Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
120361491
label
Bosnia - July 1994 [4]
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
Source extras
naId
120361491
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
otherTitles
42-t-7585499-20130687F-004-006-2016
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
2537557d58326102
ocrText
Case Number: 2013-0687-F FOIA MARKER This is not a textual record. This is used as an administrative marker by the Clinton Presidential Library Staff. Folder Title: Bosnia - July 1994 [4] Staff Office-Individual: European Affairs-Vershbow, Alexander Original OA/ID Number: 851 Row: Section: Shelf: Position: Stack: 34 1 10 2 V Withdrawal/Redaction Sheet Clinton Library DOCUMENT NO. SUBJECT/TITLE DATE RESTRICTION AND TYPE 001a. letter Russian Foreign Minister Kozyrev to Warren Christopher. [English 07/19/1994 P1/b(1) Translation] (1 page) 001b. letter Unknown to Unknown. [Russian Translation] (3 pages) 07/19/1994 P1/b(1) 002. cable re: Contact Group NATO Reps on NMA Planning. (4 pages) 07/18/1994 Pl/b(1) 003. email White House Situation Room to Kathleen Witowksy, Alexander 07/08/1994 Pl/b(1) Vershbow, Don Kerrick et al. Subject: July 5 Bosnia Ministerial Meetings. (8 pages) 004. cable re: Bosnia: Planning to Implement Contact Group Proposals. (5 pages) 07/10/1994 P1/b(1) 005a. note Alexander Vershbow to Samuel Berger. (1 page) 07/06/1994 P1/b(1) 005b. paper Bosnia: Lifting the Arms Embargo. (10 pages) 07/1994 P1/b(1) COLLECTION: Clinton Presidential Records National Security Council European Affairs (Alexander Vershbow) OA/Box Number: 851 FOLDER TITLE: Bosnia - July 1994 [4] 2013-0687-F vz2640 RESTRICTION CODES Presidential Records Act - |44 U.S.C. 2204(a)] Freedom of Information Act - (5 U.S.C. 552(b)] PI National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA] b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA] P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office |(a)(2) of the PRA] b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of P3 Release would violate a Federal statute |(a)(3) of the PRA} an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA] P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute |(b)(3) of the FOIA] financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA] b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA] b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy |(b)(6) of the FOIA] personal privacy |(a)(6) of the PRAJ b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes |(b)(7) of the FOIA| C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of of gift. financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA] PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C. b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information 2201(3). concerning wells |(b)(9) of the FOIA] RR. Document will be reviewed upon request. 07/19/94 10:55 202 647 0555 EUR EE 002 BOSNIA-H :RZEGOVINA WHAT IS THE U.S. INTEREST? O While the Bosnia conflict dies not pose an immediate threat to our security or warrant inilateral U.S. involvement, we do have interests involved which demand that we lead the way to a workable peace agr ement and to help enforce it. Our interests include: -- preventing the spread 0 the fighting into a broader European war that could threaten both Allies and the stability of newly demo ratic states in Central and Eastern Europe, and leal to serious rifts with Russia; -- proving that NATO can E ill be a credible force for peace in the post-Cold tar era, in this first ever involvement of NATO out lide a NATO country; -- stemming the destabiliz ng flow of refugees from the conflict and helping to stop the slaughter of innocents. WHAT ARE WE DOING? Politically C On July 5, the Contact Grou we established in March (composed of U.S. Russian EU, and UN representatives) presented the Bosnian side with a territorial package that would form part of a S ttlement preserving Bosnia as a single union within interna ionally recognized borders. -- The package, which woul place 51 percent of Bosnia under the control of th Bosniac-Croat Federation and 49 percent under the CC trol of the Bosnian Serbs, contains incentives for both sides to encourage acceptance of peace. -- Incentives for the Fede ation, should it accept the plan, include internati nal assistance with settlement implementation and help with reconstruction. -- Incentives for the Bosn an Serbs, should they accept the plan and pull back O within 19 percent of the Bosnian territory, incl de phased suspension of UN economic sanctions agai st Serbia. -- If the Serbs reject the map, Ministers agreed to apply gradually escalating pr. ssure through extension of exclusion zones to othe safe areas, new exclusion zones, and stricter enf recement of existing zones. UUJ -- They also agreed that a; a last resort, a decision by the Security Council to lift the arms embargo could become unavoidable. The efforts of the Contact ;roup that led up to the July Ministerial include a preli inary Ministerial in May, which set out agreed principles and parameters to guide a Bosnia settlement and served as a lemonstration OE international unity and resolve to bring thout peace in the region. In February and March, we b okered the Federation agreement between the Bosnian government and members of the Bosnian Croat minority. The Federa ion Agreement has improved the prospects for an overall se tlement, helped end the fighting in central Bosnia, and reopened humanitarian convoy routes. Working with and through the UN Security Council, we are helping to maintain one of :he most thorough sanctions regimes in history on Serbia. We are committed to seeing hat those responsible for war crimes are brought to justime. Strategically. We have long indicated our villingness, under certain conditions, to help impleme it a final peace settlement in Bosnia. We have taken a leadership ole in all key NATO decisions on the Bosnian crisis. Specifically, we led the way on: -- the June 10, 1993 decis on to provide close air support to UNPROFOR troops unde attack; -- the August 9, 1993 decision to threaten the use of air power in the event of Serb strangulation of Sarajevo and other safe areas; -- the February 9, 1994 le : ision Lo establish an exclusion zone around Sarajevo; -- the April 22, 1994 decision to establish an exclusion zone around Gorazde. O We have deployed troops to the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia as part of the UN 'ROFOR force in the area to prevent spillover of the conflict. 0 We have warned Milosevic that we will respond in the event of Serb-inspired violence il Kosovo. On the humanitarian front 0 We have provided the larges : quantity of humanitarian assistance to the region of any nation. U Tu date, the U.S. Governmen has contributed over $530 million in humanitarian ass slance since our efforts to assist the former Yugoslavi began in FY 1991. The U.S. is the major single-mation fool donor, has performed over three-quarters of all airdrops, and has transported over 30,000 metric tons of aid b. airlift to Sarajevo. We also participate in a me lical evacuation program which has brought 264 patients (2.14 adults and 60 children) with 152 family members to the United States, and have admitted over 5000 Bosnians as part f our refugee resettlement program. On the other hand, we recog tize that Bosnia is a first and foremost a European problem on which our European allies have quite properly taken t le lead. Our negotiating initiative is based on earl er EU efforts to reinvigorate the settlement process and roduce a final settlement. Is aid getting through? What in e humanitarian conditions like? O Since the Federation Agreem nt was signed in March, humanitarian conditions hav improved in much of the areas controlled by the Bosnian 9 vernment and the Bosnian Croats. Relief convoys are reaching territory held by the government and the Bosnian :roats from the Croatian coast with only minor difficultie Conditions are less stable n isolated areas. Although fairly well-supplied now, E. :cess to Sarajevo and the eastern enclaves (Goražde, :rebrenica and Zepa) is controlled by the Bosnian S rbs who can and do periodically prevent aid from getting th ough as they did during their assoult upon Goražde in Apr 1. All areas of Bosnia appear .0 have sufficient food to meet basic subsistence needs. Relief efforts by air are e so coordinated by UNICR. Airlift operations continue to Sarajevo. Airdrops have been scaled down due to the the increasing availability of relief commodities delivere by road to nearly all areas and are currently being cor ucted on an as-needed basis. 0 Work continues on the repai of public utilities in Sarajevo, and nearly all of the city's residents now receive water, electricity ind natural gas for several hours each day. Why not just lift the arms emba go on Bosnia? 0 Unilaterally lifting the ar is embargo would be a tragic mistake that would undermine the settlement process. This step would break the cohesion of the NATO Alliance, risk a controntation with Russia, and erode the effectiveness of other UN sanctions against itates like Libya and Irag. We may well reach the point where the international community decides to lift the arms empargo, but now is not the time. The Senate's decision to re ect the Dole amendment was a wise move that has already olstered our diplomatic efforts. drafted: EUR/EE/BCG: SDremner/JMc re SEEEYYUG 8684 x72452 6/22/94 (I vised) cleared: EUR: AVershbow EUR/EE: :TSnell/RErdman C:TLoar IO/PHO: AKelleran PM/ISP: SIngalsbe RP/A/O:KFoster RP/ENSA:MMetrinko AID/EN1/EUR/FY:WErdahl AID/BHR/OFDA: TDolan EUR/RPM: DMcElhaney PA: PBass P:DRussell S/P: SFlanagan Vershbow, Alexander R. From: Jonathan H Spalter To: VERSHBOA Cc: RECORDS@A1@OEOB Subject: new bosnia guidance Date: Thursday, July 21, 1994 2:42PM KOREA New Developments - US officials will meet with North Korean representatives at 11:00am in New York to discuss date for resumption of talks. -- Bob Gallucci is in Seoul, and will be visiting Tokyo, Beijing and Moscow for consultations on North Korea. Met with President Kim, and other senior leaders. - Dan Poneman briefed President Ford yesterday in Colorado. -- There is action on the Hill through Dole/Murkowski amendment and Stark amendment to constrain US flexibility in dealing with North Korea. Guidance to come. Key Themes -- Based on North Korea's commitment to freeze major elements of its nuclear program during a new round of talks between our nations, we agreed to resume talks on July 8. -- The death of Kim II Sung adds a new element of uncertainty to the picture. - We will have discussions today with the North Koreans through the New York channel on a date to resume the talks. -- We shall continue to be steady, persistent and pragmatic in proliferation regime. - We will continue to press for full North Korean compliance with the NPT, IAEA and the North-South denuclearization agreement in the context of our overall settlement. -- At the same time, we will continue to ensure that we meet our security commitments to the Republic of Korea. We will take whatever prudent measures are necessary for the Page 1 defense of our forces in South Korea and to assist in the defense of that nation. On New York Talks -- State Department officials are meeting this morning with North Korean representatives in New York to discuss a date for resumption of talks. I have no read-out at this time. On Succession -- There is no reason to believe that there will not be a transition to Kim Jong il. @ -- We hope that North Korea will quickly resume the dialogue they had begun with us under Kim il Song. On supplying a new reactor to North Korea -- In the second round of talks with the United States last graphite nuclear technology to light-water technology. Recently, North Korea has reiterated this position. -- We welcomed that proposed shift to a nuclear program less suited to nuclear weapons production, and plan to address this issue in the third round. (If Pressed) - We have never said that the United States would supply North Korea a reactor, rather that we would help them make the transition to a less dangerous technology. On North-South Dialogue - We understand that the summit has been delayed and that the two sides will need to work out the details. (If Pressed) - Obviously this is a period of uncertainty but it is in everyone's interest to see that dialogue continue. @ BOSNIA New Developments -- The Bosnian Serb response is generally being viewed as a "no" by the Contact Group. -- Bosnian President Izbetgovic, according to Reuters, told a Page 2 news conference that his government has withdrawn its unconditional acceptance in light of Serb's refusal to accept the plan. We are seeking clarification. -- The Contact Group will report to their foreign ministers on the responses. The report and next steps will be discussed in a ministerial which will convene on or near July 30th. -- We understand the Russians will continue to work with the Bosnian Serbs over the next ten days to urge them to reconsider. -- In Sarajevo, on July 21, a US C-141 aircraft participating in the UNHCR-led airlift of humanitarian aid was hit by a single shot of small arms fire. Damage was minor. Aircraft continued on to Split. Expect airlift to continue after normal suspension. On the Parties Responses -- Bosnian Serbs have regrettably not accepted the plan. - We are seeking clarification of recent reports Izbetgovic is withdrawing his unconditional acceptance. (If Pressed) - We understand the Russians will continue to urge the Bosnian Serbs to reconsider their response before the ministerial convenes on the 30th. -- We certainly hope the Serbs will accept the Contact Group proposal before the ministers meet. It is up to the Serbs. On Next Steps -- We intend to continue the course we have charted with our Contact Group partners, with the proposed map remaining the basis for an agreement. - Now the issue is being referred to the foreign ministers of the Contact Group, who will meet on the 30th to consider next steps. -- As we have said, there will be consequences for rejecting the plan. -- Our Contact Group representatives will continue to work on the incentives and disincentives package so that the ministers will be able to make decisions on next steps when they meet at the end of the month. @ Page 3 -- The necessary planning is underway at the UN and in NATO so that we will be in a position to implement the ministers' decisions. On the Attack on the US C-141 in Sarajevo. -- Initial reports indicate that one American was injured. No further information is available at this time. Responsibility for the attack is not known. - UN investigation is underway. -- Condemn senseless acts that impede a humanitarian mission and endangers lives of crews. Key Themes -- United States, Germany, Britain, France and Russia -- members of the Contact Group -- agreed on a realistic territorial proposal as a basis for a political settlement to the Bosnian conflict. - The proposal would preserve Bosnia-Herzegovina as a single union within its internationally recognized borders, while providing viable territory for the Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian Croats. - It would significantly roll back Bosnian Serb territorial gains and "ethnic cleansing," while providing a reasonable territory for the Serb people within Bosnia. -- The proposal is not perfect but we shouldn't make the best the enemy of the good. If war continues, there will be more killing, more ethnic cleansing and more human suffering. -- Contact Group Foreign Ministers agreed on incentives and disincentives to encourage the parties to accept the proposal and make clear the serious consequences if they do not. -- The Bosnian Serbs could now face increased pressure, including as a last resort, a lifting the arms embargo against the Bosnian Government. -- We hope they will both seize this opportunity for peace. Page 4 Withdrawal/Redaction Marker Clinton Library DOCUMENT NO. SUBJECT/TITLE DATE RESTRICTION AND TYPE 001a. letter Russian Foreign Minister Kozyrev to Warren Christopher. [English 07/19/1994 P1/b(1) Translation] (1 page) COLLECTION: Clinton Presidential Records National Security Council European Affairs (Alexander Vershbow) OA/Box Number: 851 FOLDER TITLE: Bosnia July 1994 [4] 2013-0687-F vz2640 RESTRICTION CODES Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)] Freedom of Information Act - 15 U.S.C. 552(b)] PI National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA| b(1) National security classified information |(b)(1) of the FOIA P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office |(a)(2) of the PRA] b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of P3 Release would violate a Federal statute |(a)(3) of the PRA] an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA| P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA] financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA] b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy |(b)(6) of the FOIA] personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA] b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA] C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of of gift. financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA] PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C. b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information 2201(3). concerning wells |(b)(9) of the FOIA) RR. Document will be reviewed upon request. Withdrawal/Redaction Marker Clinton Library DOCUMENT NO. SUBJECT/TITLE DATE RESTRICTION AND TYPE 001b. letter Unknown to Unknown. [Russian Translation] (3 pages) 07/19/1994 P1/b(1) COLLECTION: Clinton Presidential Records National Security Council European Affairs (Alexander Vershbow) OA/Box Number: 851 FOLDER TITLE: Bosnia - July 1994 [4] 2013-0687-F vz2640 RESTRICTION CODES Presidential Records Act - |44 U.S.C. 2204(a)] Freedom of Information Act [5 U.S.C. 552(b)] P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA] b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA] P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA] b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of P3 Release would violate a Federal statute ((a)(3) of the PRA an agency |(b)(2) of the FOIA] P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute |(b)(3) of the FOIA] financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA] b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President information |(b)(4) of the FOIA] and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA] b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy |(b)(6) of the FOIA] personal privacy |(a)(6) of the PRA] b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes |(b)(7) of the FOIA] C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of of gift. financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA] PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C. b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information 2201(3). concerning wells |(b)(9) of the FOIA] RR. Document will be reviewed upon request. Withdrawal/Redaction Marker Clinton Library DOCUMENT NO. SUBJECT/TITLE DATE RESTRICTION AND TYPE 002. cable re: Contact Group NATO Reps on NMA Planning. (4 pages) 07/18/1994 P1/b(1) COLLECTION: Clinton Presidential Records National Security Council European Affairs (Alexander Vershbow) OA/Box Number: 851 FOLDER TITLE: Bosnia July 1994 [4] 2013-0687-F vz2640 RESTRICTION CODES Presidential Records Act - |44 U.S.C. 2204(a)] Freedom of Information Act - 15 U.S.C. 552(b)] PI National Security Classified Information |(a)(1) of the PRA] b(1) National security classified information |(b)(1) of the FOIAJ P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office |(a)(2) of the PRA] b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA] an agency |(b)(2) of the FOIA| P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA] financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President information |(b)(4) of the FOIA] and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA] b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy |(b)(6) of the FOIA| personal privacy |(a)(6) of the PRA| b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA| C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of of gift. financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA] PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C. b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information 2201(3). concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA] RR. Document will be reviewed upon request. Withdrawal/Redaction Marker Clinton Library DOCUMENT NO. SUBJECT/TITLE DATE RESTRICTION AND TYPE 003. email White House Situation Room to Kathleen Witowksy, Alexander 07/08/1994 P1/b(1) Vershbow, Don Kerrick et al. Subject: July 5 Bosnia Ministerial Meetings. (8 pages) COLLECTION: Clinton Presidential Records National Security Council European Affairs (Alexander Vershbow) OA/Box Number: 851 FOLDER TITLE: Bosnia - July 1994 [4] 2013-0687-F vz2640 RESTRICTION CODES Presidential Records Act - 144 U.S.C. 2204(a)] Freedom of Information Act - 15 U.S.C. 552(b)] P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRAJ b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA] P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of P3 Release would violate a Federal statute |(a)(3) of the PRA| an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA] P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute |(b)(3) of the FOIA] financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA] b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] and his advisors, or between such advisors |a)(5) of the PRAJ b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy |(b)(6) of the FOIA] personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA] b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA] C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of of gift. financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA| PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C. b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information 2201(3). concerning wells |(b)(9) of the FOIA] RR. Document will be reviewed upon request. Withdrawal/Redaction Marker Clinton Library DOCUMENT NO. SUBJECT/TITLE DATE RESTRICTION AND TYPE 004. cable re: Bosnia: Planning to Implement Contact Group Proposals. (5 pages) 07/10/1994 P1/b(1) COLLECTION: Clinton Presidential Records National Security Council European Affairs (Alexander Vershbow) OA/Box Number: 851 FOLDER TITLE: Bosnia July 1994 [4] 2013-0687-F vz2640 RESTRICTION CODES Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)] Freedom of Information Act - 15 U.S.C. 552(b)] P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA] b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA] P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of P3 Release would violate a Federal statute |(a)(3) of the PRA] an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA] P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA] financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA| b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] and his advisors, or between such advisors |a)(5) of the PRA b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy |(b)(6) of the FOIA] personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA] b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA] C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of of gift. financial institutions |(b)(8) of the FOIA] PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C. b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information 2201(3). concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA] RR. Document will be reviewed upon request. July 5 Bosnia Ministerial O Very encouraged by results of Tuesday's Ministerial meeting on Bosnia. Peace process has reached a decisive point. United States, European Union and Russia -- members of the Contact Group -- agreed on a realistic territorial proposal as a basis for a political settlement to the Bosnian conflict. -- Proposal would preserve Bosnia-Herzegovina as a single union within its internationally recognized borders, while providing viable territory for the Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian Croats. -- It would significantly roll back Bosnian Serb territorial gains and "ethnic cleansing," while providing a reasonable territory for the Serb people within Bosnia. In addition to approving the proposed territorial solution, Ministers also agreed on a range of incentives and disincentives for the parties to encourage them to accept the proposal, and to make clear the serious consequences if they do not. -- In the event the Bosnian Serbs reject the proposal, it was agreed that they would face increased pressure to reconsider, including the option, as a last resort, of lifting the arms embargo against the Bosnian Government. -- Unprecedented international solidarity underpinning this effort. The Contact Group presented the proposal to the parties today (Wednesday) in Geneva, and they have two weeks to consider it. We hope they will both seize the opportunity for peace. Withdrawal/Redaction Marker Clinton Library DOCUMENT NO. SUBJECT/TITLE DATE RESTRICTION AND TYPE 005a. note Alexander Vershbow to Samuel Berger. (1 page) 07/06/1994 P1/b(1) COLLECTION: Clinton Presidential Records National Security Council European Affairs (Alexander Vershbow) OA/Box Number: 851 FOLDER TITLE: Bosnia - July 1994 [4] 2013-0687-F vz2640 RESTRICTION CODES Presidential Records Act - |44 U.S.C. 2204(a)| Freedom of Information Act - 15 U.S.C. 552(b)| P1 National Security Classified Information |(a)(1) of the PRA| b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA] P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA] b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA] an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA| P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA] financial information |(a)(4) of the PRAJ b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] and his advisors, or between such advisors |a)(5) of the PRA| b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy |(b)(6) of the FOIA] personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRAJ b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA] C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of of gift. financial institutions |(b)(8) of the FOIA] PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C. b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information 2201(3). concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA] RR. Document will be reviewed upon request. Withdrawal/Redaction Marker Clinton Library DOCUMENT NO. SUBJECT/TITLE DATE RESTRICTION AND TYPE 005b. paper Bosnia: Lifting the Arms Embargo. (10 pages) 07/1994 P1/b(1) COLLECTION: Clinton Presidential Records National Security Council European Affairs (Alexander Vershbow) OA/Box Number: 851 FOLDER TITLE: Bosnia July 1994 [4] 2013-0687-F vz2640 RESTRICTION CODES Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)] Freedom of Information Act - 15 U.S.C. 552(b)] P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA] b(1) National security classified information |(b)(1) of the FOIA] P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office |(a)(2) of the PRA| b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of P3 Release would violate a Federal statute |(a)(3) of the PRA| an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA] P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute |(b)(3) of the FOIA| financial information |(a)(4) of the PRA] b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President information |(b)(4) of the FOIA| and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA| b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA| personal privacy |(a)(6) of the PRA) b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes |(b)(7) of the FOIA| C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of of gift. financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA| PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C. b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information 2201(3). concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA] RR. Document will be reviewed upon request. BOSNIA: CONTACT GROUP PROPOSAL Q: The Contact Group has presented a take-it-or-leave-it plan to the Bosnian parties -- a plan that basically ratifies ethnic cleansing in several areas. Could you explain how you're thinking shifted on this, how you came to believe that stopping the war was more important than taking the moral high ground? A: We have said from the very beginning that the Bosnian tragedy can only be ended at the negotiating table and not on the battlefield. This has always meant that there would have to be a compromise of some kind. But we have also said from the start that the Bosnian Government -- and the Bosnian Muslims in particular have been the main victims in this war, and that a settlement has to meet their needs as a first priority. The Contact Group proposal is consistent with these principles: It would preserve Bosnia-Herzegovina as a single union within its internationally recognized borders. It would provide an economically viable territory for the Muslim-Croat Federation, including access to the sea. It would significantly roll back Bosnian Serb territorial gains and ethnic cleansing. The Serbs, who now occupy over 70 percent of Bosnia, would have to settle for 49 percent of the land. Most areas which had a Muslim or Croat majority under the 1991 census would be within the Muslim-Croat Federation. No, the proposal isn't perfect. Some ethnic cleansing would not be reversed. But this would have been the case under the Bosnian Government's own proposals of last fall, which accepted the idea of a territorial compromise with separate Muslim, Croat and Serb entities. The fact that President Izetbegovic and Prime Minister Silajdzic have recommended approval of the proposal by their Parliament indicates that the Bosnians themselves recognize it is a reasonable and realistic compromise. It is also important to remember that this is the first peace plan that is supported strongly by the U.S., Russia and the European Union, and is backed up by a commitment to strong action to see the process through. -- If the parties agree to the plan, we have pledged to help implement the settlement and to contribute to Bosnia's reconstruction. -- In the event the Bosnian Serbs reject the plan, however, we, the Russians and the Europeans have agreed that the Serbs will face increased pressure to reconsider. This includes the option, as a last resort, of lifting the arms embargo against the Bosnian Government. We shouldn't make the best the enemy of the good. If the war continues, there will be more killing, more ethnic cleansing, more human suffering for the besieged peoples of Bosnia. And we don't think the Bosnian Government could achieve as good a result by military means, even if the arms embargo were lifted. In sum, the Contact Group proposal represents a good deal for the Bosnian Government, one that rolls back a lot of Serb ethnic cleansing. And it is the first international proposal that includes the leverage to encourage the parties to accept. We are encouraged by the Bosnian Government's positive reaction, and call on the Serbs to seize the opportunity for peace. CC: Records ( RECORDS ) CC: Alexander R. Vershbow ( VERSHBOW ) Contact Group's Peace Plan Compared to Areas of Control, July 1994 Hungary Serbia and Montenego have asserted ZAGREB the formation of joint Independent Slovenia state, but this entity has not been * formally recognized 05 a stote by the United States. Croatia Vojvodina (autonomous province) Prijedor Federation Federation Bihac Banja Luka Brcko Doboj Serb Proposed Joint Croat/ Serb Muslim control Tuzla Kljuc area Zvornik Jajce Proposed Federation Serbia Bosnia)and Srebrenica* area Herzegovina Zepa SARAJEVO Federation Sarajevo district * under UN Gorazde supervision UN-patrolled area Adriatic Serb Mostar Sea I Serb-controlled area Montenegro Croat-controlled area Muslim-controlled area Croatia Muslim separatist- PODGORICA controlled area * 0 40 Kilometers Albania 0 40 Miles 732754 (R00389) 7-94 Contact Group's Peace Plan Compared to Areas of Control, July 1994 Hungary Serbia and Montenegro have asserted ZAGREB the formation of joint independent Slovenia state, but this entity has not been * formally recognized 03 state by the United States. Croatia Vojvodina (autonomous province) Prijedor Federation Federation Bihac Banja Luka Brcko Doboj Serb Proposed Joint Croat/ Serb Muslim control Tuzla Kljuc area Zvornik Jajce Proposed Federation Serbia Bosnialand Srebrenica area Herzegovina Zepa SARAJEVO Federation Sarajevo district * under UN Gorazde supervision UN-patrolled area Adriatic Serb Mostar Sea I Serb-controlled area Montenegro Croat-controlled area Muslim-controlled area Croatia Muslim separatist- PODGORICA controlled area * 0 40 Kilometers Albania 0 40 Miles 732754 (R00389) 7-94