Extracted text

OCR Page 1 of 47
h3579cnf.wpd Page 1 The Honorable Bob Livingston Chairman Committee on Appropriations U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Mr. Chairman: The purpose of this letter is to provide the Administration's views on H.R. 3579, Making Emergency Supplemental Appropriations, FY 1998, as passed by the House and by the Senate; and, H.R. 3580, Making Supplemental Appropriations and Rescissions, FY 1998, as reported by the House Appropriations Committee. As the conferees develop a final version of the bill, your consideration of the Administration's views would be appreciated. The Administration believes that we must provide disaster assistance to communities here at home and support for our troops overseas without violating last year's budget agreement or attaching extraneous provisions. The American people want their Government to be able to respond quickly and in a non-partisan manner to emergencies both here and overseas. It would be disappointing and disturbing if our ability to provide assistance to victims of natural disasters, to provide continued funding for our troops in Bosnia and Southwest Asia, and to ensure the readiness of our military forces worldwide were held hostage to partisan politics in the Congress. We urge the conferees to avoid actions that would result in gridlock and that would be detrimental to our troops abroad and our citizens at home in a time of need. The Administration is deeply concerned that the pending supplemental appropriations have been segregated into two distinct appropriations bills in the House and strongly recommends that the two measures be combined into a single bill. It is in the best interest of our national security and our economy that Congress pass a single bill that provides funding for our missions in Bosnia and Southwest Asia, for the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and for overdue payments to the United Nations. The segregation of the supplemental appropriations into two bills has already impeded the House's ability to address important international economic issues. Failure to produce one unified bill could unnecessarily delay this vital assistance. This assistance should be provided free of extraneous and controversial provisions. American economic and security interests