Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
55030683
label
Drug Czar
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
Source extras
naId
55030683
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
otherTitles
42-t-7431965-20110584F-003-007-2017
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
16de28bc88c08b8f
ocrText
FOIA Number: 2011-0584-F FOIA MARKER This is not a textual record. This is used as an administrative marker by the William J. Clinton Presidential Library Staff. Collection/Record Group: Clinton Presidential Records Subgroup/Office of Origin: Communications Series/Staff Member: Mark Gearan Subseries: OA/ID Number: 7548 FolderID: Folder Title: Drug Czar Stack: Row: Section: Shelf: Position: S 90 4 10 3 vo≥2 22 home of Drug Control THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON February 8, 1994 Memorandum for Mack McLarty From: Mark Gearan Subject: Drug Policy Roll-Out Summary. This memo outlines the plans for unveiling the President's new drug control strategy. As you know, the President will announce the strategy on Wednesday, February 9. Preliminary Briefings. Yesterday, the Office of National Drug Control Policy ("ONDCP") held a pre-briefing on the strategy for reporters who generally cover drug policy. A New York Times story from that briefing is attached. Morning Shows. Lee Brown will appear on morning shows Wednesday to preview the drug strategy. The Drug Strategy Announcement. The President and Lee Brown will unveil the plan itself Wednesday morning at a Prince George's County Correctional Center. Secretaries Reno, Shalala, Bentsen, Riley and Pena are tentatively scheduled to attend; they will do follow-up events on Thursday, February 10. Follow-Up White House Briefing. After the announcement on Wednesday, Lee Brown will brief the White House press corps on details of the strategy. Congressional Testimony. Lee Brown will testify to Congress on Thursday, February 10 and do ancillary briefings for the congressional press corps. Anti-Legalization Op-Ed. The Communications Department has been working with ONDCP on an op-ed reiterating the administration's opposition to the legalization of drugs. We will try to place that op-ed later this week. Talking Points. Talking points and a fact sheet are being finalized and will be distributed to senior staff and the Cabinet tomorrow morning. Please let me know if you have any thoughts or suggestions about this plan. Anti-Drug Effort President Plans to Raise Drug Treatment Budget By JOSEPH B. TREASTER Specialio The New York Times WASHINGTON, Feb. 7 - Following Biden said. through on a campaign promise, Presi- The budget for the 1994 fiscal year, dent Clinton today proposed a sharp which Mr. Clinton proposed last March, increase in spending for drug treat- varied little from the approach taken ment and programs to prevent drug by his Republican predecessors; abuse. spending was to increase to $13 billion Despite the spending increases for from $12.2 billion in the last budget prevention and treatment, most of the submitted by President Bush for the $13.2 billion for anti-drug programs 1993 fiscal year, but Congress ap- would go toward law enforcement. proved only $12.1 billion. Mr. Clinton budgeted $5.4 billion for This year, the Administration and drug prevention and treatment, up some Democratic members of Con- about 20 percent from the $4.5 billion gress are more optimistic. approved by Congress last year. That "I think this year, with greater em- increase would give prevention and phasis on crime and drugs, there is an treatment 41 percent of the budget. understanding that while punishment Mr. Clinton also proposed Increasing is warranted, treatment has been terri- the spending for law enforcement to bly underfunded," said Representative $7.8 billion, accounting for 59 percent of Charles E. Schumer, the Brooklyn the budget. Democrat who is chairman of the Over all, the anti-drug budget would House Subcommittee on Crime and rise by 9 percent from the $12.1 billion Criminal Justice. "And I think Con- approved by Congress for the current gress will stick with these numbers," fiscal year. he said. 'A Significant Move' Last October, Mr. Clinton said that In addition to the proposal for the he intended to make drug prevention anti-drug budget made public today, and treatment programs a hallmark of the Administration is asking for nearly his Administration, with emphasis on $1 billion for drug treatment and edu- heavy drug users who consume most of cation programs as part of an anti- the illegal drugs and are responsible crime package that would spend $22.3 for a high proportion of drug-related crime. billion over five years. But he was criticized at the time for "This is a significant move toward putting resources where the need is not spelling out how he would divide his greatest," said Dr. Herbert D. Kleber, budget to convert his goals into reality. who resigned as President George Today, Mr. Brown said Mr. Clinton's Bush's deputy directory of the National drug strategy promised "dramatic Drug Policy Office, where he was the change, and that is reflected in the chief aide for health and education, budget." after his requests for such Increases Some experts had been skeptical of went unheeded Mr. Clinton's drug plan last fall, partly Lee P. Brown, Mr. Clinton's principal because he had followed President aide on drug policy, said the increase in Bush so closely in drafting his first spending for prevention and treatment anti-drug budget. Moreover, Mr. Bush, represented a "fundamental change in like Mr. Clinton, often spoke of the the way the nation responds to the drug importance of drug treatment, but con- problem." tinued to spend much more for law But he emphasized that for the Clin- enforcement ton Administration, like the Bush and In his last budget, for example, Mr. Reagan Administrations, law enforce- Bush increased law enforcement ment remained an important part of spending by 8.6 percent and spending the country's drug strategy. on health-related issues by 8.8 percent, but that still left law enforcement with "We're providing not only a signifi- 68 percent of the budget. But the split in cant increase in drug treatment capac- Mr. Clinton's budget is ity," Mr. Brown said in an afternoon about the same split as in the last anti- briefing, "but also solid support for drug budget submitted by President law-enforcement activity." Jimmy Carter for the 1981 fiscal year. While Mr. Clinton proposed a 3 per- Drug treatment experts estimate the cent increase in spending for enforce- number of heavy drug users in the ment, his budget calls for reducing by country at from four million six mil- about $100 million the $1.2 billion spent lion. There are now programs to treat last year in trying to stop smugglers at 1.4 million of them, but Mr. Clinton's the borders and on the seas and in- drug budget would provide treatment creasing by about the same amount, to for 74,000 more men and women. In a total of $400 million the amount spent addition, the crime bill would enable on trying to counter drugs in the coun- 66,000 more to enter treatment. tries in Latin America and Asia that Peter Reuter, a drug expert who produce them. teaches public affairs and criminology "I think this is a good strategic at the University of Maryland, said the move," said Senator Joseph R. Biden Administration may be expanding in Jr., the Delaware Democrat who is these areas "as much as they responsi- chairman of the Judiciary Committee. bly can in one year." "The major thrust toward more em- "You can't double these programs phasis on treatment and prevention is overnight," he said. "You can't pump what we've been arguing we should be that much money out efficiently in one doing for the past four years," Mr. year." THE NEW YORK TIMES, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 1994 hee Brown file: DRUGS (I.) I. Dizug Strategy release by 9/27 (i.) 1. demand : primary objective meaningful dung threat healthcare hard cone drug use; pregrant in lcids (2.) amy related Wolence must be reduced (3) promote safe school midrate (3.) locus on what works. Reject effort to legalize. make clean Admin statement. Law enf + Intelligen duplication. Better condination. Research 4 4 hatl cooperation II) Rearthonization of ONDCP - by Fall "New looh". H/S hearings End a Sept. III.) Interagency effats + overlap Durg timent $ - compaign procrise of t'meat on demand. Ferer timent slots in Cliuton first 2yrs than Bush. - Rec'dtn to my. interdiction - Intelligence gathering - averlap probs noted I impr - tad dury enfercement NPR noted need of consolidation - Criminal pists Dug Timest POTUS: ABC newsclip an commity policing-Tiftan, GA Drug Cza 76 MEMORANDUM Dug TO: FROM: Mark Andre Gearan Oliver Ao. RE: Lee Brown Confirmation DATE: 10 May 1993 Here's an update on Lee Brown's confirmat 1) Confirmation Team As you know, Scott Green, a "special government employee," will take the lead on preparing Brown for the confirmation process. Scott will work with Nester Davidson, Tracey Thornton and Paul Carey on legislative liaison; Bill Kennedy and Ron Klain from counsel; Steve Hilton on public liaison; Jose Cerda on policy matters; Jennifer, Ricia and myself as needed. The team held an overview meeting with Brown on Friday to walk him through the confirmation process and begin a preparation strategy. 2) Hearing Schedule There are two likely dates for confirmation hearings: May 25-26 and June 8-9. If the FBI report is completed by next Monday, the committee could hold hearings and have a floor vote prior to its Memorial Day recess. Otherwise, we're looking at a mid-June confirmation. 3) Briefings Lee returns to Washington on Wednesday to meet with Senator Biden and pay courtesy calls to other Judiciary Committee members. He will also receive policy briefings from Carol Rasco/Jose Cerda, Dick Canas (NSC) and Bernie Arons of the Health Care Working Group. EOM. MEMORANDUM day (zan yre TO: Dee Dee Arthur FROM: Andre RE: Drug Use -- Emergency Room Visits DATE: 22 April 1993 HHS will likely release a quarterly report in the near future -- called the DAWN Survey -- that shows an increase in cocaine and heroin use in hospital emergency room visits. Once released, the report will likely receive attention as further evidence of a pattern of increased drug abuse nationally. (You should note that the report is already in certain hands in the Congress). Attached are talking points which I asked Jose Cerda to prepare in response to these statistics. Please call Jose or myself with any questions you may have. attachment CC: MDG TO: Andrea FR: Jose RE: Suggested DAWN Response ≈: Today, the quarterly Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) numbers indicated that cocaine and heroin hospital mentions have increased yet again. Given these numbers, how can the President justify his inaction on the drug issue -- let alone his delay in appointing a Drug Czar? A: The DAWN numbers show that our hospitals continue to see cocaine and heroine overdoses in record numbers particularly among older drug users (35 and up) -- and the President is concerned about this trend. But this data confirms what we've known for more than a year now -- that hardcore drug use is or the rise. The President knows that hardcore drug use must be addressed if we are to get at the root of the drug problem. Hardcore users haven't been focused on in the past, and they have remained a problem. That's why the President requested $2.8 billion for (one 4 (.6rh drug treatment and treatment research in his budget, an increase of $172 million (7%). We need to dramatically increase treatment availability -- and then demand that hardcore addicts get treatment. Demanding that hardcore addicts get treatment is where the President's policing initiative comes in. By increasing the number of police in our streets in community policing roles, we can directly confrout hardcore drug use and drug dealers. Community policing strategies have been proven to help close down drug markets and to help identify problem addicts that should get treatment. Finally, the President's Health Care Task Force is considering drug treatment options as part of its effort to reform our national health care system. This represents a completely new direction in drug policy and would do more over the long term to expand drug treatment to all addicts. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON Drog April 14, 1993 Czar Dr. Lee Brown Texas Southern University 3100 Cleburne file Houston, TX 77004 Dear Lee: It was a pleasure speaking with you today. I appreciate your input on the drug policy office, and more importantly, want you to know that the President would value your stewardship of this important office. I'd also like to address a couple of your questions regarding the authority and "impact" of the office. The specific statutory functions of the ONDCP are also attached for your review. The "Drug Czar" has several operational responsibilities for anti-drug programs within the ONDCP, as well as those implemented at the agency level. For example, the two largest accounts in the ONDCP are the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTA) Program and Special Forfeiture Funds. These accounts give the Director the discretion to direct federal resources to priority anti-drug efforts on a national, state or local level. We expect these funds to exceed $110 million in fiscal year '94. In addition, the Director is charged with coordinating and overseeing drug policy and programs involving approximately 50 federal agencies and 12 cabinet departments. This includes certifying agency drug control budgets, to ensure that they are adequate to accomplish the national drug control objectives formulated by the Drug Czar. As we discussed, the President plans to designate the Director as a member of his cabinet, to give drug policy and its execution the highest attention in the White House. Let me say personally that we are anxious to get to work on the reorganization and policy direction with the leadership of the Director. -2- Lee, thanks again for your consideration. I look forward to speaking with you again soon, and trust you will not hesitate to contact me on any matters of concern. Sincerely Marl D. Graian Mark D. Gearan Deputy Chief of Staff CMD6 TO: Dee Dee David Itshio 868 FR: Jose RE: General Drug Budget Talking Points 301 296 2990 Froz(4) DA: April 7, 1993 Dee Dee, enclosed please find the generic drug funding talking points that DPC has been using to date. If you think you'll need more specific information about line items in the drug budget, I'm happy to put something together, run it by Carol Rasco and get it to you. NB: The Drug Budget represents a compilation of proposed agency expenditures that are "scored" as "drug-related". In many instances, only partial program expenditures, salaries, etc., are scored as part of the drug budget. Thus, drug budget totals do not necessarily match the genera! budget document. OLIVER Jo: AMORE R CAN you DELIVER No ANSWER Dwg Gar DEE DEE. @ PRESS. file SUGGESTED DRUG BUDGET TALKING POINTS ≈: President Clinton's Drug Budget ($13.041 billion) Is no different than what was enacted under the previous administration ($12.210). It basically retains the current supply/demand ratio (63.7/36.3). A: NO -- if drug treatment is incorporated as a basic service in a national health care plan, we will have dramatically increased -- and helped to de-stigmatize -- drug treatment availability. In addition, the investment package includes $1.5 billion over the next four years to help meet the "treatment shortfall". The soon-to-be-appointed Drug Czar will review our Drug Budget and recommend appropriate changes in our drug policies and funding levels. & President Clinton has given our allies In the "War on Drugs" a signal that drug policy will not be an International priority for this Administration. A: Press reports to the contrary, President Clinton has not proposed slashing international drug spending; international and interdiction accounts have only been cut by 1%. Neither has the President embraced an arbitrary supply/demand ratio in deciding proper funding levels. Under this budget, demand-side expenditures (treatment and prevention) will increase 10%, and supply-side expenditures (law enforcement and interdiction) will increase 5%. These budget numbers offer a good start, and the final drug strategy/budget will include the new Drug Czar's recommendations. While the President has clearly decided to increase funding for drug treatment and prevention, doing more at home to reduce our nation's voracious appetite for illegal drugs does not preclude us from continuing to work with our allies that have the political will :0 fight against illegal drugs. Q: President Clinton has gutted the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) and demoted the "War on Drugs" as a priority. A: NO the President's reorganization will help revitalize the office. First, he has reformed the office from being a political dumping ground to a more focused policy and planning office. While ONDCP was meant to give coherence to drug policy, it has not succeeded in its mission. Second, the new Drug Czar will be elevated to the Cabinet level; the previous Administration demoted the Drug Czar from his cabinet status and physically removed the office from the White House complex. And finally, in a time of budget constraints, the President has increased overall drug spending. Q: Why is it taking so long to fill the Drug Czar position? A: The Drug Czar's job is one of the most varied jobs in the federal government, requiring knowledge in just about every aspect of government -- law enforcement, treatment and prevention, urban issues, intelligence matters, international relations, and more. Candidates from all backgrounds must be considered. Interestingly, after Bill Bennett's resignation, it took George Bush 4 months to appoint a replacement, Bob Martinez. 2: Why were funds for High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTA) and Special Forfeiture Funds (SSF) not scored under the Office of National Drug Control Policy? Will these programs no longer be administered by the ONDCP? A: Funds for HIDTA and SSF were placed under "Funds Appropriated to the President," which was an administrative action by OMB. As the budget indicates, HIDTA and SSF funds will remain at the discretion of the drug director for drug control programs. PRESIDENT WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON APPOINTING DR. LEE BROWN DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY APRIL 28, 1993 It is with great pleasure that I announce the appointment of Dr. Lee Brown -- the first police officer to hold this job -- to serve as Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy. A few weeks ago I elevated this office to Cabinet level status, because I believe drug abuse is as serious a problem as there is in America. Lee Brown shares that view, and I am proud that he will join us in this new position. As Americans who care about our future we cannot let drugs and drug related crimes continue to ruin our communities, threaten our children even in school, and fill up our prisons with wrecked and wasted lives. We must do a better job of preventing drug use and treating those who seek treatment, and we must do more to protect law abiding citizens from those who victimize them in the pursuit of drugs or profits from drugs. I am committed to winning this struggle, as all Americans are, and there is no better person to lead us in this fight than Lee Brown. He has been the chief law enforcement officer in Atlanta, Houston and New York. He's a policeman and a Ph.1 D in Criminology who brings to this tough job a truly extraordinary record -- of innovation and crime reduction -- and a sensitivity to the problems of real people who want to walk home safe at night. To reduce drug use and drug related crimes we must do many things at the same time. It has to start with community policing, with more police at the local level working with neighbors and friends to prevent crime and to quickly punish criminals. There must be better education and prevention efforts starting at the earliest ages. And there must be treatment for those who want to get better. Dr. Brown knows a little something about community policing. It's nearly his invention. He turned the Houston police force into a model of community policing, and for many serious crimes the crime rate there dropped. In New York he added thousands of officers to foot patrols, men and women who he empowered to help solve problems, not with a federal program but with a commitment to a better life in the neighborhood. And reports of serious crime there fell. 1 He's had the vision to see conditions clearly and the courage to change what isn't working. Most importantly, he gets results, and this is exactly what we need in the war against drugs. I pledge to him and the American people an exceptionally focused and very carefully executed anti-drug effort from the federal government. At the heart of our efforts will be more funds for local police officers, more for treatment and more for prevention. We will continue to do all we can to stop drugs at the border, and to work with countries that have shown the political will to fight illegal drugs. They will continue to get our full support and cooperation. But it's time we turned our attention home, and built a strategy that begins to make our neighborhoods safer. We want to close the gap between those who want treatment and available treatment. Treating addiction is good urban policy and good anti-crime policy and good health policy. We have asked for a ten per cent increase in treatment funds for 1994, and will make drug treatment part of our national health care plan. Our goal is to work towards treatment on demand. I believe the parents of America want and deserve more help in educating children about drugs. We can prevent drug abuse. School programs work. Public service programs work. But they aren't miracles. They require a commitment. We have asked for a sixteen per cent increase in drug prevention funding. Finally, we are determined to put more police on the street and to expand community policing. It's a local program, it's old fashioned law enforcement, but it works -- there's less crime. I think it's time to go back to the basics. I asked for 200 million dollars in the stimulus package for community policing, and have proposed almost 600 million in policing and similar initiatives for 1994. The most basic responsibility of the government is to protect the American people. It's our sacred duty to do our best. I believe we have a great program. It's basic. There's more officers, more education, and more treatment. And with the leadership of Dr. Brown, it promises to be more effective. I look forward to working with him to meet, and master, the challenges ahead. Thank you very much. 2 Da. William Herris Pread int Veen Semily x (713) 527. 7000 (713) 771.8640 Houston (H) Bru. 703.684. Gennedy 8772 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Andre Ricki Oliver Seidman Ao- RE: Drug Czar Announcement DATE: 27 April 1993 As we discussed, attached is background material in preparation for the President's announcement of a Drug Czar on Wednesday (we hope). - Bio from Presidential Personnel - Press Clips on Brown - Feb. 9 press release on the White House reorganization - Sen. Biden statement on the Drug Czar - Dep. Sec. Rivlin's testimony on the ONDCP (see sections "New Drug Policy Direction" and "ONDCP's Budget and Organization") Let me know if you have any questions. CC: Mark Gearan (memo only) attachments MEMORANDUM TO: Mark Gearan David Watkins FROM: Andre Oliver RE: Lee Brown DATE: 3 February 1993 FYI, Lee Brown resigned as NY City Police Commissioner in September of this year. He's currently director of the Black Male Initiative Program at Texas Southern University in Houston. His phone is (713) 527-7011. EOM. (713) 527 4361 (fox) Drug Czar Announcement Invitees Cabinet (8) : - Reno - Cisneros - Riley - Christopher - Shalala - Bentsen - Aspin - J. Brown Members of Congress/Staff (20) : - Biden - Moynihan - E. Kennedy - Hatch - DeConcini - Kassenbaum - Rangel - Hoyer - Conyers - Neil Smith Law Enforcement Officials (25) : - Federal Law Enforcemnent Officers Assoc. - Fraternal Order of Police - International Association of Chiefs of Police - International Brotherhood of Police Officers - International Union of Police Associations - Major Cities Chiefs - National Association of Police Organizations - National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives - National Sheriffs Association - National Troopers Coalition - Police Executive Research Forum - Police Foundation - National District Attorneys Association - National Association of Attorneys General ONDCP (7) : - TBD Ricia/Bruce Drug Treatment Representatives (15) : - TBD Jose/Ricia APR 1993 Brown's New Life PB SENT BY:NAT'L DRLG POLICY By Michael H. Cottman CORRESPONDENT oustun - For the first time in 15 years, Lee Brown is driving bimself around town. He bought himself a 1992 wide-body bur- gundy Buick, the first car he has owned since 1978. The man who commanded three police depart- ments around the country is finally on his own. No bodyguards. No guns. No airens. "It's a little different for me," concedes Brown, seated behind the wheel of his car as he drove through the streets of Houston. "But I'm a good driver. I re- spect the law." Six months ago, Lee Brown left New York City to 4-20-93 :12:56PM teach police courses at Texas Southern University, a black college here, but he still maintains an unessy connection with New York. In his first interview since stepping down as police commissioner, Brown talked about how the decisions be made during the first two days of rioting in Crown Heights continue to dog him Even now, in between teaching classes on commu- nity policing, Brown finds himself responding to ques- tions from state investigators about Crown Heights and queries from city attorneys defending him and the mayor against a federal lewsuit, charging that he purposefully withheld cops for more than 48 hours while gangs of youths rioted through the streets of the Brooklyn neighborhood. The suit was brought by some neighborhood residents, including the Camily of Yankel Rosenbeum, who was killed in the riots Brown's position remains the same as he repeated often here: He says that there were plenty of cops at the acene but the initial policy was containment rath- er than confrontation. "I don't like being sued, but it's a fact of American life," Brown said, in an exasperated tone. "People still call me and tell me what's going on with Crown Heights." ONDOP-EOP- Wing (1st Firs:# 7/ Newaday File Photo , An Currentes MOVING ON. Former Police Commissioner Lee Brown now works as a teacher and reporter in Texas. 910F3 These days, Brown, 55, is also responding to ru- more about his plans beyond Houston. There have been widespread reports that President Bill Clinton was considering Brown to head the FBL But, there, SENT DRLG POLICY too, his time in New York continues to be a major factor: A group of Orthodox Jews from New York, still ingry over Brown's actions in Crown Heights, have flooded the White House with telephone calls oppos- ng him. White House sources said yesterday that Brown is boards, speaks at churches and high schools and rune vard, Yale and other colleges in Texas and California also being considered for a possible appointment as a university program called the Black Male Initiative, "Some of the other universities would have been trug CLIM but no decision has been made. which counsels black males. And for the past several good for me personally," Brown said. "But this is Brown is typically tight-lipped about any Washing- months he has been a paid reporter for an ABC affili- good for black students." on prospecta. He will say be is aware of the feelings ate. He added: "It's less crowded and slower paced here, umong some Jews in the city but shrugs it off as just Once a week for two minutes of air time, Brown but anything would be slower than being police com- more opinionated New Yorkers. reports on positive aspects of Houston's black com- missioner." The desk that Brown sits behind these days is con- munity - 28 percent of the 1.7 million residents. He's When he was in New York City, Brown was some- liderably smaller than his old one, a huge cherry- done stories about a junior high school where the par- times called too aloof and academic. Although no one wood desk that nearly fills the room at One Police ents come out in the mornings to direct traffic and ever questioned Brown's integrity, be was also crits- 4-20-93 :12:57PM Plaza and was originally owned by Teddy Roosevelt. help kids and a black cowboy in town for a rodeo. cized by some for failing to 888 signs of the deteriora- In his new office, just beyond the downtown area in "I'm not a news reporter, I'm doing positive eto- tion of the police Internal Affairs Division, whom dis- south-central Houston where old clapboard shacks al- riea," Brown said. "Thers is a lot more work that goes array led to the crestion of a mayoral commission to nest meet the highway, Brown has one telephone and into it than I imagined." probe police corruption. hree plants. He lives in a two-story bouse, 15 min- Brown knows the community well and the COMMOU- He says he is proud of his record, in particular his ites from the college, with his twin daughters, 22, nity knows him. He was Houston's police chief from community policing program. who are earolled at the university. "They live up- 1982 to 1990 and many residents still call him Through his program and Mayor David N. Dinkins' tairs. I have my privacy and they have their prive- "Chies" when they see him. He was chief when Hous- "Safe Streets, Safe City" plan, the city increased pe- y." be said. ton had few black police officers and race relations in trol strength by 18 percent since 1990 and put more During the interview in his office, Brown also spoke the department were at an all-time low. than 3,200 additional uniformed cops on the streets. about his wife's battle with brain cancer and how, just The Rev. Harvey Clemons Jr., pastor of the 67- "Community policing is a great program and we wo months after her death, be is coping with the loss year-old Pleasant Hill Baptist Church, has had him wouldn't have had community policing if itwasn't for if a woman whom he described as his best friend His speak at his church. Lee Brown," said Tom Repetto, president of the Citi- vife, Yvonne, was 55 when she died on Dec. 29. A "We're impressed with his character and discipline zens Crime Commission Brown knows, however, ormer librarian known for her love of singing, she and the wide range of information he brings to the that everyone is not on his side. and cancer for several years and when Brown left community, especially the African-American commu- "People are resistant to change," Brown said. "No New York after 2½ years, he said it was to spend nity," Clemons said. "He talks about values and eth- matter what you do there is a natural tendency to sere time with his wife. ice and he encourages African-American men to take have anxiety about the unknown." Since ber death, he's tried to keep busy. a very active role in public affaire and stand up for Brown said that be believes he was successful as "If I stop for too long, I'll just sit around thinking injustices." Brown said be came to Texas Southern police commissioner in New York. despite what his bout her, Brown said. "I met her when I was 17 in University, now the largest predominantly black cot critica say - because of the support of Dinkins who fresno. She was my first real date. We had a wonder- lege in the country, with 11,000 students, to help 181- made it clear public safety was a major priority "It was ul life together." prove the quality of life for black asudents. He said be more than just a mayor-police commissioner relation- In Houston, Brown serves on several community received offers to teach at New York University, Har- ship, I considered him a friend," Brown said. West Wing (1st Firi:# pg 20F3 2/2 SENT BY:NAT L DRLG POLICY : 4-20-93 12:58PM ONDCP-EOP- West Wing (1st Flri.# 9/ 9 FROM: ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPGRSTUVWX TO: 12024679899 APR 20, 1993 7:34AM #069 P.02 THE DETROIT NEWS AND FREE PRESS APR 18 1993 Critics say president dragging his feet in war on drugs Different priorities? Some contend administration is doing nothing or little to alleviate the problem. FIRST in other agencies are Bush administra- By Richard A. Ryan as Bon holdovers. NEWS WASHINGTON BURSAU The president's proposed annual drug DAYS WASHINGTON - Drugs never spending of $13 billion is minimally have been a big deal for President Clin- higher than his predecersor's last pro- ton. who said he once smoked A morijua- posal na cigarette - but didn't inhale. Moreover, Clinton has suspended That attitude has carried over into his drug testing of White House staffers and A report on Day 88 of the presidency, say critics who accuse him of dramatically starbed staffing at the presidential pushing the federal war on drugs far White House Office of National Drug term. This behind economic. health and foreign- Control Policy from 146 to 25. continues a policy issues. The president is doing absolutely chronicle of Nearly three months into bb presi- nothing in terms of drugs," said Rep. the Clinton dency, Clinton has yet 10 name a drug. Charles Rangel, D.N.Y., head of the policy chief. House Caucus on Drug Abuse. presidency's At the same time, critics asy, there's first 100 days. Many of the key anti-drug strategiate fresh evidence that America's drug prob- 1/2 BURRELLE'S NewsExpasse PAGE / OF 6 SENT BY:NAT'L DRLG POLICY : 4-20-93 54PM : ONDCP-EOP- West Wing (1st Firi:# 2/ 9 FROM:ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPGRSTUVWX TO:12024679899 APR 20, 1993 7:34AM #089 P.03 Iem hasn't gone away. 1988, establishing the Office of National They point to the annual University experience As governor of Arkansas. he Drug Control Policy. of Michigan student drug survey released authorized A sting operation that readi- Bruce Reed, deputy assistant to the last week, which disclosed A small in- ed in the arreat of his brother. Roger. 2011 president for domestic allairs, insisted crease in drug use among eighth-gradors. cocaine-trafficking charges. The younger Clinton has not abandoned the drug war. "As critical as I've been of the whole Clinton served 18 months in prison. "The president is very concerned About drug effort of the Bush administration," During the presidential campaigu, the prevelence of drug abuse," Reed said. Rangol said, "they did & Int more than Clinton promised "to offer drug inst- A drug chief will be named "very what to being done now." ment to everyone who needs help." Whin soon" and have Cabinet-level status, the Bush came into office declaring war the 1994 budget he submitted this molth side continued. Prominent on the list of on the drug "scourge," AS his inmugural doesn't contain money for treatment on possible appointees is Lee Brown, former address promised. Clinton didn't men- demand. Reed said the health care pack- police chief in Houston and New York tion drugs at his insuguration and barely age likely is to address such treatment. City. Joseph Califann, secretary of the mentioned the issue in his houriong Peter Reuter, A drug-policy specialint Department of Health and Human Ser- State of the Union message Feb. 17. at the Rand Corporation think tank in vices in the Carter administration, is "There is no Clinton drug policy," Santa Monica, Calif., Bees no great náme another prospect. declared William Bennett, the nation's from Clinton's pace. Reed defended the dragtic staff cuts, first drug-policy chief. "The only thing "It is not as though there is some privil claiming the drug agency had become "a he has done is dismantle the drug office. crisin with respect to drugs that requires dumping ground for political hacks." Bush appointed Bennett after Con- high level attention," Reutor said. ito He also pointed out Clinton's concern Kreas passed the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of have a berious but endemic problem for drug abusers stems from personal not getting Please BURRELLE'S PAGE NewsExemass 2 OF 6 SENT BY:NAT'L DRLG POLICY : 4-20-93 :12:54PM : ONDCP-EOP- West Wing (1st Fir i : # 3/9 The 1993 National Summit on U.S. Drug Policy May 7, 1993 Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building Washington, D.C. Congressman Charles E. Schumer Chairman 8 E Street, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20003 April 16, 1993 On Friday, May 7. 1993, I will host the 1993 National Summit on U.S. Drug Policy at the new participate in the Summit. Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building in Washington, D.C. I take great pleasure in inviting you to The primary purposes of the Summit are to assess the effectiveness of current policies and programs and to discuss promising new strategies for dealing with the twin scourges of drugs and drug-related crime. We hopé that a thorough examination of both current and proposed drug policies will result in a more effective utilization of Federal resources and improved coordination between the private sector, and Federal, state and local governments. As the enclosed draft agenda for the Summit indicates, mini-presentations and discussion sessions will address such issues as: How should our anti-drug effort be organized? Is the present allocation of Federal resources working? Which existing programs have been successful enough to justify increased Federal equation? resources? Which new policies should we consider implementing on both the supply and demand sides of the The program will begin promptly at 8:45 a.m. and will conclude at 4:15 p.m. The only expense charged participants will be a $20.00 registration fee. A luncheon will be provided. To confirm your attendance, please contact Kathy Prendergast of the Columbia Institute, the coordinators of the event, at (202) 547-2470 before May I, 1993. Lunchis on me - thanks for participating. on May 7. Your attendance and participation in the Summit is critical to its success. I look forward to seeing you Sincerely, Chuck Schumer CHARLES E. SCHUMER Chairman Subcommittee on Crime and Criminal Justice A Columbia Institute Coordinated Event- -Stationary Printed at Private Expense SENT BY:NAT'L DRUG POLICY : 4-20-93 :12:55PM ; 0NDCP-EOP- West Wing (1st Firi:# 4/ 9 002 DRAFT AGENDA THE 1993 NATIONAL SUMMIT ON U.S. DRUG POLICY MAY 7, 1993 THURGOOD MARSHALL FEDERAL JUDICIARY BUILDING WASHINGTON, D.C. Congressman Charles E. Schumer, Chairman Coffee 8:15 - 8:45 a.m. Welcome and Introductions 8:45 - 9:00 a.m. I, Are We Winning or Losing the War on Drugs? (How Can We Tell2) 9:00 - 10:00 a.m. How Do We Define Success in National Drug Policy? Presentations: Mr. Joseph Califano, Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse Dr. Robert DuPont, Institute for Health and Behavior Professor David Musto, Yale Medical School Discussion Break 10:00 - 10:15 a.m. IL The Domestic Front: Innovative Approaches to Demand Reduction - 10:15 - 11:30 a.m. Law Enforcement. Prevention and Treatment, Presentations: (a) Law Enforcement Mr. Robert Bonner, Drug Enforcement Agency (invited) Chief Reuben Greenberg, Chief of Police, Charleston, SC (b) Treatment Dr. Mitchell Rosenthal, Phoenix House Foundation Dr. Herbert Kleber, Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse (c) Education/Prevention Dr. Mary Ann Penz, University of Southern California, Institute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Mr. Vince Lane, Chicago Public Housing Projects (invited) Discussion Break 11:30 - 11:45 a.m. SENT BY:NAT'L DRUG POLICY : 4-20-93 :12:55PM ; 0NDCP-EOP- West Wing (1st Fir : # 5/ y R 003 ; DRAFT III. Drug Intervention Strategies in the Criminal Justice System. 11:45 - 12:45 p.m. Presentations: (a) Diversion programs Honorable Jeffrey Tauber, Presiding Judge Oakland Drug Court Mr. Charles Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (b) Drug treatment in prisons Ms. Beth Weinman, Bureau of Prisons (invited) Dr. James Inclardi, University of Delaware, Center for Drug and Alcohol Studies (invited) (c) Drug testing of probationers and parolees with threat of immediate sanctions Mr. Mark Kleiman, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government Discussion Lunch 12:45 - 1:45 p.m. IV. Beyond the Borders: International Supuly, Interdiction and Eradication. 1:45 - 2:45 p.m. Presentations: Mr. John Walters, Center for Individual Rights Mr. William Olson, Consultant - National Security Policy, and former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for International Narcotics Matters Mr. Rens Lee, Global Advisory Services Mr. Peter Reuter, The Rand Corporation's Drug Policy Research Center - Discussion Break 2:45 - 3:00 p.m. 2 SENT BY:NAT'L DRLG POLICY ; 4-20-93 :12:56PM : ONDCP-EOP- West Wing (1st Firl:# t/ I 04/20/93 DRAFT Y. Alternative Strategies: Decriminalization and Legalization. 3:0 A Debate: Pro: Professor Amold Trebach, American University, and President, Drug Policy Foundation (invited) Professor Ethan Nadelman, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs Honorable Robert Sweet, U.S. District Judge, Southern District of New York (invited) Con: Ms. Mathea Falco, Author, The Making of a Drug-Free America (invited) Mr. Peter Benzinger, Benzinger and DuPont Associates Mr. James Burke, Partnership for a Drug Free America (invited) Discussion Closing Remarks 4:00 3 DR. Lee Brown Same understanding abt position 1.) BC sd a top priority 2) Cabinat Position - - any differences ? NO It could work- - it was never meant to be a full . Fasit to be sucessful - P make it clear - Dwg Director to point person. ' if make Jense to do analysis impact Prepare his strategy If there are diffnces- - DD wld wall E Cabinet seiy -2- - Issue off Symbolism: - office ddn't look good in Bush - Small office that (Bemnett had mi OEOB. LA symbolically- Bennett had office for his use - not for his staff - X Relocation - anaugements I've given I'd be delighted I appreciate it Can't usign for 3 weeks Dr. hee Brown MAY helpful = claufy a lot 5) concerns ) reflecting today ( don't intend to hold you Timeline - couple days Major concer P wants MDENS MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: MACK MARK MCLARTY GEARAN wf RE: DR. LEE BROWN -- DRUG CZAR DATE: 14 APRIL 1993 Following my telephone conversation today with Lee Brown, I faxed and sent federal express the attached letter and outlines of the Office of Drug Control Policy. In our conversation, Brown thought that the office had little "operational authority" and I wanted to forward materials to him. Schedule: Wednesday - Gearan letter to Brown Thursday - Gearan/McLarty phone call to Brown Friday - President calls Brown Monday - Brown in Washington One additional thought: if he accepts the position the Cabinet will have three Secretary Browns. And one Browner. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON April 14, 1993 Dr. Lee Brown Texas Southern University 3100 Cleburne Houston, TX 77004 Dear Lee: It was a pleasure speaking with you today. I appreciate your input on the drug policy office, and more importantly, want you to know that the President would value your stewardship of this important office. I'd also like to address a couple of your questions regarding the authority and "impact" of the office. The specific statutory functions of the ONDCP are also attached for your review. The "Drug Czar" has several operational responsibilities for anti-drug programs within the ONDCP, as well as those implemented at the agency level. For example, the two largest accounts in the ONDCP are the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTA) Program and Special Forfeiture Funds. These accounts give the Director the discretion to direct federal resources to priority anti-drug efforts on a national, state or local level. We expect these funds to exceed $110 million in fiscal year '94. In addition, the Director is charged with coordinating and overseeing drug policy and programs involving approximately 50 federal agencies and 12 cabinet departments. This includes certifying agency drug control budgets, to ensure that they are adequate to accomplish the national drug control objectives formulated by the Drug Czar. As we discussed, the President plans to designate the Director as a member of his cabinet, to give drug policy and its execution the highest attention in the White House. Let me say personally that we are anxious to get to work on the reorganization and policy direction with the leadership of the Director. -2- Lee, thanks again for your consideration. I look forward to speaking with you again soon, and trust you will not hesitate to contact me on any matters of concern. Mark Sincerely, Mark D. Gearan D. Deputy Chief of Staff 0 Trupt pstn - because of problems @ NYT 8 Concerns- - are ability of Director to make an impact fully ndistand- - no operational resp - -how to make an impact © ('al dealt 8 probs 7 drugs my whole career Q Does it turminate ? / gat statutory Steve Jolinson Buadlee Hartford -- Toisla - medicine of colunteer plupicious concern on security arone & NATO forces - take special faces MEMORANDUM TO: Mark Gearan FROM: Andre Oliver RE: Drug Office DATE: 1 April 1993 Here is a brief report on a major issue that will face the ONDCP in the next 3 weeks. April 22 and 28 are the scheduled dates for Senate and House appropriations committees' consideration on the ONDCP budget for FY'94. Major issues would include the immediate budget for the office, as well as the $13 billion of drug funds that the office reviews and coordinates among the agencies (this alone is an enormous piece to justify and discuss). In addition, the drug director would be asked to speak on the expected structure and functions on the new streamlined office. I have met with Hose Cerda, Jennifer O'Connor and Ricia McMahon to begin preparing briefing materials for these hearings. Needless to say, we will face tremendous political difficulties if we do not have a Drug Czar to testify before these committees (you should also consider that it will take a minimum of two weeks to get a drug director confirmed). EOM. THE white HOUSE WASHINGTON Ao- Ispoke with Lee Bron So Me_ RECOMMENDED TELEPHONE CALL Dr. To: Lee Brown (713) 639-1992 Date: April 3, 1993 Recommended by: Bruce Lindsey Purpose: To discuss the drug czar position X226 Background: Topic of Discussion: Contact Person: Bruce Lindsey, x2668 Date of Submission: April 7, 1993 Action: If you can get this guj to say yes that 12 the desired gual. However, Carol Rasco Says Mark bearan is the person you Should refer Brown to 4 he has 777.5 NOTE: The President was going to make call J now he obviously cannot Talking Points Drug Director Appointment The country needs a drug director with top-notch credentials in the crime and drug prevention area. Lee Brown possesses such credentials. Drug control will be given high-priority in the Clinton Administration. To assure that, you plan to make the director a member of your cabinet, so that drug policy is developed and coordinated at the highest levels of the White House. You're looking for a director who is a visionary and a problem solver. Community policing is a major tenet of your anti-crime strategy, and much of its success is credited to Lee Brown's stewardship. You look forward to working with Lee to develop innovative anti-drug policies and programs on a national level. You've reorganized the drug office to a size on par with the NEC and DPC, your primary domestic and economic policy offices. You expect the drug director to be a close partner with the heads of those offices and the Attorney General. You want to emphacize more and more the areas of prevention and treatment, and you know he can work effectively to carry out this message with the general public as well as the advocacy groups and provider network involved in these areas. You are also looking for someone who can see that effective collaboration is occurring throughout the federal government on drug and drug related policies and programs. You know that Lee can carry this out, making the Director's office a focal point for coordination, collaboration, innovation so that drug policy is seen as a systemic whole throughout government. Lee P. Brown Professionally and philosophically, Lee Brown's background is ideal for the position of "drug czar." Brown brings a wealth of experience in law enforcement and public policy, having served as Commissioner of the New York City Police (the nation's largest force) and as the top law enforcement official in Houston and Atlanta. Brown has three graduate degrees, including a Ph. D in criminology from the University of California at Berkeley. Known as a visionary and a problem-solver, Brown also has the ability to speak thoughtfully to audiences about how to solve complex societal problems. Better known as a planner rather than a politician, Brown believes there is no quick fix to many of our problems, but that we can make progress through hard work and planning. For years Brown has described illegal drugs as "America's number one problem." Brown believes that illegal drugs and violent crime are interrelated problems. His approach to drug control is holistic: prevention, rehabilitation and police officers "walking the beat." Indeed, Brown is perhaps best known for his philosophy of "community-based" policing, in which police are assigned to a specific location so they can know the neighborhood and exchange information with residents. As Houston's Police Chief, Brown received high marks for improving the relationship between the community and police officers. He turned the Houston police force, considered one of the worst in the country, into a model of modern "community- based" policing. The crime rate in many crime categories dropped, and Brown's popularity soared. He developed the same reputation and record in New York City. However, while Houston's Police Chief, Brown was nicknamed "Out-of-Town Brown" for spending too much time traveling to professional conferences. He spent at least 100 days out of town in 1984 and 1985. While Commissioner in New York, he was also criticized for being "out-of-town" following a mini-riot. In both Houston and New York, Brown was not popular among some rank-and-file police officers. Police unions in Houston were unhappy because Brown did not support a measure protecting the rights of police officers accused of wrongdoing. Others perceived Brown to be a technocrat enamored of studies and plans instead of being a "real cop". However, a review of the record leads one to surmise he may have been criticized because some of these officers resisted Brown's fundamental reform efforts. As Atlanta's top law-enforcement official, Brown is best remembered for his handling of the Wayne Williams child murders case. While the police department's investigation of the child murders case was controversial, Brown emerged relatively unscathed. Commented Hal Guilliver, then-editor of the Atlanta Constitution: "Lee did a good job under exceedingly difficult circumstances. " Brown also successfully weathered similar storms in Houston and New York, proving to be quite adept at press relations. Uniformly praised upon his departure from New York, Mayor Dinkins and Governor Cuomo described him as the best police commissioner in the country. The public record clearly shows he resigned as Commissioner because of his wife's serious illness. Office of National Drug Control Policy Background: The ONDCP was created by Congress (specifically, Sen. Biden) in 1989 to coordinate national drug policy and advise the President accordingly. Its primary functions are: 1) development of an annual drug control strategy and, 2) coordination of drug control policy by the various agencies (Justice, HHS, Treasury, State, etc.) With its current 147 employees, the office is widely perceived as a political dumping ground (in fact the President has made this statement on several occasions). White House Reorganization: The reorganization plan proposes to refocus the office to a policymaking and coordination function, on par with the NEC and DPC. The number of employees will be reduced from 147 to 21. While we are in the process of a review of the statute creating the office, we anticipate that some "policy implementation" functions may be shifted to Justice, HHS and other agencies. This reorganization does not diminish the administration's commitment to the war on drugs. The President is committed to an aggressive drug strategy, with greater emphasis on drug treatment and "targeted" drug enforcement efforts. The President will promote community policing, aid for communities hit hard by drugs, and programs for kids in trouble. We are committed to a drug czar with clout, who will be in the cabinet, and an active partner with cabinet heads. We believe the policy coordination of the office requires it. We are considering some very qualified candidates for drug czar and hope to have an announcement soon. THE NEW YORK TIMES, MONDAY, APRIL 12, 1993 Administration Drawing Criticism for an Unrevised Drug Policy Al Continued rom Page AI said that details would not be forthcom- than Mr Bush in his last drug budget. CLINTON IS CHIDED ing until the President selected the chief drug policy aide. 'Excellent First Step' suggests no major change in philoso- He could not sav when that selection Among the most criticized aspects of ON DRUG PROGRAM phy and offers no hope 01 stanching might come. And he would not com- the Reagan-Bush drug policies were what many regard as the waste of ment on reports that several people the expensive and largely unsuccessful tens of millions of dollars on ineffec- had declined the nomination since the efforts to stop overseas farmers from live law-enforcement measures. drug office. in an economizing step. producing the raw material for cocaine While Mr. Clinton has devoted con- was hacked to a sixth of its previous and opium and 10 block the smuggling Critics See Old Inadequacies size 10 25 staif members from 147 of the drugs into the United States. siderable energy 10 the economy and earlier this year. and the director's Mr. Clinton cut financing for some has made general health care a prior- in $13.04 Billion Package post was simultaneously elevated to international operations in South ity, he has been virtually silent on the Cabmet rank America and Asia by 8 percent That drug problem. He has also not chosen Cocaine and most other drugs are will trim $44 million from spending last the official who would be in charge of not being talked about as much as they year of $536 million. But he added $19 By JOSEPH B. TREASTER developing strategy. were just a few years ago, when they million for anti-smuggling efforts. As a result, drug experts say Mr. attained a certain chic in some middle- When President Clinton moved into bringing spending in that category to Chnton's handling of the budget has class circles But crack is still a crip- $1.765 billion, much of It gomg to the the White House in January, spec deepened their concern that the new pling problem in the inner cities and Detense Department, which has been 1515 in academia. health centers and Administration IS neglecting the fight herom abuse IS on the rise, Federal widely criticized as meffective against law enforcement around the country against drugs. studies indicate. drug traffickers. were expecting big changes in the While departing little from his prede- "This IS not a time when we can pull In his last year in office. Mr. Bush way the Federal Government dealt cessor's spending policies. Mr. Clinton back and say the drug problem IS cut $336 million from international op with the national drug problem. chose not to adopt Mr Bush's tradition over," said Dr Herbert D Kleber, a erations and anti-smuggling efforts He But Mr. Clinton surprised and dis- of using the annual presentation of the professor of psychiatry at the Colum- budget as a means of calling attention appointed many specialists last week bia University Medical School who re- to the drug problem. Instead, Mr. Clin- increased spending for drug treatment signed as President Bush's senior aide by presenting a $13.04 billion anti- ion's anti-drug program was inconspic- $168 million while Mr. Chinton IS pro- drug budget that offered little change on anti-drug health issues after failing uously tucked into two pages among posing a $170 million increase to win a $1 billion increase in spending from the widely criticized approach the more than 1,300 pages of the Fed- Representative Charles Schumer, on treatment. research and anti-drug followed for 12 years by Presidents eral budget. the Brooklyn Democrat wr. IS chair- education. Besides not vei appointing a director man of the House Subcommittee on Ronald Reagan and George Bush That approach has relied heavily on of the White House's Office of National Questions and More Questions Crime and Crimmal Justice which Representative Charles B. Rangel, oversees the Drug Enforcement Ad- law enforcement instead of empha- Drug Control Policy 10 serve as his sizing rehabilitation and prevention senior anti-drug aide. Mr Clinton has Democrat of Manhattan. charged that ministration, said that by increasing also left most other Federal positions the Administration. pressed on con- the total anti-drug budget by 7 percent "What we have here is a budget in the field in the hands of acting direc- cerns like the economy and the turmoil Mr. Clinton was showing his commit- that savs business as usual.' said tors or holdovers from the Bush Ad- in Russia, was simply ignoring illegal ment to the issue Dr LaMond Tullis, a professor of ministration. drugs. Mark A. R. Kleiman, a drug expert at political science at Brigham Young During the Presidential campaign, 'There IS absolutely nobody in the Harvard University. said that with $850 University in Provo. Utah, and a drug Mr. Clinton raised the hopes of drug Administration willing to accept any billion being spent on national health policy consultant to the United Na- experts by saying he favored treat- responsibility on any subject relating care, the reforms being developed by tions. "H seems we're going to go on ment on demand, which would make to our drug problem. said Mr. Rangel, Mrs. Clinton could become far more doing things we know don't work drug rehabilitation available 10 anyone who was chairman of the recently important than the anti-drug budget who asks for It. costing hundreds of channated House Select Committee on TI drug treatment could Ret a small Health-Care Overhaul Cited millions of dollars. At present. the na- Narcotics Abuse and Control and IS Traction of what the country spends on tion's drug treatment centers can han- now a leader of the newly formed Administration officials said the health care" he said, "That would be die only about a third of the estimated House Caucus on Drug Abuse. "They budget was prepared before a de- much better than having a big traction SIX million heavy drug abusers. haven't the foggiest idea where the of the drug budget tailed drug strategy could be worked Appointments Praised Administration is heading I've got a out. and they added that It was likely letter on mv desk from the President of the health-care overhaul being devel- The drug experts say they have been Colombia asking me if I can share with oped under the leadership of Hillary encouraged by Mr. Clinton appoint- him as to the direction in which the Rodham Clinton would include in ment of Janet Reno as Attorney Gen- Administration IS going on this." eral and of Dr Jovcelvn Elders as creased spending for drug treatment William S. Smith. a senior official In Surgeon General. both of whom are the White House anti-drug office under Even SO. drug experts pointed out regarded as understanding the nu- President Bush. said national drug pol- that the budget represented a general ances of the drug problem. ICV appeared to be on cruise control statement of the Administration's The staff at the Office of National Robert O Boorstin. another White plans for the coming year. Regard Drug Control Policy. which was Presi- House spokesman. card that rather less of the outcome of the new health dent Bush's center for anti-drug infor- than being ignored, drug abuse and mation, is referring inquiries about the care measures mey said. the budget treatment has been part and parcel of Clinton Administration's drug policy to one of the working groups on the the White House. But Arthur L. Jones, a) President's Task Force on National Continued on Page B10. Column I deputy White House press secretary, Health Care. headed by Mrs. Chnton One possibility being explored. other Administration tals said. IS extend- mg Medio and coverage including drugs treatment to the 50 percent 01 the na-1 tron poor who now nave no such COX erage. In his new budget Mr. Clinton desig- named $8.30 billion 10; Law emoreeme n: and $4.74 billion for such things as rehabilitation and anti-drug education That !! a proportional sphil of 63.66 per em 10 percent. or about one percent more for he alth and education Drug Cyan MEMORANDUM TO: DAVID DREYER BOB BOORSTIN FROM: MARK GEARAN vg RE: DRUG POLICY OFFICE INTERIM DRUG STRATEGY I attach a copy of the Drug Office interim strategy report which Lee Brown would like to issue. I would value your thoughts on this draft as soon as possible. attachment 301 937 6018 P.02 DUE TO GO TO PRINT ANTIME NOW - AND RELEASED NEXT WEEK. THE CYCLE RUG ABUSE Internal ional Drug Control Strategy Office of National September 1993 THIS the MARK, IN US NO 4 AT Love SEP-29-93 WED 20:34_JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 P.03 BREAKING THE CYCLE OF DRUG ABUSE 1993 Interim National Drug Control Strategy Office of National Drug Control Policy September 1993 SEP-29-93 WED 20:34 JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 P.04 ii WEU 20:34 JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 P.05 Preface The drug issue is about the responsibility of government to its citizens and the kind of society we aspire to be. There must be a national imperative to reduce drug use. Surely this is a national goal that can unite us all, across the boundaries of party, race, region, and income. Bill Clinton he President's vision of America is one due in part to some encouraging news. Drug use T where all Americans have a chance of among our nation's youth has dropped since its achieving their hopes and dreams. He peak in 1985 and 1986, prompting some to con- envisions an America renewed by clude that the drug problem, if not over, is no reduced drug use and drug-related longer a crisis. This conclusion is as dangerous as crime and violence. He sees an Amer- it is wrong. ica where children can play in the park or walk to school without falling victim to drug turf violence Although some strides have been made in or the lure of a street corner sale. He sees drug- reducing drug abuse, they have been realized free schools preparing our children for the chal- largely among young people who were not heavy lenges of the 21st century and drug-free users to begin with and who, following natural workplaces enabling America to prosper. demographic trends, would likely have stopped using drugs early in their adult years. To achieve this vision, we must recognize that America is still in the midst of a drug epidemic. The loss of public focus has also allowed the This 1993 Interim National Drug Control Strategy voices of those who would promote legalization to comes at a critical crossroad. Although drug- ring more loudly and be heard more clearly. The related violence and abuse continue to be among declines thus far in the use of drugs are in part the most profound problems confronting the because they are illegal. Legalization is a formula Nation, much of the media and public attention for self-destruction. The Administration is that accompanied the drug crisis during the 1980's unequivocally opposed to any "reform" that is cer- has begun to fade. The loss of public focus may be tain to increase drug use. 1 SEP-29-93 WED 20:35 JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 P.06 BREAKING THE CYCLE OF DRUG ABUSE A NATIONAL IMPERATIVE We begin this new course by recognizing that We will target hard-core drug users, both the principal drug problem today lies with hard Inside and outside of the criminal justice core drug use. Past anti-drug policies have focused system, for treatment to reduce their drug use on the casual and intermittent user, achieving and its consequences. some degree of success. But by focusing on this less complicated aspect of the drug problem, we We will work to reduce drug-related violence have failed to reduce hard-core drug use and its by expanding community policing, putting disproportionate impact on society. more police on the streets. and taking guns out of the hands of criminals. This Administration has no illusions about the tenacity of the drug problem — particularly hard- We will promote certainty of punishment by core drug use - and its Impact on the lives of all ensuring that all drug offenders— partic- Americans. Drug and alcohol abuse destroy indi- ularly younger offenders- receive some type viduals, families, and even communities. Drugs of sanction when they first encounter the increase violent crime, overburden the criminal criminal justice system. justice and health care systems, hinder learning. and reduce America's productivity. We will support research to assist treatment providers to more effectively treat drug This Interim Drug Strategy is designed to chart addicts. a new, realistic course that captures our national conscience and fortifies our national resolve. We will reinvent our drug control programs, Progress will be made if we commit to preventing move beyond ideological debates. and build drug abuse before it starts, to extending a hand to on proven strategles. This means designing those who have started, and to punishing those our anti-drug strategies based on knowledge who profit on misery and tragedy through drug gained from research. trafficking. We will seek to increase international This Interim Strategy is intended to give a new commitment to narcotics control and will sense of direction and reinvigorate this nation's work with other nations that demonstrate the efforts against drug trafficking and abuse. Here is political will to end illegal drug crafficking. what we will do differently: The drug problem is a national one. Drugs are We will make drug policy a comerstone of not a problem solely of the poor. or minorities. or domestic policy in general and social policy inner-city residents. In fact. the majority of these in particular, by acknowledging drug abuse as citizens do not use drugs, but they are victims of a public health problem and by linking drug those who do. The problem is neither liberal nor policy to our efforts to grow the economy, to conservative, Republican nor Democrat. It affects empower communities, to curb youth all Americans. And so leadership at all levels is violence, to preserve families, and to reform essential. The President has expressed his com- health care. mitment by making the Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy a member of his We will target our prevention programs, Cabinet. This will ensure that a strong drug poli- especially among inner-city youth, and reach cy voice is present at the table when labor, educa- out to pregnant women, women of child- tion, housing, health, justice, and international bearing age, children, and others at-risk for matters are discussed. Moreover, this elevation drug use to avoid any increase in levels of will facilitate more coordinated national drug first-time drug use. policies. 2 SEP-29-93 WED 20:36 JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 P.07 BREAKING THE CYCLE OF DRUG ABUSE A NATIONAL IMPERATIVE Our immediate efforts will include several and direction will be presented in the comprehen- straightforward initiatives that are the foundation sive National Drug Control Strategy that will be for a new National Drug Control Strategy: submitted to Congress on February 1, 1994, as required by law. I. Reducing Demand: A New Focus The challenges before us today are as daunting 11. Reducing Drug-Related Violence: A Call as they were more than four years ago when the for Common Sense Crime Control first Strategy was released. Drugs continue to and Prevention. threaten to break apart society. No parent addict- ed to drugs or alcohol can adequately care for a III. Changing the Way We Do Business: child. No child so afflicted can adequately learn Streamlining Government and in school. No street is safe where drugs predomi- Empowering Communities. nate. No effort in housing or employment or edu- cation or public safety will fully succeed until the IV. Providing International Leadership: target populations are free of drug and alcohol Support for Anti-Drug Policies Around addiction. the World. This Interim Strategy offers an initial response This Interim Strategy does not represent the to these challenges, providing the direction for a Administration's definitive drug control policy. It safer, stronger. and more secure Nation for out does not contain detailed and quantifiable goals children and our children's children. and objectives, nor does it address every facet of how national government can and will seek to Lee P. Brown reduce the supply of and demand for illegal drugs Director, Office of National in America and abroad. Such specific guidance Drug Control Policy 3 SEP-29-93 WED 20:37 JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 P.09 Reducing Demand: A New Focus Our aim is to cut off the demand for drugs through prevention. That means more and better education, more treatment, and more rehabilitation. Bill Clinton he first step in reducing the demand ment go beyond drug users and are extended to for drugs is to prevent drug use before it the rest of society in the form of reduced criminal- starts. Accordingly, we must continue ity, lower health care costs, increased productivity, to work hard to prevent Americans, and more. particularly our youth, from ever trying drugs. Our drug prevention programs We should continue to work to ensure that must send a strong "no use" message and educate treatment is more effective, but the simple fact is individuals about the risks and dangers of illegal that the case for treatment has been repeatedly drug and alcohol use, including the spread of made. We must move treatment to the forefront HIV/AIDS, and teach them how to resist peer of our drug abuse policy and make it a higher pri- pressure to use drugs. ority. If we do not, hard-core drug use with all its negative consequences will continue unabated. But when prevention fails — as it will in some cases- we must get drug users to stop. Drug For many drug users, drug treatment means out- dependency is a chronic, relapsing disorder, and patient drug counseling and/or pharmacotherapy.2 users stand little chance of recovery without But for some drug users, medically supervised appropriate intervention and treatment. Treat- detoxification is a necessary prerequisite. For the ment must be made available to those who need most dependent users, more intensive treatment and want it. - -such as residential or intensive day programs - may be required before outpatient community pro- The time has come for Americans to change grams can be effective in helping them lead drug- their thinking about drug treatment. As a society, free lives. And for those who put the greatest we continue to have difficulty with accepting the strain on our health care and criminal justice sys- merits of drug treatment. Myriad studies have tems - hard-core users and criminals who are established over and over again that many differ- addicts- we must use the carrot and stick of the ent forms of treatment can be successful in reduc- criminal justice system to demand that they ing drug use and increasing a drug user's chances receive treatment. Recognizing the chronic, of leading a drug-free, crime-free, and generally recurring nature of drug addiction, out treatment more productive life.¹ The benefits of drug treat- efforts must include rehabilitation, habilitation, 5 SEP-29-93 WED 20:37 JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 P. 10 BREAKING THE CYCLE OF DRUG ABUSE A NATIONAL IMPERATIVE and supportive social services, and must be but- Cocaine Use by Male and tressed by strong case management and supervi- Female Booked Arrestees sion. Atlanta 58 58 Birmingham 49 STEP ONE 46 Chicago 56 Mount an Aggressive Drug Treatment Clevelend 53 Strategy with Hard-Core Drug Use as its 66 Primary Target Dallas 41 48 Today, the principal drug problem lies with Denver 38 hard-core drug users - those heaviest users who 50 use drugs at least once a week. Hard-core drug use Detroit 37 62 has not been reduced by past anti-drug efforts, especially in our inner cities and among the disad- Ft. Lauderdale 46 47 vantaged. Recent data suggest that problems Houston 41 resulting from heroin and cocaine use are on the 44 rise. According to the statistics from the Drug Indianapolis 23 Abuse Warning Network (DAWN). which moni- 26 tors the health consequences associated with drug Kansas City 41 abuse in terms of drug-related deaths and emer- 62 gency room cases across the country, cocaine and Los Angeles 52 heroin medical emergencies reached 119,800 and 58 48,000 in 1992, respectively, the highest levels Manhattan 62 72 since data for this survey were first reported. Fur- Miami 56 New Orleans 49 DAWN Cocaine and Heroin 44 Mentions, 1988-1992 Omaha 16 Philadelphia 63 1988 102 67 38 Phoenbx 26 49 110 1989 Portland 35 42 54 St. Louis 50 80 62 1990 34 San Antonio 32 25 1991 101 San Diego 45 36 37 8an Jose 28 32 1992 120 48 Washington 44 64 0 25 50 75 100 125 0 20 40 60 80 100 Total Mentions in Thousands % Positive Cocaine Males Females Cocaine Heroin Source: National Institute of Justice/Drug Use Forecasting Program Source SAMHSA Drug Abuse Waming Network. 6 SEP-29-93 WED 20:38 301 937 6018 P.11 BREAKING THE CYCLE OF DRUG ABUSE A NATIONAL IMPERATIVE ther, we continue to see high levels of drug use among the arrestee population, with cocaine Estimated Cocaine being the most commonly abused drug. Consumption by Type of User The data also indicate that hard-core users fuel 300 the overall demand for drugs, making them the most difficult and intractable aspect of the drug 250 problem. One study. for example, found that although heavy users constitute only about 20 per- studies estimate that the number of hard-core cocaine and heroin users is either stable or Cocaine Consumption Imetric tons) 200 cent of all cocaine users, they account for roughly Heavy Users two-thirds of total cocaine consumption.³ Other 150 100 increasing, compared to 1988.4 50 Thus, reducing hard-core drug use is para- mount to the successful resolution of this Nation's 0 drug problem. This requires that we work aggres- 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 sively to reduce the disparity between the num- Source: RAND. "Controlling Cocambe: Supply vs. Demand Program," bers of those who seek drug treatment and Draft Work in Progress for The Office of National Drug Control Policy, available treatment capacity. Our current esti- (July 1993). mates suggest that as many as 1.1 million persons HIV/AIDS ranges from $85,000 to $150,000 per do not receive treatment because of inadequate patient.⁷ treatment capacity. This Administration will make it a priority to add to our Nation's capacity Experts estimate that well over 100,000 bables so that those who need treatment can receive it. born each year in the U.S. are exposed to illicit drugs in utero.⁸ These babies have lower weights Unless we can increase treatment capacity, the and more health problems at birth and therefore physical and psychological debilitation often have longer hospital stays and more health care caused by substance abuse and a drug-using expenses than babies born to lifestyle will overwhelm our health care system nondrug-using mothers. So- with increased incidence of emergency room ciety is just now learning episodes for overdoses, hepatitis. tuberculosis, about the extent of behav- HIV/AIDS, drug-exposed infants and children, ioral and developmental and other serious, drug-related problems. Some problems some of these chil- estimate that by the end of 1993, addictive dis- dren face as they mature. eases will result in health care and related costs that will reach $140 billion annually.⁵ Of course, We must be prepared to It is impossible to put a price tag on the intangible focus as never before on solu- Pofte may costs to the family structure, communities, and tions to the problems of society as a whole. heavy drug use from both the criminal justice and the public According to the Department of Health and health perspectives. We must TOUAL Human Services, more than one million persons begin to focus more directly Street are now infected with HIV. At the end of 1992, on ways to reduce the popula- an additional 250,000 Americans had developed tion of heavy users. We need full-blown AIDS. Injection drug use is directly to devise a new approach to address the drug-using responsible for about 33 percent of these cases. population most resistant to current treatment The medical cost for treating persons with and prevention strategies.⁹ 7 SEP-29-93 WED 20:40 JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 P.12 BREAKING THE CYCLE OF DRUB ABUSE A NATIONAL IMPERATIVE This Administration willingly accepts the diffi- instance, the courts can either divert criminal cult challenge of addressing hard-core drug use. addicts to drug treatment before they enter pleas We can start by addressing the shortfalls among or go to trial. or make treatment a condition of the highest priority populations. For example, probation, supervised release, or parole. The about 30,000 pregnant drug abusers are currently incentive to take treatment seriously and com- being treated. Depending upon the estimate, this plete it is enhanced when the alternative is incar- represents as few as one in 10 pregnant drug ceration. Coupled with initiatives like Treatment abusers receiving treatment. And generally, Alternatives to Street Crime (TASC) that have women remain underserved by our treatment sys- proven successful in reducing drug use and allevi- tem, making up less than 35 percent of admissions ating prison and jail overcrowding, these efforts to drug treatment pro- can help reduce hard-core drug use. grams. 10 The stigma associ- ated with being a substance The President strongly believes that both the abusing woman, particularly individual and society benefit when those in the a substance abusing mother, criminal justice system in need of treatment can as well as fear of losing cus- get it. Accordingly, he has asked the Director of tody of one's children, lack of the Office of National Drug Control Policy to child care, and lack of trans- work with the Attorney General and the Secre- portation are foremost tary of Health and Human Services to assess the among the obstacles to current situation and recommend steps the Feder- entering treatment faced by al Government can take to promote such treat- women. Women living in ment at the Federal, State, and local levels. public housing can also be deterred from seeking help for themselves or their It is also imperative that heavy drug users children because they fear losing their home. receive the support and skills they need to prevent Where the Federal Government is the source of them from reverting to drug use. Habilitation and such unintentional disincentives to treatment, we social services must be linked with treatment ser- will remove them. vices, both during and after treatment. By giving heavy drug users the skills to cope without using We can also focus on the criminal justice popu- drugs and alcohol. they will be afforded a chance lation. Hard-core users are more than likely to to remove themselves permanently from drug become involved in the criminal justice system. addiction. and we must take this opportunity to demand that they receive treatment. 11 Effective Institutional Finally, the role of health care professionals is programs have demonstrated immediate benefits critical in helping 10 reduce drug use in general in prison and jail security. When coupled with and hard-core drug use in particular. Rehabilita- effective transitional services, aftercare, and tion of hard-core users presents a difficult chal- supervision. such programs provide tangible long- lenge, and many treatment programs are reluctant term benefits in reducing drug use, reducing crimi- to admit them. Hard-core drug users often lack nal activity, and increased work force the social support system conducive to treatment participation. If we do not act, each year about participation and completion, and they generally 200,000 convicted criminals who entered fail or lack the resources to pay for their treatment. prison with drug-related problems will be released Moreover, if they do enter treatment, they usually without having received drug treatment. recycle one or more times from recovery back through relapse to dependence or abuse. We must use all components of the criminal justice system - enforcement, prosecution, adju- There is a moral and social obligation for dication, and corrections, including probation, physicians and other health care professionals to parole, and innovative programs such as boot protect their patients by warning them about the camps¹² - to promote drug treatment. For perils of substance abuse and by providing proper 8 SEP-29-93 WED 20:41 JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 P. 13 BREAKING THE CYCLE OF DRUB ABUSE A NATIONAL IMPERATIVE guidance to and care for those who are already recent study.¹ for example, there was a 24 percent addicted. To ensure that those in the health care decrease in health care costs for a group of treated professions are trained to treat substance abusers. alcoholics when compared with an untreated professional accrediting organizations and associa- group. The study also reports that a Fortune 100 tions should ensure that such knowledge is company looked at the initial savings from their required as a prerequisite to accreditation or certi- Employee Assistance Program and found that fication. medical costs for each employee for the three years prior to their beginning substance abuse treatment averaged $2,068 per year. One year fol- STEP TWO lowing the initial treatment, average medical costs - excluding treatment costs - were $165. Enact National Health Care Legislation When the cost of substance abuse treatment is that Makes Drug Treatment Part of factored in, the company still saved $500 per a Basic Health Care Package employee. Health care reform provides direct substance abuse treatment benefits for inparient and resi- STEP THREE dential treatment, intensive non-residential treat- ment, and outpatient treatment. Further, it Educate Our Children About the Dangers ensures that all Americans will have access to one of Illegal Drugs and Alcohol system of health-care. replacing an old system that provided one level of care for those with health Drug use and its attendant violence are symp- insurance and another very different level of care toms of a much deeper problem affecting Ameri- for the uninsured. Our plan focuses on improving the management of both the public and private can society - our forgotten and neglected substance abuse service systems. It establishes children. The issues most affecting the youth of America- crime, drugs, violence, teen pregnan- better linkages between the treatment system and cy, youth gangs, and home- primary health care providers and seeks to lessness — are rooted in our improve access to needed services for those popu- neglect of one of our most lations who have been underserved or hard to precious resources: children reach. In addition, public initiatives will further aged zero to three. We must complement health care reform by including con- redouble our efforts to solve tinued support for substance abuse prevention this problem. programs and for programs to meet the special ser- vice and educational needs of adolescents and The years zero to three are school-aged youth in high-risk settings. the most formative years of a Our national health plan will reform our child's life. In the first year, a child will learn health care system by providing a substantial drug about half of learned human response. Within the treatment benefit so that those who need treat- first three years, a child will learn, among other ment have the means to get it. All Americans things, the concept of reward and punishment. should be able to secure treatment when they These two factors alone suggest that we must focus need it, and - In addition to health care reform our attention on our very youngest citizens. - this Administration will continue to work to expand the capacity of the treatment system. Our institutions must devise appropriate responses to ensure children have appropriate Good drug policy is also good economic policy. medical care that seeks to prevent. not just cure. Substantial and longer-term savings will accrue Our agenda must start with assurance that every from the timely provision of treatment for alcohol child has good prenatal care. and drug abuse problems. According to one We must have appropriate pre-leaming oppor- 9 SEP-29-93 WED 20:42 JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 P.14 BREAKING THE CYCLE OF DRUG ABUSE A NATIONAL IMPERATIVE prehensive community-based drug prevention 8th Graders Use of Cocaine and programs can help provide our children with these Marijuana in the Last 30 Days skills. While the field of drug abuse prevention is in its infancy, experts agree that successful pro- grains share three common characteristics: they are comprehensive in approach, positive in focus, 0.5% and tailored to the population they intend to 1991 serve. 3.2% As part of a comprehensive community-based approach to prevention, drug education programs are effective in reducing the likelihood that young people will start using drugs.¹ 14 Or, if children do 0.7% start, these programs will lessen the chances that 1992 they will use drugs more frequently or progress to 3.7% more dangerous substances. A challenging cur- riculum, one that is backed by a comprehensive drug education program and firm anti-drug poli- 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% cies, and also faces the challenges of underage drinking and tobacco use, creates an environment Cocaine Marijuana where drugs are unacceptable. Moreover, dedicat- Source: University Of Michigan. "Monitoring the Future Survey, ed teachers, an energetic principal, involved fami- 1975-1992" lies, and high expectations for students strengthen prevention efforts. tunities, like Head Start, that are consistent in their approaches and available to those that need Virtually all schools have instituted drug pre- them. We must also focus vention programs. Many are doing an excellent our attention on the mes- job, but there is cause for concern. According to sages our children receive recent data, eighth graders and college students through the media, and are reporting higher rates of drug use in 1992 than direct them away from vio- they did in 1991. Further, fewer eighth graders in lence and toward construc- 1992 perceived great risk with using cocaine or tive, positive messages. crack than did eighth graders in 1991 15 Schools and institutions of higher education must In short, we must create a strengthen their efforts to ensure that our young- national agenda for the sters are able to learn in a drug-free environment. health, safety, and education of our children, one to be Effective school-based programs are compre- implemented by those closest hensive and include the following elements. They to them, their parents and are conducted by teachers who are thoroughly their communities. The Fed- informed about substance abuse. Further, they eral Government can assist in begin in early childhood, extend through 12th the development of partner- grade, and integrate teaching about drug abuse ships and alliances, and it can provide direction into comprehensive courses on health education. and funding. But, the real work must be done in They identify skills and techniques to resist drugs the community, by those who know what is most and include firm anti-drug policies that include needed. strong sanctions and parental involvement. In addition, schools should provide a student assis- We must give all our children the skills they rance program, offer drug-free activities, and vigor- need to choose a healthy, drug-free lifestyle. Com- ously address other problems associated with the 10 SEP-29-93 WED 20:43 JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 P.15 BREAKING THE CYCLE OF DRUG ABUSE A NATIONAL IMPERATIVE drug trade, such as weapons and violence in the efforts to reduce drug use and will give encourage- schools. To complement and reinforce school- ment to other communities to face the challenge based prevention programs, positive activities for of drug use head-on. youth, such as recreational, cultural, mentoring, tutoring, and community service opportunities should be made widely available for youth. STEP FOUR Volunteers are another important prevention Reduce Drug Use in the Workplace resource. Citizens of all ages, from all occupa- tions, and in every community can become mean- Drug use in the workplace threatens worker ingfully involved in the lives of at-risk children — safety, health. and productivity; it increases health as tutors, mentors, coaches, companions, group care costs and has a negative impact on employ- leaders/advisors, etc.- and thereby help them ment and training efforts. In certain industries, avoid drug use and crime. For example, individu- the very safety of the public may be at greater risk als from all walks of life can become adult mentors if drug use is not eliminated. In short, illegal drug and help steer young people away from drugs and use endangers the economic recovery and future crime and toward a productive future. competitiveness of this country.¹⁶ The President's National Service Plan, which The workplace provides a unique setting to was signed into law on September 21. 1993, will educate young adults and parents about the dan- play an important role in reaching out to our gers of drug use. Many of our large corporations, youth and offering alternatives to drugs. National faced with new and emerging technologies in a Service marries educational opportunity and ser- global environment, are "re-engineering" their vice - offering opportunities to serve in our organizations to remain competitive. We encour- country, meeting its unmet needs. Participants, age them to continue to develop innovative ap- age 16 and older, will receive awards to help pay proaches to maintaining a for post-secondary education. Those engaged in drug-free work environment. National Service will work in one of four priority areas - public safety, education, human needs, The Administration will and the environment — on projects that may continue to assist businesses transform participants and provide direct service in their efforts to ensure that to our Nation's neighborhoods. drug use and distribution are not tolerated in America's In the drug-related areas, participants might workplaces. The Adminis- teach drug awareness to elementary and middle tration will encourage busi- school students, or work alongside a police officer nesses to adopt comprehensive drug-free engaged with the community in addressing neigh- workplace programs, similar to those instituted in borhood crime and disorder problems. National the transportation sector, that are effective in Service adds up to alternatives for out Nation's deterring and detecting drug use. The Federal youth and holds the possibility of providing a surer Government will develop a national partnership sense of citizenship and participation through ser- with State governments and large and small busi- vice. nesses to further the development of drug-free workplaces throughout the Nation. Finally, the media has an important role to play in reducing the demand for drugs. Newspapers, radio, and television can help keep this important issue in the public eye by giving higher visibility to those in our communities who are struggling to regain control and create a safe environment. By doing this, the media will showcase the positive 11 WED 21:35 JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 P.01 BREAKING THE CYCLE OF DRUG ABUSE A NATIONAL IMPERATIVE ENDNOTES impairs the immune response, leading to many health problems, including AIDS. 1 The number of such studies is extensive. See, Gerstein, Dean R. and Harwood, Henrick J. 7 U.S. Department of Health and Human (eds), Treating Drug Problems (Vol. 1) National Services. Surgeon General's Report to the Academy Press: Washington. D.C., 1990; American Public on HIV Infection and AIDS. Hubbard, Robert L. et al, Drug Abuse (Washington, D.C.: GPO). 1993. Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness, the University of North Carolina Press: Chapel 8 In fact, a recent study of mothers giving birth Hill, 1989. in California estimated that 5.2 percent of mothers in that State tested positive for illicit 2 Pharmacotherapy involves using drug use prior to delivery. See William A. pharmaceutical, licit drugs to control physical Vega, et al, "Profile of Alcohol and Drug Use and psychological addictions. During Pregnancy in California, 1992," sub- mitted to the State of California, Department 3 RAND work in progress, "Modeling the of Alcohol and Drug Programs. Demand for Cocaine," draft report prepared for the Office of National Drug Control Policy, 9 Many hard-core users have never received July 1993. treatment. In fact, over 40 percent of out-of- treatment injecting users have never been in a 4 See Abt Associates, "What America's Users treatment program. despite having used drugs Spend on Illegal Drugs, 1988-1991," prepared for an average of 11 years. under contract to the Office of National of Drug Control Policy (July 1993), and Joseph 10 Many treatment programs are designed for Gfroerer and Marc Brodsky, "Frequent Cocaine men and do not allow for special techniques to Users and Their Use of Treatment," American address the psychology and problems of Journal of Public Health (1993). women. 5 According to the Center on Addiction and 11 Effective institutional programs have Substance Abuse (CASA), the abuse of demonstrated immediate benefits in prison and tobacco, alcohol, and legal and illegal drugs is jail security and, when coupled with effective responsible for one out of five dollars Medicaid transitional services and supervision, long-term spends on hospital care. According to CASA, benefits in reduced drug use, reduced substance abuse will be responsible for more criminal activity, and increased work force than $7.4 billion in Medicaid inpatient costs participation. in Fiscal Year 1994. (Source: Jeffrey Merrill, et al., "The Cost of Substance Abuse to 12 Shock incarceration, or boot camps as they are America's Health Care System." Center on commonly called, appeared in the early 1980s Addiction and Substance Abuse, Columbia as an alternative to traditional corrections University, 1993). programs. Offenders in these programs spend a 6 Injection drug use is not the only source of relatively short period of time in a quasi- military program involving physical training. drug-related HIV exposure. Disinhibition and drill, manual labor. education, and strict impaired judgment due to drug use, especially discipline. alcohol use, increase HIV exposure through increased sexual activity and unprotected sex. 13 This estimate comes from recommendations Further, heavy alcohol and other drug use on substance abuse coverage and health care 12 SEP-29-93 WED 20:44 JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 P.17 BREAKING THE CYCLE OF DRUG ABUSE A NATIONAL IMPERATIVE reform, prepared by a working group from 13 Lloyd D. Johnston et al., Monitoring the Future Columbia University's Center on Addiction Survey, Survey Research Center, Institute for and Substance Abuse. in collaboration with Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann the Brown University Center for Alcohol Arbor. Michigan. 1992. and Addiction Studies. The working group met in New York City on March 6-7, 1993. 16 According to preliminary estimates from the 1992 National Household Survey on Drug 14 A recent study for the Office of National Drug Abuse (Advance Report #3), about two-thirds Control Policy found, among other things, of current adult users of illicit drugs are evidence of improved self-esteem, classroom employed. conduct among students in school-based programs. See Abt Associates, "Substance Abuse Prevention: What Works, and Why" (August 1993). 13 SEP-29-93 WED 20:45 JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 P.18 14 PAGE 301 937 6018 P.02 Reducing Drug-Related Violence: Common Sense Crime Control and Prevention [W]e must do more to protect law-abiding citizens from those who victimize them in the pursuit of drugs or profit from drugs. Bill Clinton he tremendous strain that drugs place health, and developmental effects that are reflect- I on our economy, and the health care ed in the societal damage done by large scale, vio- and criminal justice systems makes a lent drug trafficking organizations that disrupt the clear case for increased treatment and fundamental institutions of out society. prevention efforts. Drug use fosters crime and violence- property crime to support drug consumption and violent crime to STEP ONE support drug trafficking.¹ No reasonable drug pol- icy can ignore the safety and security of those Increase Police Presence and Expand Americans who work hard and play by the rules, Community Policing but live in fear because of drug-related crime. A comprehensive, balanced approach involving law As a result of the hard work of America's law enforcement officials, educators, substance abuse enforcement officers and the heroic efforts of treatment specialists, and community members, is many community leaders and members of commu- essential. nity coalitions, neighborhood residents have start- ed to take back their communities - house- Government's first responsibility to its people is by-house, block-by-block. But in too many com- to ensure their security, and this Administration munities, drug crimes continue to take a terrible will aggressively pursue this duty. We will strive to toll, especially — though not exclusively — in the ensure that our criminal justice system reflects the inner city and in economically disadvantaged common sense values of the American people. communities. Moreover, drug traffickers have That means putting more police on the street, tak- proven quite adept at expanding their illegal ing guns out of the hands of criminals, ensuring activity beyond the inner city to suburban and swift and certain punishment for offenders. and rural areas, where they perceive they can tap new acting on innovative crime control and prevention markets and escape the reach of aggressive, short- measures. We are most concerned about violence, term drug enforcement efforts. 15 SEP-29-93 WED 21:36 JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 P.03 BREAKING THE CYCLE OF DRUG ABUSE A NATIONAL IMPERATIVE The effects of drug-related crimes and violence Bridging the Gap Between Police and the are similar in almost all communities. Social Community: Community policing can help activity is reduced because of fear. Once peaceful bridge the gap that exists between many com- neighborhoods can quickly become 30 violence- munities and their police departments. Com- ridden and drug-infested that residents become munity policing is about working in prisoners in their own homes. partnership to solve crime and drug problems. By working together, neighborhood residents To halt this cycle of community decay, many and police officers can ensure that our drug cities have turned to increased police presence policies have an impact at the community and community policing. Although community level, where success and failure is best mea- policing alone cannot undo sured. the problems of drug-infested neighborhoods. it is a neces- Coordinating Drug Control Programs: By sary first step. When police learning the specifics about local crime and officers join with community drug problems, police officers engaged in com- residents to help resurrect munity policing can work with other govern- neighborhoods, they lay the ment agencies, treatment providers, or any foundation for representa- ocher appropriate social service agency, as well tives from other government as members of the community, to ensure that agencies, private sector our drug programs are properly coordinated groups, and others to come from the start. For instance, police officers in and work with local resi- learn who on their beats are the drug users and dents. who are the drug traffickers. They also learn who needs help and who needs to be closely This Administration is strongly committed to watched. And they can assist neighborhood putting more police on the street and expanding residents and city officials to close "crack the use of community policing throughout the houses" and open-air drug markets. country. By promoting and supporting communi- ty policing across the country, we can impact local As a first-step in promoting community polic- drug problems in a series of different ways. These ing, the Administration announced in August the include: availability of $150 million to hire additional sworn officers who will engage in community Reducing Fear of Crime: Los Angeles Police policing activities. These monies will be awarded Chief Willie Williams recently stated that: "If to applicant communities based on their need for you put new officers in uniform and on the increased police resources, as well as on the street, in cars, on foot beats, on bicycles, strength of their community-based policing plans. wherever they are necessary, you can make a community safe. It can reduce crime. It can We will build on this Initial investment by reduce the fear of crime." The President and enacting a crime bill to help communities put even members of his Cabinet strongly agree. more police on the street, by enacting legislation that allows local education and housing authorities Preventing Drug Crime: By increasing the to use Federal monies to implement community number of police officers who are working policing in our schools and public housing, and by with neighborhood residents to solve crime giving educational benefits to students willing to and drug problems, community policing helps serve their communities as police officers and pub- to prevent drug crime. lic safety volunteers. 16 SEP-29-93 WED 21:37 JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 P.04 BREAKING THE CYCLE OF DRUG ABUSE A NATIONAL IMPERATIVE STEP TWO This Administration has submitted to Con- gress the Safe Schools Act of 1993, emergency Responding to Gun Violence legislation to help schools combat violence. This Act would establish the first Federal program The ready availability of and easy access to specifically designed to direct funds to local school guns plays a significant role in drug-related vio- districts that are experiencing high rates of crime, lence and the tragic loss of life in our communi- violence, and disciplinary problems. Our chil- ties. In fact, crimes committed with guns, dren's safety is not a political option or a policy especially those incidents involving young people, question. It is a moral imperative. are on the rise.² Among our major concerns is the devastating This Administration strongly supports the impact that drugs and associated violence have on Brady Bill that would create a five-day waiting high-risk youth, particularly African Americans. period for handgun purchases. We urge the Con- Consider that during their lifetimes, 40 percent of gress to pass this legislation immediately. And. African American males will be a victim of a vio- while we have taken a step forward by banning lent crime three or more times. Further, homicide is the future importation of assault pistols and the leading cause of death for all African Ameri- reforming Federal firearms licensing procedures as can males and females between the ages of 15 and best we can under current law, we need to do 34. more. We need to enact a ban on the domestic manufacture of all assault weapons and pass legis- Because of the perceived hopelessness of their lation to increase basic fees for Federal firearms situation, many of these youth have "dropped licenses and ensure that recipients of Federal out," thereby adding to the interrelated problems firearms licenses are complying with all State and of unemployment, welfare, health. and crime. To local laws - not circumventing them. counter this problem. we will develop initiatives to address the impact of drugs and violence on high-risk youth. STEP THREE Juvenile Violent Crime Arrest Curb Youth Violence Rates, United States, 1995-1990 Violence against students and teachers in our 500 Nation's schools has now reached epidemic pro- portions. If any place in our community is gun- free and drug-free, it must be our schools. 400 We must continue to explore the interrelation- ships between drugs, violence, and the ability to learn. If out public schools must first concern themselves with security, learning takes a back seat. Only when our children are free from the Arrest Rate (per 100,000) 300 200 threat of violence will they be able to learn the 100 skills they will need for their future and ours. The entire community, including parents, law enforce- ment. health professionals, and the schools must o 1966 1970 1975 1980 1986 1990 work together to resolve the multitude of prob- lems spawned by drug use and drug trafficking. Source: FBI Uniform Crime Reports. 17 301 937 6018 P.05 BREAKING THE CYCLE OF DRUG ABUSE A NATIONAL IMPERATIVE The criminal justice system must work with the juvenile justice system. We need to develop com- Arrests for Drug Offenses prehensive, humane, rational policies that recog- as a Percent of Total State nize the need to ensure swift and appropriate and Local Arrests punishment for these juvenile offenders. yet bal- 10 ance our long-term vision of setting these youth on the right track back to productivity. Ensure Swift and Certain Punishment Percent of Total State and Local Arrests 8 Drug Offenses STEP FOUR 6 4 There is no better arena in which to begin the discussion of intergovernmental partnerships than with prosecution and sentencing strategies. We 2 must rethink our options and devise the best approach to using our limited resources. 0 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 Our bottom line must be a sentencing policy that gives credibility to out criminal justice system Source: FBL Crime in the United States. at all levels of government. We need to have appropriate punishments that are fair, objective, ity and many States were under court order to and carried out. In short, we need truth in sen- reduce their prison overcrowding. tencing. Punishments that are threatened, but not carried out, undermine the credibility of the Part of this problem is that in making drug- entire criminal justice system. Clearly, as we related penalties more severe during the past rethink the structure of appropriate sanctions, we decade, we have inadvertently made punishment must evaluate the role of minimum mandatory less certain. We need to make sure that criminals sentences. receive swift and certain punishment when they first encounter the criminal justice system, not The Nation's criminal justice system. especial- after it is too late. To deter crime, we must ly the courts and prisons, is overburdened by the increase the risk to criminals by making the high level of drug arrests. 3 prospect of punishment more certain. The choice For the period 1986-90 the for those who would break the law must not be number of Federal drug between prison or no punishment at all; it must be offenders sentenced to prison between the different forms of punishment. rose 48 percent, while the number of persons sentenced The goal of this Administration is that every to prison for all other types of convicted criminal should receive an appropriate crimes grew only 14 percent. punishment for his crime. Many will require Drug offenders as a percent- incarceration, and there must be sufficient space age of the State- sentenced to house them. Others - particularly first-time. prison population increased non-violent offenders - would be served better from 7 percent in 1981 to by alternative sanctions, including assignment to approximately 33 percent by work programs, boot camps, day reporting centers, 1990, nearly a five-fold electronic monitoring programs, and diversion jump. As of September 1993, the Federal prison into treatment. system was estimated to be 41 percent over capac- 18 301 937 6018 P.06 BREAKING THE CYCLE OF DRUG ABUSE A NATIONAL IMPERATIVE ENDNOTES "Uniform Crime Reports for the United States 1991," August 30, 1992). 1 Violence is used to protect or expand markets, intimidate competitors, and retaliate against 3 Drug users report greater involvement in crime sellers or buyers who are suspected of cheating. and are more likely than nonusers to have To avoid being arrested and punished, drug criminal records. Persons with criminal dealers commit violent crimes against police records are much more likely than ones and threaten informants or witnesses. without records to report being drug users. 2 Crimes rise in number as drug use increases. Nationally, there were 151 arrests per 100,000 (Source: Chaiken, Jan M., and Chaiken, juveniles for weapons law violations in 1990. Marcia R. in Crime and Justice. Ed. James Q. This was the highest rate ever recorded. Wilson and Michael Tonry. University of (Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation, Chicago Press, 1990, 203-239. Vol. 5). 19 WED 21:39 JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 P.07 20 SE5-69-93 WED 21:40 JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 P.08 Changing the Way We Do Business: Streamlining Government and Empowering Communities Drug policy must focus on those programs that have proven to be successful and cost-effective. It is time to end our philosophical discussion of goals and evaluations, and get down to the business of identifying and funding those programs that show results — and dropping those that do not. Lee Brown any new and innovative pro- tion is committed to moving drug policy beyond M grams have been implemented the criminal justice and public health context, to help reduce the supply and and into the greater arena of domestic policy. demand for drugs, both overseas and at home. In the past, we have talked about the need to STEP ONE evaluate these programs to determine which of them succeed in preventing or reducing drug use. Focus Federal Efforts It is now time to move beyond philosophical dis- cussions and identify and fund those anti-drug This Administration will set a new tone in programs that work. reducing illegal drug use by "reinventing" Federal drug control programs. Duplicative and uncoordi- But identifying successful programs is not nated drug control efforts abound in the Federal enough. We must broaden our perspective of drug Government, and we can start by streamlining policy and realize that unless successful programs drug control responsibilities. Currently, consider- are properly coordinated at the local level, we will able overlap exists in the areas of Federal drug not be able to truly pursue a national drug control enforcement, interdiction and intelligence sys- policy. Community coalitions comprised of the tems, as well as prevention and education. We many public and private agencies involved in intend to fully review the overlap in these and shaping local drug policy have taken drug prob- other drug control programs. leins into their own hands. By getting everyone in the community working together, these coalitions The goal of drug law enforcement is to protect have been successful in coordinating drug pro- Americans from drug abuse, by making drugs more grams and - equally important - in raising the expensive and harder to obtain, and to reduce the public's awareness of drug abuse issues and in gain- violence attendant within Illicit markets, while ing their support. Accordingly, this Administra- protecting Americans and their communities. 21 BREAKING THE CYCLE OF DAUG ABUSE A NATIONAL IMPERATIVE The best national drug law enforcement effort is In 8 country with borders as vast and as open 23 not one that results in ever-increasing numbers of our own,³ however, interdiction is a costly under- arrests and convictions, drug removals, and asset taking that requires the cooperation of numerous seizures, but rather one that effectively reduces Federal agencies and the source and transit drug abuse and its harmful effects, including vio- nations. We will review existing interdiction lence. A clear, rational. and comprehensive sup- organization, resources, and methods, to ensure ply reduction strategy must focus its investigative they are operating in the most effective and effi- resources, interdiction assets, intelligence opera- cient manner. Programs that are proven effective tions, and other resources on the international will be continued. and domestic trafflcking organizations that are the Intelligence support is a particularly critical ele- most significant and danger- ment of interdiction. Effective interdiction ous. Our law enforcement requires that Federal agencies be provided with the agencies will attack criminal best possible intelligence information. Therefore. enterprises engaged in the we will aggressively pursue improvements to those production, transportation, intelligence systems that are the most capable of and wholesale and retail dis- meeting this need. tribution of our most danger- ous drugs, e.g., heroin, and cocaine, without And finally, to determine which programs and diminishing efforts against the other drugs of strategies are the most effective, we will improve abuse: clandestinely manufactured dangerous our data and research efforts to help Federal. State drugs, legal pharmaceuticals diverted to the illegal and local governments, and private organizations market, and marijuana. obtain the best information possible about the nature and extent of the drug problem. We will However, to achieve these goals, we must have work with Federal agencies to improve the quality, an integrated strategy that effectively distributes timeliness, and policy relevance of drug data col- responsibilities among Federal, State, and local lection systems and to develop new methods for institutions. We must rethink what are appropri- capturing information about emerging trends. We ate roles for the Federal Government, State gov- will also undertake a new data collection effort to emments, and local governments. We must think measure the number, location, and characteristics through the multiple, cross-cutting issues, applying of the hard-core user population, and sponsor and principles of Federalism mixed with the realities of conduct research and evaluation projects to deter- modern life and current local conditions. Our goal mine which strategies and programs are working. must be to facilitate a real partnership among Fed- eral, State, and local governments, one in which We will measure the success of our effort by the the Federal Government is not telling the States reduction in drug use and other social harms, such what to do, but one where we are true partners. as illness, unemployment, and crime. We will look for concrete results from specific programs. Interdiction,¹ a uniquely Federal responsibility, We will establish performance standards for drug keeps many tons of cocaine, heroin. and other treatment providers. This will enable local com- dangerous drugs from crossing our borders. It munities to assess the effectiveness of their treat- attacks the trafficker's critical transportation net- ment providers and will facilitate more informed works to deny them easy access to this country as funding decisions. well as the use of their preferred routes.² Success in keeping the traffickers from significantly increasing drug availability supports the treat- ment, prevention, and local law enforcement ele- ments of our strategy. 22 SEP-29-93 WED 21:42 JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 P.10 BREAKING THE CYCLE OF DRUG ABUSE A NATIONAL IMPERATIVE STEP TWO To highlight the importance of community empowerment, on September 9, 1993, the Presi- Empower Communities dent signed an Executive Order creating the Community Enterprise Board. Headed by the Some of the best solutions to the drug problem Vice President. the Board will take the lead on have resulted from successful community coali- working with the Empowerment Zones and Enter- tions. Formed out of citizens' frustration with prise Communities. The Board will be co-chaired government's bureaucratic response to a multifac- by the President's Assistants for Domestic and eted issue such as the drug problem, these coali- Economic Policy and includes the Director of the tions took their fate into their own hands. Instead Office of National Drug Control Policy and other of government, at all levels, telling them how to Members of the Cabinet. solve their problems, community coalitions put together comprehensive plans of their own and told government what resources and support they STEP THREE needed to rid their neighborhoods of drug traffick- ers and drug abuse. Using Research For Results This Administration wholeheartedly believes that where Federal, State, and local governments Research is an investment in our future, and share a role in addressing drug abuse and traffick- this Administration will continue to support ing, the Federal approach must be one that efforts that add to our knowledge base about the empowers communities. Empowering communities nature and extent of the drug means supporting local efforts that are based on problem, and about what comprehensive, strategic plans and that involve works in reducing drug avail- the private sector, build on existing community ability and use. In particular, institutions, and coordinate government efforts we need to know more about across program and jurisdiction lines. Despite all the causes and consequences the rhetoric about Federal anti-drug programs to of drug use, where and among reduce drug abuse and drug crime, we simply have whom it is the most threaten- not done enough to support community efforts. ing, what options are avail- able to us to control To help do so, the President's economic plan initiation, and to reduce drug targets anti-drug monies — along with growth use. Our objective is the incentives and other Federal investments- into explicit application of research. studies, and eval- nine Empowerment Zones and 95 Enterprise uations by all involved in the drug effort to Communities. This is an important step toward improve the efficiency and effectiveness of drug revitalizing our cities and rural areas. It will pro- control programs. vide a starting point for ensuring that our drug policy is integrated and community-based. Com- With respect to demand-related research, munities must look at the spectrum of domestic emphasis will be placed on behavioral and biomed- initiatives— from substance abuse and preven- ical research, which forms the knowledge base for tion programs, to community policing grants, and new and improved prevention and treatment from growth incentives to create jobs, to Commu- strategies. The Federal government supports nity Development Banks to help finance future almost 90 percent of all drug abuse research, which growth - in developing their plans and ask for what makes the most sense for them. In essence, focuses on the incidence and prevalence of drug use, and its causes and effects. Federally-funded these communities will become laboratories of Domestic and Economic Policy. research is developing new therapeutic approach- es, evaluating their efficacy, and designing ways to 23 SEP-29-93 WED 21:42 JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 P.11 BREAKING THE CYCLE OF DRUG ABUSE A NATIONAL IMPERATIVE optimize their outcome. Improved diagnostic enforcement agencies. Accordingly, we will strategies and instruments, and outreach ap- establish an Advisory Group on State and Local proaches for drug users not in treatment (especially Technology Needs, which will be comprised of injection drug users at risk for HIV/AIDS) are also senior State and local law enforcement executives under development. Research on the human and technology experts, to help CTAC identify, brain's drug receptors and their sites of action, drug define, and develop new technologies specifically detection technologies, and behavioral and biolog- in support of State and local law enforcement. ical techniques will continue. Priority areas for CTAC will also sponsor research to identify and research efforts will focus on evaluation of behav- address gaps in technology to improve our ability ioral therapies for drug treat- to counter drug trafficking and its associated crim- ment and the effects of drugs inal activity. on the brain and nervous sys- tem. CTAC will continue outreach programs to facilitate the sharing of technology throughout Practical requirements the law enforcement community, internationally dictate that the bulk of and domestically, by sponsoring technical sym- demand reduction studies posia and workshops on state-of-the-art and focus on the quality, cost, advanced technology. access, organization, financ- ing, management, and effec- Historically Black Colleges and Universities tiveness of drug treatment, (HBCU) can make a significant contribution to prevention, and other de- both supply reduction and demand-side research mand reduction activities. and development initiatives. With unique ties to Priority areas for research both academia and the African-American com- include the evaluation of munity, HBCUs offer an opportunity to target new medications for the treatment of drug abuse, sophisticated prevention and treatment modali- the effects of drugs on the pregnant addict and her ties for drug use, as well as technical contributions child, and the development and testing of new pre- to technology development. vention strategies. Research will also focus on populations at particular risk, such as children, We will identify those schools with graduate minorities, and underserved populations. degrees in technologies applicable to CTAC re- quirements. We will then work with HBCU's with With respect to supply-related research, we will the most promising mix of technologies for coun- provide a community-wide infrastructure support terdrug research proposals, emphasizing proposals program of technology testbeds or "laboratories in that feature joint academic-community partner- the field" to test and evaluate prototype technolo- ships. Additionally, CTAC will include HBCU's in gy for counterdrug enforcement in realistic opera- areas of particular relevance, such as technical sem- tional settings. Testbeds will derive better designs inars and technology review meetings. for fielded equipment and provide a sound basis for bringing new equipment into the law enforce- We will also work with the Hispanic Associa- ment inventory. Furthermore, we will continue to tion of Colleges and Universities (HACU) to support development of illicit drug and precursor identify those colleges and universities that have chemical signature detectability standards for use strong links with Hispanic populations in order to in designing and evaluating detecrion equipment target prevention and treatment programs to the in the field. fastest growing and youngest minority population in the United States. These institutions provide The Office of National Drug Control Policy's an effective vehicle to reach large numbers of His- Counter-Drug Technology Assessment Center panic youths living in poverty and at high risk for (CTAC)⁵ will expand its technology develop- using drugs and alcohol. ment and sharing efforts with State and local law 24 WED 21:44 JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 P. 12 BREAKING THE CYCLE OF DRUG ABUSE A NATIONAL IMPERATIVE Research support to the Office of National Drug Control Policy will be expanded to provide a are that 70 percent of the cocaine entering this country does so across this section of our more comprehensive look at drug control policy border. and strategy development and implementation. Specifically, the research will develop methodolo- 3 The United States has 88,633 miles of gles, models for identifying trends in drug industry coastline and more than 7,500 miles of borders operations and for assessing the suitability of exist- with Canada and Mexico. There are also 300 ing policies and strategies to counter these trends. ports of entry to the United States. The research will also explore the relationship between international trafficking, production, 4 Research in other areas are also critical: and smuggling operations and fluctuations in mar- findings from basic research. which are used ket supply, purity, and price. toward building blocks toward the development of new medications; research on ENDNOTES drug abuse and HIV/AIDS, which is of critical importance because of the link between drug 1 The goal of interdiction is to prevent illegal use and AIDS cases; and research on the drugs from entering the United States by maternal. paternal, and fetal effects of drug use. intercepting and seizing such shipments. 5 CTAC, established in 1991, is the Office of 2 Interdiction efforts that contribute to National Drug Control Policy's central counterdrug enforcement research and decreasing the flow of drugs across the Southwest Border are crucial since estimates development organization of the U.S. government. 25 SEP-29-93 WED 21:45 JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 P.14 Providing International Leadership: Support for Anti-Drug Policies Around The World Although much remains for the United States to do at home, we will not neglect our close partnership with 8 growing number of countries around the world that share our commitment to combatting drug trafficking. Lee Brown nternational narcotics control is a major demand and supply reduction efforts to curb drug U.S. foreign policy objective, particularly in availability and use will be undermined. To the leading drug source, transit, and money ensure progress, U.S. foreign policy will pursue laundering countries. Left unchecked, the short- and long-term initiatives at bilateral and illegal drug trade's corrupting influences will multilateral levels. undermine the goals we seek to achieve in the fields of democracy and economic stability and growth, as well as efforts to promote human Total Potential Cocaine rights, the rule of law, and a clean environment. Production, 1988-1992 The unabated flow of drugs also undercuts the (range estimate) effectiveness of our domestic supply and demand reduction efforts. We must, therefore, continue to 1988 840 1,040 work with, and offer our full support and coopera- tion to other nations. especially the major source and transit countries, that demonstrate the politi- 1989 845 1,050 cal will and program commitment to combat the drug trade. We will urge other nations to under- 1990 880 1,090 take more action on their own by reinforcing the concept that it is in their best interests to do so. Strong diplomatic leadership will help deliver this 1991 955 1,170 message and spark foreign governments to take action. 1992 955 1,165 The great majority of illicit drugs found on the 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 streets of the United States are produced overseas, Metric Tons and the major criminal organizations that produce and smuggle them are located in foreign coun- Source: Bureau of International Narcotics Matters. U.S. Department of tries.¹ Without international cooperation, our State, "International Narcotics Control Strategy Report." 27 WED 21:45 JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 a) BREAKING THE CYCLE OF DRUG ABUSE A NATIONAL IMPERATIVE enforcement and judicial institutions. We will Total Worldwide Oplum selectively back alternative development and crop Cultivation control programs when there is a strong prospect or record of success. We will emphasize assistance to international and regional institutions, such as 1989 the United Nations and Organization of American 230 States, that conduct counternarcotics programs in support of democratic governments in such areas as legal and judicial reform, strengthening of law 1990 221 enforcement capabilities, and promotion of demand reduction and alternative development efforts. 1991 239 Furthermore, we will sponsor projects that have regional applicability, such as law enforce- ment training, detection and monitoring activi- 1992 257 ties, and communications systems. We will seek to involve more deeply multinational develop- 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 ment banks and other international financial Thousands of Hectares institutions in support of counternarcotics pro- grams directed toward alternative development Source: Bureau of International Narcotics Matters, U.S. Department of and judicial reform. And we will develop, where State, "Loternational Narcotice Control Strategy Report." appropriate and with host country participation, integrated regional technical systems to support STEP ONE their own interdiction efforts. Prioritize International Efforts We will concentrate drug control assistance in major producer and transit countries that have We will continue to treat the flow of drugs to demonstrated their political will to reduce drug this country and the operations of foreign drug trafficking. Assistance programs will focus on trafficking organizations as a threat to U.S. nation- improving judicial and policy systems, interdic- al security. Cocaine remains tion efforts, and other programs to attack the our primary threat, although drug-trafficking infrastructure. Our goal is to heroin warrants serious con- improve their ability to arrest or incapacitate the cern. To counter this threat. leaders of drug organizations and to control money we will ensure a coordinated laundering and the flow of essential and precursor response by U.S. supply chemicals. 2 Further, we will monitor shifts in reduction agencies and the illicit production and trafficking and institute the strongest cooperation be- planning required to counter these shifts. countries tween the United States and commitment other countries to stem the We will continue diplomatic, public awareness, international drug trade. demand reduction, and other efforts with key countries whose political commitment to coun- To improve our national ternarcotics is weak. Our objective is to convince responses to organized inter- them that, as members of the global community, national drug trafficking, the United States will their full participation in the international cam- support counternarcotics programs within source paign against drugs is their responsibility and is in countries (i.e., Bolivia, Peru, and Colombia), their own national interest. focusing on democratic institution-building of law 28 SEP-29-93 WED 21:46 JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 P.16 BREAKING THE CYCLE OF DRUG ABUSE A NATIONAL IMPERATIVE STEP TWO Drug Enforcement Conference, and various Unit- ed Nations and European Community efforts that Build A Global Alliance have been useful in coordinating multi-national activities and in developing controls and regula- tions to address such problems as maritime smug- The urgent need to strengthen and broaden gling, money laundering, and the flow and International cooperation against the global drug diversion of essential and precursor chemicals to trade cannot be overstated. The cultivation, pro- source countries. We will continue efforts to duction, trafficking, and use of illicit drugs is an strengthen the United Nations Drug Control Pro- increasingly global problem. The drug trade poses gram that currently provides drug control assis- new trafficking challenges and threats to political tance to 97 countries and, as coordinator of the and economic stability that the United States U.N. anti-drug effort, is getting more U.N. agen- cannot confront alone. For example. criminal cies to include drug control objectives in their syndicates are taking advantage of the political activities. turmoil in Eastern Europe and other parts of the world to expand narcotics trafficking, a move that is undermining regional progress towards democ- ENDNOTES ratic. social, and economic reform. 1 For example, the Cali cartel in Colombia is an The United States will continue to lead the organized crime group that, by some estimates, effort to develop an international coalition controls over 70 percent of the world's cocaine against drug cultivation, production, trafficking, business. and use, through multilateral organizations and initiatives, using the full range of traditional and 2 The production of illicit drugs requires public diplomacy tools at our disposal. Past "drug precursor and essential chemicals (e.g., cocaine summits" created cooperative frameworks for producing chemicals include acetone, ethyl action in the form of international treaties, ether, methyl ethyl ketone, potassium regional working groups, and model legislation. permanganate, and toluene). Since most of Some of these efforts continue to bear fruit, but these chemicals are not manufactured in the some agreements have languished. We will use established consultative groups such as the Orga- cocaine and heroin source countries, drug trafficking organizations must usually obtain nization of American States, the Financial Action them through international commerce. Task Force, the Dublin Group, the International 29 SEP-29-93 WED 21:47 JIM PAGE 301 937 6018 P.18 Conclusion T he National Drug Control Strategy will give We will ensure fairness- yet emphasize certainty a new direction and focus to our drug control of punishment - for those who violate drug laws. efforts. The Administration is committed to We will also encourage innovative alternatives to reducing the demand for drugs through effective and aggressive prevention and treatment initia- incarceration, expand drug treatment capacity, promote referrals into treatment for those in the tives, with particular focus on the difficult prob- lem of hard-core drug use and seriously at-risk criminal justice system, and support community policing to make our communities safe once populations. The economic and social revitaliza- again. We will work with the international coin- tion of those communities ravaged by drug use will munity to combat the transnational syndicates efforts. be central to the Administration's anti-drug that control the drug trade. At the same time, the Administration will Our anti-drug effort will not just be a Federal undertaking, but will be a collaborative one that continue to work aggressively to suppress the traf- fic in illicit drugs in and directed at the United includes State and local governments, the private States. The Administration remains committed sector, schools, religious institutions, community groups, and the efforts of individual Americans. to using the full force of the investigative and Our task is a challenging one, but one that must prosecutive tools at our disposal to ensure that drug traffickers and their organizations are disrupt- be done for the future growth, security, and pros- perity of all Americans. ed. dismantled. and destroyed. 31