Ask the Scholar
Page 39 of 159
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
1
QUESTIONS ON CHILDREN'S TELEVISION
Q:
When will the FCC make a decision on this issue?
A:
The FCC could adopt the proposed compromise at its earliest business meeting. Those
are currently scheduled for August 1st and August 8th
Q:
If Congress, in passing the Act, did not require a specific number of hours of
educational programming, why should the FCC mandate a number?
A:
The Act did not require a minimum number in statute, but it did not preclude the FCC
from setting a minimum number as a way to enforce the Act.
The lack of clear guidelines is leading to a lack of compliance with the act. The clear
guidelines for commercial time limits has resulted in greater than 90% compliance with those
limits. In addition, broadcasters, including the association of independent broadcasters (INTV)
have argued that greater certainty is needed. INTV recommended a minimum of 2 hours a week.
Q:
Why three hours a week?
A:
The Administration is recommending a minimum of 3 hours -- and preferably more -- a
week of programming specifically designed to educate. We hope that most broadcasters will air
more than 3 hours a week of educational programming.
Although the NAB has testified that the average station airs 3.5 hours a week, many of
these hours are filled with shows that are primarily entertainment programs rather than programs
specifically designed to educate children.
We feel that 3 hours should be an absolute minimum, and hope that many broadcasters do
more.
Q:
Does educational programming actually make a difference? Why is it important?
A:
Most parents know very well that their children learn from television. But studies over
the years have found that educational programming contributes to children's success in school.
A recent study conducted at the University of Kansas found that half an hour a day of
viewing educational programming had a positive impact on children's learning.
Q:
What kinds of programs do you think are educational?
A:
The Act states that educational programs can promote cognitive or social development.
The key is whether the program was designed primarily with education in mind, or whether the
program is primarily designed to entertain.
Page data
- Page
- 39
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- b6f2dd1fa8909bce
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 158698564
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "158698564",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/158698564",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Early Childhood Development #1: Early Childhood Development [3]",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/158698564",
"collections": [
"Records of the First Lady's Office (Clinton Administration)",
"Melanne Verveer's Subject Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/2068127/42-t-2068127-20060198F-Seg4-017-001-2014-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/2068127/42-t-2068127-20060198F-Seg4-017-001-2014-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/2068127/42-t-2068127-20060198F-Seg4-017-001-2014-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 159,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "158698564",
"label": "Early Childhood Development #1: Early Childhood Development [3]",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/158698564"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "158698564",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/158698564",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Early Childhood Development #1: Early Childhood Development [3]",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/158698564",
"collections": [
"Records of the First Lady's Office (Clinton Administration)",
"Melanne Verveer's Subject Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/2068127/42-t-2068127-20060198F-Seg4-017-001-2014-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/2068127/42-t-2068127-20060198F-Seg4-017-001-2014-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/2068127/42-t-2068127-20060198F-Seg4-017-001-2014-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 159,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/158698564",
"naId": 158698564,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"otherTitles": [
"42-t-2068127-20060198F-Seg4-017-001-2014"
],
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 39,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/2068127/42-t-2068127-20060198F-Seg4-017-001-2014-039.jpg",
"mediaId": "b6f2dd1fa8909bce",
"ocrText": "1\nQUESTIONS ON CHILDREN'S TELEVISION\nQ:\nWhen will the FCC make a decision on this issue?\nA:\nThe FCC could adopt the proposed compromise at its earliest business meeting. Those\nare currently scheduled for August 1st and August 8th\nQ:\nIf Congress, in passing the Act, did not require a specific number of hours of\neducational programming, why should the FCC mandate a number?\nA:\nThe Act did not require a minimum number in statute, but it did not preclude the FCC\nfrom setting a minimum number as a way to enforce the Act.\nThe lack of clear guidelines is leading to a lack of compliance with the act. The clear\nguidelines for commercial time limits has resulted in greater than 90% compliance with those\nlimits. In addition, broadcasters, including the association of independent broadcasters (INTV)\nhave argued that greater certainty is needed. INTV recommended a minimum of 2 hours a week.\nQ:\nWhy three hours a week?\nA:\nThe Administration is recommending a minimum of 3 hours -- and preferably more -- a\nweek of programming specifically designed to educate. We hope that most broadcasters will air\nmore than 3 hours a week of educational programming.\nAlthough the NAB has testified that the average station airs 3.5 hours a week, many of\nthese hours are filled with shows that are primarily entertainment programs rather than programs\nspecifically designed to educate children.\nWe feel that 3 hours should be an absolute minimum, and hope that many broadcasters do\nmore.\nQ:\nDoes educational programming actually make a difference? Why is it important?\nA:\nMost parents know very well that their children learn from television. But studies over\nthe years have found that educational programming contributes to children's success in school.\nA recent study conducted at the University of Kansas found that half an hour a day of\nviewing educational programming had a positive impact on children's learning.\nQ:\nWhat kinds of programs do you think are educational?\nA:\nThe Act states that educational programs can promote cognitive or social development.\nThe key is whether the program was designed primarily with education in mind, or whether the\nprogram is primarily designed to entertain."
}