Ask the Scholar
Page 61 of 159
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
Implementation Group for Television Ratings
Background
At the meeting between President Clinton and a delegation of media executives on
Feb. 29, Jack Valenti announced that he would lead the effort to devise a rating system for
television. Other members of the panel include PBS President Ervin Duggan, Rick Taylor
from Media Productions Association of America.
The group, ranging form 15-25 people depending on the issue, has met twice a
month. Subgroups deal with issues such as audience research, rating dissemination, defining
'newscast' etc (NYT 3/18).
Purpose
To design and implement a rating system for TV programs (not including newscasts
or sports) that will provide parents with four kinds of information about television programs:
Sexual content, violence, adult language, and age-appropriateness.
Also, Duggan suggests adding a positive rating icon to designate shows with
educational value. This icon would distinguish mindless cartoons from shows like CNN
Newsroom, Nickelodeon's Launch Box, Court TV's 'Class Action' and CBS 'Schoolbreak
Specials. Duggan said the rating would be based on agreed-upon educational standards
determined by the implementation group.
Target deadline
The group aims to develop the rating system by January of 1997 (4/4/96 NYT).
Challenges
Opponents brought up a number of questions and challenges for the implementation
group. Here are some examples and the groups responses.
o How can such a vast quantity of material-1640 hours per day-- be rated?
The group plans to assign a categorical rating for each program series as opposed to rating
individual shows.
o How can such a comprehensive rating system be structured?
The group will use movie association's ratings as a template but will be more specific about
age suitability--PG-8, PG-10 for example (NYT 3/18)-and less specific about actual content.
o How should the ratings be publicized in an objective and understandable format ?
The group hopes to display the ratings, once created, in TV guide, on the air during broadcast
time as well as during program promotions (Christian Science Monitor 6/27).
Page data
- Page
- 61
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 1f03b079748c4f98
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 158698564
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "158698564",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/158698564",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Early Childhood Development #1: Early Childhood Development [3]",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/158698564",
"collections": [
"Records of the First Lady's Office (Clinton Administration)",
"Melanne Verveer's Subject Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/2068127/42-t-2068127-20060198F-Seg4-017-001-2014-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/2068127/42-t-2068127-20060198F-Seg4-017-001-2014-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/2068127/42-t-2068127-20060198F-Seg4-017-001-2014-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 159,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "158698564",
"label": "Early Childhood Development #1: Early Childhood Development [3]",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/158698564"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "158698564",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/158698564",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Early Childhood Development #1: Early Childhood Development [3]",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/158698564",
"collections": [
"Records of the First Lady's Office (Clinton Administration)",
"Melanne Verveer's Subject Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/2068127/42-t-2068127-20060198F-Seg4-017-001-2014-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/2068127/42-t-2068127-20060198F-Seg4-017-001-2014-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/2068127/42-t-2068127-20060198F-Seg4-017-001-2014-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 159,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/158698564",
"naId": 158698564,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"otherTitles": [
"42-t-2068127-20060198F-Seg4-017-001-2014"
],
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 61,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/2068127/42-t-2068127-20060198F-Seg4-017-001-2014-061.jpg",
"mediaId": "1f03b079748c4f98",
"ocrText": "Implementation Group for Television Ratings\nBackground\nAt the meeting between President Clinton and a delegation of media executives on\nFeb. 29, Jack Valenti announced that he would lead the effort to devise a rating system for\ntelevision. Other members of the panel include PBS President Ervin Duggan, Rick Taylor\nfrom Media Productions Association of America.\nThe group, ranging form 15-25 people depending on the issue, has met twice a\nmonth. Subgroups deal with issues such as audience research, rating dissemination, defining\n'newscast' etc (NYT 3/18).\nPurpose\nTo design and implement a rating system for TV programs (not including newscasts\nor sports) that will provide parents with four kinds of information about television programs:\nSexual content, violence, adult language, and age-appropriateness.\nAlso, Duggan suggests adding a positive rating icon to designate shows with\neducational value. This icon would distinguish mindless cartoons from shows like CNN\nNewsroom, Nickelodeon's Launch Box, Court TV's 'Class Action' and CBS 'Schoolbreak\nSpecials. Duggan said the rating would be based on agreed-upon educational standards\ndetermined by the implementation group.\nTarget deadline\nThe group aims to develop the rating system by January of 1997 (4/4/96 NYT).\nChallenges\nOpponents brought up a number of questions and challenges for the implementation\ngroup. Here are some examples and the groups responses.\no How can such a vast quantity of material-1640 hours per day-- be rated?\nThe group plans to assign a categorical rating for each program series as opposed to rating\nindividual shows.\no How can such a comprehensive rating system be structured?\nThe group will use movie association's ratings as a template but will be more specific about\nage suitability--PG-8, PG-10 for example (NYT 3/18)-and less specific about actual content.\no How should the ratings be publicized in an objective and understandable format ?\nThe group hopes to display the ratings, once created, in TV guide, on the air during broadcast\ntime as well as during program promotions (Christian Science Monitor 6/27)."
}