(Dollars in Thousands)
Federal
State (State/Local)
Total
Caseload
Change
% Change
Change
% Change
Change
% Change
Change
California
(1,302,733)
(41%)
1,368,781
(41%)
(2,671,514)
(41%)
(34%)
Georgia
(118,712)
(43%)
(103,002)
(65%)
(221,714)
(52%)
(62%)
Missouri
(35,370)
(20%)
(80,753)
(68%)
(116,123)
(39%)
(47%)
Wisconsin
(175,788)
(83%)
(97,178)
(69%)
(272,966)
(77%)
(89%)
Finding 4: Spending on child care and child development programs has risen in all four states.
Another large change in absolute spending was in the areas of child care and child development.
As Table 3 shows, this spending rose significantly in all four states. California experienced the
largest absolute increase in spending, a $988 million increase from state fiscal year 1995 to state
fiscal year 1999. Wisconsin had the largest percent increase - 168% - but all except Georgia had at
least a doubling of total child care and child development spending. In all states but Missouri, the
bulk of the increase was in federal spending and reflects the Congress's large increase in child care
funding as part of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act in 1996.
At that time, Congress combined several child care funding streams into the new Child Care
Development Fund, which was projected to increase the total federal outlays by $3.5 billion over
the 1997-2002 period. 13 This increase in both state and federal spending appears to acknowledge
13 Congressional Budget Office, "CBO Memorandum, Federal Budgetary Implications of the Personal
Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996," (Washington, DC: CBO, December 1996).
11
Page data
- Page
- 60
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 92bb8b148b3d5a8f
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 565376738
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "565376738",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/565376738",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "TANF [Temporary Assistance for Needy Families] Supplantation",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/565376738",
"collections": [
"Records of the Domestic Policy Council (Clinton Administration)",
"Margy Waller's Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-025-005-2025/7367483-20200317S-025-005-2025-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-025-005-2025/7367483-20200317S-025-005-2025-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-025-005-2025/7367483-20200317S-025-005-2025-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 104,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "565376738",
"label": "TANF [Temporary Assistance for Needy Families] Supplantation",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/565376738"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "565376738",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/565376738",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "TANF [Temporary Assistance for Needy Families] Supplantation",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/565376738",
"collections": [
"Records of the Domestic Policy Council (Clinton Administration)",
"Margy Waller's Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-025-005-2025/7367483-20200317S-025-005-2025-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-025-005-2025/7367483-20200317S-025-005-2025-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-025-005-2025/7367483-20200317S-025-005-2025-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 104,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/565376738",
"naId": 565376738,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"otherTitles": [
"7367483-20200317S-025-005-2025"
],
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 60,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/wjc-dpc/7367483/7367483-20200317S-025-005-2025/7367483-20200317S-025-005-2025-060.jpg",
"mediaId": "92bb8b148b3d5a8f",
"ocrText": "A Preliminary Report\nFigure 1\nState Social Services Spending\nas a Percent of State Budget\nState Fiscal Years 1995 and 1999\n20\n15\n10\n:\n0\nCA\nGA\nMO\nWI\n1995 1999\nSources: National Association of State Budget Officers and Rockefeller Institute of Government.\nTable 2\nChanges in Cash Assistance Spending and Caseloads\nState Fiscal Year 1995 to State Fiscal Year 1999\n(Dollars in Thousands)\nFederal\nState (State/Local)\nTotal\nCaseload\nChange\n% Change\nChange\n% Change\nChange\n% Change\nChange\nCalifornia\n(1,302,733)\n(41%)\n1,368,781\n(41%)\n(2,671,514)\n(41%)\n(34%)\nGeorgia\n(118,712)\n(43%)\n(103,002)\n(65%)\n(221,714)\n(52%)\n(62%)\nMissouri\n(35,370)\n(20%)\n(80,753)\n(68%)\n(116,123)\n(39%)\n(47%)\nWisconsin\n(175,788)\n(83%)\n(97,178)\n(69%)\n(272,966)\n(77%)\n(89%)\nFinding 4: Spending on child care and child development programs has risen in all four states.\nAnother large change in absolute spending was in the areas of child care and child development.\nAs Table 3 shows, this spending rose significantly in all four states. California experienced the\nlargest absolute increase in spending, a $988 million increase from state fiscal year 1995 to state\nfiscal year 1999. Wisconsin had the largest percent increase - 168% - but all except Georgia had at\nleast a doubling of total child care and child development spending. In all states but Missouri, the\nbulk of the increase was in federal spending and reflects the Congress's large increase in child care\nfunding as part of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act in 1996.\nAt that time, Congress combined several child care funding streams into the new Child Care\nDevelopment Fund, which was projected to increase the total federal outlays by $3.5 billion over\nthe 1997-2002 period. 13 This increase in both state and federal spending appears to acknowledge\n13 Congressional Budget Office, \"CBO Memorandum, Federal Budgetary Implications of the Personal\nResponsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996,\" (Washington, DC: CBO, December 1996).\n11"
}