Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
24822842
label
Zero to Three Volume 15 No. 2, October/November 1994 [Bound Material]
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
Source extras
naId
24822842
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
otherTitles
42-t-7763278-20121035S-041-015-2015
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
9bc4c7c3327fc3fa
ocrText
Clinton Presidential Records Digital Records Marker This is not a presidential record. This is used as an administrative marker by the William J. Clinton Presidential Library Staff. This marker identifies the place of a publication. Publications have not been scanned in their entirety for the purpose of digitization. To see the full publication please search online or visit the Clinton Presidential Library's Research Room. ZERO TO THREE National Center for Clinical Infant Programs October / November 1994 Volume 15 No.2 Marlyn Holt Cross-Cultural Studies of Child Development: Implications for clinicians J. Kevin Nugent, have for the primacy or superiority of our own cultural world view. Second, cross-cultural research reminds us Professor of Child Development, University of Massachu- that experimental-controlled studies are by no means the setts Director of Brazelton Scale Training, Child Development only source (or even the chief source) of data collection Unit, Harvard Medical School or information-gathering about child development. Stud- ies conducted within the classic empirical tradition often Cross-cultural studies of child development provide in- tell the practitioner little about the dynamic nature of fant/family practitioners with three invaluable, if not child-environment relations or the context of development indispensable principles which can serve to support and and as such provide us with few reliable guidelines for direct culturally-inclusive clinical reflection and practice. working with families from different cultures. Third, First, while studies of child development in different cul- cross-cultural research forces practitioners, program de- tural settings contribute to our appreciation of the rich signers, advocates and policy makers to question the ap- diversity of child rearing practices and belief systems propriateness of every program goal and the validity of across the globe, they also challenge our own assumptions about the very nature of child development and in turn Continued on page 3 help to free us from whatever residual nostalgia we may Zero to Three October/November 1994 1