Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
34429040
label
Parity/48 Hours
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
Source extras
naId
34429040
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
otherTitles
42-t-7422560-20140536S-039-011-2016
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
47a88a68803d9e72
ocrText
07/30/96 09:40 OMB AD HP 002 002 07/29/96 18:25 JLW-04-96 16:44 FROM.CBO/BAD/HRCEU ID.202 226 2820 PAGE 1/3 TO: Dean Rosen, Rebecca Jones FROM: Jeff Lemieux, CBO SUBJ: Preliminary Federal Cost Estimate: Limited Mental Health Parity Proposal DATE: 6/4/96 I have attached a preliminary federal cost estimate of your proposal for a limited parity for mental health parity. Over the ten years between 1997 and 2006, CBO and the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) estimate that the revised proposal mental health parity would increase the deficit by about $1.9 billion The revised proposal is different from the proposal in the Senate-passed plan in several ways. Substance abuse benefits would not be subject to any mandates for parity, Parity would apply only to two types of insurance items as specified in the proposal: 1. Aggregate lifetime limits DRAFT 2. Aggregate annual limits Plans serving employers with 25 or fewer employees would be exempt, Plans would be allowed to have separate insurance products for mental and medical health coverage, with more stringent thresholds of management for mental health care, and Medicare and Medicaid would be exelopt (In its previous estimate, CBO had assumed that these last two clarifications would be made as the legislation progressed Therefore, they do not change the federal cost estimate.) The Congressional Research Service estimates that premiums for a typical fee-for-service plan using customary management teclmiques to control costs would initially increase by 0.4 percent under this proposal. This estimate has not been adjusted for the impact the proposal would have on certain managed care plans or the fact that employers with 25 or fewer employees would be exempt. Both adjustments could lower the estimated cost of 06-04-96 04:55PM P001 #20 Mental Health Parity Compromise 1. PARITY FOR AGGREGATE LIFETIME AND ANNUAL PAYMENT LIMITS. If a health plan has a lifetime or annual limit on what it will spend for medical or surgical services, that plan must either include services for mental illness in that total, or have a separate limit for mental illnesses that is no more restrictive than the medical/surgical limit. If a health plan does not have either of these limits for medical/surgical services, it may not limit these aspects of mental health services. The compromise proposal: - does not determine what a plan must charge for mental health services; - does not require parity for copays and deductibles; - does not require parity for inpatient hospital days or outpatient limits; - excludes substance abuse and chemical dependency; - excludes MEDICARE and MEDICAID; - includes the Federal Employee Health Benefit Program; - allows for managed care and mental health "carve-outs;" - does not apply to individual health coverage; - exempts small businesses with 25 or fewer employees. Cost: Relative to the original Domenici/Wellstone amendment passed by the Senate, the cost to both private sector premiums and the federal government has been cut by 90%. Initial Premium + Employer Loss Revenue (Industry-wide) Contribution To Gov't Original 4.0% +1.6% $16.17 billion Compromise 0.4% +0.16% $ 1.8 billion 2, A COMMISSION ON MENTAL HEALTH PARITY. The Commission's purpose is to review and analyze data and studies on the prevalence of mental illnesses, the efficacy and cost effectiveness of treatment for mental illnesses and to develop strategies for implementation of fair and equitable health coverage for individuals with mental illnesses. The Commission should submit its final report no later than September 1, 1998. The final report should include strategies and a timetable for implementing its recommendations. MEMORANDUM September 20, 1996 TO: John Hilley Jack Lew Nancy-Ann Min Jen Klein Jack Ebeler Christie Schmidt Darrel Grinstead FROM: Chris Jennings SUBJ: 48 Hour Rule Following our conversation this morning, I have composed a draft statement/colloquy on the 48 hour rule for your review. It is my understanding that the conference report has already been filed. Therefore, our most likely course of action may be drafting a colloquy between the appropriate members to take place on the floor prior to a final vote. Despite the initial positive reaction by Representative Jerry Lewis (R-CA), we have subsequently learned this issue may create major problems for Representative Solomon and other Republicans. It is our understanding that they explicitly made a decision not to refer to Medicaid because they want to treat Medicaid separately and they do not want to bring another committee into the discussion (e.g., Senate Finance Committee). Senator Bradley is concerned that raising this issue may put the rest of the bill at risk. However, he will defer to us, if we believe raising the issue can lead to successful resolution without undermining the recently agreed to provision. I would like to have a brief conference call on this issue before the end of the day. DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT Application of 48-Hour Rule to Medicaid Contracts with Certified Health Plans It is our understanding that it is the intention of the statutory language (approved by the VA/HUD conferees) for the 48-hour rule provisions to apply to State-certified health plans that contract out with Medicaid. In other words, just as any other health plan in the nation must comply with the 48-hour rule, so too shall any health plan that contracts out with Medicaid. It is also our understanding that the statutory language was scored consistent with this interpretation. We believe the language is somewhat vague on this point and believe, at minimum, additional report language is necessary to clarify the intent of this provision. Suggested Colloquy Question: It is my understanding that the intent of the statutory language for the 48-hour rule requirements to be applied to any State-certified health plan that contracts with Medicaid. Just as any other health plan in the nation must comply with the 48-hour rule, so too shall any health plan that contracts with Medicaid. Is this correct? Answer: Yes it is. Question: It is also my understanding that the Congressional Budget Office has scored this provision consistent with this interpretation. Is this correct? Answer: Yes it is. OMB AD HP 5. 09/20/96 16:52 002 Application of 48-Hour Rule to Medicaid Contracts with Certified Health Plans Background It is our understanding that it is the intention of the statutory language (approved by VA/HUD conferees) for the 48-hour rule provisions to apply to State-certified health plans that contract out with Medicaid. In other words, just as any other health plan in the nation must comply with the 48-hour rule, so too shall any health plan that contracts out with Medicaid. It is our understanding that the statutory language was scored consistent with this interpretation. We believe the language is somewhat vague on this point and believe, at minimum, an explanatory statement is necessary to clarify the intent of this provision. Suggested Bill Managers' Statement The intent of the statutory language is for the 48-hour rule requirements to be applied to any State-certified plan that contracts with Medicaid. Just as any other health plan in the nation must comply with the 48-hour rule, so too shall any health plan that contracts with a State to cover Medicaid beneficiaries. This interpretation is consistent with CBO's scoring of the 48-hour rule provisions. Presidential Statements In Support of Mental Health Parity "I am writing to express the President's strong support for the alternative that has been proposed by Senator Domenici to prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long, and it is time we take steps to end this inequity..." Leon Panetta July 30, 1996 " I was disappointed that the mental health provision was taken out, [of the Kennedy/Kassebaum bill] and I certainly hope we can get it as soon as possible in the future. It should remain a high priority." President Bill Clinton August 1, 1996 "I wish this bill [Kennedy/Kassebaum] had contained the provision to eliminate the differential treatment of mental health coverage, or at least taken some positive steps in that direction." President Bill Clinton August 21, 1996 ush Presidential Statements In Support of the 48 Hour Rule "I urge members of Congress to move legislation forward as soon as possible that makes this protection for mothers and their children the law of the land. No insurance company should be free to make the final judgment about what is medically best for newborns and their mothers. That decision should be left up to doctors, nurses and mothers themselves." President Bill Clinton May 11, 1996 "We should protect mothers and newborn babies from being forced out of the hospital in less than 48 hours." President Bill Clinton Democratic National Convention August 30, 1996 " the President is right to support a bill that would prohibit the practice of forcing mothers and babies to leave the hospital in less than 48 hours." Hillary Rodham Clinton Democratic National Convention August 28, 1996 "That's why I'm supporting the legislation I mentioned, dealing with not forcing new mothers and their newborns out of the hospital." President Bill Clinton September 5, 1996 Sept 11th FILE No. 637 09/18 '96 20:05 ID: PAGE 1 Namt Gingrich Sixth Bistrict (202)225-0600 Georgia Office of the Speaker United States House of Representatives Mashington, no 20515 FAX COVER LETTER ATTENTION: Chuck KIEFER FROM: Policy Office Staff Karen Feaga Fred Nutt Jack Howard Chris Scheve Ed Kutler Sue Yang Gardner Peckham DATE: FAX NUMBER: TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER): 15 COMMENTS: Mental health language as agreed to by Domeniciard Wellstone : Asued toby Kemerly /wellstore All materials are confidential, to be delivered only to the party addressed above. If there are any problems with this fax transmission, please contact (202) 225-0510. FILE No. 637 09/18 '96 20:05 ID: PAGE 2 SENT BY:53437 ; 9-18-96 8:32PM : DEGISLATIVE COUNSEL- :# 2/15 F:\EGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\MNTLHLTH.004 [Final Draft] Substitute for Senate Amendment #118 to H.R. 3666 (viz., title VII): 1 TITLE VII-PARITY IN THE AP- 2 PLICATION OF CERTAIN LIM- 3 ITS TO MENTAL HEALTH BEN- 4 EFITS 5 SEC. 701. SHORT TITLE. 6 This title may be cited as the "Mental Health Parity 7 Act of 1996". 8 SEC. 702. AMENDMENTS TO THE EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT 9 INCOME SECURITY ACT OF 1074. 10 (a) IN GENERAL.Subpart B of part 7 of subtitle 11 B of title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security 12 Act of 1974 (as added by section 603(a)) is amended by 13 adding at the end the following new section: 14 "SEC. 712. PARITY IN THE APPLICATION OF CERTAIN LIM- 15 ITS TO MENTAL HEALTH BENEFITS. 16 "(a) IN GENERAL.- 17 "(1) AGGREGATE LIFETIME LIMITS.-In the 18 case of a group health plan (or health insurance COV- 19 erage offered in connection with such a plan) that 20 provides both medical and surgical benefits and 21 mental health benefits— 22 "(A) No LIFETIME LIMIT.-If the plan or 23 coverage does not include an aggregate lifetime September 18, 1996 (8:26 p.m.) FILE No. 637 09/18 '96 20:05 ID: PAGE 3 SENT BY:53437 : 9-18-96 : 8:33PM ; LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL- :# 3/15 F:\EGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\MNTLHITH.004 (Final Draft| 2 1 limit on substantially all medical and surgical 2 benefits, the plan or coverage may not impose 3 any aggregate lifetime limit on mental health 4 benefits. 5 "(B) LIFETIME LIMIT.-If the plan or cov- 6 erage includes an aggregate lifetime limit on 7 substantially all medical and surgical benefits 8 (in this paragraph referred to as the 'applicable 9 lifetime limit'), the plan or coverage shall ei- 10 ther— 11 "(i) apply the applicable lifetime limit 12 both to the medical and surgical benefits to 13 which it otherwise would apply and to 14 mental health benefits and not distinguish 15 in the application of such limit between 16 such medical and surgical benefits and 17 mental health benefits; or 18 "(ii) not include any aggregate life- 19 time limit on mental health benefits that is 20 less than the applicable lifetime limit. 21 "(C) RULE IN CASE OF DIFFERENT LIM- 22 ITS.-In the case of a plan or coverage that is 23 not described in subparagraph (A) or (B) and 24 that includes no or different aggregate lifctime 25 limits on different categorios of medical and September 18. 1996 (8:20 p.m.) FILE No. 637 09/18 '96 20:05 ID: PAGE 4 SENT BY 53437 ; 8-18-96 : 8:33PM : LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL- :# 4/15 F:\EGG\HCR98\VAHUDCONVMNTLHLTH.006 |Final Draft] 3 1 surgical benefits, the Secretary shall establish 2 rules under which subparagraph (B) is applied 3 to such plan or coverage with respect to mental 4 health benefits by substituting for the applica- 5 ble lifetime limit an average aggregate lifetime 6 limit that is computed taking into account the 7 weighted average of the aggregate lifetime lim- 8 its applicable to such categories. 9 "(2) ANNUAL LIMITH.-In the case of A group 10 hoalth plan (or health insurance coverage offered in 11 connection with such a plan) that provides both 12 medical and surgical benefits and mental health ben- 13 efits— 14 "(A) No ANNUAL LIMIT.-If the plan or 15 coverage does not include an annual limit on 16 substantially all medical and surgical benefits, 17 the plan or coverage may not impose any an- 18 nual limit on mental health benefits. 19 "(B) ANNUAL LIMIT.-If the plan or COV- 20 erage includes an annual limit on substantially 21 all medical and surgical benefits (in this para- 22 graph referred to as the 'applicable annual 23 limit'), the plan or coverage shall cither— 24 "(i) apply the applicable annual limit 25 both to medical and surgical benefits to September 18, 1996 (8:26 p.m.) FILE No. 637 09/18 '96 20:06 ID: PAGE 5 SENT BY 53437 ; 9-18-96 8:34PM ; LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL- :# 5/15 F:\EGG\HCR96\VAHUDOON\MNTLHI.TH.004 [Final Draft.] 4 1 which it otherwise would apply and to 2 mental health benefits and not distinguish 3 in the application of such limit between 4 such medical and surgical benefits and 5 mental health benefits; or 6 "(ii) not include any annual limit on 7 mental health benefits that is less than the 8 applicable annual limit. 9 "(C) RULE IN CASE OF DIFFERENT LIM- 10 ITS.-In the case of a plan or coverage that is 11 not described in subparagraph (A) or (B) and 12 that includes no or different annual limits on 13 different categories of medical and surgical ben- 14 efits, the Secretary shall establish rules under 15 which subparagraph (B) is applied to such plan 16 or coverage with respect to mental health bene- 17 fits by substituting for the applicable annual 18 limit an average annual limit that is computed 19 taking into account the weighted average of the 20 annual limits applicable to such categories. 21 "(b) CONSTRUCTION-Nothing in this section shall 22 be construed— 23 "(1) AS requiring a group health plan (or health 24 insurance coverage offered in connection with such a 25 plan) to provide any mental health benefits; or September 18. 1998 (8:26 p.m.) FILE No. 637 09/18 '96 20:06 ID: PAGE 6 SENT BY 53437 ; 9-18-96 : 8:35PM ; LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL- :# 6/15 F:\EGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\MNTLHLTH004 [Final Draft] 5 I "(2) in the case of such a plan or coverage that 2 provides such mental health benefits, as affecting 3 the terms and conditions (including cost sharing, 4 limits on numbers of visits or days of coverage, and 5 requirements relating to medical necessity) relating 6 to the amount, duration, or scope of mental health 7 benefits under the plan or coverage, except as spe- 8 cifically provided in subsection (a) (in regard to par- 9 ity in the imposition of aggregate lifetime limits and 10 annual limits for mental health benefits). 11 "(c) EXEMPTIONS.- 12 "(1) SMALL EMPLOYER EXEMPTION.- 13 "(A) IN GENERAL.-This section shall not 14 apply to any group health plan (and group 15 health insurance coverage offered in connection 16 with a group health plan) for any plan year of 17 a small employer. 18 "(B) SMALL EMPLOYME.-For purposes of 19 subparagraph (A), the term 'small employer' 20 means, in connection with a group health plan 21 with respect to a calendar year and a plan year, 22 an employer who employed an average of at 23 least 2 but not more than 50 employees on 24 business days during the preceding calendar September 18, 1998 (8:20 p.m.) FILE No. 637 09/18 '96 20:06 ID: PAGE 7 SENT BY:53437 i 9-18-96 : 8:35PM ; LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL- ;# 7/15 F:\EGG\HCR98\VAHUDCON\MNTLHLTH.004 [Final Draft] 6 1 year and who employs at least 2 employees on 2 the first day of the plan year. 3 "(2) INCREASED COST EXEMPTION.-This sec- 4 tion shall not apply with respect to a group health 5 plan (or health insurance coverage offered in connec- 6 tion with a group health plan) if the application of 7 this section under such plan (or to such coverage) 8 results in an increase in the cost under the plan (or 9 for such coverage) of at least 1 percent. 10 "(d) SEPARATE APPLICATION TO EACH OPTION OF- 11 FRRMD.-In the case of a group health plan that offers 12 a participant or beneficiary two or more benefit package 13 options under the plan, subsections (a) and (c) shall be 14 applied separately with respect to each such option. 15 "(e) DEFINITIONS-For purposes of this section: 16 "(1) AGGREGATE LIFETIME LIMIT-The term 17 'aggregate lifetime limit' means, with respect to ben- 18 efits under a group health plan or health insurance 19 coverage, a dollar limitation on the total amount 20 that may be paid with respect to such benefits under 21 the plan or health insurance covorage with respect to 22 an individual or other coverage unit. 23 "(2) ANNUAL LIMT.-The term 'annual limit' 24 means, with respect to benefits under a group health 25 plan or health insurance coverage, a dollar limitation September 18, 1996 (8:28 p.m.) FILE No, 637 09/18 '96 20:06 ID: PAGE 8 SENT BY:53437 ; 9-18-96 ; 8:36PM LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL- :# 8/15 F:\EGG\HCR96\VAHUDOON\MNTLHLTH.004 [Final Dratt) 7 1 on the total amount of benefits that may be paid 2 with respect to such benefits in a 12-month period 3 under the plan or health insurance coverage with re- 4 speet to an individual or other coverage unit. 5 "(3) MEDICAL OR SURGICAL BENEFTTS.-The 6 term 'medical or surgical benefits' moans benefits 7 with respect to medical or surgical services, as de- 8 fined under the terms of the plan, but does not in- 9 clude mental health benefits. 10 "(4) MENTAL HEALTH HENEFITS.-The term 11 'mental health benefits' means benefits with respect 12 to mental health services, as defined under the terms 13 of the plan, but does not include benefits with re- 14 speet to treatment of substance abuse or chemical 15 dependency. 16 "(f) SUNSET.-This section shall not apply to bene- 17 fits for services furnished on or after September 30, 18 2001.". 19 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.-The table of contents 20 in section 1 of such Act, an amended by section 602 of 21 this Act, is amended by inserting after the item relating 22 to section 711 the following new item: "See. 712. Parity in the application of certain limits to mental health Lesse- fits.". September 16, 1896 (8:28 p.m.) FILE No. 637 09/18 '96 20:07 ID: PAGE 9 SENT BY :53437 : 9-18-86 ; 8:37PM i LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL- i# 8/15 F:\EGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\MNTLHLTH004 [Final Draft) 8 1 (e) EFFECTIVE DATE.-The amondments made by 2 this section shall apply with respect to group health plans 3 for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 1998. 4 SEC. 703. AMENDMENTS TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE 5 ACT RELATING TO THE GROUP MARKET. 6 (a) IN GENERAL-Subpart 2 of part A of title 7 XXVII of the Public Health Service Act (as added by sec- 8 tion 604(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following 9 new section: 10 "SEC. 2705. PARITY IN THE APPLICATION OF CERTAIN LIM- 11 ITS TO MENTAL HEALTH RENEFITS. 12 "(a) IN GENERAL.- 13 "(1) AGGREGATE LIFETIME LIMITS.-In the 14 case of a group health plan (or health insurance cov- 15 crage offered in connection with such a plan) that 16 provides both medical and surgical benefits and 17 mental health benefits- 18 "(A) No LIFETIME LIMIT.-If the plan or 19 coverage does not include an aggregate lifetime 20 limit on substantially all medical and surgical 21 benefits, the plan or coverage may not impose 22 any aggregate lifetime limit on mental health 23 benefits. 24 "(B) LIFETIME LIMIT.-If the plan or cov- 25 erage includes an aggregate lifetime limit on September 18, 1998 (8:26 p.m.) FILE No. 637 09/18 '96 20:07 ID: PAGE 10 SENT BY:53437 : 9-18-96 ; 8:37PM : LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL+ :#10/15 [Final Draft) 9 1 substantially all medical and surgical benefits 2 (in this paragraph referred to as the 'applicable 3 lifetime limit'), the plan or coverage shall ai- 4 thor— 5 "(i) apply the applicable lifetime limit 6 both to the medical and surgical benefits to 7 which it otherwise would apply and to 8 mental hcalth benefits and not distinguish 9 in the application of such limit between 10 such medical and surgical benefits and 11 mental health benefits; or 12 "(ii) not include any aggregate life- 13 time limit on mental health benefits that is 14 less than the applicable lifetime limit. 15 "(C) RULE IN CASE OF DIFFERENT LIM- 16 ITS.-In the case of a plan or coverage that is 17 not described in subparagraph (A) or (B) and 18 that includes no or different aggregate lifetime 19 limits on different categories of medical and 20 surgical benefits, the Secretary shall establish 21 rules under which subparagraph (B) is applied 22 to such plan or coverage with respect to mental 23 health benefits by substituting for the applica- 24 ble lifetime limit un average aggregate lifetime 25 limit that is computed taking into account the September 18. 1998 (8:28 p.m.) FILE No. 637 09/18 '96 20:07 ID: PAGE 11 SENT 8Y:53437 ; 9-18-86 ; 8:38PM i LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL- :#11/15 [Final Draft) 10 1 weighted average of the aggregate lifetime lim- 2 its applicable to such categories. 3 "(2) ANNUAL LIMITS.-In the nase of a group 4 health plan (or health insurance coverage offered in 5 connection with such a plan) that provides both 6 medical and surgical benefits and mental health hen- 7 efits- 8 "(A) No ANNUAL LIMIT.-If the plan or 9 coverage does not include an annual limit on 10 substantially all medical and surgical benefits, 11 the plan or coverage may not impose any an- 12 nual limit on mental health benefits. 13 "(B) ANNUAL LIMIT.-If the plan or cov- 14 crage includes an annual limit on substantially 15 all medical and surgical benefits (in this para- 16 graph referred to as the 'applicable annual 17 limit'), the plan or coverage shall either- 18 "(i) apply the applicable annual limit 19 both to medical and surgical benefits to 20 which it otherwise would apply and to 21 mental health benefits and not distinguish 22 in the application of such limit between 23 such medical and surgical benefits and 24 mental health benefits; or September 18, 1996 (6:26 p.m.) FILE No. 637 09/18 '96 20:07 ID: PAGE 12 SENT BY :53437 : 9-18-96 : 8:39PM ; LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL- :#12/15 F:\EGG\HOR96\VAHUDCON\MNTLHLTH.004 [Final Draft] 11 1 "(ii) not include any annual limit on 2 mental health benefits that is less than the 3 applicable annual limit. 4 "(C) RULE IN CASE OF DIFFERENT LIM- 5 ITS.-In the case of a plan or coverage that is 6 not described in subparagraph (A) or (B) and 7 that includes no or different annual limits on 8 different categorics of medical and surgical ben- 9 efits, the Secretary shall establish rules under 10 which subparagraph (B) is applied to such plan 11 or coverage with respect to mental health bene- 12 fits by substituting for the applicable annual 13 limit an average annual limit that is computed 14 taking into account the weighted average of the 15 annual limits applicable to such categories. 16 "(b) CONSTRUCTION.-Nothing in this section shall 17 be construed— 18 "(1) as requiring a group health plan (or health 19 insurance coverage offered in connection with such a 20 plan) to provide any mental health benefits; or 21 "(2) in the case of such a plan or coverage that 22 provides such mental health benefits, as affecting 23 the terms and conditions (including cost sharing, 24 limits on numbers of visits or days of coverage, and 25 requirements relating to modical necessity) relating September 18. 1998 (8:20 p.m.) FILE No. 637 09/18 '96 20:08 ID: PAGE 13 SENT BY:53437 ; 8-18-96 ; 8:38PM ; LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL- ;#13/15 F:\EGG\HCR98\VAHUDCON\MNTLHLTH.004 [Final Draft| 12 1 to the amount, duration, or scope of mental health 2 benefits under the plan or coverage, except as spe- 3 cifically provided in subscction (a) (in regard to par- 4 ity in the imposition of aggregate lifetime limits and 5 annual limits for mental health benefits). 6 "(c) EXEMPTIONS.- 7 "(1) SMALL EMPLOYER EXEMPTION.-This SOO- 8 tion shall not apply to any group health plan (and 9 group health insurance coverage offered in connec- 10 tion with a group health plan) for any plan year of 11 a small employer. 12 "(2) INCREASED COST EXEMPTION.-This sec- 13 tion shall not apply with respect to & group health 14 plan (or health insurance coverage offered in connec- 15 tion with a group health plan) if the application of 16 this section under such plan (or to such coverage) 17 results in an increase in the cost under the plan (or 18 for such coverage) of at least 1 percent. 19 "(d) SEPARATE APPLICATION TO EACH OPTION OF- 20 FERED.-In the case of a group health plan that offers 21 a participant or beneficiary two or more benefit package 22 options under the plan, subsections (a) and (c) shall be 23 applied separately with respect to each such option. 24 "(e) DEFINITIONS.-For purposes of this section: September 18, 1996 (8:26 p.m.) FILE No. 637 09/18 '96 20:08 ID: PAGE 14 SENT :53437 9-18-96 8:40PM : LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL- :#14/15 F:\EGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\MNTLHLTH.004 [Final Draft) 18 1 "(1) AGGREGATE LIFETIME LIMIT.-The term 2 'aggregate lifetime limit' means, with respect to ben- 3 efits under a group health plan or health insurance 4 coverage, a dollar limitation on the total amount 5 that may be paid with respect to such benefits under 6 the plan or health insurance coverage with respect to 7 an individual or other coverage unit. 8 "(2) ANNUAL LIMIT--The term 'annual limit' 9 mcans, with respect to benefits under a group health 10 plan or health insurance coverage, a dollar limitation 11 on the total amount of benefits that may be paid 12 with respect to such benefits in a 12-month period 13 under the plan or health insurance coverage with rc- 14 spcct to an individual or other coverage unit. 15 "(3) MEDICAL OR SURGICAL BENEFITS.-The 16 term 'medical or surgical benefits' means benefits 17 with respect to medical or surgical services, as de- 18 fined under the terms of the plan, but does not in- 19 clude mental health benefits. 20 "(4) MENTAL HEALTH BENEFITS.-The term 21 'mental health benefits' means benefits with respect 22 to mental health services, as defined under the terms 23 of the plan, but docs not include benefits with re- 24 spect to treatment of substance abusc or chemical 25 dependency. September 18, 1996 (8:26 p.m.) FILE No. 637 09/18 '96 20:08 ID: PAGE 15 SENT BY 53437 : 8-18-86 ; 8:41PM ; LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL- :#15/15 F:\EGG\HCR26\VAHUDCON\MNTLHLTH.004 (Final Draft) 14 1 "(f) SUNSET.-This section shall not apply to bene- 2 fits for services furnished on or after September 30, 3 2001.". 4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.-The amendments made by 5 this section shall apply with respect to group health plans 6 for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 1998. September 18, 1996 (8:26 p.m.) SEP-19-96 09:26 FROM: ID: PAGE 1/28 ONE HUNDRED FOURTH CONGRESS THOMAS J. BLILEY, JR.. VIRGINIA CHAIRMAN CARLOS J. MOORMEAD. CALIFORNIA, JOHN D. DINGELL. MICHIGAN VICE CHAIRMAN MENRY A. WAXMAN, CALIFORNIA W.J. "BILLY" TAUZIN. LOUISIANA FOWARD J. MARKEY МАЗЅАСНИЗЕТТЅ JACK FIELOS, TEXAS U.S. house of Representatives CARDISS COLLINS. ILLINOIS MICHAEL G. OXLEY. OMIO RALPK M. HALL. TEXAS MICHAEL BILIRAKIS. FLORIDA BILL RICHARDSON. NEW MEXICO Committee on Commerce DAN SCHAEFER, COLORADO JOHN BRYANT. TEXAS JOE BARTON. TEXAS RICK BOUCHER, VIRGINIA J. DENNIS MASTERT. ILLINOIS THOMAS J MANTON. NEW YORK FRED UPTON. MICHIGAN EDOLPHUS TOWNS. NEW YORK CLIFF STEARNS. FLORIDA GERRYE STUDDS, MASSACHUSETTS BILL PAXON. NEW YORK FRANK PALLONE. JR., NEW JERSEY Mashington, DC 20515-6115 PAUL E. GILLMOR. OMB SHERROD BROWN. OMIO SCOTT L KLUG, WISCONSIN BLANCHE LAMBERT LINCOLN ARKANSAS GARY A. FRANKS. CONNECTICUT BART GORDON. TENNESSEE JAMES C. GREENWOOD. PENNSYLVANIA ELIZABETH FURSE. OPECON MICHAEL 5. CRAPO. IDANO PETER DEUTSCH. FLORIDA CHRISTOPHER COX. CALIFORNIA BOBBY L. RUSH. ILLINOIS NATHAN DEAL GEORGIA ANNA G. ESHOO. CALIFORNIA RICHARD BURR, NORTH CAROLINA RON KLINK PENNSYLVANIA BRIAN F. BILBRAY, CALIFORNIA PART STUPAK MICHIGAN ED WHITFIELD. KENTUCKY EUOT L ENGEL NEW YORK GREG GANSKE. IOWA DAN FRISA. NEW YORK CHARLIE NORWOOD. GEORGIA RICK WHITE. WASHINGTON TOM COBURN. OKLAHOMA DEMOCRATIC STAFF JAMES E. DERDERIAN CHIEF OF STAFF FAX COVER SHEET DATE: 9-19-96 TO: Chris Jennings FROM: Bridgett Taylor FAX NUMBER: 456-7431 NUMBER OF PAGES: (Including Cover) 27 COMMENTS: Moms language/stetement VA/HUD (If there are problems with this transmission, please phone 202-226-3400, Democratic Staff, 564 FHOB.) SEP-19-96 09:26 FROM: ID: PAGE 2/28 F:VEGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\MNREPORT.001 Statement of Conferees on Senate Amendment #117 to HR 3666 ("Newborns' and Mothers' Health Pro- tection Act of 1996") The conference agreement includes the Senate amendment with modifications. It incorporates the re- quirements of the provision and the authority to enforce the requirements into the new part 7 of subtitle B of ERISA and the new title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act as established by P.L. 104-191. It does not include the exception to the requirement for the 48-hour or 96-hour minimum stay in the case that the plan pro- vides for post-delivery follow-up care. It adds a prohibi- tion that a health plan cannot restrict benefits for any portion of the required minimum 48-hour or 96-hour stay in a manner which is less favorable than the benefits pro- viding for any preceding portion of such stay. In addi- tion, the conference agreement provides that nothing in this provision is intended to be construed as preventing a group health plan or issuer from imposing coinsurance, deductibles, or other cost-sharing in relation to benefits for hospital lengths of stay in connection with childbirth for a mother or newborn child under the plan (or under health insurance coverage offered in connection with a group health plan), except that such coinsurance or other cost-sharing for any portion of a period within a hospital September 19, 1996 (12:45 a.m.) SEP 19-96 09:27 FROM: ID: PAGE 3728 F:\EGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\MNREPORT001 2 length of stay required under subsection (a) may not be greater than such coinsurance or cost-sharing for any preceding portion of such stay. It is the intent of the con- ferees that cost-sharing not be used in a manner that cir- cumvents the objectives of this title. It provides for a modification to the notice requirements by conforming them to the summary of material modifications under ERISA In general, it conforms the provision relating to preemption to State laws to the Health Insurance Port- ability and Accountability Act of 1996. Notwithstanding section 731(a)(1) of ERISA and sections 2723(a)(1) and 2762 of the Public Health Service Act, the new provi- sions shall not preempt a State law that requires health insurance coverage to include coverage for maternity and pediatric care in accordance with guidelines established by the American College of Obstetricians and Gyne- cologists, the American Academy of Pediatrics, or other established professional medical associations. In addition, those sections shall not be construed as superseding a State law that leaves decisions regarding the appropriate hospital length of stay in connection with childbirth en- tirely to the attending provider in consultation with the mother. In addition, it is the intent of the conferees that, consistent with section 704 (redesignated as section 731) of ERISA and section 2723 of the Public Health Service September 19. 1996 (12:45 a.m.) SEP: 19-96 09:27 FROM: ID: PAGE 4/28 F:VEGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\MNREPORT.001 3 Act, the application of the preemption provision should permit the operation of any State law or provision which requires more favorable treatment of maternity coverage under health insurance coverage than that required under this title. It is the intent of the conferees that health plans have sufficient flexibility to encourage or specify that at- tending providers follow nationally recognized guidelines for maternal and perinatal care in determining when early discharge is medically appropriate. Throughout the title, the conferees have used the term "hospital length of stay" to indicate that the re- quirement for coverage of a 48-hour stay following vagi- nal delivery and a 96-hour length of stay following a ce sarean section delivery is triggered by any delivery in connection with hospital care, regardless of whether the delivery is in a hospital inpatient or outpatient setting. It is the intent of the conferees that a detailed series of conforming changes shall be made as soon as possible to the Internal Revenue Code, specifically subtitle K of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as added by section 401(a) of the Health Insurance Portability and Account- ability Act of 1996), in order to fully implement these provisions as part of chapter 100 of the Code. September 19. 1996 (12:45 a.m.) SEP-19-96 09:27 FROM: ID: PAGE 5/28 F:\EGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\NEWBORNS.06A [Final Draft] Substitute for Senate Amendment #117 to H.R. 3666 (viz., title VI): 1 TITLE VI-NEWBORNS' AND 2 MOTHERS' HEALTH PROTEC- 3 TION ACT OF 1996 4 SEC. 601. SHORT TITLE. 5 This title may be cited as the "Newborns' and Moth- 6 ers' Health Protection Act of 1996". 7 SEC. 602. FINDING. 8 Congress finds that- 9 (1) the length of post-delivery hospital stay 10 should be based on the unique characteristics of 11 each mother and her newborn child, taking into con- 12 sideration the health of the mother, the health and 13 stability of the newborn, the ability and confidence 14 of the mother and the father to care for their new- 15 born, the adequacy of support systems at home, and 16 the access of the mother and her newborn to appro- 17 priate follow-up health care; and 18 (2) the timing of the discharge of a mother and 19 her newborn child from the hospital should be made 20 by the attending provider in consultation with the 21 mother. September 19. 1996 (12:30 a.m.) SEP,-19-96 09:27 FROM: ID: PAGE 6/28 F:VEGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\NEWBORNS.064 [Final Draft] 2 1 SEC. 603. AMENDMENTS TO THE EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT 2 INCOME SECURITY ACT OF 1974. 3 (a) IN GENERAL.-Part 7 of subtitle B of title I of 4 the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 5 (added by section 101(a) of the Health Insurance Port- 6 ability and Accountability Act of 1996) is amended- 7 (1) by amending the heading of the part to read 8 as follows: 9 "PART 7-GROUP HEALTH PLAN REQUIREMENTS"; 10 (2) by inserting after the part heading the fol- 11 lowing. 12 "SUBPART A-REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO 13 PORTABILITY, ACCESS, AND RENEWABILITY"; 14 (3) by redesignating sections 704 through 707 15 as sections 731 through 734, respectively; 16 (4) by inserting before section 731 (as SO redes- 17 ignated) the following new heading 18 "SUBPART C-GENERAL PROVISIONS": 19 and 20 (5) by inserting after section 703 the following 21 new subpart: 22 "SUBPART B-OTHER REQUIREMENTS 23 "SEC. 711. STANDARDS RELATING TO BENEFITS FOR MOTH- 24 ERS AND NEWBORNS. 25 "(a) REQUIREMENTS FOR MINIMUM HOSPITAL STAY 26 FOLLOWING BIRTH.- September 19. 1996 (12:30 a.m.) SEP-19-96 09:28 FROM: ID: PAGE 7/28 F:VEGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\NEWBORNS064 [Final Draft] 3 1 "(1) IN GENERAL.-A group health plan, and a 2 health insurance issuer offering group health insur- 3 ance coverage, may not- 4 "(A) except as provided in paragraph 5 (2)- 6 "(i) restrict benefits for any hospital 7 length of stay in connection with childbirth 8 for the mother or newborn child, following 9 a normal vaginal delivery, to less than 48 10 hours, or 11 "(ii) restrict benefits for any hospital 12 length of stay in connection with childbirth 13. for the mother or newborn child, following 14 a cesarean section, to less than 96 hours; 15 or 16 "(B) require that a provider obtain author- 17 ization from the plan or the issuer for prescrib- 18 ing any length of stay required under subpara- 19 graph (A) (without regard to paragraph (2)). 20 "(2) EXCEPTION.-Paragraph (1)(A) shall not 21 apply in connection with any group health plan or 22 health insurance issuer in any case in which the de- 23 cision to discharge the mother or her newborn child 24 prior to the expiration of the minimum length of 25 stay otherwise required under paragraph (1)(A) is September 19. 1996 (12:30 a.m.) SEP-19-96 09:28 FROM: ID: PAGE 8/28 F:\EGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\NEWBORNS.06A [Final Draft] 4 1 made by an attending provider in consultation with 2 the mother. 3 "(b) PROHIBITIONS.-A group health plan, and a 4 health insurance issuer offering group health insurance 5 coverage in connection with a group health plan, may 6 not- 7 "(1) deny to the mother or her newborn child 8 eligibility, or continued eligibility, to enroll or to 9 renew coverage under the terms of the plan, solely 10 for the purpose of avoiding the requirements of this 11 section; 12 "(2) provide monetary payments or rebates to 13 mothers to encourage such mothers to accept less 14 than the minimum protections available under this 15 section; 16 "(3) penalize or otherwise reduce or limit the 17 reimbursement of a provider because such provider 18 provided care in accordance with this section; 19 "(4) provide incentives (monetary or otherwise) 20 to a provider to induce such provider to provide care 21 to a participant or beneficiary in a manner inconsist- 22 ent with this section; or 23 "(5) subject to subsection (c)(3), restrict bene- 24 fits for any portion of a period within a hospital 25 length of stay required under subsection (a) in a September 19, 1996 (12:30 a.m.) SEP-19-96 09 : 28 FROM: ID: PAGE 9/28 F:VEGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\NEWBORNS06A [Final Draft) 5 1 manner which is less favorable than the benefits pro- 2 vided for any preceding portion of such stay. 3 "(c) RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.- 4 "(1) Nothing in this section shall be construed 5 to require a mother who is a participant or bene- 6 ficiary- 7 "(A) to give birth in a hospital; or 8 "(B) to stay in the hospital for a fixed pe- 9 riod of time following the birth of her child. 10 "(2) This section shall not apply with respect to 11 any group health plan, or any group health insur- 12 ance coverage offered by a health insurance issuer, 13 which does not provide benefits for hospital lengths 14 of stay in connection with childbirth for a mother or 15 her newborn thild. 16 "(3) Nothing in this section shall be construed 17 as preventing a group health plan or issuer from im- 18 posing deductibles, coinsurance, or other cost-shar- 19 ing in relation to benefits for hospital lengths of stay 20 in connection with childbirth for a mother or new- 21 born child under the plan (or under health insurance 22 coverage offered in connection with a group health 23 plan), except that such coinsurance or other cost- 24 sharing for any portion of a period within a hospital 25 length of stay required under subsection (a) may not September 19. 1996 (12:30 a.m.) SEP-19-96 09 : 28 FROM: ID: PAGE 10/28 F:\EGG\HCR96\VAHUDCONVNEWBORNS-06A [Final Draft] 6 1 be greater than such coinsurance or cost-sharing for 2 any preceding portion of such stay. 3 "(d) NOTICE UNDER GROUP HEALTH PLAN.-The 4 imposition of the requirements of this section shall be 5 treated as a material modification in the terms of the plan 6 described in section 102(a)(1), for purposes of assuring 7 notice of such requirements under the plan; except that 8 the summary description required to be provided under the 9 last sentence of section 104(b)(1) with respect to such 10 modification shall be provided by not later than 60 days 11 after the first day of the first plan year in which such 12 requirements apply. 13 "(e) LEVEL AND TYPE OF REIMBURSEMENTS.- 14 Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent a 15 group health plan or a health insurance issuer offering 16 group health insurance coverage from negotiating the level 17 and type of reimbursement with a provider for care pro- 18 vided in accordance with this section. 19 "(f) PREEMPTION- 20 "(1) IN GENERAL.-Notwithstanding section 21 731(a)(1), the provisions of this section shall not 22 preempt a State law (as defined in section 23 731(d)(1)) that requires health insurance coverage 24 to include coverage for maternity and pediatric care 25 in accordance with guidelines established by the September 19. 1996 (12:30 a.m.) SEP,-19-96 09:29 FROM: ID: PAGE 11/28 F:VEGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\NEWBORNS06A [Final Draft] 7 1 American College of Obstetricians and Gyne- 2 cologists, the American Academy of Pediatrics, or 3 other established professional medical associations. 4 "(2) CONSTRUCTION.-Section 731(a)(1) shall 5 not be construed as superseding a State law (as SO 6 defined) that leaves decisions regarding the appro- 7 priate hospital length of stay in connection with 8 childbirth entirely to the attending provider in con- 9 sultation with the mother. 10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.-- 11 (1) Section 731(c) of such Act (as added by 12 section 101 of the Health Insurance Portability and 13 Accountability Act of 1996 and redesignated by the 14 preceding provisions of this section) is amended by 15 striking "Nothing" and inserting "Except as pro- 16 vided in section 711, nothing". 17 (2) Section 732(a) of such Act (as added by 18 section 101 of the Health Insurance Portability and 19 Accountability Act of 1996 and redesignated by the 20 preceding provisions of this section) is amended by 21 inserting "(other than section 711)" after "part". 22 (3) Title I of such Act (as amended by section 23 101 of the Health Insurance Portability and Ac- 24 countability Act of 1996 and the preceding provi- 25 sions of this section) is further amended- September 19. 1996 (12:30 a.m.) SEP-19-96 09:29 FROM: ID: PAGE 12/28 F:\EGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\NEWBORNS.06A [Final Draft] 8 1 (A) in the last sentence of section 4(b), by 2 striking "section 706(b)(2)", "section 3 706(b)(1)", and "section 706(a)(1)" and insert- 4 ing "section 733(b)(2)", "section 733(b)(1)", 5 and "section 733(a)(1)", respectively; 6 (B) in section 101(g), by striking "section 7 706(a)(2)" and inserting "section 733(a)(2)"; 8 (C) in section 102(b), by striking "section 9 706(a)(1)" each place it appears and inserting 10 "section 733(a)(1), and by striking "section 11 706(b)(2)" and inserting "section 733(b)(2)"; 12 (D) in section 104(b)(1), by striking "sec- 13 tion 706(a)(1)" each place it appears and in- 14 serting "section 733(a)(1); 15 (E) in section 502(b)(3), by striking "sec- 16 tion 706(a)(1)" and inserting "section 17 733(a)(1)"; 18 (F) in section 506(c), by striking "section 19 706(a)(2)" and inserting "section 733(a)(2)"; 20 (G) in section 514(b)(9), by striking "sec- 21 tion 704" and inserting "section 731"; 22 (H) in the last sentence of section 23 701(c)(1), by striking "section 706(c)" and in- 24 serting "section 733(c)"; September 19. 1996 (12:30 a.m.) SEP-19-96 09:29 FROM: ID: PAGE 13/28 F:\EGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\NEWBORNS.06A [Final Draft] 9 1 (I) in section 732(b), by striking "section 2 706(c)(1)" and inserting "section 733(c)(1)"; 3 (J) in section 732(c)(1), by striking "sec- 4 tion 706(c)(2)" and inserting "section 5 733(c)(2)"; 6 (K) in section 732(c)(2), by striking "sec- 7 tion 706(c)(3)" and inserting "section 8 733(c)(3)"; and 9 (L) in section 732(c)(3), by striking "sec- 10 tion 706(c)(4)" and inserting "section 11 733(c)(4)". 12 (4) The table of contents in section 1 of such 13 Act is amended by striking the items relating to part 14 7 and inserting the following: "PART 7-GROUP HEALTH PLAN REQUIREMENTS "SUBPART A-REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO PORTABILITY. ACCESS, AND RENEWABILITY "Sec. 701. Increased portability through limitation on preexisting condition ex- clusions. "Sec. 702. Prohibiting discrimination against individual participants and bene- ficiaries based on health status. "Sec. 703. Guaranteed renewability in multiemployer plans and multiple em- ployer welfare arrangements. "SUBPART B-OTHER REQUIREMENTS "Sec. 711. Standards relating to benefits for mothers and newborns. "SUBPART C-GENERAL PROVISIONS "Sec. 731. Preemption; State flexibility: construction. "Sec. 732. Special rules relating to group health plans. "Sec. 733. Definitions. "Sec. 734 Regulations." September 19. 1996 (12:30 a.m.) SEP-19-96 09:29 FROM: ID: PAGE 14/28 F:\EGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\NEWBORNS.06A [Final Draft] 10 1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.-The amendments made by 2 this section shall apply with respect to group health plans 3 for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 1998. 4 SEC. 604. AMENDMENTS TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE 5 ACT RELATING TO THE GROUP MARKET. 6 (a) IN GENERAL.-Title XXVII of the Public Health 7 Service Act (as added by section 102 of the Health Insur- 8 ance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) is 9 amended- 10 (1) by amending the title heading to read as 11 follows: 12 "TITLE XXVII-REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO 13 HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE"; 14 (2) by redesignating subparts 2 and 3 of part 15 A as subparts 3 and 4 of such part; 16 (3) by inserting after subpart 1 of part A the 17 following new subpart: 18 "Subpart 2-Other Requirements 19 "SEC. 2704. STANDARDS RELATING TO BENEFITS FOR 20 MOTHERS AND NEWBORNS. 21 "(a) REQUIREMENTS FOR MINIMUM HOSPITAL STAY 22 FOLLOWING BIRTH.- 23 "(1) IN GENERAL-A group health plan, and a 24 health insurance issuer offering group health insur- 25 ance coverage, may not- September 19, 1996 (12:30 a.m.) SEP-19-96 09:30 FROM: ID: PAGE 15/28 F:\EGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\NEWBORNS.064 [Final Draft] 11 1 "(A) except as provided in paragraph 2 (2)- 3 (i) restrict benefits for any hospital 4 length of stay in connection with childbirth 5 for the mother or newborn child, following 6 a normal vaginal delivery, to less than 48 7 hours, or 8 "(ii) restrict benefits for any hospital 9 length of stay in connection with childbirth 10 for the mother or newborn child, following 11 a cesarean section, to less than 96 hours, 12 or 13 "(B) require that a provider obtain author- 14 ization from the plan or the issuer for prescrib- 15 ing any length of stay required under subpara- 16 graph (A) (without regard to paragraph (2)). 17 "(2) EXCEPTION.-Paragraph (1) (A) shall not 18 apply in connection with any group health plan or 19 health insurance issuer in any case in which the de- 20 cision to discharge the mother or her newborn child 21 prior to the expiration of the minimum length of 22 stay otherwise required under paragraph (1) (A) is 23 made by an attending provider in consultation with 24 the mother. September 19. 1996 (12:30 a.m.) SEP-19-98 09:30 FROM: ID: PAGE 16/28 F:VEGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\NEWBORNS.064 [Final Draft] 12 1 "(b) PROHIBITIONS.-A group health plan, and a 2 health insurance issuer offering group health insurance 3 coverage in connection with a group health plan, may 4 not- 5 "(1) deny to the mother or her newborn child 6 eligibility, or continued eligibility, to enroll or to 7 renew coverage under the terms of the plan, solely 8 for the purpose of avoiding the requirements of this 9 section; 10 "(2) provide monetary payments or rebates to 11 mothers to encourage such mothers to accept less 12 than the minimum protections available under this 13 section; 14 "(3) penalize or otherwise reduce or limit the 15 reimbursement of a provider because such provider 16 provided care in accordance with this section; 17 "(4) provide incentives (monetary or otherwise) 18 to a provider to induce such provider to provide care 19 to a participant or beneficiary in a manner inconsist- 20 ent with this section: or 21 "(5) subject to subsection (c)(3), restrict bene- 22 fits for any portion of a period within a hospital 23 length of stay required under subsection (a) in a 24 manner which is less favorable than the benefits pro- 25 vided for any preceding portion of such stay. September 19, 1996 (12:30 a.m.) SEP-19-96 09:30 FROM: ID: PAGE 17/28 F:\EGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\NEWBORNS06A [Final Draft] 13 1 "(c) RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.- 2 "(1) Nothing in this section shall be construed 3 to require a mother who is a participant or bene- 4 ficiary- 5 "(A) to give birth in a hospital; or 6 "(B) to stay in the hospital for a fixed pe- 7 riod of time following the birth of her child. 8 "(2) This section shall not apply with respect to 9 any group health plan, or any group health insur- 10 ance coverage offered by a health insurance issuer, 11 which does not provide benefits for hospital lengths 12 of stay in connection with childbirth for a mother or 13 her newborn child. 14 "(3) Nothing in this section shall be construed 15 as preventing. a group health plan or issuer from im- 16 posing deductibles, coinsurance, or other cost-shar- 17 ing in relation to benefits for hospital lengths of stay 18 in connection with childbirth for a mother or new- 19 born child under the plan (or under health insurance 20 coverage offered in connection with a group health 21 plan), except that such coinsurance or other cost- 22 sharing for any portion of a period within a hospital 23 length of stay required under subsection (a) may not 24 be greater than such coinsurance or cost-sharing for 25 any preceding portion of such stay. September 19, 1996 (12:30 a.m.) SEP-19-96 09:30 FROM: ID: PAGE 18/28 F:\EGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\NEWBORNS06A [Final Draft] 14 1 "(d) NOTICE.-A group health plan under this part 2 shall comply with the notice requirement under section 3 711(d) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act 4 of 1974 with respect to the requirements of this section 5 as if such section applied to such plan. 6 "(e) LEVEL AND TYPE OF REIMBURSEMENTS. 7 Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent a 8 group health plan or a health insurance issuer offering 9 group health insurance coverage from negotiating the level 10 and type of reimbursement with a provider for care pro- 11 vided in accordance with this section. 12 "(f) PREEMPTION.- 13 "(1) IN GENERAL-Notwithstanding section 14 2723(a)(1), the provisions of this section shall not 15 preempt a State law (as defined in section 16 2723(d)(1)) that requires health insurance coverage 17 to include coverage for maternity and pediatric care 18 in accordance with guidelines established by the 19 American College of Obstetricians and Gyne- 20 cologists, the American Academy of Pediatrics, or 21 other established professional medical associations. 22 "(2) CONSTRUCTION.-Section 2723(a)(1) shall 23 not be construed as superseding a State law (as SO 24 defined) that leaves decisions regarding the appro- 25 priate hospital length of stay in connection with September 19. 1996 (12:30 a.m.) SEP-19-96 09:30 FROM: ID: PAGE 19/28 F:VEGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\NEWBORNS.06A [Final Draft] 15 1 childbirth entirely to the attending provider in con- 2 sultation with the mother.' 3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.- 4 (1) Section 2721 of such Act (as added by sec- 5 tion 102 of the Health Insurance Portability and Ac- 6 countability Act of 1996) is amended- 7 (A) in subsection (a), by striking "subparts 8 1 and 2" and inserting "subparts 1 and 3", 9 and 10 (B) in subsections (b) through (d), by 11 striking "subparts 1 and 2" each place it ap- 12 pears and inserting "subparts 1 through 3". 13 (2) Section 2723(c) of such Act (as added by 14 section 102 of the Health Insurance Portability and 15 Accountability Act of 1996) is amended by inserting 16 "(other than section 2704)" after "part". 17 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.-The amendments made by 18 this section shall apply with respect to group health plans 19 for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 1998. 20 SEC. 605. AMENDMENTS TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE 21 ACT RELATING TO THE INDIVIDUAL MARKET. 22 (a) IN GENERAL.-Part B of title XXVII of the Pub- 23 lic Health Service Act (as added by section 111 of the 24 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 25 1996) is amended- September 19. 1996 (12:30 a.m.) SEP-19-96 09:31 FROM: ID: PAGE 20/28 F:\EGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\NEWBORNS.06A [Final Draft] 16 1 (1) by inserting after the part heading the fol- 2 lowing. 3 "Subpart 1-Portability, Access, and Renewability 4 Requirements"; 5 (2) by redesignating sections 2745, 2746, and 6 2747 as sections 2761, 2762, and 2763, respectively; 7 (3) by inserting before section 2761 (as so re- 8 designated) the following: 9 "Subpart 3-General Provisions"; and 10 (4) by inserting after section 2744 the follow- 11 ing. 12 "Subpart 3-Other Requirements 13 "SEC. 2751. STANDARDS RELATING TO BENEFITS FOR 14 MOTHERS AND NEWBORNS. 15 "(a) IN GENERAL.-The provisions of section 2704 16 (other than subsections (d) and (f)) shall apply to health 17 insurance coverage offered by a health insurance issuer 18 in the individual market in the same manner as it applies 19 to health insurance coverage offered by a health insurance 20 issuer in connection with a group health plan in the small 21 or large group market. 22 "(b) NOTICE REQUIREMENT.-A health insurance is- 23 suer under this part shall comply with the notice require- 24 ment under section 711(d) of the Employee Retirement 25 Income Security Act of 1974 with respect to the require- September 19. 1996 (12:30 a.m.) SEP-19-96 09:31 FROM: ID: PAGE 21/28 F:VEGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\NEWBORNS.06A [Final Draft] 17 1 ments referred to in subsection (a) as if such section ap- 2 plied to such issuer and such issuer were a group health 3 plan. 4 "(c) PREEMPTION- 5 "(1) IN GENERAL-Notwithstanding section 6 2762(a)), the provisions of this section shall not pre- 7 empt a State law (as defined in section 2723(d)(1)) 8 that requires health insurance coverage to include 9 coverage for maternity and pediatric care in accord- 10 ance with guidelines established by the American 11 College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the 12 American Academy of Pediatrics, or other estab- 13 lished professional medical associations. 14 "(2) CONSTRUCTION-Section 2762(a) shall 15 not be construed as superseding a State law (as SO 16 defined) that leaves decisions regarding the appro- 17 priate hospital length of stay in connection with 18 childbirth entirely to the attending provider in con- 19 sultation with the mother.' 20 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.-Such part (as SO 21 added) is further amended as follows: 22 (1) In section 2744(a)(1), strike "2746(b)" and 23 insert "2762(b)". September 19. 1996 (12:30 a.m.) SEP-19-96 09:31 FROM: ID: PAGE 22/28 F:\EGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\NEWBORNS064 [Final Draft] 18 1 (2) In section 2745(a)(1) (before redesignation 2 under subsection (a)(1)), strike "2746" and insert 3 "2762". 4 (3) In section 2746(b) (before redesignation 5 under subsection (a)(1))- 6 (A) by inserting "(1)" after the dash, and 7 (B) by adding at the end the following: 8 "(2) Nothing in this part (other than section 2751) 9 shall be construed as requiring health insurance coverage 10 offered in the individual market to provide specific benefits 11 under the terms of such coverage.". 12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.-The amendments made by 13 this section shall apply with respect to health insurance 14 coverage offered, sold, issued, renewed, in effect, or oper- 15 ated in the individual market on or after January 1, 1998. 16 SEC. 606. REPORTS TO CONGRESS CONCERNING CHILD- 17 BIRTH 18 (a) FINDINGS.-Congress finds that- 19 (1) childbirth is one part of a continuum of ex- 20 perience that includes prepregnancy, pregnancy and 21 prenatal care, labor and delivery, the immediate 22 postpartum period, and a longer period of adjust- 23 ment for the newborn, the mother, and the family, 24 (2) health care practices across this continuum 25 are changing in response to health care financing September 19. 1996 (12:30 a.m.) SEP-19-96 09:31 FROM: ID: PAGE 23/28 F:\EGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\NEWBORNS.06A [Final Draft] 19 1 and delivery system changes, science and clinical re- 2 search, and patient preferences; and 3 (3) there is a need- 4 (4) to examine the issues and con- 5 sequences associated with the length of hospital 6 stays following childbirth; 7 (B) to examine the follow-up practices for 8 mothers and newborns used in conjunction with 9 shorter hospital stays; 10 (C) to identify appropriate health care 11 practices and procedures with regard to the 12 hospital discharge of newborns and mothers; 13 (D) to examine the extent to which such 14 care is affected by family and environmental 15 factors; and 16 (E) to examine the content of care during 17 hospital stays following childbirth. 18 (b) ADVISORY PANEL.- 19 (1) IN GENERAL.-Not later than 90 days after 20 the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 21 Health and Human Services (in this section referred 22 to as the "Secretary") shall establish an advisory 23 panel (referred to in this section as the "advisory 24 panel")- September 19, 1996 (12:30 a.m.) SEP-19-96 09:32 FROM: ID: PAGE 24/28 F:VEGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\NEWBORNS06A [Final Draft] 20 1 (A) to guide and review methods, proce- 2 dures, and data collection necessary to conduct 3 the study described in subsection (c) in a man- 4 ner that is intended to enhance the quality, 5 safety, and effectiveness of health care services 6 provided to mothers and newborns; 7 (B) to develop a consensus among the 8 members of the advisory panel regarding the 9 appropriateness of the specific requirements of 10 this title; and 11 (C) to prepare and submit to the Sec- 12 retary, as part of the report of the Secretary 13 submitted under subsection (d), a report sum- 14 marizing the consensus (if any) developed under 15 subparagraph (B) or the reasons for not reach- 16 ing such a consensus. 17 (2) PARTICIPATION.- 18 (A) DEPARTMENT REPRESENTATIVES- 19 The Secretary shall ensure that representatives 20 from within the Department of Health and 21 Human Services that have expertise in the area 22 of maternal and child health or in outcomes re- 23 search are appointed to the advisory panel. 24 (B) REPRESENTATIVES OF PUBLIC AND 25 PRIVATE SECTOR ENTITIES.- September 19. 1996 (12.30 a.m.) SEP-19-96 09:32 FROM: ID: PAGE 25/28 F:VEGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\NEWBORNS06A [Final Draft] 21 1 (i) IN GENERAL-The Secretary shall 2 ensure that members of the advisory panel 3 include representatives of public and pri- 4 vate sector entities having knowledge or 5 experience in one or more of the following 6 areas: 7 (I) Patient care. 8 (II) Patient education. 9 (III) Quality assurance. 10 (IV) Outcomes research 11 (V) Consumer issues. 12 (ii) REQUIREMENT.-The panel shall 13 include representatives of each of the fol- 14 lowing categories: 15 (I) Health care practitioners. 16 (II) Health plans. 17 (III) Hospitals. 18 (IV) Employers. 19 (V) States. 20 (VI) Consumers. 21 (c) STUDIES.- 22 (1) IN GENERAL.-The Secretary shall conduct 23 a study of- September 19. 1996 (12:30 a.m.) SEP-19-96 09:32 FROM: ID: PAGE 26/28 F:VEGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\NEWBORNS064 [Final Draft] 22 1 (A) the factors affecting the continuum of 2 care with respect to maternal and child health 3 care, including outcomes following childbirth; 4 (B) the factors determining the length of 5 hospital stay following childbirth: 6 (C) the diversity of negative or positive 7 outcomes affecting mothers, infants, and fami- 8 lies; 9 (D) the manner in which post natal care 10 has changed over time and the manner in which 11 that care has adapted or related to changes in 12 the length of hospital stay, taking into ac- 13 count- 14 (i) the types of post natal care avail- 15 able and the extent to which such care is 16 accessed; and 17 (ii) the challenges associated with pro- 18 viding post natal care to all populations, 19 including vulnerable populations, and solu- 20 tions for overcoming these challenges; and 21 (E) the financial incentives that may- 22 (i) impact the health of newborns and 23 mothers; and 24 (ii) influence the clinical decisionmak- 25 ing of health care providers. September 19. 1996 (12:30 a.m.) SEP-19-96 09:32 FROM: ID: PAGE 27/28 \EGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\NEWBORNS.06A [Final Draft] 23 1 (2) RESOURCES.-The Secretary shall provide 2 to the advisory panel the resources necessary to 3 carry out the duties of the advisory panel. 4 (d) REPORTS.- 5 (1) IN GENERAL-The Secretary shall prepare 6 and submit to the Committee on Labor and Human 7 Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Com- 8 merce of the House of Representatives a report that 9 contains— 10 (A) a summary of the study conducted 11 under subsection (c); 12 (B) a summary of the best practices used 13 in the public and private sectors for the care of 14 newborns and mothers; 15 (C) recommendations for improvements in 16 prenatal care, post natal care, delivery and fol- 17 low-up care, and whether the implementation of 18 such improvements should be accomplished by 19 the private health care sector, Federal or State 20 governments, or any combination thereof; and 21 (D) limitations on the databases in exist- 22 ence on the date of the enactment of this Act. 23 (2) DEADLINES.-The Secretary shall- prepare 24 and submit to the Committees referred to in para- 25 graph (1)- September 19, 1996 (12:30 a.m.) SEP-19-96 09:33 FROM: ID: PAGE 28/28 F:VEGG\HCR96\VAHUDCONVNEWBORNS064 [Final Draft] 24 1 (A) an initial report concerning the study 2 conducted under subsection (c) and elements 3 described in paragraph (1), not later than 18 4 months after the date of the enactment of this 5 Act; 6 (B) an interim report concerning such 7 study and elements not later than 3 years after 8 the date of the enactment of this Act; and 9 (C) a final report concerning such study 10 and elements not later than 5 years after the 11 date of the enactment of this Act. 12 (e) TERMINATION OF PANEL.-The advisory panel 13 shall terminate on the date that occurs 60 days after the 14 date on which the last report is submitted under sub- 15 section (d). September 19, 1996 (12:30 a.m.) MEMORANDUM September 11, 1996 TO: Carol Rasco Laura Tyson FROM: Chris Jennings/Jen Klein SUBJ: President sends letter to Gingrich on health provisions . Congress responds As you know, early this morning the President sent a letter to Representative Gingrich urging the House to "act quickly to enact three important health reform provisions." (See attached) Later today, the House passed a motion (392 to 17) offered by Representative Stokes (D-OH) to instruct VA-HUD conferees to (1) assure new mothers and their babies the option of a 48-hour post-delivery hospital stay, (2) move toward providing mental health coverage parity, and (3) provide protections for the children of Vietnam veterans who are born with the birth defect spina bifida. This motion contains all of the provisions referenced in the President's letter. (Please see attached AP story). This vote is likely to assure that the 48-hour rule and the spina bifida provisions will be sent up in the final VA-HUD Appropriations bill. Notwithstanding this vote, the mental health parity provision is still a long shot. We will keep you informed of developments. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON September 11, 1996 The Honorable Newt Gingrich Speaker of the House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Mr. Speaker: I am writing to urge the House to act quickly to enact three important health reform provisions that were passed by the Senate last week. I encourage you to work toward the speedy passage of provisions that (1) assure new mothers and their babies the option of a 48-hour post-delivery hospital stay, (2) move toward providing mental health coverage parity, and (3) provide protections for the children of Vietnam veterans who are born with the birth defect spina bifida. First, we should enact bipartisan legislation to require health insurers to let all new mothers and their babies stay in the hospital at least 48 hours following normal deliveries. Over the past two decades, the average length of stay for an uncomplicated childbirth has fallen sharply. A large and growing "humber of health plans are refusing to pay for anything more than a 24-hour stay, except in the most extreme circumstances, and some have recommended releasing new mothers as early as eight hours after delivery. Enactment of this measure would give peace of mind to families who will no longer have to fear that new mothers will be prematurely discharged from the hospital. Second, we should ensure that the Domenici/Wellstone mental health parity compromise becomes law. This legislation would prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long; it is time that we take steps to end this inequity. Finally, we should act now to give the Veterans' Administration authority to help the children of Vietnam veterans who are born with the birth defect spina bifida. Studies have shown a positive link between this condition and parental exposure to Agent Orange during service in Vietnam. This legislation would provide health care, vocational training, and a monthly monetary allowance to these children, fulfilling our commitment to them. -2- I urge you to do all you can to ensure passage of these important initiatives, either as part of the VA-HUD appropriations bill, or in any other vehicle in which passage by both Houses can be assured before Congress adjourns. In so doing, we will improve the quality of health care for some of our most vulnerable populations. Sincerely, n) Date: 09/11/96 Time: 17:20 CClinton Urges Passage of Health-Related Legislation WASHINGTON (AP) President Clinton urged the Republican-controlled House on Wednesday to pass three health-related pieces of legislation, including one that would assure a two-day hospital stay for new mothers. The House quickly concurred, voting 392-17 to endorse the three measures approved by the Senate last week as amendments to a 1997 spending bill. In addition to assuring that insurance companies pay for at least 48 hours in the hospital for mothers after delivery, the measures would close the gap between insurance coverage for mental and physical illnesses and give benefits to veterans exposed to Agent Orange during the Vietnam War whose offspring suffer from spina bifida, a crippling birth defect. The House vote instructed House members of a House-Senate conference to accept the Senate-approved measures as they work out differences on an $84 billion bill to fund veterans, housing, space and other programs in fiscal 1997. The action is not binding, but the size of the vote makes it almost certain the House conferees will accept the Senate amendments. In a letter to House Speaker Newt Gingrich, Clinton also pressed for approval of the mental illness and Agent Orange bills. The letter, which was released Wednesday at the White House while the president campaigned in Colorado, said that by passing the bills, ' 'we will improve the quality of health care for some of our most vulnerable populations. Referring to the time new mothers are allowed to remain in the hospital after giving birth, Clinton said a large and growing number of health plans now refuse to pay for anything more than a 4-hour stay except in extreme circumstances. Some have recommended releasing new mothers as early as eight hours after delivery, he said. 'Enactment of this measure would give peace of mind to families who will no longer have to fear that new mothers will be prematurely discharged from the hospital Clinton also endorsed legislation sponsored by Sens. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., and Paul Wellstone, D-Minn. that would prohibit health insurers from setting separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long. It is time that we take steps to end this inequity, the president said. On the veterans measure, he wrote that studies have shown a positive link between this condition (spina bifida) and parental exposure to Agent Orange during service in Vietnam 'This legislation would provide health care, vocational training, and a monthly monetary allowance to these children, fulfilling our commitment to them, Clinton said. The letter did not specify how much any these programs would cost. Republican leaders urged their members against hasty acceptance of what they said were measures aimed at pleasing interest groups just before the election, but all but 16 Republicans and one Democrat voted to endorse the three measures. Appropriations Committee Chairman Rep. Bob Livingston, R-La. said lawmakers `risk a great danger that we in the haste of trying to do good things in advance of an election all of a sudden adopt measures in such a legislative domain that later on prove to be ill -advised. Keeping the three measures in the Veterans Affairs-Housing and Urban Development spending bill would also put greater pressure on Clinton to sign legislation he has indicated that he might veto. The administration has objected to cuts in housing programs and the House decision to eliminate all funding for AmeriCorps, the president's national service program. The Senate allocated $400 million for AmeriCorps, still more than $100 million under the administration request. APNP-09-11-96 - 1730EDT Statement by the President I am pleased that the conferees on the VA-HUD appropriations bill have responded to my challenge to pass two provisions that will give vital health care services and peace of mind to American families. As I wrote in my September 11 letter to Speaker Gingrich urging the House to pass these measures, the first provision requires health insurers to let all new mothers and their babies stay in the hospital at least 48 hours following normal deliveries. Over the past few decades, the average length of stay for an uncomplicated childbirth has fallen sharply. A large and growing number of health plans refuse to pay for anything more than a 24 hour stay, except in the most extreme circumstances, and some release mothers as early as eight hours after delivery. This can pose serious health risks for both mothers and newborns. We owe all new mothers the assurance that when they bring a baby into this world, they will not be rushed out of the hospital until they and their health care provider decide it is medically safe for both mother and child. The second provisions prohibits health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long; it is time that we take steps to end this inequity. I hope that the conferees will now pass the provision protecting the children of Vietnam veterans who are born with spina bifida. I also look forward to prompt action by the House and Senate on all of these measures. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON July 30, 1996 Dear Mr. Chairman: I am writing to express the President's strong support for the alternative that has been proposed by Senator Domenici to prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long, and it is time we take steps to end this inequity by including the Domenici alternative in the final version of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (H.R. 3103) presented by the conference to the Congress. On April 23, 1996, by an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 68- 30, the Senate passed a Domenici/Wellstone amendment which would have required health plans to treat mental health coverage on an equal footing with other health benefits. The Domenici/Wellstone amendment would have ended the most egregious inequities in coverage for mental illness. Despite this impressive vote, concerns about the potential cost of this amendment were raised. In response, Senator Domenici dropped all of the mental health parity requirements in the amendment except equitable treatment of lifetime and annual limits. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Senator Domenici's compromise would cost 90 percent less than the original amendment ($966 million). CBO has also estimated that the proposal would increase insurance premiums by 0.4 percent at most. The President feels strongly that Senator Domenici's compromise should be the acceptable bipartisan alternative to the Senate passed amendment. I urge you and all conferees to incorporate his proposal into the bill reported out by the conference. We look forward to reaching prompt agreement on this and all the other important provisions of H.R. 3103. Sincerely, Leon E Panetta Chief of Staff The Honorable Bill Archer Chairman Committee on Ways and Means House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON July 30, 1996 Dear Mr. Chairman: I am writing to express the President's strong support for the alternative that has been proposed by Senator Domenici to prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long, and it is time we take steps to end this inequity by including the Domenici alternative in the final version of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (H.R. 3103) presented by the conference to the Congress. On April 23, 1996, by an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 68- 30, the Senate passed a Domenici/Wellstone amendment which would have required health plans to treat mental health coverage on an equal footing with other health benefits. The Domenici/Wellstone amendment would have ended the most egregious inequities in coverage for mental illness. Despite this impressive vote, concerns about the potential cost of this amendment were raised. In response, Senator Domenici dropped all of the mental health parity requirements in the amendment except equitable treatment of lifetime and annual limits. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Senator Domenici's compromise would cost 90 percent less than the original amendment ($966 million). CBO has also estimated that the proposal would increase insurance premiums by 0.4 percent at most. The President feels strongly that Senator Domenici's compromise should be the acceptable bipartisan alternative to the Senate passed amendment. I urge you and all conferees to incorporate his proposal into the bill reported out by the conference. We look forward to reaching prompt agreement on this and all the other important provisions of H.R. 3103. Sincerely, G Chief of Staff The Honorable William M. Thomas Chairman Committee on House Oversight House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON July 30, 1996 Dear Mr. Chairman: I am writing to express the President's strong support for the alternative that has been proposed by Senator Domenici to prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long, and it is time we take steps to end this inequity by including the Domenici alternative in the final version of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (H.R. 3103) presented by the conference to the Congress. On April 23, 1996, by an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 68- 30, the Senate passed a Domenici/Wellstone amendment which would have required health plans to treat mental health coverage on an equal footing with other health benefits. The Domenici/Wellstone amendment would have ended the most egregious inequities in coverage for mental illness. Despite this impressive vote, concerns about the potential cost of this amendment were raised. In response, Senator Domenici dropped all of the mental health parity requirements in the amendment except equitable treatment of lifetime and annual limits. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Senator Domenici's compromise would cost 90 percent less than the original amendment ($966 million). CBO has also estimated that the proposal would increase insurance premiums by 0.4 percent at most. The President feels strongly that Senator Domenici's compromise should be the acceptable bipartisan alternative to the Senate passed amendment. I urge you and all conferees to incorporate his proposal into the bill reported out by the conference. We look forward to reaching prompt agreement on this and all the other important provisions of H.R. 3103. Sincerely, eon F Panetta Chief of Staff The Honorable Thomas J. Bliley, Jr. Chairman Committee on Commerce House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON July 30, 1996 Dear Representative Bilirakis: I am writing to express the President's strong support for the alternative that has been proposed by Senator Domenici to prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long, and it is time we take steps to end this inequity by including the Domenici alternative in the final version of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (H.R. 3103) presented by the conference to the Congress. On April 23, 1996, by an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 68- 30, the Senate passed a Domenici/Wellstone amendment which would have required health plans to treat mental health coverage on an equal footing with other health benefits. The Domenici/Wellstone amendment would have ended the most egregious inequities in coverage for mental illness. Despite this impressive vote, concerns about the potential cost of this amendment were raised. In response, Senator Domenici dropped all of the mental health parity requirements in the amendment except equitable treatment of lifetime and annual limits. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Senator Domenici's compromise would cost 90 percent less than the original amendment ($966 million). CBO has also estimated that the proposal would increase insurance premiums by 0.4 percent at most. The President feels strongly that Senator Domenici's compromise should be the acceptable bipartisan alternative to the Senate passed amendment. I urge you and all conferees to incorporate his proposal into the bill reported out by the conference. We look forward to reaching prompt agreement on this and all the other important provisions of H.R. 3103. Sincerely, Leon Panetta Chief of Staff The Honorable Michael Bilirakis House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON July 30, 1996 Dear Mr. Chairman: I am writing to express the President's strong support for the alternative that has been proposed by Senator Domenici to prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long, and it is time we take steps to end this inequity by including the Domenici alternative in the final version of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (H.R. 3103) presented by the conference to the Congress. On April 23, 1996, by an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 68- 30, the Senate passed a Domenici/Wellstone amendment which would have required health plans to treat mental health coverage on an equal footing with other health benefits. The Domenici/Wellstone amendment would have ended the most egregious inequities in coverage for mental illness. Despite this impressive vote, concerns about the potential cost of this amendment were raised. In response, Senator Domenici dropped all of the mental health parity requirements in the amendment except equitable treatment of lifetime and annual limits. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Senator Domenici's compromise would cost 90 percent less than the original amendment ($966 million). CBO has also estimated that the proposal would increase insurance premiums by 0.4 percent at most. The President feels strongly that Senator Domenici's compromise should be the acceptable bipartisan alternative to the Senate passed amendment. I urge you and all conferees to incorporate his proposal into the bill reported out by the conference. We look forward to reaching prompt agreement on this and all the other important provisions of H.R. 3103. Sincerely, Leon P Panetta Chief of Staff The Honorable William F. Goodling Chairman Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunity House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON July 30, 1996 Dear Representative Fawell: I am writing to express the President's strong support for the alternative that has been proposed by Senator Domenici to prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long, and it is time we take steps to end this inequity by including the Domenici alternative in the final version of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (H.R. 3103) presented by the conference to the Congress. On April 23, 1996, by an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 68- 30, the Senate passed a Domenici/Wellstone amendment which would have required health plans to treat mental health coverage on an equal footing with other health benefits. The Domenici/Wellstone amendment would have ended the most egregious inequities in coverage for mental illness. Despite this impressive vote, concerns about the potential cost of this amendment were raised. In response, Senator Domenici dropped all of the mental health parity requirements in the amendment except equitable treatment of lifetime and annual limits. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Senator Domenici's compromise would cost 90 percent less than the original amendment ($966 million). CBO has also estimated that the proposal would increase insurance premiums by 0.4 percent at most. The President feels strongly that Senator Domenici's compromise should be the acceptable bipartisan alternative to the Senate passed amendment. I urge you and all conferees to incorporate his proposal into the bill reported out by the conference. We look forward to reaching prompt agreement on this and all the other important provisions of H.R. 3103. Sincerely, G Panetta The Honorable Harris W. Fawell House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON July 30, 1996 Dear Mr. Chairman: I am writing to express the President's strong support for the alternative that has been proposed by Senator Domenici to prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long, and it is time we take steps to end this inequity by including the Domenici alternative in the final version of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (H.R. 3103) presented by the conference to the Congress. On April 23, 1996, by an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 68- 30, the Senate passed a Domenici/Wellstone amendment which would have required health plans to treat mental health coverage on an equal footing with other health benefits. The Domenici/Wellstone amendment would have ended the most egregious inequities in coverage for mental illness. Despite this impressive vote, concerns about the potential cost of this amendment were raised. In response, Senator Domenici dropped all of the mental health parity requirements in the amendment except equitable treatment of lifetime and annual limits. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Senator Domenici's compromise would cost 90 percent less than the original amendment ($966 million). CBO has also estimated that the proposal would increase insurance premiums by 0.4 percent at most. The President feels strongly that Senator Domenici's compromise should be the acceptable bipartisan alternative to the Senate passed amendment. I urge you and all conferees to incorporate his proposal into the bill reported out by the conference. We look forward to reaching prompt agreement on this and all the other important provisions of H.R. 3103. Sincerely, Leon DR Panetta Chief of Staff The Honorable Henry J. Hyde Chairman Committee on Judiciary House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON July 30, 1996 Dear Representative McCollum: I am writing to express the President's strong support for the alternative that has been proposed by Senator Domenici to prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long, and it is time we take steps to end this inequity by including the Domenici alternative in the final version of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (H.R. 3103) presented by the conference to the Congress. On April 23, 1996, by an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 68- 30, the Senate passed a Domenici/Wellstone amendment which would have required health plans to treat mental health coverage on an equal footing with other health benefits. The Domenici/Wellstone amendment would have ended the most egregious inequities in coverage for mental illness. Despite this impressive vote, concerns about the potential cost of this amendment were raised. In response, Senator Domenici dropped all of the mental health parity requirements in the amendment except equitable treatment of lifetime and annual limits. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Senator Domenici's compromise would cost 90 percent less than the original amendment ($966 million). CBO has also estimated that the proposal would increase insurance premiums by 0.4 percent at most. The President feels strongly that Senator Domenici's compromise should be the acceptable bipartisan alternative to the Senate passed amendment. I urge you and all conferees to incorporate his proposal into the bill reported out by the conference. We look forward to reaching prompt agreement on this and all the other important provisions of H.R. 3103. Sincerely, Leon F Panetta Chief of Staff The Honorable Bill McCollum House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON July 30, 1996 Dear Representative Hastert: I am writing to express the President's strong support for the alternative that has been proposed by Senator Domenici to prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long, and it is time we take steps to end this inequity by including the Domenici alternative in the final version of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (H.R. 3103) presented by the conference to the Congress. On April 23, 1996, by an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 68- 30, the Senate passed a Domenici/Wellstone amendment which would have required health plans to treat mental health coverage on an equal footing with other health benefits. The Domenici/Wellstone amendment would have ended the most egregious inequities in coverage for mental illness. Despite this impressive vote, concerns about the potential cost of this amendment were raised. In response, Senator Domenici dropped all of the mental health parity requirements in the amendment except equitable treatment of lifetime and annual limits. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Senator Domenici's compromise would cost 90 percent less than the original amendment ($966 million). CBO has also estimated that the proposal would increase insurance premiums by 0.4 percent at most. The President feels strongly that Senator Domenici's compromise should be the acceptable bipartisan alternative to the Senate passed amendment. I urge you and all conferees to incorporate his proposal into the bill reported out by the conference. We look forward to reaching prompt agreement on this and all the other important provisions of H.R. 3103. Sincerely, 5 Chief of Staff The Honorable Dennis Hastert House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON July 30, 1996 Dear Representative Gibbons: I am writing to express the President's strong support for the alternative that has been proposed by Senator Domenici to prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long, and it is time we take steps to end this inequity by including the Domenici alternative in the final version of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (H.R. 3103) presented by the conference to the Congress. On April 23, 1996, by an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 68- 30, the Senate passed a Domenici/Wellstone amendment which would have required health plans to treat mental health coverage on an equal footing with other health benefits. The Domenici/Wellstone amendment would have ended the most egregious inequities in coverage for mental illness. Despite this impressive vote, concerns about the potential cost of this amendment were raised. In response, Senator Domenici dropped all of the mental health parity requirements in the amendment except equitable treatment of lifetime and annual limits. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Senator Domenici's compromise would cost 90 percent less than the original amendment ($966 million). CBO has also estimated that the proposal would increase insurance premiums by 0.4 percent at most. The President feels strongly that Senator Domenici's compromise should be the acceptable bipartisan alternative to the Senate passed amendment. I urge you and all conferees to incorporate his proposal into the bill reported out by the conference. We look forward to reaching prompt agreement on this and all the other important provisions of H.R. 3103. Sincerely, 5 Panetta Chief of Staff The Honorable Sam M. Gibbons Ranking Member Committee on Ways and Means House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON July 30, 1996 Dear Representative Stark: I am writing to express the President's strong support for the alternative that has been proposed by Senator Domenici to prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long, and it is time we take steps to end this inequity by including the Domenici alternative in the final version of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (H.R. 3103) presented by the conference to the Congress. On April 23, 1996, by an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 68- 30, the Senate passed a Domenici/Wellstone amendment which would have required health plans to treat mental health coverage on an equal footing with other health benefits. The Domenici/Wellstone amendment would have ended the most egregious inequities in coverage for mental illness. Despite this impressive vote, concerns about the potential cost of this amendment were raised. In response, Senator Domenici dropped all of the mental health parity requirements in the amendment except equitable treatment of lifetime and annual limits. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Senator Domenici's compromise would cost 90 percent less than the original amendment ($966 million). CBO has also estimated that the proposal would increase insurance premiums by 0.4 percent at most. The President feels strongly that Senator Domenici's compromise should be the acceptable bipartisan alternative to the Senate passed amendment. I urge you and all conferees to incorporate his proposal into the bill reported out by the conference. We look forward to reaching prompt agreement on this and all the other important provisions of H.R. 3103. Sincerely, 5 Panetta Chief of Staff The Honorable Pete Stark House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON July 30, 1996 Dear Representative Dingell: I am writing to express the President's strong support for the alternative that has been proposed by Senator Domenici to prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long, and it is time we take steps to end this inequity by including the Domenici alternative in the final version of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (H.R. 3103) presented by the conference to the Congress. On April 23, 1996, by an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 68- 30, the Senate passed a Domenici/Wellstone amendment which would have required health plans to treat mental health coverage on an equal footing with other health benefits. The Domenici/Wellstone amendment would have ended the most egregious inequities in coverage for mental illness. Despite this impressive vote, concerns about the potential cost of this amendment were raised. In response, Senator Domenici dropped all of the mental health parity requirements in the amendment except equitable treatment of lifetime and annual limits. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Senator Domenici's compromise would cost 90 percent less than the original amendment ($966 million). CBO has also estimated that the proposal would increase insurance premiums by 0.4 percent at most. The President feels strongly that Senator Domenici's compromise should be the acceptable bipartisan alternative to the Senate passed amendment. I urge you and all conferees to incorporate his proposal into the bill reported out by the conference. We look forward to reaching prompt agreement on this and all the other important provisions of H.R. 3103. Sincerely, eon E Panetta Chief of Staff The Honorable John D. Dingell Ranking Member Committee on Commerce House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON July 30, 1996 Dear Representative Waxman: I am writing to express the President's strong support for the alternative that has been proposed by Senator Domenici to prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long, and it is time we take steps to end this inequity by including the Domenici alternative in the final version of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (H.R. 3103) presented by the conference to the Congress. On April 23, 1996, by an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 68- 30, the Senate passed a Domenici/Wellstone amendment which would have required health plans to treat mental health coverage on an equal footing with other health benefits. The Domenici/Wellstone amendment would have ended the most egregious inequities in coverage for mental illness. Despite this impressive vote, concerns about the potential cost of this amendment were raised. In response, Senator Domenici dropped all of the mental health parity requirements in the amendment except equitable treatment of lifetime and annual limits. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Senator Domenici's compromise would cost 90 percent less than the original amendment ($966 million). CBO has also estimated that the proposal would increase insurance premiums by 0.4 percent at most. The President feels strongly that Senator Domenici's compromise should be the acceptable bipartisan alternative to the Senate passed amendment. I urge you and all conferees to incorporate his proposal into the bill reported out by the conference. We look forward to reaching prompt agreement on this and all the other important provisions of H.R. 3103. Sincerely, 5 Panetta Chief of Staff The Honorable Henry A. Waxman House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON July 30, 1996 Dear Representative Clay: I am writing to express the President's strong support for the alternative that has been proposed by Senator Domenici to prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long, and it is time we take steps to end this inequity by including the Domenici alternative in the final version of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (H.R. 3103) presented by the conference to the Congress. On April 23, 1996, by an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 68- 30, the Senate passed a Domenici/Wellstone amendment which would have required health plans to treat mental health coverage on an equal footing with other health benefits. The Domenici/Wellstone amendment would have ended the most egregious inequities in coverage for mental illness. Despite this impressive vote, concerns about the potential cost of this amendment were raised. In response, Senator Domenici dropped all of the mental health parity requirements in the amendment except equitable treatment of lifetime and annual limits. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Senator Domenici's compromise would cost 90 percent less than the original amendment ($966 million). CBO has also estimated that the proposal would increase insurance premiums by 0.4 percent at most. The President feels strongly that Senator Domenici's compromise should be the acceptable bipartisan alternative to the Senate passed amendment. I urge you and all conferees to incorporate his proposal into the bill reported out by the conference. We look forward to reaching prompt agreement on this and all the other important provisions of H.R. 3103. Sincerely, Leon. E Panetta Chief of Staff The Honorable William (Bill) Clay Ranking Member Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON July 30, 1996 Dear Representative Conyers: I am writing to express the President's strong support for the alternative that has been proposed by Senator Domenici to prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long, and it is time we take steps to end this inequity by including the Domenici alternative in the final version of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (H.R. 3103) presented by the conference to the Congress. On April 23, 1996, by an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 68- 30, the Senate passed a Domenici/Wellstone amendment which would have required health plans to treat mental health coverage on an equal footing with other health benefits. The Domenici/Wellstone amendment would have ended the most egregious inequities in coverage for mental illness. Despite this impressive vote, concerns about the potential cost of this amendment were raised. In response, Senator Domenici dropped all of the mental health parity requirements in the amendment except equitable treatment of lifetime and annual limits. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Senator Domenici's compromise would cost 90 percent less than the original amendment ($966 million). CBO has also estimated that the proposal would increase insurance premiums by 0.4 percent at most. The President feels strongly that Senator Domenici's compromise should be the acceptable bipartisan alternative to the Senate passed amendment. I urge you and all conferees to incorporate his proposal into the bill reported out by the conference. We look forward to reaching prompt agreement on this and all the other important provisions of H.R. 3103. Sincerely, eon E Panetta Chief of Staff The Honorable John Conyers, Jr. Ranking Member Committee on Judiciary House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON July 30, 1996 Dear Representative Bonior: I am writing to express the President's strong support for the alternative that has been proposed by Senator Domenici to prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long, and it is time we take steps to end this inequity by including the Domenici alternative in the final version of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (H.R. 3103) presented by the conference to the Congress. On April 23, 1996, by an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 68- 30, the Senate passed a Domenici/Wellstone amendment which would have required health plans to treat mental health coverage on an equal footing with other health benefits. The Domenici/Wellstone amendment would have ended the most egregious inequities in coverage for mental illness. Despite this impressive vote, concerns about the potential cost of this amendment were raised. In response, Senator Domenici dropped all of the mental health parity requirements in the amendment except equitable treatment of lifetime and annual limits. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Senator Domenici's compromise would cost 90 percent less than the original amendment ($966 million). CBO has also estimated that the proposal would increase insurance premiums by 0.4 percent at most. The President feels strongly that Senator Domenici's compromise should be the acceptable bipartisan alternative to the Senate passed amendment. I urge you and all conferees to incorporate his proposal into the bill reported out by the conference. We look forward to reaching prompt agreement on this and all the other important provisions of H.R. 3103. Sincerely, 5 Chief of Staff The Honorable David E. Bonior Democratic Whip House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON July 30, 1996 Dear Mr. Leader: I am writing to express the President's strong support for the alternative that has been proposed by Senator Domenici to prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long, and it is time we take steps to end this inequity by including the Domenici alternative in the final version of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (H.R. 3103) presented by the conference to the Congress. On April 23, 1996, by an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 68- 30, the Senate passed a Domenici/Wellstone amendment which would have required health plans to treat mental health coverage on an equal footing with other health benefits. The Domenici/Wellstone amendment would have ended the most egregious inequities in coverage for mental illness. Despite this impressive vote, concerns about the potential cost of this amendment were raised. In response, Senator Domenici dropped all of the mental health parity requirements in the amendment except equitable treatment of lifetime and annual limits. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Senator Domenici's compromise would cost 90 percent less than the original amendment ($966 million). CBO has also estimated that the proposal would increase insurance premiums by 0.4 percent at most. The President feels strongly that Senator Domenici's compromise should be the acceptable bipartisan alternative to the Senate passed amendment. I urge you and all conferees to incorporate his proposal into the bill reported out by the conference. We look forward to reaching prompt agreement on this and all the other important provisions of H.R. 3103. Sincerely, Jeon W. Panetta Chief of Staff The Honorable Trent Lott Majority Leader United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON July 30, 1996 Dear Senator Kennedy: I am writing to express the President's strong support for the alternative that has been proposed by Senator Domenici to prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long, and it is time we take steps to end this inequity by including the Domenici alternative in the final version of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (H.R. 3103) presented by the conference to the Congress. On April 23, 1996, by an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 68- 30, the Senate passed a Domenici/Wellstone amendment which would have required health plans to treat mental health coverage on an equal footing with other health benefits. The Domenici/Wellstone amendment would have ended the most egregious inequities in coverage for mental illness. Despite this impressive vote, concerns about the potential cost of this amendment were raised. In response, Senator Domenici dropped all of the mental health parity requirements in the amendment except equitable treatment of lifetime and annual limits. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Senator Domenici's compromise would cost 90 percent less than the original amendment ($966 million). CBO has also estimated that the proposal would increase insurance premiums by 0.4 percent at most. The President feels strongly that Senator Domenici's compromise should be the acceptable bipartisan alternative to the Senate passed amendment. I urge you and all conferees to incorporate his proposal into the bill reported out by the conference. We look forward to reaching prompt agreement on this and all the other important provisions of H.R. 3103. Sincerely, Leon Panetta of Staff The Honorable Edward M. Kennedy Ranking Member Committee on Labor and Human Resources United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON July 30, 1996 Dear Senator Moynihan: I am writing to express the President's strong support for the alternative that has been proposed by Senator Domenici to prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long, and it is time we take steps to end this inequity by including the Domenici alternative in the final version of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (H.R. 3103) presented by the conference to the Congress. On April 23, 1996, by an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 68- 30, the Senate passed a Domenici/Wellstone amendment which would have required health plans to treat mental health coverage on an equal footing with other health benefits. The Domenici/Wellstone amendment would have ended the most egregious inequities in coverage for mental illness. Despite this impressive vote, concerns about the potential cost of this amendment were raised. In response, Senator Domenici dropped all of the mental health parity requirements in the amendment except equitable treatment of lifetime and annual limits. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Senator Domenici's compromise would cost 90 percent less than the original amendment ($966 million). CBO has also estimated that the proposal would increase insurance premiums by 0.4 percent at most. The President feels strongly that Senator Domenici's compromise should be the acceptable bipartisan alternative to the Senate passed amendment. I urge you and all conferees to incorporate his proposal into the bill reported out by the conference. We look forward to reaching prompt agreement on this and all the other important provisions of H.R. 3103. Sincerely, Leon E Panetta Chlef-of Staff The Honorable Daniel Patrick Moynihan Ranking Member Committee on Finance United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON July 30, 1996 Dear Mr. Chairman: I am writing to express the President's strong support for the alternative that has been proposed by Senator Domenici to prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long, and it is time we take steps to end this inequity by including the Domenici alternative in the final version of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (H.R. 3103) presented by the conference to the Congress. On April 23, 1996, by an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 68- 30, the Senate passed a Domenici/Wellstone amendment which would have required health plans to treat mental health coverage on an equal footing with other health benefits. The Domenici/Wellstone amendment would have ended the most egregious inequities in coverage for mental illness. Despite this impressive vote, concerns about the potential cost of this amendment were raised. In response, Senator Domenici dropped all of the mental health parity requirements in the amendment except equitable treatment of lifetime and annual limits. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Senator Domenici's compromise would cost 90 percent less than the original amendment ($966 million). CBO has also estimated that the proposal would increase insurance premiums by 0.4 percent at most. The President feels strongly that Senator Domenici's compromise should be the acceptable bipartisan alternative to the Senate passed amendment. I urge you and all conferees to incorporate his proposal into the bill reported out by the conference. We look forward to reaching prompt agreement on this and all the other important provisions of H.R. 3103. Sincerely, Leon D. Panetta Chief of Staff The Honorable William V. Roth, Jr. Chairman Committee on Finance United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON July 30, 1996 Dear Madam Chair: I am writing to express the President's strong support for the alternative that has been proposed by Senator Domenici to prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long, and it is time we take steps to end this inequity by including the Domenici alternative in the final version of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (H.R. 3103) presented by the conference to the Congress. On April 23, 1996, by an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 68- 30, the Senate passed a Domenici/Wellstone amendment which would have required health plans to treat mental health coverage on an equal footing with other health benefits. The Domenici/Wellstone amendment would have ended the most egregious inequities in coverage for mental illness. Despite this impressive vote, concerns about the potential cost of this amendment were raised. In response, Senator Domenici dropped all of the mental health parity requirements in the amendment except equitable treatment of lifetime and annual limits. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Senator Domenici's compromise would cost 90 percent less than the original amendment ($966 million). CBO has also estimated that the proposal would increase insurance premiums by 0.4 percent at most. The President feels strongly that Senator Domenici's compromise should be the acceptable bipartisan alternative to the Senate passed amendment. I urge you and all conferees to incorporate his proposal into the bill reported out by the conference. We look forward to reaching prompt agreement on this and all the other important provisions of H.R. 3103. Sincerely, Leon E Panetta Chief of Staff The Honorable Nancy Landon Kassebaum Chairman Committee on Labor and Human Resources United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 AMENDMENT NUMBERED 117 That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 117, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the matter proposed by said amendment, insert: 1 TITLE VI-NEWBORNS AND 2 MOTHERS' HEALTH PROTEC- 3 TION ACT OF 1996 4 SEC. 601. SHORT TITLE. 5 This title may be cited as the "Newborns' and Moth- 6 ers' Health Protection Act of 1996". 7 SEC. 602. FINDING. 8 Congress finds that— 9 (1) the length of post-delivery hospital stay 10 should be based on the unique characteristics of 11 each mother and her newborn child, taking into con- 12 sideration the health of the mother, the health and 13 stability of the newborn, the ability and confidence 14 of the mother and the father to care for their new- 15 born, the adequacy of support systems at home, and 16 the access of the mother and her newborn to appro- 17 priate follow-up health care; and 18 (2) the timing of the discharge of a mother and 19 her newborn child from the hospital should be made 20 by the attending provider in consultation with the 21 mother. F \EGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\NEWBORNS.07A (Finai Drait] 2 1 SEC. 603. AMENDMENTS TO THE EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT 2 INCOME SECURITY ACT OF 1974. 3 (a) IN GENERAL.-Part 7 of subtitle B of title I of 4 the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 5 (added by section 101(a) of the Health Insurance Port- 6 ability and Accountability Act of 1996) is amended— 7 (1) by amending the heading of the part to read 8 as follows: 9 "PART 7-GROUP HEALTH PLAN REQUIREMENTS"; 10 (2) by inserting after the part heading the fol- 11 lowing: 12 "SUBPART A-REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO 13 PORTABILITY, ACCESS, AND RENEWABILITY"; ITAL 14 (3) by redesignating sections 704 through 707 15 as sections 731 through 734, respectively; 16 (4) by inserting before section 731 (as SO redes- 17 ignated) the following new heading: 18 "SUBPART C-GENERAL PROVISIONS"; 19 and 20 (5) by inserting after section 703 the following 21 new subpart: 22 "SUBPART B-OTHER REQUIREMENTS 23 "SEC. 711. STANDARDS RELATING TO BENEFITS FOR MOTH- 24 ERS AND NEWBORNS. 25 "(a) REQUIREMENTS FOR MINIMUM HOSPITAL STAY 26 FOLLOWING BIRTH.- (7:28 p.m.) F:\EGG VAHUDCON EWBORNS 07A [Final 3 1 "(1) IN GENERAL.- group health plan, and a 2 health insurance issuer offering group health insur- 3 ance coverage, may not- 4 "(A) except as provided in paragraph 5 (2)- 6 "(i) restrict benefits for any hospital 7 length of stay in connection with childbirth 8 for the mother or newborn child, following 9 a normal vaginal delivery, to less than 48 10 hours, or 11 "(ii) restrict benefits for any hospital 12 length of stay in connection with childbirth ITAL 13 for the mother or newborn child, following 14 a cesarean section, to less than 96 hours; 15 or 16 "(B) require that a provider obtain author- 17 ization from the plan or the issuer for prescrib- 18 ing any length of stay required under subpara- 19 graph (A) (without regard to paragraph (2)). 20 "(2) EXCEPTION.-Paragrap (1)(A) shall not 21 apply in connection with any group health plan or 22 health insurance issuer in any case in which the de- 23 cision to discharge the mother or her newborn child 24 prior to the expiration of the minimum length of 25 stay otherwise required under paragraph (1)(A) is 1996 F:\EGG\HCR96\ VAHUDCON NEWBORNS.07A [Fimar 4 1 made by an attending provider in consultation with 2 the mother. 3 "(b) PROHIBITIONS.-A group health plan, and a 4 health insurance issuer offering group health insurance 5 coverage in connection with a group health plan, may 6 not- 7 "(1) deny to the mother or her newborn child 8 eligibility, or continued eligibility, to enroll or to 9 renew coverage under the terms of the plan, solely 10 for the purpose of avoiding the requirements of this 11 section; 12 "(2) provide monetary payments or rebates to 13 mothers to encourage such mothers to accept less 14 than the minimum protections available under this 15 section; 16 "(3) penalize or otherwise reduce or limit the 17 reimbursement of an attending provider because 18 such provider provided care to an individual partici- 19 pant or beneficiary in accordance with this section; 20 "(4) provide incentives (monetary or otherwise) 21 to an attending provider to induce such provider to 22 provide care to an individual participant or bene- 23 ficiary in a manner inconsistent with this section; or 24 "(5) subject to subsection (c)(3), restrict bene- 25 fits for any portion of a period within a hospital Potember F: EGG HCR96\ VAHUDCON [Final Draft] 5 1 length of stay required under subsection (a) in a 2 manner which is less favorable than the benefits pro- 3 vided for any preceding portion of such stay. 4 "(c) RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.- 5 "(1) Nothing in this section shall be construed 6 to require a mother who is a participant or bene- 7 ficiary- 8 "(A) to give birth in a hospital; or 9 "(B) to stay in the hospital for a fixed pe- 10 riod of time following the birth of her child. 11 "(2) This section shall not apply with respect to 12 any group health plan, or any group health insur- 13 ance coverage offered by a health insurance issuer, 14 which does not provide benefits for hospital lengths 15 of stay in connection with childbirth for a mother or 16 her newborn child. 17 "(3) Nothing in this section shall be construed 18 as preventing a group health plan or issuer from im- 19 posing deductibles, coinsurance, or other cost-shar- 20 ing in relation to benefits for hospital lengths of stay 21 in connection with childbirth for a mother or new- 22 born child under the plan (or under health insurance 23 coverage offered in connection with a group health 24 plan), except that such coinsurance or other cost- 25 sharing for any portion of a period within a hospital September 19 p.m.) [Final Draftl 6 1 length of stay required under subsection (a) may not 2 be greater than such coinsurance or cost-sharing for 3 any preceding portion of such stay. 4 "(d) NOTICE UNDER GROUP HEALTH PLAN.-The 5 imposition of the requirements of this section shall be 6 treated as a material modification in the terms of the plan 7 described in section 102(a)(1), for purposes of assuring 8 notice of such requirements under the plan; except that 9 the summary description required to be provided under the 10 last sentence of section 104(b)(1) with respect to such 11 modification shall be provided by not later than 60 days 12 after the first day of the first plan year in which such 13 requirements apply. 14 "(e) LEVEL AND TYPE OF REIMBURSEMENTS.- 15 Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent a 16 group health plan or a health insurance issuer offering 17 group health insurance coverage from negotiating the level 18 and type of reimbursement with a provider for care pro- 19 vided in accordance with this section. 20 "(f) PREEMPTION; EXCEPTION FOR HEALTH INSUR- 21 ANCE COVERAGE IN CERTAIN STATES.- 22 "(1) IN GENERAL.-The requirements of this 23 section shall not apply with respect to health insur- 24 ance coverage if there is a State law (as defined in 25 section 731(d)(1)) for a State that regulates such September 10 AMUDCON [Final Draft] 7 1 coverage that is described in any of the following 2 subparagraphs: 3 "(A) Such State law requires such cov- 4 erage to provide for at least a 48-hour hospital 5 length of stay following a normal vaginal deliv- 6 ery and at least a 96-hour hospital length of 7 stay following a cesarean section. 8 "(B) Such State law requires such cov- 9 erage to provide for maternity and pediatric 10 care in accordance with guidelines established 11 by the American College of Obstetricians and 12 Gynecologists, the American Academy of Pedi- 13 atrics, or other established professional medical 14 associations. 15 "(C) Such State law requires, in connec- 16 tion with such coverage for maternity care, that 17 the hospital length of stay for such care is left 18 to the decision of (or required to be made by) 19 the attending provider in consultation with the 20 mother. 21 "(2) CONSTRUCTION.-Section 731(a)(1) shall 22 not be construed as superseding a State law de- 23 scribed in paragraph (1).". 24 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.- September 19, 1996 (7:28 p.m.) \EGG\HCRes Final Draft] 8 1 (1) Section 731(c) of such Act (as added by 2 section 101 of the Health Insurance Portability and 3 Accountability Act of 1996 and redesignated by the 4 preceding provisions of this section) is amended by 5 striking "Nothing" and inserting "Except as pro- 6 vided in section 711, nothing". 7 (2) Section 732(a) of such Act (as added by 8 section 101 of the Health Insurance Portability and 9 Accountability Act of 1996 and redesignated by the 10 preceding provisions of this section) is amended by 11 inserting "(other than section 711)" after "part". 12 (3) Title I of such Act (as amended by section 13 101 of the Health Insurance Portability and Ac- 14 countability Act of 1996 and the preceding provi- 15 sions of this section) is further amended— 16 (A) in the last sentence of section 4(b), by 17 striking "section 706(b)(2)", "section 18 706(b)(1)", and "section 706(a)(1)" and insert- 19 ing "section 733(b)(2)", "section 733(b)(1)", 20 and "section 733(a)(1)", respectively; 21 (B) in section 101(g), by striking "section 22 706(a)(2)" and inserting "section 733(a)(2)"; 23 (C) in section 102(b), by striking "section 24 706(a)(1)" each place it appears and inserting VAHUDOON WBORNS.07A (Final Draft] 9 1 "section 733(a)(1), and by striking "section 2 706(b)(2)" and inserting "section 733(b)(2)"; 3 (D) in section 104(b)(1), by striking "sec- 4 tion 706(a)(1)" each place it appears and in- 5 serting "section 733(a)(1); 6 (E) in section 502(b)(3), by striking "sec- 7 tion 706(a)(1)" and inserting "section 8 733(a)(1)"; 9 (F) in section 506(c), by striking "section 10 706(a)(2)" and inserting "section 733(a)(2)"; 11 (G) in section 514(b)(9), by striking "sec- 12 tion 704" and inserting "section 731"; 13 (H) in the last sentence of section 14 701(c)(1), by striking "section 706(c)" and in- 15 serting "section 733(c)"; 16 (I) in section 732(b), by striking "section 17 706(c)(1)" and inserting "section 733(c)(1)"; 18 (J) in section 732(c)(1), by striking "sec- 19 tion 706(c)(2)" and inserting "section 20 733(c)(2)"; 21 (K) in section 732(c)(2), by striking "sec- 22 tion 706(c)(3)" and inserting "section 23 733(c)(3)"; and September 19 FAEGG HCR96 VAHUDCON NEWBORNS.07A [Final Draft] 10 1 (L) in section 732(c)(3), by striking "sec- 2. tion 706(c)(4)" and inserting "section 3 733(c)(4)". 4 (4) The table of contents in section 1 of such 5 Act is amended by striking the items relating to part 6 7 and inserting the following: "PART 7-GROUP HEALTH PLAN REQUIREMENTS "SUBPART A-REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO PORTABILITY, ACCESS, AND RENEWABILITY "Sec. 701. Increased portability through limitation on preexisting condition ex- clusions. "Sec. 702. Prohibiting discrimination against individual participants and bene- ficiaries based on health status. "Sec. 703. Guaranteed renewability in multiemployer plans and multiple em- ployer welfare arrangements. "SUBPART B-OTHER REQUIREMENTS ITAL "Sec. 711. Standards relating to benefits for mothers and newborns. "SUBPART C-GENERAL PROVISIONS "Sec. 731. Preemption; State flexibility; construction. "Sec. 732. Special rules relating to group health plans. "Sec. 733. Definitions. "Sec. 734. Regulations.". 7 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.-The amendments made by 8 this section shall apply with respect to group health plans 9 for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 1998. 10 SEC. 604. AMENDMENTS TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE 11 ACT RELATING TO THE GROUP MARKET. 12 (a) IN GENERAL.-Title XXVII of the Public Health 13 Service Act (as added by section 102 of the Health Insur- 14 ance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) is 15 amended- F: EGG HCR96 [Final Draft] 11 1 (1) by amending the title heading to read as 2 follows: 3 "TITLE XXVI-REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO 4 HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE"; 5 (2) by redesignating subparts 2 and 3 of part 6 A as subparts 3 and 4 of such part; 7 (3) by inserting after subpart 1 of part A the 8 following new subpart: 9 "Subpart 2-Other Requirements 10 "SEC. 2704. STANDARDS RELATING TO BENEFITS FOR 11 MOTHERS AND NEWBORNS. 12 "(a) REQUIREMENTS FOR MINIMUM HOSPITAL STAY 13 FOLLOWING BIRTH.- 14 "(1) IN GENERAL.-A group health plan, and a 15 health insurance issuer offering group health insur- 16 ance coverage, may not- 17 "(A) except as provided in paragraph 18 (2)- 19 "(i) restrict benefits for any hospital 20 length of stay in connection with childbirth 21 for the mother or newborn child, following 22 a normal vaginal delivery, to less than 48 23 hours, or 24 "(ii) restrict benefits for any hospital 25 length of stay in connection with childbirth F:\EGG HCR96 VAHUDGON NEWDORNS.07A [Final Draft] 12 1 for the mother or newborn child, following 2 a cesarean section, to less than 96 hours, 3 or 4 "(B) require that a provider obtain author- 5 ization from the plan or the issuer for prescrib- 6 ing any length of stay required under subpara- 7 graph (A) (without regard to paragraph (2)). 8 "(2) EXCEPTION.-Paragraph (1)(A) shall not 9 apply in connection with any group health plan or 10 health insurance issuer in any case in which the de- 11 cision to discharge the mother or her newborn child 12 prior to the expiration of the minimum length of 13 stay otherwise required under paragraph (1) (A) is 14 made by an attending provider in consultation with 15 the mother. 16 "(b) PROHIBITIONS.-A group health plan, and a 17 health insurance issuer offering group health insurance 18 coverage in connection with a group health plan, may 19 not- 20 "(1) deny to the mother or her newborn child 21 eligibility, or continued eligibility, to enroll or to 22 renew coverage under the terms of the plan, solely 23 for the purpose of avoiding the requirements of this 24 section; Septembe 1996 (7:28 p.m.) FAEGG HCR96 VAHUDSONANEWBORNS.07 [Final Draft] 13 1 "(2) provide monetary payments or rebates to 2 mothers to encourage such mothers to accept less 3 than the minimum protections available under this 4 section; 5 "(3) penalize or otherwise reduce or limit the 6 reimbursement of an attending provider because 7 such provider provided care to an individual partici- 8 pant or beneficiary in accordance with this section; 9 "(4) provide incentives (monetary or otherwise) 10 to an attending provider to induce such provider to 11 provide care to an individual participant or bene- 12 ficiary in a manner inconsistent with this section; or (TAL 13 "(5) subject to subsection (c)(3), restrict bene- 14 fits for any portion of a period within a hospital 15 length of stay required under subsection (a) in a 16 manner which is less favorable than the benefits pro- 17 vided for any preceding portion of such stay. 18 "(c) RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.- 19 "(1) Nothing in this section shall be construed 20 to require a mother who is a participant or bene- 21 ficiary- 22 "(A) to give birth in a hospital; or 23 "(B) to stay in the hospital for a fixed pe- 24 riod of time following the birth of her child. September FGG VAHUDOON NEWBORNS.07A Draft] 14 1 "(2) This section shall not apply with respect to 2 any group health plan, or any group health insur- 3 ance coverage offered by a health insurance issuer, 4 which does not provide benefits for hospital lengths 5 of stay in connection with childbirth for a mother or 6 her newborn child. 7 "(3) Nothing in this section shall be construed 8 as preventing a group health plan or issuer from im- 9 posing deductibles, coinsurance, or other cost-shar- 10 ing in relation to benefits for hospital lengths of stay 11 in connection with childbirth for a mother or new- 12 born child under the plan (or under health insurance 13 coverage offered in connection with a group health 14 plan), except that such coinsurance or other cost- 15 sharing for any portion of a period within a hospital 16 length of stay required under subsection (a) may not 17 be greater than such coinsurance or cost-sharing for 18 any preceding portion of such stay. 19 "(d) NOTICE.-A group health plan under this part 20 shall comply with the notice requirement under section 21 711(d) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act 22 of 1974 with respect to the requirements of this section 23 as if such section applied to such plan. 24 "(e) LEVEL AND TYPE OF REIMBURSEMENTS.- 25 Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent a September 19, 1990 EGG HCR96\ VAHUDCON NEWDORNS.07A [Final Draftl 15 1 group health plan or a health insurance issuer offering 2 group health insurance coverage from negotiating the level 3 and type of reimbursement with a provider for care pro- 4 vided in accordance with this section. 5 "(f) PREEMPTION; EXCEPTION FOR HEALTH INSUR- 6 ANCE COVERAGE IN CERTAIN STATES.- 7 "(1) IN GENERAL-The requirements of this 8 section shall not apply with respect to health insur- 9 ance coverage if there is a State law (as defined in 10 section 2723(d)(1)) for a State that regulates such 11 coverage that is described in any of the following 12 subparagraphs: 13 "(A) Such State law requires such cov- 14 erage to provide for at least a 48-hour hospital 15 length of stay following a normal vaginal deliv- 16 ery and at least a 96-hour hospital length of 17 stay following a cesarean section. 18 "(B) Such State law requires such cov- 19 erage to provide for maternity and pediatric 20 care in accordance with guidelines established 21 by the American College of Obstetricians and 22 Gynecologists, the American Academy of Pedi- 23 atrics, or other established professional medical 24 associations. EGG' HCR96 VAHUDCO [Final Draft] 16 1 "(C) Such State law requires, in connec- 2 tion with such coverage for maternity care, that 3 the hospital length of stay for such care is left 4 to the decision of (or required to be made by) 5 the attending provider in consultation with the 6 mother. 7 "(2) CONSTRUCTION.-Section 2723(a)(1) shall 8 not be construed as superseding a State law de- 9 scribed in paragraph (1).' 10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.- 11 (1) Section 2721 of such Act (as added by sec- 12 tion 102 of the Health Insurance Portability and Ac- 13 countability Act of 1996) is amended- 14 (A) in subsection (a), by striking "subparts 15 1 and 2" and inserting "subparts 1 and 3", 16 and 17 (B) in subsections (b) through (d), by 18 striking "subparts 1 and 2" each place it ap- 19 pears and inserting "subparts 1 through 3". 20 (2) Section 2723(c) of such Act (as added by 21 section 102 of the Health Insurance Portability and 22 Accountability Act of 1996) is amended by inserting 23 "(other than section 2704)" after "part". September p.m.) HORSO [Final Draft] 17 1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.-The amendments made by 2 this section shall apply with respect to group health plans 3 for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 1998. 4 SEC. 605. AMENDMENTS TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE 5 ACT RELATING TO THE INDIVIDUAL MARKET. 6 (a) IN GENERAL.-Part B of title XXVII of the Pub- 7 lic Health Service Act (as added by section 111 of the 8 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 9 1996) is amended- 10 (1) by inserting after the part heading the fol- 11 lowing: 12 "Subpart 1-Portability, Access, and Renewability 13 Requirements"; 14 (2) by redesignating sections 2745, 2746, and ITAL 15 2747 as sections 2761, 2762, and 2763, respectively; 16 (3) by inserting before section 2761 (as so re- 17 designated) the following: 18 "Subpart 3-General Provisions"; and 19 (4) by inserting after section 2744 the follow- 20 ing: 21 "Subpart 3-Other Requirements 22 "SEC. 2751. STANDARDS RELATING TO BENEFITS FOR 23 MOTHERS AND NEWBORNS. 24 "(a) IN GENERAL.-The provisions of section 2704 25 (other than subsections (d) and (f)) shall apply to health 1996 (7:28 n.m VAHUDCON \NE WBORNS.07A [Final Draftl 18 1 insurance coverage offered by a health insurance issuer 2 in the individual market in the same manner as it applies 3 to health insurance coverage offered by a health insurance 4 issuer in connection with a group health plan in the small 5 or large group market. 6 "(b) NOTICE REQUIREMENT.-A health insurance is- 7 suer under this part shall comply with the notice require- 8 ment under section 711(d) of the Employee Retirement 9 Income Security Act of 1974 with respect to the require- 10 ments referred to in subsection (a) as if such section ap- 11 plied to such issuer and such issuer were a group health 12 plan. 13 "(c) PREEMPTION; EXCEPTION FOR HEALTH INSUR- 14 ANCE COVERAGE IN CERTAIN STATES:- 15 "(1) IN GENERAL-The requirements of this 16 section shall not apply with respect to health insur- 17 ance coverage if there is a State law (as defined in 18 section 2723(d)(1)) for a State that regulates such 19 coverage that is described in any of the following 20 subparagraphs: 21 "(A) Such State law requires such cov- 22 erage to provide for at least a 48-hour hospital 23 length of stay following a normal vaginal deliv- 24 ery and at least a 96-hour hospital length of 25 stay following a cesarean section. EGG HCR96 VAHUDCON [Final Draft] 19 1 "(B) Such State law requires such cov- 2 erage to provide for maternity and pediatric 3 care in accordance with guidelines established 4 by the American College of Obstetricians and 5 Gynecologists, the American Academy of Pedi- 6 atrics, or other established professional medical 7 associations. 8 "(C) Such State law requires, in connec- 9 tion with such coverage for maternity care, that 10 the hospital length of stay for such care is left 11 to the decision of (or required to be made by) 12 the attending provider in consultation with the ITAL 13 mother. 14 "(2) CONSTRUCTION.-Section 2762(a) shall 15 not be construed as superseding a State law de- 16 scribed in paragraph (1). 17 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.-Such part (as SO 18 added) is further amended as follows: 19 (1) In section 2744(a)(1), strike "2746(b)" and 20 insert "2762(b)". 21 (2) In section 2745(a)(1) (before redesignation 22 under subsection (a)(1)), strike "2746" and insert 23 "2762". 24 (3) In section 2746(b) (before redesignation 25 under subsection (a)(1))- September WAILUDCON NEWDORNO.07A [Final Draft] 20 1 (A) by inserting "(1)" after the dash, and 2 (B) by adding at the end the following: 3 "(2) Nothing in this part (other than section 2751) 4 shall be construed as requiring health insurance coverage 5 offered in the individual market to provide specific benefits 6 under the terms of such coverage.". 7 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.-The amendments made by 8 this section shall apply with respect to health insurance 9 coverage offered, sold, issued, renewed, in effect, or oper- 10 ated in the individual market on or after January 1, 1998. 11 SEC. 606. REPORTS TO CONGRESS CONCERNING CHILD- 12 BIRTH. 13 (a) FINDINGS.-Congress finds that- 14 (1) childbirth is one part of a continuum of ex- ITAL 15 perience that includes prepregnancy, pregnancy and 16 prenatal care, labor and delivery, the immediate 17 postpartum period, and a longer period of adjust- 18 ment for the newborn, the mother, and the family; 19 (2) health care practices across this continuum 20 are changing in response to health care financing 21 and delivery system changes, science and clinical re- 22 search, and patient preferences; and 23 (3) there is a need— EGG HCR96 VAHUDCON [Final Draft] 21 1 (A) to examine the issues and con- 2 sequences associated with the length of hospital 3 stays following childbirth; 4 (B) to examine the follow-up practices for 5 mothers and newborns used in conjunction with 6 shorter hospital stays; 7 (C) to identify appropriate health care 8 practices and procedures with regard to the 9 hospital discharge of newborns and mothers; 10 (D) to examine the extent to which such 11 care is affected by family and environmental 12 factors; and 13 (E) to examine the content of care during 14 hospital stays following childbirth. 15 (b) ADVISORY PANEL.- 16 (1) IN GENERAL.-Not later than 90 days after 17 the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 18 Health and Human Services (in this section referred 19 to as the "Secretary") shall establish an advisory 20 panel (referred to in this section as the "advisory 21 panel")- 22 (A) to guide and review methods, proce- 23 dures, and data collection necessary to conduct 24 the study described in subsection (c) in a man- 25 ner that is intended to enhance the quality, FAEGG HCR96 VAHUDCON (NEWBORNS.U7A [Final Draft] 22 1 safety, and effectiveness of health care services 2 provided to mothers and newborns; 3 (B) to develop a consensus among the 4 members of the advisory panel regarding the 5 appropriateness of the specific requirements of 6 this title; and 7 (C) to prepare and submit to the Sec- 8 retary, as part of the report of the Secretary 9 submitted under subsection (d), a report sum- 10 marizing the consensus (if any) developed under 11 subparagraph (B) or the reasons for not reach- 12 ing such a consensus. 13 (2) PARTICIPATION.- 14 (A) DEPARTMENT REPRESENTATIVES.- 15 The Secretary shall ensure that representatives 16 from within the Department of Health and 17 Human Services that have expertise in the area 18 of maternal and child health or in outcomes re- 19 search are appointed to the advisory panel. 20 (B) REPRESENTATIVES OF PUBLIC AND 21 PRIVATE SECTOR ENTITIES.- 22 (i) IN GENERAL.-The Secretary shall 23 ensure that members of the advisory panel 24 include representatives of public and pri- 25 vate sector entities having knowledge or September HCR96\VAHUDCON\NEWBORNS.07A Draft] 23 1 experience in one or more of the following 2 areas: 3 (I) Patient care. 4 (II) Patient education. 5 (III) Quality assurance. 6 (IV) Outcomes research. 7 (V) Consumer issues. 8 (ii) REQUIREMENT.-The panel shall 9 include representatives of each of the fol- 10 lowing categories: 11 (I) Health care practitioners. 12 (II) Health plans. 13 (III) Hospitals. 14 (IV) Employers. 15 (V) States. 16 (VI) Consumers. 17 (c) STUDIES.- 18 (1) IN GENERAL-The Secretary shall conduct 19 a study of- 20 (A) the factors affecting the continuum of 21 care with respect to maternal and child health 22 care, including outcomes following childbirth; 23 (B) the factors determining the length of 24 hospital stay following childbirth; AHUDCON [Final Draft] 24 1 (C) the diversity of negative or positive 2 outcomes affecting mothers, infants, and fami- 3 lies; 4 (D) the manner in which post natal care 5 has changed over time and the manner in which 6 that care has adapted or related to changes in 7 the length of hospital stay, taking into ac- 8 count— 9 (i) the types of post natal care avail- 10 able and the extent to which such care is 11 accessed; and 12 (ii) the challenges associated with pro- 13 viding post natal care to all populations, 78" 14 including vulnerable populations, and solu- 15 tions for overcoming these challenges; and 16 (E) the financial incentives that may- 17 (i) impact the health of newborns and 18 mothers; and 19 (ii) influence the clinical decisionmak- 20 ing of health care providers. 21 (2) RESOURCES.-The Secretary shall provide 22 to the advisory panel the resources necessary to 23 carry out the duties of the advisory panel. 24 (d) REPORTS.- EGG HCR96 VAHUDCOT 25 1 (1) IN GENERAL-The Secretary shall prepare 2 and submit to the Committee on Labor and Human 3 Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Com- 4 merce of the House of Representatives a report that 5 contains— 6 (A) a summary of the study conducted 7 under subsection (c); 8 (B) a summary of the best practices used 9 in the public and private sectors for the care of 10 newborns and mothers; 11 (C) recommendations for improvements in 12 prenatal care, post natal care, delivery and fol- 13 low-up care, and whether the implementation of 14 such improvements should be accomplished by 15 the private health care sector, Federal or State 16 governments, or any combination thereof; and 17 (D) limitations on the databases in exist- 18 ence on the date of the enactment of this Act. 19 (2) DEADLINES.-The Secretary shall prepare 20 and submit to the Committees referred to in para- 21 graph (1)- 22 (A) an initial report concerning the study 23 conducted under subsection (c) and elements 24 described in paragraph (1), not later than 18 September 19, 1996 p.m.) TITLE VI - NEWBORNS' AND MOTHERS' HEALTH PROTECTION ACT OF 1996 Amendment No. 117: The conference agreement includes the Senate , including the deletion of 0 ffsets, amendment with modifications It incorporates the re- quirements of the provision and the authority to enforce the requirements into the new part 7 of subtitle B of ERISA and the new title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act as established by P.L. 104-191. It does not include the exception to the requirement for the 48-hour or 96-hour minimum stay in the case that the plan pro- vides for post-delivery follow-up care. It adds a prohibi- tion that a health plan cannot restrict benefits for any portion of the required minimum 48-hour or 96-hour stay in a manner which is less favorable than the benefits pro- viding for any preceding portion of such stay. In addi- tion, the conference agreement provides that nothing in this provision is intended to be construed as preventing a group health plan or issuer from imposing coinsurance, deductibles, or other cost-sharing in relation to benefits for hospital lengths of stay in connection with childbirth for a mother or newborn child under the plan (or under health insurance coverage offered in connection with a group health plan), except that such coinsurance or other cost-sharing for any portion of a period within a hospital 75 length of stay required under subsection (a) may not be greater than such coinsurance or cost-sharing for any preceding portion of such stay. It is the intent of the con- ferees that cost-sharing not be used in a manner that cir- cumvents the objectives of this title. It provides for a modification to the notice requirements by conforming them to the summary of material modifications under ERISA In general, it conforms the provision relating to preemption to State laws to the Health Insurance Port- ability and Accountability Act of 1996. Notwithstanding section 731(a)(1) of ERISA and sections 2723(a)(1) and 2762 of the Public Health Service Act, the new provi- sions shall not preempt a State law that requires health insurance coverage to include coverage for maternity and pediatric care in accordance with guidelines established by the American College of Obstetricians and Gyne- cologists, the American Academy of Pediatrics, or other established professional medical associations. In addition, those sections shall not be construed as superseding a State law that leaves decisions regarding the appropriate hospital length of stay in connection with childbirth en- tirely to the attending provider in consultation with the mother. In addition, it is the intent of the conferees that, consistent with section 704 (redesignated as section 731) of ERISA and section 2723 of the Public Health Service 76 Act, the application of the preemption provision should permit the operation of any State law or provision which requires more favorable treatment of maternity coverage under health insurance coverage than that required under this title. It is the intent of the conferees that health plans have sufficient flexibility to encourage or specify that at- tending providers follow nationally recognized guidelines for maternal and perinatal care in determining when early discharge is medically appropriate. Throughout the title, the conferees have used the term "hospital length of stay" to indicate that the re- quirement for coverage of a 48-hour stay following vagi- nal delivery and a 96-hour length of stay following a ce- sarean section delivery is triggered by any delivery in connection with hospital care, regardless of whether the delivery is in a hospital inpatient or outpatient setting. It is the intent of the conferees that a detailed series of conforming changes shall be made as soon as possible to the Internal Revenue Code, specifically subtitle K of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as added by section 401(a) of the Health Insurance Portability and Account- ability Act of 1996), in order to fully implement these provisions as part of chapter 100 of the Code. 77 TITLE VII - PARITY IN THE APPLICATION OF CERTAIN LIMITS TO MENTAL HEALTH BENEFITS Amendment No. Inserts language proposed by- the Sonate egarding montal health parity |amended to delete the offsets and make other modifications. The conference agreement includes the Senate amendment with modifications. It incorporates the re- quirement into the new part 7 of subtitle B of title I of ERISA and the new title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act as established by Public Law 104-191. The construction clause has been modified to state that noth- ing in this section shall be construed as- (1) requiring a group health plan (or health in- surance coverage offered in connection with such a plan) to provide any mental health benefits; or (2) in the case of such a plan or coverage that provides such mental health benefits, as affecting the terms and conditions (including cost sharing, the limits on numbers of visits or days of coverage, and requirements relating to medical necessity) relating to the amount, duration, or scope of mental health benefits under the plan or coverage, except as spe- cifically provided in regard to parity in the imposi- tion of aggregate lifetime limits and annual limits for mental health benefits. This language affirms the intent of conferees that group health plans and issuers retain the flexibility, consistent with the requirements of the Act, to define the scope of 70 benefits, establish cost-sharing requirements, and to im- pose limits on hospital days and out-patient visits. Parity of mental health services with medical and surgical serv- ices defined under a group health plan is limited solely to any aggregate dollar life-time limit and any annual dollar limit under such a plan. The conference agreement clarifies that the requirements apply to each group health plan, and, in the case of a group health plan that offers two or more benefit packages, the parity requirements shall be applied separately with respect to each such op- tion. In addition, the conference agreement applies an ex- emption to small employers as defined in the Health In- surance Portability and Accountability Act; adds certain definitions; and applies the requirements of the provision to group health plan years beginning on or after January 1, 1998. The agreement does not include the Senate lan- guage relating to effective dates for the Federal Em- ployee Health Benefit Plan. It is the intent of the conferees that a detailed series of conforming changes shall be made as soon as possible to the Internal Revenue Code, specifically subtitle K of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as added by section 401(a) of the Health Insurance Portability and Account- ability Act of 1996), in order to fully implement these provisions as part of chapter 100 of the Code. 79 The conferees intend that a limit be considered to apply to "substantially all medical and surgical benefits" if it applies to at least two-thirds of all the medical and surgical benefits covered under the group health plan's benefit package. It is the intent of the conferees that, consistent with section 704 (redesignated as section 731) of ERISA and section 2723 of the Public Health Service Act, the appli- cation of the preemption provision should permit the op- eration of any State law or provision which requires more favorable treatment of mental health benefits under health insurance coverage than that required under this section. 80 CONFERENCE TOTAL--WITH COMPARISONS The total new budget (obligational) authority for the fiscal year 1997 recommended by the Committee of Conference, with comparisons to the fiscal year 1996 amount, the 1997 budget estimates, and the House and Senate bills for 1997 follow: New budget (obligational) authority, fiscal year 1996 $ 82,442,966,000 Budget estimates of new (obligational) authority, fiscal year 1997 87,820,371,000 House bill, fiscal year 1997 83,995,260,000 Senate bill, fiscal year 1997 84,810,153,000 Conference agreement, fiscal year 1997 84,800,283,000 Conference agreement compared with: New budget (obligational) authority, fiscal year 1996 +2,357,317,000 Budget estimates of new (obligational) authority, fiscal year 1997 -3,020,088,000 House bill, fiscal year 1997 +805,023,000 Senate bill, fiscal year 1997 -9,870,000 81 Managers on the Part of the HOUSE JERRY LEWIS Lews Managers on the Part of the Juny SENATE CHRISTOPHERS. BOND Barhara 2. Vercananich CONRAD BURNS BARBARA F. VUCANOVICH Webh TED STEVENS JAMES T. David WALSH Hoh RICHARD Richard C. SHELBY C. Hulby Lakulledse DAVID L. HOBSON ) Robert ROBERT F. 7 BENNETT Summy JOE KNOLLENBERG TURP. Juling BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL RODNEY P. FRELINGHUYSEN MARK O. HATFIELD BARBARA A. MIKULSKI BOB IVINGSTON PATRICK Patient J LEAHY Lenhy LOUIS STOKES /Ola B Molloha ALAN B. MOLLOHAN J. FRANK BENNETT R. LAUTENBERG JOHNS ON JIM CHAPMAN marcy MARCY Kaptur J. ROBERT KERREY ROBERT C. BYRD DAVID AMENDMENT NUMBERED 118 That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 118, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the matter proposed by said amendment, insert: 1 TITLE VII-PARITY IN THE AP- 2 PLICATION OF CERTAIN LIM- 3 ITS TO MENTAL HEALTH BEN- 4 EFITS 5 SEC. 701. SHORT TITLE. 6 This title may be cited as the "Mental Health Parity 7 Act of 1996". 8 SEC. 702. AMENDMENTS TO THE EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT 9 INCOME SECURITY ACT OF 1974. 10 (a) IN GENERAL.-Subpart B of part 7 of subtitle 11 B of title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security 7+1 12 Act of 1974 (as added by section 603(a)) is amended by 13 adding at the end the following new section: 14 "SEC. 712. PARITY IN THE APPLICATION OF CERTAIN LIM- 15 ITS TO MENTAL HEALTH BENEFITS. 16 "(a) IN GENERAL.- 17 "(1) AGGREGATE LIFETIME LIMITS.-In the 18 case of a group health plan (or health insurance cov- 19 erage offered in connection with such a plan) that 20 provides both medical and surgical benefits and 21 mental health benefits- 22 "(A) No LIFETIME LIMIT.-If the plan or 23 coverage does not include an aggregate lifetime [Final Draft] 2 1 limit on substantially all medical and surgical 2 benefits, the plan or coverage may not impose 3 any aggregate lifetime limit on mental health 4 benefits. 5 "(B) LIFETIME LIMIT.-If the plan or cov- 6 erage includes an aggregate lifetime limit on 7 substantially all medical and surgical benefits 8 (in this paragraph referred to as the 'applicable 9 lifetime limit'), the plan or coverage shall ei- 10 ther— 11 "(i) apply the applicable lifetime limit 12 both to the medical and surgical benefits to 13 which it otherwise would apply and to 14 mental health benefits and not distinguish 15 in the application of such limit between ITAL 16 such medical and surgical benefits and 17 mental health benefits; or 18 "(ii) not include any aggregate life- 19 time limit on mental health benefits that is 20 less than the applicable lifetime limit. 21 "(C) RULE IN CASE OF DIFFERENT LIM- 22 ITS.-In the case of a plan or coverage that is 23 not described in subparagraph (A) or (B) and 24 that includes no or different aggregate lifetime 25 limits on different categories of medical and September F:\EGG MNTLHLTH.005 [Final Draft] 3 1 surgical benefits, the Secretary shall establish 2 rules under which subparagraph (B) is applied 3 to such plan or coverage with respect to mental 4 health benefits by substituting for the applica- 5 ble lifetime limit an average aggregate lifetime 6 limit that is computed taking into account the 7 weighted average of the aggregate lifetime lim- 8 its applicable to such categories. 9 "(2) ANNUAL LIMITS.-In the case of a group 10 health plan (or health insurance coverage offered in 11 connection with such a plan) that provides both 12 medical and surgical benefits and mental health ben- ITAL 13 efits- 14 "(A) No ANNUAL LIMIT.-If the plan or 15 coverage does not include an annual limit on 16 substantially all medical and surgical benefits, 17 the plan or coverage may not impose any an- 18 nual limit on mental health benefits. 19 "(B) ANNUAL LIMIT.-If the plan or cov- 20 erage includes an annual limit on substantially 21 all medical and surgical benefits (in this para- 22 graph referred to as the 'applicable annual 23 limit'), the plan or coverage shall either- 24 "(i) apply the applicable annual limit 25 both to medical and surgical benefits to September 19 WTLHLTH.005 [Final 4 1 which it otherwise would apply and to 2 mental health benefits and not distinguish 3 in the application of such limit between 4 such medical and surgical benefits and 5 mental health benefits; or 6 "(ii) not include any annual limit on 7 mental health benefits that is less than the 8 applicable annual limit. 9 "(C) RULE IN CASE OF DIFFERENT LIM- 10 ITS.-In the case of a plan or coverage that is 11 not described in subparagraph (A) or (B) and 12 that includes no or different annual limits on 13 different categories of medical and surgical ben- 14 efits, the Secretary shall establish rules under 15 which subparagraph (B) is applied to such plan 16 or coverage with respect to mental health bene- 17 fits by substituting for the applicable annual 18 limit an average annual limit that is computed 19 taking into account the weighted average of the 20 annual limits applicable to such categories. 21 "(b) CONSTRUCTION.-Nothing in this section shall 22 be construed— 23 "(1) as requiring a group health plan (or health 24 insurance coverage offered in connection with such a 25 plan) to provide any mental health benefits; or September 19, 1996 p.m.) VAHUBCO. 111.00 Draftl 5 1 "(2) in the case of a group health plan (or 2 health insurance coverage offered in connection with 3 such a plan) that provides mental health benefits, as 4 affecting the terms and conditions (including cost 5 sharing, limits on numbers of visits or days of cov- 6 erage, and requirements relating to medical neces- 7 sity) relating to the amount, duration, or scope of 8 mental health benefits under the plan or coverage, 9 except as specifically provided in subsection (a) (in 10 regard to parity in the imposition of aggregate life- 11 time limits and annual limits for mental health bene- 12 fits). 13 "(c) EXEMPTIONS.- 14 "(1) SMALL EMPLOYER EXEMPTION.- 15 "(A) IN GENERAL.-This section shall not 16 apply to any group health plan (and group 17 health insurance coverage offered in connection 18 with a group health plan) for any plan year of 19 a small employer. 20 "(B) SMALL EMPLOYER.-For purposes of 21 subparagraph (A), the term 'small employer' 22 means, in connection with a group health plan 23 with respect to a calendar year and a plan year, 24 an employer who employed an average of at 25 least 2 but not more than 50 employees on [Final Draft] 6 1 business days during the preceding calendar 2 year and who employs at least 2 employees on 3 the first day of the plan year. 4 "(C) APPLICATION OF CERTAIN RULES IN 5 DETERMINATION OF EMPLOYER SIZE.-For 6 purposes of this paragraph- 7 "(i) APPLICATION OF AGGREGATION 8 RULE FOR EMPLOYERS.-Rules similar to 9 the rules under subsections (b), (c), (m), 10 and (o) of section 414 of the Internal Rev- 11 enue Code of 1986 shall apply for purposes 12 of treating persons as a single employer. 13 "(ii) EMPLOYERS NOT IN EXISTENCE 14 IN PRECEDING YEAR.-In the case of an 15 employer which was not in existence 16 throughout the preceding calendar year, 17 the determination of whether such em- 18 ployer is a small employer shall be based 19 on the average number of employees that 20 it is reasonably expected such employer 21 will employ on business days in the current 22 calendar year. 23 "(iii) PREDECESSORS.-Any reference 24 in this paragraph to an employer shall in- September 19 1996 F: EGG HCR96 MNTLHLTH.005 [Final Draft] 7 1 clude a reference to any predecessor of 2 such employer. 3 "(2) INCREASED COST EXEMPTION.-This sec- 4 tion shall not apply with respect to a group health 5 plan (or health insurance coverage offered in connec- 6 tion with a group health plan) if the application of 7 this section to such plan (or to such coverage) re- 8 sults in an increase in the cost under the plan (or 9 for such coverage) of at least 1 percent. 10 "(d) SEPARATE APPLICATION TO EACH OPTION OF- 11 FERED.-In the case of a group health plan that offers 12 a participant or beneficiary two or more benefit package 13 options under the plan, the requirements of this section 14 shall be applied separately with respect to each such op- 15 tion. 16 "(e) DEFINITIONS.-For purposes of this section: 17 "(1) AGGREGATE LIFETIME LIMIT.-The term 18 'aggregate lifetime limit' means, with respect to ben- 19 efits under a group health plan or health insurance 20 coverage, a dollar limitation on the total amount 21 that may be paid with respect to such benefits under 22 the plan or health insurance coverage with respect to 23 an individual or other coverage unit. 24 "(2) ANNUAL LIMIT.-The term 'annual limit' 25 means, with respect to benefits under a group health September 19, 1996 (7:18 p.m.) FAUGG 111.003 [Final 8 1 plan or health insurance coverage, a dollar limitation 2 on the total amount of benefits that may be paid 3 with respect to such benefits in a 12-month period 4 under the plan or health insurance coverage with re- 5 spect to an individual or other coverage unit. 6 "(3) MEDICAL OR SURGICAL BENEFITS.-The 7 term 'medical or surgical benefits' means benefits 8 with respect to medical or surgical services, as de- 9 fined under the terms of the plan or coverage (as the 10 case may be), but does not include mental health 11 benefits. 12 "(4) MENTAL HEALTH BENEFITS.-The term 13 'mental health benefits' means benefits with respect 14 to mental health services, as defined under the terms 15 of the plan or coverage (as the case may be), but 16 does not include benefits with respect to treatment 17 of substance abuse or chemical dependency. 18 "(f) SUNSET.-This section shall not apply to bene- 19 fits for services furnished on or after September 30, 20 2001." 21 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.-The table of contents 22 in section 1 of such Act, as amended by section 602 of 23 this Act, is amended by inserting after the item relating 24 to section 711 the following new item: "Sec. 712. Parity in the application of certain limits to mental health bene- fits.". F: EGG HCR96 VAHUDCON MNTLHLTH.005 [Final Draft] 9 1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.-The amendments made by 2 this section shall apply with respect to group health plans 3 for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 1998. 4 SEC. 703. AMENDMENTS TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE 5 ACT RELATING TO THE GROUP MARKET. 6 (a) IN GENERAL.-Subpart 2 of part A of title 7 XXVII of the Public Health Service Act (as added by sec- 8 tion 604(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following 9 new section: 10 "SEC. 2705. PARITY IN THE APPLICATION OF CERTAIN LIM- 11 ITS TO MENTAL HEALTH BENEFITS. 12 "(a) IN GENERAL.- 13 "(1) AGGREGATE LIFETIME LIMITS.-In the 14 case of a group health plan (or health insurance cov- 15 erage offered in connection with such a plan) that 16 provides both medical and surgical benefits and 17 mental health benefits— 18 "(A) No LIFETIME LIMIT.-If the plan or 19 coverage does not include an aggregate lifetime 20 limit on substantially all medical and surgical 21 benefits, the plan or coverage may not impose 22 any aggregate lifetime limit on mental health 23 benefits. 24 "(B) LIFETIME LIMIT.-If the plan or cov- 25 erage includes an aggregate lifetime limit on 10 1 substantially all medical and surgical benefits 2 (in this paragraph referred to as the 'applicable 3 lifetime limit'), the plan or coverage shall ei- 4 ther— 5 "(i) apply the applicable lifetime limit 6 both to the medical and surgical benefits to 7 which it otherwise would apply and to 8 mental health benefits and not distinguish 9 in the application of such limit between 10 such medical and surgical benefits and 11 mental health benefits; or ( 12 "(ii) not include any aggregate life- 13 time limit on mental health benefits that is 14 less than the applicable lifetime limit. 15 "(C) RULE IN CASE OF DIFFERENT LIM- 16 ITS.-In the case of a plan or coverage that is 17 not described in subparagraph (A) or (B) and 18 that includes no or different aggregate lifetime 19 limits on different categories of medical and 20 surgical benefits, the Secretary shall establish 21 rules under which subparagraph (B) is applied 22 to such plan or coverage with respect to mental 23 health benefits by substituting for the applica- 24 ble lifetime limit an average aggregate lifetime 25 limit that is computed taking into account the F: MNTLHLTH.005 [Final Draft] 11 1 weighted average of the aggregate lifetime lim- 2 its applicable to such categories. 3 "(2) ANNUAL LIMITS.-In the case of a group 4 health plan (or health insurance coverage offered in 5 connection with such a plan) that provides both 6 medical and surgical benefits and mental health ben- 7 efits- 8 "(A) No ANNUAL LIMIT.-If the plan or 9 coverage does not include an annual limit on 10 substantially all medical and surgical benefits, 11 the plan or coverage may not impose any an- 1 12 nual limit on mental health benefits. 13 "(B) ANNUAL LIMIT.-If the plan or cov- 14 erage includes an annual limit on substantially 15 all medical and surgical benefits (in this para- 16 graph referred to as the 'applicable annual 17 limit'), the plan or coverage shall either- 18 "(i) apply the applicable annual limit 19 both to medical and surgical benefits to 20 which it otherwise would apply and to 21 mental health benefits and not distinguish 22 in the application of such limit between 23 such medical and surgical benefits and 24 mental health benefits; or F:\EGG HCR96 12 1 "(ii) not include any annual limit on 2 mental health benefits that is less than the 3 applicable annual limit. 4 "(C) RULE IN CASE OF DIFFERENT LIM- 5 ITS.-In the case of a plan or coverage that is 6 not described in subparagraph (A) or (B) and 7 that includes no or different annual limits on 8 different categories of medical and surgical ben- 9 efits, the Secretary shall establish rules under 10 which subparagraph (B) is applied to such plan 11 or coverage with respect to mental health bene- 12 fits by substituting for the applicable annual 13 limit an average annual limit that is computed 14 taking into account the weighted average of the 15 annual limits applicable to such categories. 16 "(b) CONSTRUCTION.-Nothing in this section shall 17 be construed— 18 "(1) as requiring a group health plan (or health 19 insurance coverage offered in connection with such a 20 plan) to provide any mental health benefits; or 21 "(2) in the case of a group health plan (or 22 health insurance coverage offered in connection with 23 such a plan) that provides mental health benefits, as 24 affecting the terms and conditions (including cost 25 sharing, limits on numbers of visits or days of cov- MNTLHLTH.005 [Final Draft) 13 1 erage, and requirements relating to medical neces- 2 sity) relating to the amount, duration, or scope of 3 mental health benefits under the plan or coverage, 4 except as specifically provided in subsection (a) (in 5 regard to parity in the imposition of aggregate life- 6 time limits and annual limits for mental health bene- 7 fits). 8 "(c) EXEMPTIONS.- 9 "(1) SMALL EMPLOYER EXEMPTION.-This sec- 10 tion shall not apply to any group health plan (and 11 group health insurance coverage offered in connec- 12 tion with a group health plan) for any plan year of ITAL 13 a small employer. 14 "(2) INCREASED COST EXEMPTION.-This sec- 15 tion shall not apply with respect to a group health 16 plan (or health insurance coverage offered in connec- 17 tion with a group health plan) if the application of 18 this section to such plan (or to such coverage) re- 19 sults in an increase in the cost under the plan (or 20 for such coverage) of at least 1 percent. 21 "(d) SEPARATE APPLICATION TO EACH OPTION OF- 22 FERED.-In the case of a group health plan that offers 23 a participant or beneficiary two or more benefit package 24 options under the plan, the requirements of this section HI 005 [Final Draft] 14 1 shall be applied separately with respect to each such op- 2 tion. 3 "(e) DEFINITIONS.-For purposes of this section: 4 "(1) AGGREGATE LIFETIME LIMIT.-The term 5 'aggregate lifetime limit' means, with respect to ben- 6 efits under a group health plan or health insurance 7 coverage, a dollar limitation on the total amount 8 that may be paid with respect to such benefits under 9 the plan or health insurance coverage with respect to 10 an individual or other coverage unit. 11 "(2) ANNUAL LIMIT.-The term 'annual limit' 12 means, with respect to benefits under a group health 13 plan or health insurance coverage, a dollar limitation 14 on the total amount of benefits that may be paid 15 with respect to such benefits in a 12-month period 16 under the plan or health insurance coverage with re- 17 spect to an individual or other coverage unit. 18 "(3) MEDICAL OR SURGICAL BENEFITS.-The 19 term 'medical or surgical benefits' means benefits 20 with respect to medical or surgical services, as de- 21 fined under the terms of the plan or coverage (as the 22 case may be), but does not include mental health 23 benefits. 24 "(4) MENTAL HEALTH BENEFITS.-The term 25 'mental health benefits' means benefits with respect HCR96 VAHUDCON MNTLHLTH.005 Final Draft] 15 1 to mental health services, as defined under the terms 2 of the plan or coverage (as the case may be), but 3 does not include benefits with respect to treatment 4 of substance abuse or chemical dependency. 5 "(f) SUNSET.-This section shall not apply to bene- 6 fits for services furnished on or after September 30, 7 2001.". 8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.-The amendments made by 9 this section shall apply with respect to group health plans 10 for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 1998 i and the Senate agree to the same. 48 HOUR RULE I. 48 HOUR RULE The "Newborns' and Mothers' Protection Act of 1996" will require health plans to allow all new mothers of newborns, at their option, to remain in the hospital for at least 48 hours following most normal deliveries. II. PURPOSE Over the past two decades, the average length of stay for an uncomplicated childbirth has declined sharply. Today, a growing number of insurance companies are refusing to pay for anything more than a 24-hour stay, and as few as 8 hours. III. IMPACT This initiative will bring "peace of mind" to new mothers because they know they will not be discharged prematurely from the hospital. IV. SPECIFIC PROVISIONS Requires health plans to let mothers and newborns remain in the hospital for a minimum of 48 hours after a normal delivery and 96 hours after a Caesarean section. Shorter stays may be allowed if the attending health care provider, in consultation with the new mother, determines such a stay is appropriate. Requires follow-up care within 72 hours of discharge, if discharge occurs earlier than 48 hours after birth. The initiative will not pre-empt state legislation if states already require a minimum of 48 hour stays for normal deliveries (96 hours for Caesarean section) or meet guidelines established by the American College of Obstetricians or Gynecologists, the American Academy of Pediatrics, or certain other medical professional organizations. V. BACKGROUND Senators Bradley, Frist and Kassebaum and Representative Dingell introduced the "Newborns' and Mothers' Health Protection Act" to allow all new mothers a minimum of 48 hours of care following most normal deliveries. The President, First Lady and members of the Administration challenged Congress to pass this legislation before they adjourned. In September, Congress responded to their challenge and included this legislation on the VA/HUD appropriations bill that they sent to the President for his signature. September 25, 1996 Statements In Support of the 48 Hour Rule "I urge members of Congress to move legislation forward as soon as possible that makes this protection for mothers and their children the law of the land. No insurance company should be free to make the final judgment about what is medically best for newborns and their mothers. That decision should be left up to doctors, nurses and mothers themselves." President Bill Clinton May 11, 1996 "We should protect mothers and newborn babies from being forced out of the hospital in less than 48 hours." President Bill Clinton Democratic National Convention August 30, 1996 " the President is right to support a bill that would prohibit the practice of forcing mothers and babies to leave the hospital in less than 48 hours." Hillary Rodham Clinton Democratic National Convention August 28, 1996 "That's why I'm supporting the legislation I mentioned, dealing with not forcing new mothers and their newborns out of the hospital." President Bill Clinton September 5, 1996 "We should enact bipartisan legislation to require health insurers to let all new mothers and their babies stay in the hospital at least 48 hours following normal deliveries." President Bill Clinton September 11, 1996 September 25, 1996 MENTAL HEALTH PARITY I. MENTAL HEALTH PARITY This provision will prohibit insurers from setting separate lifetime and annual coverage limits for mental and physical illnesses. II. PURPOSE In insurance plans today, there is widespread variation in lifetime and annual caps and in other aspects of mental health care coverage. Many of these plans discriminates against individuals diagnosed with mental illness. President Clinton believes that individuals with mental illness should be treated in the same manner as those with other medical disorders. III. IMPACT This provision will provide more equitable treatment of mental health benefits under private health insurance plans. IV. SPECIFIC PROVISIONS This provision will require health plans that have a lifetime or annual limit on spending for medical or surgical services to include either mental health services in that total or have a separate limit for mental illnesses that is no more restrictive than the medical-surgical limit. The provision applies to health plans under the Federal Employee Benefit Health Plan (FEBHP) and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Businesses with 50 or fewer employees are exempt from this provision. The provision does not require health plans to cover mental illness. The provision allows for separate co-payment, deductible and visit limits from mental health treatment. The provision will take effect January 1, 1998. V. BACKGROUND The President has been a strong proponent of moving toward mental health parity. The President endorses reforms that will provide more equitable treatment of mental health benefits under private health insurance plans. The President stated his support for the Domenici/Wellstone compromise and expressed his disappointment that it was not included in the Kennedy/Kassebaum health insurance reform legislation. He also made a public commitment to work toward the passage of such legislation. September 25, 1996 Statements In Support of Mental Health Parity "I am writing to express the President's strong support for the alternative that has been proposed by Senator Domenici to prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health benefits. People with mental illness have faced discrimination in health insurance coverage for far too long, and it is time we take steps to end this inequity..." Leon Panetta July 30, 1996 " I was disappointed that the mental health provision was taken out, [of the Kennedy/Kassebaum bill] and I certainly hope we can get it as soon as possible in the future. It should remain a high priority." President Bill Clinton August 1, 1996 "I wish this bill [Kennedy/Kassebaum] had contained the provision to eliminate the differential treatment of mental health coverage, or at least taken some positive steps in that direction." President Bill Clinton August 21, 1996 "We also have to find a way to provide access to mental health benefits and health insurance. It's a very important thing for our country." President Bill Clinton August 27, 1996 "We should ensure that the Domenici/Wellstone mental health parity compromise becomes law.' " President Bill Clinton September 11, 1996 September 25, 1996 CHILDREN OF VIETNAM VETERANS BORN WITH SPINA BIFIDA I. CHILDREN OF VIETNAM VETERANS BORN WITH SPINA BIFIDA This legislation will authorize the Veterans' Administration to provide medical and rehabilitative training for children of Vietnam veterans who are born with the birth defect spina bifida. II. PURPOSE Research has shown a positive link between spina bifida exposure to Agent Orange during service in Vietnam. The President strongly believes it is appropriate that we help children whose birth defects may be a result of their father's or mother's service to this country. III. IMPACT This initiative will provide assistance to at least 2,000 spina-bifida afflicted children of Vietnam veterans. This initiative will provide about $35 million in 1997 for treatment and vocational rehabilitation, with additional funding made available in the future. IV. SPECIFIC PROVISIONS Requires the Department of Veterans Affairs to furnish needed health care to a Vietnam veteran's child who is suffering from spina bifida. Provides treatment and vocational rehabilitation to eligible children. V. BACKGROUND On May 20, 1996 you announced your intent to propose legislation to meet the needs of veterans' children afflicted with spina bifida -- the first time the offspring of American soldiers will receive benefits for combat-related health problems. The Congress responded to your challenge, through the leadership of Senator Daschle, Senator Rockefeller and Representative Evans, to pass legislation to authorize the Veterans' Administration to provide medical and rehabilitative training for children of Vietnam veterans who are born with the birth defect spina bifida. September 25, 1996 Statements In Support of Children of Vietnam Veterans Born with Spina Bifida "Our administration will also propose legislation to meet the needs of veterans' children afflicted with the birth defect, spina bifida -- the first time the offspring of American solders will receive benefits for combat-related health problems." President Bill Clinton May 20, 1996 "The President and I firmly believe that VA needs to be on the side of veterans and their children." Secretary Jesse Brown May 25, 1996 "It seems appropriate, therefore, and in the best interests of these children, that the same benefit of the doubt as is required to be given Vietnam veterans be given to their offspring, whose birth defects may be a result of their father's or mother's service to this country." Secretary Jesse Brown July 25, 1996 "We should act now to give the Veterans' Administration authority to help the children of Vietnam veterans who are born with the birth defect spina bifida." President Bill Clinton September 11, 1996 September 25, 1996 SEP-19-1996 20:11 FROM TO 94567431 P.01/08 NANCY LANDON KASSEBAUM. KANSAS. CHAIRMAN JAMES fort JESSORDS. VERMONT EDWARD M. KENNEDY. MASSACHUSCTTS DAN COATS. INDIANA CLAISORNE PELL RHODE ISLAND JUDD GREGG. NEW MAMPSHIRE CHRISTOPHER I DODD. CONNECTICUT BILL FRIST. ENNESSEE PAUL SIMON. ILLINOIS MIKE DEWINE. OHIO TOM HARKIN, IOWA JOWN ASHCROFT, MISSOURI BARBARA A, MIKULSRI, MARYLAND SPENCER ABRAHAM, MICHIGAN PAUL WELLSTONE, MINNESOTA SLADE GORTON, WASHINGTON United States Senate SUSAN < MATTAN, STAFF DIRECTOR NICK LITTLEFIELD. MINORITY STAFF DIRECTOR AND CHIEF COUNSEL COMMITTEE ON LABOR AND HUMAN RESOURCES WASHINGTON, DC 20510-6300 TO: Chris Jennings FR: David Nexon DATE & TIME: 9/19 8:20 pm NUMBER OF PAGES: COVER + 7 RETURN FAX NUMBER: (202) 224-3533 IF THERE IS TROUBLE RECEIVING THIS FAX, PLEASE CALL (202) 224-7675. MESSAGE: Changes. FAX NUMBER: 456-7431 SEP-19-1996 20:11 FROM TO 94567431 P.02/08 F:\EGG\HCR96\VAHLDCON\MHREPORT.001 Find Statement of Conferees on Senate Amendment #118 to H.R. 3666 ("Mental Health Parity Act of 1996") The conference agreement includes the Senate amendment with modifications. It incorporates the re- quirement into the new part 7 of subtitle B of title I of ERISA and the new title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act as established by Public Law 104-191. The construction clause has been modified to state that noth- ing in this section shall be construed as- (1) requiring a group health plan (or health in- surance coverage offered in connection with such a plan) to provide any mental health benefits; or (2) in the case of such a plan or coverage that provides such mental health benefits, as affecting the terms and conditions (including cost sharing, the limits on numbers of visits or days of coverage, and requirements relating to medical necessity) relating to the amount, duration, or scope of mental health benefits under the plan or coverage, except as spe- cifically provided in regard to parity in the imposi- tion of aggregate lifetime limits and annual limits for mental health benefits. This language affirms the intent of conferees that group health plans and issuers retain the flexibility, consistent with the requirements of the Act, to define the scope of September 19. 1996 (12:37 a.m.) SEP-19-1996 20:11 FROM TO 94567431 P.03/08 2 benefits, establish cost-sharing requirements, and to im- pose limits on hospital days and out-patient visits. Parity of mental health services with medical and surgical serv- ices defined under a group health plan is limited solely to any aggregate dollar life-time limit and any annual dollar limit under such a plan. The conference agreement clarifies that the requirements apply to each group health plan, and, in the case of a group health plan that offers two or more benefit packages, the parity requirements shall be applied separately with respect to each such op- tion. In addition, the conference agreement applies an ex- emption to small employers as defined in the Health In- surance Portability and Accountability Act; adds certain definitions; and applies the requirements of the provision to group health plan years beginning or or after January 1, 1998. The agreement does not include the Senate lan- guage relating to effective dates for the Federal Em- ployee Health Benefit Plan. It is the intent of the conferees that a detailed series of conforming changes shall be made as soon as possible to the Internal Revenue Code, specifically subtitle K of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as added by section 401(a) of the Health Insurance Portability and Account- ability Act of 1996), in order to fully implement these provisions as part of chapter 100 of the Code. September 19. 1996 (12:37 a.m.) SEP-19-1996 20:12 FROM TO 94567431 P.04/08 F:\EGG\HCR96VVAHUDCON\MHREPORT.001 3 The conferees intend that a limit be considered to apply to "substantially all medical and surgical benefits" if it applies to at least two-thirds of all the medical and surgical benefits covered under the group health plan's benefit package. It is the intent of the conferees that, consistent with section 704 (redesignated as section 731) of ERISA and section 2723 of the Public Health Service Act, the appli- cation of the preemption provision should permit the op- eration of any State law or provision which requires more favorable treatment of mental health benefits under health insurance coverage than that required under this section. September 19. 1996 (12:37 a.m.) TO 94567431 P.05/08 SEP-19-1996 20:12 FROM ID: PAGE 85P-18-96 18:51 FROM. 2/6 F:\EGG\HCE96\VAHUDCON\PEEEMPT02 wringebt Filer HARMP 55288 NEWBORNS: Substitute for page 6, line 19 through page 7 line 9 the following (and also in PHSA provisions): 1 "(f) PREEMPTION; EXCEPTION FOR HEALTH INSUR- 2 ANCE COVERAGE IN CHETAIN STATES- 3 "(1) IN GHNERAL-The requirements of this 4 section shall not apply with respect to health insur- 5 snce coverage if there is a State law (as defined in 6 section 731(d)(1)) for a State that regulates such 7 coverage that is described in any of the following 8 subperagraphs: 9 "(A) Such State law requires such COV- 10 erage to provide coverage for at least 48 hours 11 of hospital length of stay following & normal 12 vaginal delivery and at least 96 hours of how- 13 pital length of stay following a cesarian section. 14 "(B) Such State law requires such cov- 15 erage to provide coverage for maternity and pe- 16 diatric care in accordance with guidelines estab- 17 lished by the American College of Obstetricians 18 and Gynecologists, the American Academy of 19 Pediatrics, or other established professional 20 medical associations. 21 "(C) Such State law requires that such 22 coverage for the hospital length of stay for ma- September 19. 1996 (Print p.m.) 09-19-96 06:39PM P002 #22 SEP-19-1996 20:13 FROM TO 94567431 P.06/08 BEP-18-96 18.51 FROM. ID. PAGE 3/5 F:\EGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\PFEEMPT.003 2 1 ternity and pediatric care may not be less than 2 the coverage provided for in such guidelines un- 3 less such shorter coverage is at the rec- 4 ommendation of the attending provider in con- 5 sultation with the mother. 6 "(2) CONSTRUCTION.-Section 731(a)(1) shall 7 not be construed as superseding a State law de- 8 scribed in paragraph (1). September 19, 1998 (SVP p.m.) 09-19-96 08:39PM P003 #22 SEP-19-1996 20:13 FROM TO 94567431 P.07/08 ID: PAGE 4/6 SEP-18-96 18.51 FROM: FAEGG\HCR96\VAHUDCON\PREEMPT.008 8 Additional technical changes: (1) MENTAL HEALTH PARITY (page 6, end of line 2): Aggregation rule should be applied to ERISA small employer provision. Add a new subparagraph (C): "(C) APPLICATION OF CHETAIN RULES IN DETERMINATION or EMPLOYER SIZE.-For purposes of this paragraph- "(i) APPLICATION OF AGGREGATION EULE FOR EMPLOYERS.-all persons treat- ed as 8 single employer under subsection (b), (e), (m), or (o) of section 414 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be treated as 1 employer. "(ii) EMPLOYERS NOT IN EXISTENCE IN PRECEDING YEAR-In the case of an employer which was not in existence throughout the preceding calendar year, the determination of whether such em- player is a small employer shall be based on the average number of employees that it is reasonably expected such employer will employ on business days in the current calendar year. "(iii) PREDECESSORS.-Any reference in this paragraph to an employer shall in- September 10, 1998 (LAT p.m.) 09-19-96 06:39PM P004 #22 89% SEP-19-1996 20:14 FROM TO 94567431 P.08/08 SEP-19 96 18:51 FROM: ID: PAGE 5/5 \EGG\ECR96\VAHUDOON\PREEMPT.002 4 clude & reference to any predecessor of such employer. (2) MENTAL HEALTH PARITY (page 6, line 13), should refer to "(c)(2)" reather than "(c)" [or should refer to "the requirements of this section" rather than "subsections (a) and (c)".] (3) NEWBORNS. Strike page 7 lices 17 through 21 and conform succeeding provisions. [This would strike the following Section 732(a) of such Act (as added by section 101 of the Health Insurance Portability and Ac- countability Act of 1996 and redesignated by the preced- ing provisions of this section) is amended by inserting "(other than section 711)" after "part" September 18, 1995 (5:47 am) 09-19-96 06:39PM P005 #22