Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
55279933
label
CRA [Community Reinvestment Act] [Folder 3]
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
Source extras
naId
55279933
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
otherTitles
42-t-26466288-20120043S-004-002-2017
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
6fc3619b98bf372d
ocrText
Withdrawal/Redaction Sheet Clinton Library DOCUMENT NO. SUBJECT/IITLE DATE RESTRICTION AND TYPE 001. memo Memorandum for the President and Vice President (5 pages) ca. 05/1999 P5 002. memo Memorandum for the President and Vice President (5 pages) ca. 05/1999 P5 COLLECTION: Clinton Presidential Records Policy Development Lisa Green OA/Box Number: 20587 FOLDER TITLE: CRA [Community Reinvestment Act] [Folder 3] 2012-0043-S ms434 RESTRICTION CODES Presidential Records Act - 144 U.S.C. 2204(a)] Freedom of Information Act - 15 U.S.C. 552(b)] P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA) b(1) National security classified information |(b)(1) of the FOIA] P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA| h(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA] an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA] P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA] financial information |(a)(4) of the PRA] h(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA] b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA] personal privacy |(a)(6) of the PRA] b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes |(b)(7) of the FOIA] C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of of gift. financial institutions |(b)(8) of the FOIA| PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C. h(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information 2201(3). concerning wells ((b)(9) of the FOIA] RR. Document will be reviewed upon request. NATIONAL COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT COALITION NCRC Flor John E Taylor President 6 CEO Board of Directors Ernest E (Gene) Ortega. Champerson Home Education Livenhood Program Gail Burks. Vice Champerson Nevada Fair Housing Conter. Inc Mr. Gene Sperling Pete Garcia. Vice Champerson Chicanos Por La Causa National Economic Advisor to the President Elbert Jones. 11., Treasurer Community Equity Investments, Inc Office of the President Anne Peterson. Secretary White House The Housing Council Washington, DC June 28, 1999 Irvin Henderson, Past Chairperson Community Reinvestment Association of North Carolina Marra Smith Battle-Bey Dear Mr. Sperling: Vermont Slauson Economic Development Corporation Lee Beaulac Rural Opportunities, Inc. Aggie Brose I attended the meeting at Treasury on Monday, June 28th as part of the Pittsburgh Community Reinvestment Group National Community Reinvestment Coalition group that met with you and Malcom Bush Woodstock Institute Under Secretary Gensler. I wish to take you up on your invitation to make Dbarmena Downey suggestions on how the President's New Market's Initiative could increase Neighborhood of Affordable Housing Nan Fisher CRA support and more importantly increase access to credit and capital in Cahfornia Reinvestment Committee underserved communities. Devorab Lee bong Spring Crech Community Corporation Mattbew Lee Inner CIV Press First, on the New Market's trip, the President should reaffirm, in the presence Community On the Move of community reinvestment leaders, his strong commitment to CRA coupled Engene Lowe United States Conference of Mayors with comments on the remarkable success of CRA. One obvious way to Jesse R' Ornelas Cabrillo Economic support this position is to have the president express his zero tolerance for Development Corporation Suzy Post CRA weakening legislation. Toward this end, we would encourage you to Metropolitan Housing Coalition invite a local CRA practitioner, along with a community bank partner, to Rashmi Rangan Delaware Community participate in the various days events as you make your New Market's visits Reinvestment Action Council Jerry Reynolds to the various cities. Fust Nations Development Institute Shelley Sheeby Muscatine Center for Second, the SBA, working in concert with NCRC has produced a new small Strategic Action. CDC Hubert Van Tol business product, named "Community Express" that we feel dramatically Wisconsin Rural Development Corporation increases traditionally underserved people's access to small business lending. Morris Williams This product is an obvious match for inclusion in the New Market's Initiative. Coalition of Neighborhoods Ted Wysocki Chicago Association of Neighborhood Development Organizations (CANDO) 1: Barton Harrey, III Charperson Emeritus The Enterprise Foundation 733 15th Street, NW State 5.10 Washington, DC 20005-2112 202 626-8866 Fax: 202 628-9800 E-Mail noremembargte.net Website www.nerc.org NATIONAL COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT COALITION NCRC Finally, several organizations at the Treasury meeting suggested that you work more closely with NCRC and myself. I would welcome that opportunity and I look forward to any collaboration that makes sense for you and the Administration. NCRC would be pleased to also assist with any logistics that may arise out of the above suggestions, including coordinating community speakers for each visit, should you so desire. Our organization stands ready to support your New Market Initiatives and to oppose the Bliley Amendment. In turn, we hope you stand ready to include NCRC in your initiatives. Sincerely, Zen John Taylor President & CEO Peter A. Weissman 06/29/99 04:56:14 PM Record Type: Record To: Lisa Green/OPD/EOP@EOP, Melissa G. Green/OPD/EOP, Sarah Rosen Wartell/OPD/EOP@EOP CC: Subject: Lisa- pls return this call for Gene John Taylor Natl Community Reinvestment Coalition 628-8866 was at your CRA briefing. called to follow up on your offer to help with New Markets. Faxed you a letter. Lisa will call him. JUN-25-1999 16:34 ACORN P.01 € ACORN FAX COVER SHEET TO: The Hon. Gene Sparling FROM: Chris Saffert DATE: 6/25/99 FAX # OF RECEIVER: 456-2878 NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 2 NOTE: Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now National Office: 739 8th Street S.E., Washington, D.C. 20003 202-547-2500 FAX 202-546-2483 " JUN-25-1999 16:34 ACORN P.02 June 25. 1999 The Hon. Gene Sperling Director, National Economic Council White House Washington, DC 20502 Dear Mr. Sperling: We write in regard to H.R. 10 and our concerns about its potential impact on the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). We are deeply appreciative of the Clinton Administration's past and current support for CRA and the law's efforts to increase access to capital in traditionally underserved communities. CRA has enjoyed significant successes in expanding economic and homeownership opportunities for residents of low and moderate income and minority neighborhoods. In the range of day-to-day activities of our organizations, we see first-hand the positive impact of CRA in our communities, and we are adamantly opposed to any legislation that diminishes the effectiveness of CRA. We do not consider H.R. 10 to be CRA-neutral because it would alter the structure of the financial industry in ways that would be harmful to CRA. The bill would encourage additional concentration in the financial industry and the creation of larger financial conglomerates that would have fewer ties to local communities, especially lower-income and minority neighborhoods. and be less responsive to local concerns. It would also result in financial holding companies shifting their assets into new affiliates and away from their bank and thrift divisions, which are covered by CRA. To address H.R. 10's negative impact on CRA, we request that the Administration support amendments that Reps. Luis Gutierrez and Thomas Barrett are seeking to introduce during House consideration and push for making them in order under the rule for H.R. 10. Rep. Gutierrez' amendment would extend CRA to bank holding company affiliates that provide banking services. The Gutierrez Amendment would help preserve the principle that institutions offering basic banking services should be subject to CRA and stop H.R. 10 from giving an unfair market advantage to financial institutions that offer such services through affiliates. The amendment would also prevent H.R. 10 from encouraging financial holding companies to shift their assets into affiliates to avoid CRA coverage. In addition, it would mark a good first step toward curbing abusive practices by predatory lenders, some of which are affiliates of bank holding companies. that maintain such an aggressive presence in communities that are underserved by banks. The Barrett Amendment would address the problem of insurance redlining by setting basic data disclosure requirements for insurance companies. Like redlining by banks. insurance redlining greatly restricts economic opportunities in lower-income areas. Without access to homeowners' or small business property insurance, minorities and people with lower incomes are prevented from obtaining mortgages or getting loans to start up a small businesses. The Barrett Amendment would require insurance companies to provide information about the race, income, and other characteristics of potential customers by census tract both on policies they choose to underwrite and on applicants they reject, much like the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) requires for mortgage lenders. While we know discrimination exists in the property insurance industry, there is very little public data on industry practices, and the Barrett Amendment would remedy that problem. Thank you for your attention to our concerns. We look forward to seeing you at the CRA forum at the Treasury Department on June 28 and discussing these amendments with you in more detail at that time. Sincerely, ACORN Center for Community Change National Community Reinvestment Coalition National League of Cities National Neighborhood Coalition NETWORK: A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby TOTAL P.02 Sarah Rosen Wartell 05/24/99 02:22:59 PM Record Type: Record To: See the distribution list at the bottom of this message CC: See the distribution list at the bottom of this message Subject: CRA Burden Hours As you know, under the Paperwork Reduction Act, agencies are required to periodically assess the time that it takes to complete their paperwork requirements. In 1995, when the CRA regulations were revised, estimates of the burden hours on firms were calculated. The four banking agencies (OCC, OTS, Fed, and FDIC) have recently reestimated the burden hours. The revised numbers will be sent this week to the Federal Register. Actual publication date is unclear, but they will be laid on the table (and thus in the public domaine) sometime this week. In general, I am told by Treasury, the estimates will be significantly higher (4-5 times) than was originally estimated in 1995. A big part of the difference is attributable to geocoding. It was assumed in 1995 that there would be readily available software that could be integrated with existing applications to geocode each loan. Unfortunately, while some software is available, the integration is not seemless and the calculation takes longer than expected. There is good news, however. While the estimates for all banks (including small banks) are higher than expected, the total burden hours for small banks is still very low -- only 10 burden hours per year per bank. (Note: these numbers do not count time spent undergoing examination for CRA compliance, which is not counted under the paperwork reduction act.) This is basically consistent with what we have been saying in response to the small bank exemption -- that streamlining done by the Administration in 1995 dramatically reduced the impact on small institutions. Treasury will provide us with talking points on this issue BEFORE the estimates are made public. However, we are not contacting the bank regulators directly as we do not want to leave anyone with the impression that these estimates were not developed entirely independently and without political pressure. Please contact me if you have any questions. Message Sent To: Melissa G. Green/OPD/EOP@EOP Roger S. Ballentine/WHO/EOP@EOP Broderick Johnson/WHO/EOP@EOP Lisa Green/OPD/EOP@EOP Paul J. Weinstein Jr./OPD/EOP@EOP Message Copied To: Michael Deich/OMB/EOP@EOP Alan B. Rhinesmith/OMB/EOP@EOP Theodore Wartell/OMB/EOP@EOP Edward A. Brigham/OMB/EOP@EOP Alice Veenstra/OMB/EOP@EOP Derek A. Chapin/OMB/EOP@EOP Jefferson B. Hill/OMB/EOP@EOP Joseph F. Lackey Jr./OMB/EOP@EOP Michelle A. Enger/OMB/EOP@EOP Leticia Sierra/OMB/EOP@EOP Roger S. Ballentine 05/03/99 01:09:47 PM Record Type: Record To: [email protected] CC: See the distribution list at the bottom of this message Subject: Re: More re CRA-Reply ..] pls be sure that Steve H. knows this a Message Copied To: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Sarah Rosen Wartell/OPD/EOP@EOP Broderick Johnson/WHO/EOP@EOP [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Jonathan A. Kaplan/OPD/EOP@EOP [email protected] Lisa Green/OPD/EOP@EOP [email protected] [email protected]. Melissa G. Green/OPD/EOP@EOP [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Sarah Rosen Wartell 05/03/99 10:38:44 AM Record Type: Record To: Sarah Rosen Wartell/OPD/EOP@EOP CC: See the distribution list at the bottom of this message Subject: More re CRA Also at 8:00, there was a discussion about how we could elevate our profile on CRA during this week's fight. One suggestion was that Gene go to the event on CRA hosted by the civil rights groups this week. Query -- Is this a good idea? I understand that neither rubin nor the members will be there. I thought we had said that we would participate in this IF it was focused solely on CRA, but not if it was going to bash Fin Mod which we support. Guidance ASAP please. Message Copied To: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Roger S. Ballentine/WHO/EOP@EOP Broderick Johnson/WHO/EOP@EOP Melissa G. Green/OPD/EOP@EOP Lisa Green/OPD/EOP@EOP Jonathan A. Kaplan/OPD/EOP@EOP [email protected] 05/03/99 01:05:22 PM Record Type: Record To: See the distribution list at the bottom of this message CC: See the distribution list at the bottom of this message Subject: More re CRA -Reply Date: 05/03/1999 01:02 pm (Monday) From: Michael Barr To: DOM3.DOPO5(COMSTOCKN, FROMANM, KORNBLUHK, LEVINEM, WATCHOFFICE), DOM3.DOPO6(BAERG, CARNELLR, GENSLERG, KELLOGGC, SCHRODERM, TUCKERI), ex.mail("[email protected]", "[email protected]") CC: ex.mail("[email protected]", "cliff.kellogg", "gary.gensler", "gregory.baer", "irma.tucker", "[email protected]", "karen.kornbluh", "[email protected]", "marne.levine", "melissa.schroder", "[email protected]", "michael.barr", "michael.froman", "neal.comstock", "rick.carnell", "[email protected]", "watch.office", "[email protected]"), Subject: More re CRA -Reply Civil rights groups want to fly solo. >>>ex.mail."[email protected]" 05/03/99_10:38am »» Also at 8:00, there was a discussion about how we could elevate our profile on CRA during this week's fight. One suggestion was that Gene go to the event on CRA hosted by the civil rights groups this week. Query -- Is this a good idea? I understand that neither rubin nor the members will be there. I thought we had said that we would participate in this IF it was focused solely on CRA, but not if it was going to bash Fin Mod which we support. Guidance ASAP please. Message Sent To: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Sarah Rosen Wartell/OPD/EOP Message Copied To: Broderick Johnson/WHO/EOP [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Jonathan A. Kaplan/OPD/EOP [email protected] Lisa Green/OPD/EOP [email protected] [email protected] Melissa G. Green/OPD/EOP [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Roger S. Ballentine/WHO/EOP [email protected] [email protected] file CRA THE WHITE HOUSE NATIONAL ECONOMIC COUNCIL TO: Gene FROM: San PHONE: FAX: DATE: 5/3 PAGES TO FOLLOW 5 COMMENTS: RUBIN will discuss at 800 Memo is badly Flaved. Written about for Gudience who's 'is familia ul technical ISSUED. Desn't explain tactical benefits of key recommendation Not clear why suddenly time pressing afta stting at Tressury far 10 days. Withdrawal/Redaction Marker Clinton Library DOCUMENT NO. SUBJECT/TTTLE DATE RESTRICTION AND TYPE 001. memo Memorandum for the President and Vice President (5 pages) ca. 05/1999 P5 COLLECTION: Clinton Presidential Records Policy Development Lisa Green OA/Box Number: 20587 FOLDER TITLE: CRA [Community Reinvestment Act] [Folder 3] 2012-0043-S ms434 RESTRICTION CODES Presidential Records Act - |44 U.S.C. 2204(a)] Freedom of Information Act - 15 U.S.C. 552(b)] PI National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA] b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA] P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA| b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA] an agency |(b)(2) of the FOIA] P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute |(b)(3) of the FOIA] financial information |(a)(4) of the PRA] b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA] b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy |(b)(6) of the FOIA] personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA] b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA] C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of of gift. financial institutions |(b)(8) of the FOIA] PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C. b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information 2201(3). concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA] RR. Document will be reviewed upon request. To: See the distribution list at the bottom of this message CC: Subject: CRA memo to president Date: 05/02/1999 10:19 pm (Sunday) From: Michael Barr To: WATCHOFFICE, genslerg, carnellr, baerg, levinem, fromanm, kornbluhk, comstockn,EX.MAlL."[email protected]" EX.MAIL."[email protected]", schroderm, kelloggc, tuckeri, barrm Subject: CRA memo to president This draft includes comments from Paul Weinstein, Froman, Gensler, and me. It currently contains recommendations endorsed by all advisors. Watchoffice: Please fax to (1) Secretary Rubin; (2) Paul Weinstein; (3) Sarah Rosen; (4) Gary Gensler. - crapotus2.502.wpd Message Sent To: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Sarah Rosen Wartell/OPD/EOP [email protected] Message Copied To: Sarah Rosen Wartell 05/03/99 10:32:11 AM Record Type: Record To: Lisa Green/OPD/EOP@EOP CC: Subject: Re: CRA memo to president Forwarded by Sarah Rosen Wartell/OPD/EOP on 05/03/99 10:32 AM Sarah Rosen Wartell 05/03/99 10:32:00 AM Record Type: Record To: [email protected] CC: See the distribution list at the bottom of this message bcc: Records Management@EOP Subject: Re: CRA memo to president III I am told that at the 8:00 meeting, a decision was made to not do a more specific veto threat from the President, although, if Rubin were asked, he can say that he would recommend a veto if "have and maintain" is not in the bill. Attached is some comments (in the 10:15 last night file) that I was putting in before I had heard the news. Obviously, the memo needs to be revised, since as written, the central question posed is no longer relevant. We'll await a revised fraft from Treasury. thanks. crapotus2.502.wp [email protected] [email protected] 05/03/99 08:47:24 AM Record Type: Record [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Withdrawal/Redaction Marker Clinton Library DOCUMENT NO. SUBJECT/TTTLE DATE RESTRICTION AND TYPE 002. memo Memorandum for the President and Vice President (5 pages) ca. 05/1999 P5 COLLECTION: Clinton Presidential Records Policy Development Lisa Green OA/Box Number: 20587 FOLDER TITLE: CRA [Community Reinvestment Act] [Folder 3] 2012-0043-S ms434 RESTRICTION CODES Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)] Freedom of Information Act - 15 U.S.C. 552(b)] P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRAJ b(1) National security classified information |(b)(1) of the FOIA] P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRAJ b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of P3 Release would violate a Federal statute |(a)(3) of the PRA] an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA] P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute |(b)(3) of the FOIA] financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA] b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA] b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA] personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA] h(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA] C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of of gift. financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA] PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C. b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information 2201(3). concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA] RR. Document will be reviewed upon request. 23724 Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 4/Monday, May 3, 1999/Notices For the Commission, by the Division of SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION SW 5th Portland, OR. To receive Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated comments and testimony from small authority.¹³ National Small Business Development businesses and representatives of trade Margaret H. McFarland, Center Advisory Board; Public Meeting associations concerning regulatory Deputy Secretary. The U.S. Small Business enforcement or compliance taken by [FR Doc. 99-10986 Filed 4-30-99; 8:45 am] Administration National Small Business federal agencies. Transcripts of these BILLING CODE 8010-01-M Development Center Advisory Board proceedings will be posted on the will hold a public meeting on Sunday, Internet. These transcripts are subject July 18, 1999, from 9:00 am to 5:00 pm only to limited review by the National Ombudsman. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION at the University of Alaska Conference For further information, please write Center, Anchorage, Alaska to discuss Data Collection Available for Public such matters as may be presented by or call Gary P. Peele (312) 353-0880. Comments and Recommendations members, staff of the U.S. Small Shirl Thomas, Business Administration, or others Director, External Affairs. ACTION: Notice and request for present. [FR Doc. 99-11001 Filed 4-30-99; 8:45 am] comments. For further information. please write BILLING CODE 8025-01-U or call Ellen Thrasher, U.S. Small SUMMARY: In accordance with the Business Administration, 409 Third Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this Street, SW, Fourth Floor, Washington, DEPARTMENT OF STATE notice announces the Small Business DC 20416, telephone number (202) 205- Administration's intentions to request 6817. [Public Notice #2998] approval on a new, and/or currently Shirl Thomas, approved information collection. Advisory Committee to the U.S. Director, External Affairs. Section of the Inter-American Tropical DATES: Comments should be submitted [FR Doc. 99-10942 Filed 4-30-99; 8:45 am] Tuna Commission (Committee by July 2. 1999. BILLING CODE 8025-01-P Renewal) FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Curtis B. Rich, Management Analyst, The Department of State has renewed Small Business Administration, 409 3rd SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION the Charter of the Advisory Committee Street, S.W., Suite 5000, Washington, to the U.S. Section of the Inter- D.C. 20416. Phone Number: 202-205- New England States Regional Fairness American Tropical Tuna Commission 6629. Board Public Hearing (IATTC) for another two years. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The IATTC was established pursuant The U.S. Small Business to section 4 of the Tuna Conventions Title: "SBIC Licensing Application Administration Region I Advisory Part 1. Part 2 and Guidelines for Act of 1950 (U.S.C. 953, as amended). Council located in the geographical area Applications". The goal of the Advisory Committee is of Hartford, CT, will hold a public to serve the U.S. Section of the IATTC, Form No: 415. meeting at 9:30 a.m. on June 24, 1999, Description of Respondents: the Department of State, and other at the Legislative Office Building Applicants for SBIC Licenses. agencies of the U.S. Government, as Broadway Street and Capitol Avenue Annual Responses: 60. advisors on matters relating to the Hartford, CT 06106. The space Is being Annual Burden: 160. conservation and management of provided by the State Government. To international stocks of tuna and Title: "SBIC Licensing Application receive comments and testimony from dolphins in the eastern tropical Pacific Management Assessment Form". small businesses and representatives of Ocean, in particular, on the Form No: 415A. trade associations concerning regulatory development of U.S. policy and Description of Respondents: enforcement or compliance taken by positions associated with such matters. Applicants for SBIC Licenses. federal agencies. Transcripts of these The Committee is composed of Annual Responses: 60. proceedings will be posted on the representatives of the major U.S. tuna Annual Burden: 160. Internet. These transcripts are subject harvesting, processing, and marketing Comments: Send all comments only to limited review by the National sectors. Additionally, Committee regarding this information collection to Ombudsman. membership includes representatives of Saunders Miller, Senior Policy Advisor, For further information, please write or call Gary P. Peele (312) 353-0880. recreational fishing Interests and Office of Investment Division, Small environmental interests. Business Administration, 409 3rd Street Shirl Thomas, The Advisory Committee will S.W., Suite 6300, Washington, D.C. Director, External Affairs. continue to follow the procedures 20416. Phone No: 202-205-3646. [FR Doc. 99-11000 Filed 4-30-99; 8:45 am] prescribed by the Federal Advisory Send comments regarding whether BILLING CODE 8025-01-U Committee Act (FACA). Meetings will this information collection is necessary continue to be open to the public unless for the proper performance of the a determination is made in accordance function of the agency, accuracy of SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION with Section 10 of the FACA, 5 U.S.C. burden estimate, in addition to ways to 552b(c) (1) and (4), that a meeting or a minimize this estimate, and ways to Northwestern States Regional Falmess portion of the meeting should be closed enhance the quality. Board Public Hearing to the public. Notice of each meeting Jacqueline K. White, The U.S. Small Business continues to be provided for publication Chief, Administrative Information Branch. Administration Reglon X Advisory in the Federal Register as far in advance [FR Doc. 99-10941 Filed 4-30-99; 8:45 am) Council located in the geographical area as possible prior to the meeting. BILLING CODE 8025-01-P of Portland, OR, will hold a public For further information on the meeting at 9:00 a.m. on July 7, 1999, at renewal of the Advisory Committee, 1317 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). the Portland Building Auditorium 120 please contact Brian S. Hallman, Deputy 23618 Federal Register/\ 64, No. /Monday, May 3, 1999 Notices Insecticide. Active ingredient: electronic form must be identified by ADDRESSES: Questions and comments Pymetrozine: 1,2,4-triazin-3(2H)- the docket number [OPP-30477]. may be sent to Keith J. Todd, Executive one,4,5-dihydro-6-methyl-4-[(3- Electronic comments on this notice may Secretary, Federal Financial Institutions pyridinyl methylene)amino] at 98.3%. be filed online at many Federal Examination Council, 2000 K Street, Proposed classification/Use: None. For Depository Libraries. NW, Suite 310, Washington, DC 20006, use only in the manufacture of EPA Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136. or by facsimile transmission to (202) registered insecticidal formulations. 872-7501. (PM 4) List of Subjects FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 6. File Symbol: 100-OER. Applicant: Environmental protection, Pesticides OCC: Malloy Harris, National Bank Novartis Crop Protection. Product Examiner, Community and Consumer Name: Acibenzolar-S-Methyl Technical. and pest, Product registration. Policy Division, (202) 874-4446; or Plant activator. Active ingredient: Benzo Dated: April 22, 1999. Margaret Hesse, Senior Attorney, (1,2,3) thiadiazole-7-carbothioic acid-S- James Jones, Community and Consumer Law methyl ester at 98.6%. Proposed Division, (202) 874-5750, Office of the classification/Use: None. For Director, Registration Division, Office of Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E formulation into end-use fungicide Pesticide Programs. Street, SW., Washington, DC 20219. products. (PM 22) [FR Doc. 99-11042 Filed 4-30-99; 8:45 am] Board: Catherine M.J. Gates, Senior 7. File Symbol: 100-OEE. Applicant: BILLING CODE 6560-50-F Review Examiner, (202) 452-3946; Novartis Crop Protection. Product James H. Mann, Attorney, (202) 452- Name: Actigard 50WG. Plant activator. 2412; or Kathleen C. Ryan, Attorney, Active ingredient: Benzo (1,2,3) (202) 452-3667, Board of Governors of thiadiazole-7-carbothioic acid-S-methyl FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS the Federal Reserve System, 20th Street ester at 50%. Proposed classification/ EXAMINATION COUNCIL and Constitution Avenue, NW., Use: None. For protection against certain diseases of leafy vegetables, Community Reinvestment Act; Washington, DC 20551. tomato, and tobacco. (PM 22) Interagency Questions and Answers FDIC: Robert W. Mooney, Senior Fair Regarding Community Reinvestment Lending Specialist, Division of Notice of approval or denial of an Compliance and Consumer Affairs, application to register a pesticide AGENCY: Federal Financial Institutions (202) 942-3090; or A. Ann Johnson, product will be announced in the Examination Council. Counsel, Legal Division, (202) 898- Federal Register. The procedure for requesting data will be given in the ACTION: Notice and request for comment. 3573, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street, NW., Federal Register if an application is SUMMARY: The Consumer Compliance Washington, DC 20429. approved. Task Force (we) of the Federal Financial Comments received within the OTS: Theresa A. Stark, Project Institutions Examination Council specified time period will be considered Manager, Compliance Policy. (202) 906- (FFIEC) is supplementing, amending, before a final decision Is made; 7054; or Richard R. Riese, Project comments received after the time and republishing its Interagency Manager, Compliance Policy, (202) 906- Questions and Answers Regarding 6134, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 specified will be considered only to the Community Reinvestment, as well as extent possible without delaying C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552. proposing for comment three new or processing of the application. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: revised questions and answers. The II. Public Record and Electronic Interagency Questions and Answers Background Submissions have been prepared by staff of the Office In 1995, the agencies revised the The official record for this notice, as of the Comptroller of the Currency Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) well as the public version, has been (OCC). the Board of Governors of the regulations by issuing a joint final rule, established for this notice under docket Federal Reserve System (Board), the which was published on May 4. 1995 number [OPP-30477] (including Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (60 FR 22156). See 12 CFR parts 25, 228, comments and data submitted (FDIC), and the Office of Thrift 345 and 563e, implementing 12 U.S.C. electronically as described below). A Supervision (OTS) (collectively, the 2901 et seq. The agencies published public version of this record, including agencies) to answer frequently asked related clarifying documents on printed. paper versions of electronic questions about community December 20, 1995 (60 FR 66048) and comments, which does not include any reinvestment. These Interagency May 10, 1996 (61 FR 21362). information claimed as CBI, is available Questions and Answers contain The revised regulations are for inspection from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., informal staff guidance for agency interpreted primarily through Monday through Friday, excluding legal personnel, financial institutions, and "Interagency Questions and Answers holidays. The official notice record is the public. We seek public comment on Regarding Community Reinvestment," located at the address in "ADDRESSES" the proposed questions and answers. In which provide informal staff guidance at the beginning of this document. addition, we Invite public comment on for use by agency personnel. financial Electronic comments can be sent any of the new and revised questions institutions, and the public, and which directly to EPA at: and answers, as well as other are supplemented periodically. We [email protected] community reinvestment issues that are published our most recent guidance on not addressed in these Interagency October 7, 1997 (1997 Interagency Electronic comments must be Questions and Answers. Questions and Answers). See 62 FR submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the DATES: Effective date of amended 52105. In addition to Issuing the 1997 use of special characters and any form Interagency Questions and Answers on Interagency Questions and Answers, we of encryption. Comment and data will Community Reinvestment: May 3, 1999. proposed several questions and answers also be accepted on disks In We request that comments on the in the accompanying supplementary Wordperfect 5.1/6.1 or ASCII file proposed questions and answers be information. These questions and format. All comments and data in submitted on or before: July 2, 1999. answers were proposed to clarify what Federal Register 64, No. /Monday, May 3, 1999/Notices 23619 is meant by "primary purpose of 228.12 (I)(1). (j)(1), and (s); 345.12 (i)(1). dollars involved in the entire project are community development." We (j)(1). and (s); and 563e.12 (h)(1), (i)(1). concentrated on that purpose. For specifically requested comment and (r). In response to Inquiries about example, federal tax-incentive addressing the proposed questions and whether certain activities have the affordable housing projects, where less answers, as well as general comments necessary "primary purpose" of than half the units or half the dollars go and questions regarding the CRA community development to qualify as a into the portion of the project that regulations. See 62 FR at 52108-09. community development loan, qualified represents affordable housing for low- or We received 44 letters in response to Investment or community development moderate-income persons, fall into this our request for comments in the 1997 service, we proposed four questions and category. Accordingly, we are adopting Interagency Questions and Answers. answers (Q&As) to explain what is without change the proposed guidance Comments came from financial meant by "primary purpose." With one that emphasizes the quantitative and institutions (16), community groups clarifying change, which is discussed qualitative distinctions to be made (14), trade associations (6). federal below, we are adopting the previously when evaluating eligible community entities (6). and state/local agencies (2). proposed Q&A7 addressing §§ .12(i) development loans, qualified This document supplements, revises, and 563e.12(h). Q&A1 addressing investments, or community and republishes the 1997 Interagency § .22(b)(4), Q&A1 addressing development services. Questions and Answers based, in part, § .23(e), and Q&A3 addressing Q&A 7 addressing §§ .12(i) and on questions and comments received § .42(b)(2). 563e.12(h) is based on the preamble to from examiners, financial institutions, Twenty commenters addressed topics the final rule set forth at 60 FR 22,156, and other interested parties, and on related to the proposed Q&As. The 22,159 (May 4, 1995), which states that comments received in response to our commenters were generally in favor of activities not designed for the express request for comments. the proposed Q&As. Seven commenters purpose of community development (as This document adopts the four supported greater flexibility for defined in the regulations) are not questions and answers proposed In 1997 examiners when considering whether to eligible for consideration as community and thirteen new questions and give CRA consideration to certain loans. development loans or services or answers, revises seven other questions (These seven commenters also raised qualified investments. The preamble and answers, and proposes three new or issues regarding the definition of further states that providing indirect or revised questions and answers for "community development" in the short-term benefits to low- or moderate- comment. A discussion of these regulations, which is discussed below.) Income persons does not make an questions and answers follows. Three commenters, however, felt that activity community development. In Questions and answers are grouped examiners rely too heavily on addition to incorporating this guidance by the provision of the CRA regulations mathematical formulas in making this into these Interagency Questions and that they discuss and are presented in determination. such as the amount of Answers, the answer Identifies the kind the same order as the regulatory the low- or moderate-income set-aside, of information used to determine provisions. The Interagency Questions the number of units constructed, or the whether an activity was designed for the and Answers employ an abbreviated number of jobs for low-income persons express purpose of community method to cite to the regulations. actually created. Six commenters development. The answer adopts a Because the regulations of the four supported giving CRA consideration to simplified threshold rule (i.e., majority) agencies are substantially identical, community development loans, even if and an alternative approach for finding corresponding sections of the different 50% or less of the proceeds are used for sufficient bases to conclude that an regulations usually bear the same suffix. community development purposes. One activity possesses the requisite primary Therefore, the Interagency Questions commenter suggested, however, that an purpose. and Answers typically cite only to the institution should receive CRA We are also adopting Q&A1 suffix. For example, the small bank consideration only for that portion of a addressing § .22(b)(4) and Q&A1 performance standards for national loan or investment expressly devoted to addressing § .23(e). which provide banks appear at 12 CFR 25.26; for the community development purpose. guidance on the evaluation of activities Federal Reserve System member banks The agencies have generally stated that have a primary purpose of supervised by the Board, they appear at that a "primary purpose" of community community development, as well as the 12 CFR 228.26; for nonmember state development exists when the loan, reporting of community development banks, at 12 CFR 345.26; and for thrifts, investment or service is divisible and loans. This additional guidance at 12 CFR 563e.26. Accordingly, the measurable In terms of the number of emphasizes that once loans or citation in this document would be to dollars spent, housing units built, or Investments are found to possess a § .26. In the few instances in which individuals benefited, and when an primary purpose of community the suffix in one of the regulations is identifiable majority of the dollars development, examiners may different, the specific citation for that expended, units built or individuals differentiate among community regulation is provided. benefited is clearly attributable to one of development loans or qualified the community development purposes investments under the relevant Adopting Questions and Answers enumerated in the regulations. performance criteria. This Proposed in 1997 However, this answer does not address differentiation may be based not only on We are adopting the four questions other activities that are subject to certain the differing dollar amounts attributable and answers addressing "primary legal or market restraints, such that they to the underlying community purpose" of community development do not reach this threshold, even though development purpose, but also on a activities that were proposed in 1997. they have community development as loan's innovation or complexity under The definitions of "community their purpose and result in real, long- § .22(b)(4) or an investment's development loan," community term community development benefits. innovation, complexity, responsiveness development service," and "qualified Many of these projects are "designed for or non-routine characteristics under investment" all require a "primary the express purpose" of achieving a § .23(e). purpose of community development." qualifying community development Finally, we are adopting Q&A3 See 12 CFR 25.12 (I)(1). (j)(1), and (s); purpose, even though less than half the addressing § .42(b)(2), which 23620 Federal Register/ 64, No. 4/Monday, May 3, 1999/Notices explains that a loan may be reported as Do institutions receive consideration regulations, an Institution's investment a community development loan if its for originating or purchasing loans that in a fund, which In turn Invests in a express primary purpose is to finance an are fully guaranteed? We are adopting a community development project (e.g., affordable housing project for low- or new Q&A, designated as Q&A4 affordable housing for low- and moderate-income individuals, although, addressing § .22(a)(2), to stress that moderate-Income individuals that for example, only 40% of the project's the lending test evaluates an benefits the institution's assessment units will actually be occupied by institution's record of helping to meet area(s) or a broader statewide or regional individuals or families with low or the credit needs of its assessment area(s) area that includes one or more of the moderate incomes. Although an through the origination and purchase of Institution's assessment area(s)), is a institution would report the entire specified types of loans, but that the test qualified Investment. amount of the loan, we are expanding criteria do not take into account How do examiners evaluate an upon the answer proposed In 1997 to whether or not the loans are guaranteed. institution's qualified investment in a clarify that examiners may make What is the range of practices that fund, the primary purpose of which is qualitative distinctions among examiners may consider in evaluating community development, as that is community development loans on the the innovativeness, complexity, or defined in the CRA regulations? Many basis of how well each loan advances its flexibility of an institution's lending? financial institutions have made community development purpose. We have been asked whether qualified investments in community contracting programs, under which development funds that operate New Questions and Answers institutions may commit to contracting regionally or nationally. Examiners, What is "affordable" housing? with small business borrowers, may institutions, and the funds have asked Institutions and others have asked how receive consideration under the CRA for guidance on how to evaluate these to determine whether a housing regulations. To date, examiners investments. We are adopting a new development will provide "affordable" generally have not been considering Q&A, designated as Q&A2 addressing such programs in reviewing an $ housing for low- and moderate-Income .23(e), reiterating guidance individuals, particularly in a new institution's CRA performance. New previously provided in an interagency project where the units are not yet Q&A1 addressing § .22(b)(5) staff CRA interpretive letter. See leased or sold, or in other projects discusses the range of factors that Interagency Staff CRA Interpretive where the income of renters cannot be examiners may consider in evaluating Letter, published as OCC Interpretive verified. It has been suggested that a the innovativeness and flexibility of an Letter No. 800, supra. simple formula might be appropriate, institution's lending practices (and the The new Q&A explains that such as if the mortgage payments or complexity and innovativeness of its examiners evaluate investments that rental expenses amount to less than community development lending). It benefit an institution's assessment makes clear that, even though area(s) or a broader statewide or regional 30% of the income of individuals or contracting programs are not, standing area that includes its assessment area(s) families who are low- or moderate- alone, considered in connection with a using the investment test's four Income (i.e., have an Income that is less CRA evaluation, such programs may performance criteria. When determining than 80% of the area median income). enhance the success and effectiveness of the dollar amount of the investment (the We believe, however. that the critical a related lending program. Therefore, first criterion). examiners rely on the consideration is the extent to which a certain contracting programs may figures the institution records according project is or likely will be utilized by warrant consideration as examiners to generally accepted accounting low- or moderate-income individuals. A review the innovativeness, complexity, principles. Even though different formula based solely on rents as a and flexibility of an institution's lending institutions may employ different percentage of median family income practices. The Q&A also provides investment strategies, institutions may determine this accurately in some another example of when examiners making the same dollar amount of circumstances, but may fail to do so in may consider related program activities Investments over the same number of others. For example, in an area with in connection with an evaluation of an years, all other performance criteria relatively low-cost housing, such a institution's lending performance. being equal, would receive the same formula may result in a calculation May an institution receive level of consideration. above even the median housing cost for consideration for a qualified investment The remaining three performance the area. Therefore, we believe that it is if it invests indirectly through a fund criteria-the "qualitative" criteria of appropriate to look at several factors, with a community development innovativeness and complexity, such as median rents of the assessment purpose, as that is defined in the CRA responsiveness, and the degree to which area and the project, the median home regulations? We are adopting a new the investment is not routinely provided value of either the assessment area, low- Q&A, designated as Q&A1 addressing by private investors-will provide the and moderate-income geographies or the § 23(a), that incorporates guidance basis for examiner differentiation among project, the low- and moderate-income previously provided in Interagency staff investments. Examiners also will population in the area of the project, or interpretive letters. See, e.g., Interagency consider factors relevant to the the past performance record of the Staff CRA Interpretive Letter, published institution's CRA performance context, organization(s) undertaking the project as OCC Interpretive Letter No. 800, such as the effect of outstanding long- in determining whether a housing (1997 Transfer Binder) Fed. Banking L. term qualified Investments, the pay-in development does or likely will benefit Rep. (CCH), 81-227 (Sept. 11, 1997). schedule, and the amount of any cash low- and moderate-income individuals. In those letters, staff stated that the call, on the capacity of the institution to To clarify this position, we are direct or indirect nature of a qualified make new investments. adopting Q&A1 addressing investment does not affect whether an How do examiners evaluate an §§ .12(h)(1) and 563e.12(g)(1), institution will receive consideration for institution's activities in connection which discusses the types of factors that the Investment during Its CRA with "Individual Development examiners consider when determining evaluation. As long as the primary Accounts"? Individual Development whether housing is "affordable" to low- purpose of the Investment Is community Accounts (IDAs) generally are matched and moderate-Income individuals. development, as defined in the CRA savings accounts designed to help low- Federal Register 64, No. Monday, May 3, 1999 Notices 23621 and moderate-income families Interagency Staff CRA Interpretive development services sometimes require accumulate savings for education or job Letter, published as OCC Interpretive special expertise and effort on the part training, down-payment and closing Letter No. 801, (1997 Transfer Binder) of the institution and provide a direct costs on a new home, or start-up capital Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH), I 81-228 benefit to the community that would not for a small business. Once IDA (Sept. 11, 1997). Examiners first otherwise be possible. participants have successfully funded determine whether the institution has We are adopting a new Q&A, an IDA, their personal IDA savings are adequately addressed the needs of its designated as Q&A2 addressing matched by a public or private entity, assessment area(s). In doing so, § .28, which explains that the such as a state or local government, examiners also consider qualified agencies consider the qualitative aspects church, foundation, or financial Investments that benefit a broader of an Institution's activities when institution. Participating depositors statewide or regional area that Includes measuring the benefits received by the often receive training in the basics of the institution's assessment area(s). If community. These qualitative aspects of money management, including examiners find that the institution has an institution's performance may budgeting, saving, and credit repair. In adequately addressed the needs of its augment the consideration given to an addition, an entity, such as a assessment area(s). they will give institution's performance under the community organization, typically consideration to nationwide qualified quantitative criteria of the regulations, monitors participants' withdrawals from investments, community development resulting in a higher level of their IDAs. loans, and community development performance and rating. Financial institutions may participate services. When collecting and reporting, if in IDA programs in a number of ways, Are innovative loan products, applicable, the gross annual revenue or including: offering accounts, which may innovative or complex qualified income of small business or farm or be structured as traditional savings investments, and innovative community consumer borrowers, do institutions use accounts; enhancing accounts by development services necessary for a the gross annual or the adjusted gross offering special account benefits, "satisfactory" or "outstanding" CRA annual revenue or income? In response including higher interest rates, ATM rating? Two commenters expressed to questions from financial institutions, services, or waived minimum balance concern that examiners might discount we are adopting two new Q&As requirements; providing funding in the community development loans if they clarifying that institutions should form of matching funds for participants are not considered to be "innovative." collect and report gross annual revenue or operating support for community As one commenter stated, innovation is (for small businesses and small farms) organizations running the IDA program: only one of the four criteria considered and gross annual income (for helping to design and implement IDA when examiners evaluate an consumers) rather than adjusted gross programs, Including developing and institution's responsiveness to annual revenue or Income. The new teaching financial literacy courses; and community development needs. We are adopting a new Q&A1, Q&As are designated as Q&A4 making loans to participants once they § .28, to clarify that addressing § .42(a)(4) and Q&A3 have achieved their savings goals. addressing The extent of each financial innovative practices are not required for addressing § .42(c)(1)(iv). institution's Involvement in IDAs and an "outstanding" or "satisfactory" The purpose of collecting and the products and services offered in rating. Innovative loan products, reporting gross annual revenue data for small businesses and small farms is to connection with the accounts will vary. innovative or complex qualified Therefore, examiners will evaluate the Investments, and innovative community enable examiners and the public to actual services and products provided development services may augment judge whether an institution is lending consideration of an institution's to small businesses and farms, or by each institution in connection with the IDA programs as one or more of the performance under the quantitative whether it is only making small loans to following: community development criteria of the performance tests, larger businesses and farms. Similarly. services, retail banking services, resulting in a higher level of gross annual income information is qualified investments, home mortgage performance and rating. The Q&A also collected from consumer borrowers to loans, small business loans, consumer makes clear that the lack of innovative help examiners determine the loans. or community development or complex investments, loans, or distribution of the institution's loans. We are adopting a Q&A, services alone will not result in a consumer loans based on borrower designated as Q&A2 addressing "needs to improve" rating. characteristics, including the number § .24(d). which articulates this How is performance under the and amount of consumer loans to low-, opinion. quantitative and qualitative moderate-, middle-; and upper-income How do examiners evaluate a performance criteria weighed when borrowers. wholesale or limited purpose examiners assign a CRA rating? The May an institution keep the compact institution's qualified investment in a lending, investment, and service tests disc that contains its CRA Disclosure fund that invests in projects nationwide, each contain a number of performance Statement, which is distributed by the the purpose of which is community criteria designed to measure whether an FFIEC, in its public file, rather than a development, as that term is defined in Institution Is effectively helping to meet paper copy of the information? Several the CRA regulations? We are adopting a the credit needs of its entire community, institutions asked whether they may new Q&A. designated as Q&A1 including low- and moderate-income retain the compact disc that contains the addressing § .25(e), memorializing neighborhoods, in a safe and sound CRA Disclosure Statement provided by guidance previously provided in manner. Some of these criteria are the FFIEC in its public file rather than interagency staff interpretive letters, quantitative (number and amount). a paper copy. We are adopting a new which clarifies how examiners evaluate while others are qualitative Q&A2 addressing § .43(b)(1). which qualified Investments made by (innovativeness, complexity, clarifies that an institution may keep the wholesale or limited purpose responsiveness, or flexibility). The compact disc (or a duplicate of the institutions in a community qualitative performance criteria compact disc) in its public file at its development fund that invests in recognize that certain loans, qualified main office and the designated branch projects nationwide. See, e.g., Investments, and community in each state as long as the Institution 23622 Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. /Monday, May 3, 1999 Notices can readily print the Information upon that limiting the purpose test to consistently stated that the mere request. activities that, for example, provide Jobs purchase of stock in the Federal Home Must an institution's performance fit in low- and moderate-income areas Loan Banks (FHLBs) does not have a each aspect of a particular rating profile targeted for redevelopment by the sufficient connection to community in order to receive that rating? We are government would exclude financing to development to be considered as a adopting a new Q&A1 addressing open a facility in a low- or moderate- qualified investment. Appendix A to Part -Ratings to income area that is not targeted by the Institutions. however, have asked us clarify that exceptionally strong government for redevelopment. about how their activities In connection performance by an institution in some We determined that the explanation with certain specific AHP projects are aspects of a particular rating profile may of the purpose test in the 1997 considered during their CRA compensate for weak performance in Interagency Questions and Answers was evaluations. Institutions that are others, thus permitting the Institution to incomplete. We are revising the answer members of a FHLB typically provide a earn that rating. The Q&A describes to be less restrictive by stating that an high level of technical assistance to retail institutions that use non-branch activity promotes economic prospective borrowers in preparing the delivery systems to obtain deposits and development if it supports "permanent application for AHP funds and ensuring to deliver loans, as an example. Almost job creation, retention, and/or that the borrower meets the eligibility all of the loans originated by such an improvement for persons who are criteria. Although an institution does institution may be outside of its currently low- or moderate-income, or not necessarily provide a loan in assessment area(s). The Q&A assumes, supports permanent job creation, connection with an AHP project, it does for purposes of illustration, that retention, and/or Improvement either in disburse the funds for the FHLB and examiners may find, after considering low- or moderate-income geographies or monitor the continued qualified use of the Institution's performance context in areas targeted for redevelopment by the funds. We believe these activities to and other regulatory considerations, that Federal, state, local or tribal be community development services such an Institution shows weak governments." and are revising the second bullet in performance under the lending test Examiners will continue to presume Q&A 3 addressing §§ .12(j) and criteria applicable to lending activity, that any loan or investment in or to a 563e.12(i) to so state. geographic distribution, and borrower SBDC or SBIC promotes economic If an institution's employees develop characteristics within the assessment development. Funding provided in or teach financial education curricula area. It clarifies that the institution may connection with other SBA programs, as for low- or moderate-income students, compensate for such weak performance well as similar state and local programs, are such activities community by exceptionally strong performance in may also promote economic development services? We are revising community development lending in its development; however, examiners will the fifth bullet of Q&A3 addressing assessment area or a broader statewide make their determinations based on §§ .12(j) and 563e.12(i) to or regional area that includes its business types, funding purposes, and Incorporate guidance previously assessment area. other relevant information. provided in interagency staff Consistent with Q&A2 addressing Interpretive letters. See, e.g., Interagency Revised Questions and Answers § .28, Q&A1 addressing Staff CRA Interpretive Letter, published What does "promote economic §§ .12(h)(3) and 563e.12(g)(3) also as OCC Interpretive Letter No. 802, development" mean? The CRA clarifies that examiners will make (1997 Transfer Binder) Fed. Banking L. regulations define the term "community qualitative assessments in connection Rep. (CCH), [81-229 (Sept. 17. 1997). development" to include "activities that with an institution's community Specifically, we are clarifying that promote economic development by development activities in addition to institutions may receive CRA financing businesses or farms that meet the quantitative assessment of its consideration for the services provided the size eligibility standards of the activities. by its employees in developing financial Small Business Administration's Does "rehabilitation of affordable education curricula or teaching Development Company (SBDC) or Small housing or community facilities" financial education courses to low- or Business Investment Company (SBIC) include the abatement of environmental moderate-income students. programs (13 CFR 121.301) or have hazards, such as lead-based paint, that Is providing Electronic Transfer gross annual revenues of $1 million or are present in the housing or facilities? Accounts pursuant to the Debt less." 12 CFR 25.12(h)(3). 228.12(h)(3), Three commenters asked us to state that Collection Improvement Act of 1996 a 345.12(h)(3) and 563e.12(g) loans for the removal of environmental community development service? The The 1996 Interagency Questions and hazards (particularly lead-based paint) terms, costs, and features of low-cost Answers included a Q&A, Q&A1 may be community development loans. accounts offered by financial addressing §§ .12(h)(3) and We believe the abatement of institutions may vary depending on the 563e.12(g)(3). concerning whether all environmental hazards could be a part particular needs of the institutions' low- activities that finance small businesses of rehabilitating affordable housing or and moderate-income customers. In or farms promote economic community facilities targeted to low- response to an inquiry we received development. The 1997 Interagency and moderate-Income individuals; concerning whether a particular account Questions and Answers revised that rehabilitation of these facilities has for federal benefits payments would be Q&A in response to public comments. already been identified as an example of considered to be a community Since publication of the 1997 a community development purpose. To development service, we are revising Interagency Questions and Answers, we clarify this position, we are adding a Q&A3 addressing §§ .12(j) and have received 11 comments about this sentence to Q&A1 addressing 563e.12(i) by amending the seventh revised Q&A. §§ .12(i) and 563e.12(h). bullet to provide an example of one low- One commenter asserted that the Are an institution's activities in cost transaction account targeted to low- description of the purpose test, i.e., that connection with the Federal Home Loan and moderate-Income individuals. the activity must promote economic Banks' Affordable Housing Program Under the provisions of the Debt development, was too restrictive. (AHP) considered when the institution's Collection Improvement Act of 1996 Specifically, the commenter believed CRA performance is evaluated? We have relating to electronic payment of federal Federal Register/ 64, No. /Monday, May 3, 1999/Notices 23623 benefits payments (EFT ''99), codified at answer by adding the phrase, "or Accordingly, we are clarifying in Q&A1 31 U.S.C. 3332, insured depository multifamily housing.' In addition, that institutions need not report small institutions may offer basic, low-cost examiners may also consider loans for farm loan data as to loans having "electronic transfer accounts" (ETAs) multifamily housing as community original amounts greater than $500,000. specified in Treasury Department development loans if they are targeted What are the data requirements regulations (63 FR 51490) to recipients to low- and moderate-income regarding consumer loans? of federal benefits payments. These individuals, or if they benefit middle- or We have revised Q&A1 addressing accounts are designed to attract low- upper-income borrowers as part of a § .42(c)(1) to clarify that our income persons who do not currently plan to encourage attracting mixed- questions and answers written with have account relationships with Insured income residents to stabilize and create respect to data collection (and reporting) depository institutions. A demographic an economically diverse area out of a in connection with small business and and market analysis commissioned by low- or moderate-income geography. small farm loans also apply to the the Treasury Department in connection How should an institution collect and collection of consumer loan data. with EFT "99 concluded that ETA report the location of a loan made to a Discussion of Other Comments account holders are likely to be small business or small farm if the Received primarily individuals with less than borrower provides an address consisting of a post office box number or rural We received several other comments $10,000 in annual income. Therefore, the ETA is an account targeted to low- route and box number? that are not addressed by specific and moderate-income individuals and We adopted Q&A10 addressing questions and answers. providing such accounts qualifies as a § .42(a) in the 1997 Interagency Community development. Several community development service. Questions and Answers answering this commenters suggested that the current Under the lending test, how will question. In response to this Q&A, we definition of "community development" examiners evaluate home mortgage received nine comments. Several does not Include all the types of loans to middle- or upper-income commenters questioned the accuracy activities that Institutions engage in and individuals in a low- or moderate- and usefulness of data collected and/or that should be considered as having a income geography? We received 24 reported without the census tract or community development purpose. letters commenting on Q&A5 addressing block numbering area (BNA). One Before adopting the definition of § .22(b) (2) & (3). The commenters commenter stated that we should allow "community development" in the generally were in agreement that loans institutions more lead time when revised regulations in 1995, the agencies to middle- or upper-income individuals providing interpretations of data received and considered a number of in a low- or moderate-income geography collection and reporting provisions to comments on the characteristics of should receive CRA consideration. allow the institutions to change their activities with community development Some commenters were concerned that reporting systems, if necessary. We purposes. The agencies also committed requiring that there be a revitalization or believe that data collection according to to conduct a complete review of the stabilization plan for the area may be this Q&A results in the most accurate regulations in 2002. See 60 FR 22,177. too restrictive, especially in rural data, even though in some cases no We will ensure that comments on the communities, where a formal plan may information about census tract or BNA definition of "community development" not exist. However, a "formal" plan is is provided, but agree that sufficient are considered at that time. not necessary. An Informal plan, such as time should be provided to Implement Loan-to-deposit ratio. Two town council resolutions, or a plan changes to data collection procedures, commenters raised issues regarding the developed by a private entity, such as a whenever possible. use of a loan-to-deposit ratio as a community-based development In addition to formal comments on measure of performance In the small organization, may be sufficient the Q&As, regulated institutions institution performance test. One stated evidence, so long as it offers evidence of requested clarification about whether an that the loan-to-deposit ratio should not a plan for development designed to institution should report the census be the only indicator of performance. ensure economic diversity among the tract or block numbering area (BNA) of The other suggested that, due to their prospective residents and not just a location, If known, even If there is no volatility, public funds should be displacement of low- and moderate- street address for that location. We are subtracted from the deposit side of the income individuals. amending Q&A10 addressing ratio prior to calculation. One commenter stated that examiners § .42(a) to clarify that If the census The first concern, the relative should compare an institution's tract or BNA is known, It should be importance of the loan-to-deposit ratio percentage of lending to low- and reported, even If the institution does not in the overall rating of a small moderate-income households to the know the street address for that Institution, is one that the agencies aggregate percentage of lending by all particular location (or there is no street routinely address in examiner training. reporting institutions to these address). We are also revising the Q&A As a general matter, we agree that the households and to the percentage of to delete obsolete 1997 data collection loan-to-deposit ratio Is not the only low- and moderate-income households instructions. indicator of lending activity in the area. The agencies' examination What small business and small farm performance. However, there may be procedures already suggest that data should be reported? cases in which a loan-to-deposit ratio is examiners may perform these types of We are making a technical change to so low that it indicates that the comparisons and others, if appropriate, Q&A1 addressing § .42(b)(1). The institution is not lending. In such cases, to help them explain examination regulations define a "small farm loan" the proportion of lending inside the findings. as those included in "loans to small institution's assessment area, together One commenter asked whether farms" as defined In the Instructions for with the geographic and borrower multifamily housing loans in low- and preparation of the Consolidated Report distribution of those loans, will not moderate-income geographies would be of Condition and Income or the Thrift excuse the low level of lending overall. considered In the same fashion as loans Financial Report. These Instructions The second concern, the subtraction for single family housing. In response to define such loans as having original of public funds from the calculations of the comment. we are clarifying the amounts of $500,000 or less. loan-to-deposit ratios, Is a performance 23624 Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 84/Monday, May 3, 1999/Notices context issue. We believe that examiners in the context of institutions that obtain area that includes the institution's have the flexibility to consider the level deposits and deliver products and assessment area(s). of public funds on deposit, and their services through non-branch systems, The text of the proposed Q&A follows: volatility, in determining whether a such as the Internet. We are adopting Sections .12(I) and 563e.12(h) particular loan-to-deposit ratlo is Q&A1 addressing Appendix A to Part reasonable. -Ratings, and are proposing a Proposed Q5. Must there be some Letters of credit. One commenter revision to Q&A5 addressing immediate or direct benefit to the asserted that lenders should receive §§ .12(i) and 563e.12(h), which may institution's assessment area(s) to consideration under the CRA be particularly relevant to Issues arising satisfy the regulations' requirement that regulations for providing letters of credit in this context. Furthermore, we expect qualified investments and community because institutions often use letters of to address comments relating to out-of- development loans or services benefit an credit to meet small business needs. assessment area activities through institution's assessment area(s) or a Q&A1 addressing § .22(a)(2) materials issued for public comment broader statewide or regional area that specifically addresses this issue and includes the institution's assessment later this year. permits information about letters of area(s)? credit to be used by examiners to Proposed Questions and Answers and Proposed A5. No. The regulations, for enhance their understanding of an Request for Comment example, recognize that community institution's performance. development organizations and Must there be some immediate or Loans to nonprofit organizations. One programs are frequently efficient and direct benefit to the institution's commenter suggested that loans under effective ways for institutions to assessment area(s) to satisfy the $1 million for business purposes, or promote community development. regulations' requirement that qualified under $500,000 for farm purposes, made These organizations and programs often investments and community to nonprofit organizations, should be operate on a local, statewide, or even development loans or services benefit an considered community development multi-state basis. Therefore, an institution's assessment area(s) or a loans even though they are secured by Institution's activity Is considered a broader statewide or regional area that real property. Under the CRA community development loan or service includes the assessment Q&A5 regulations, these loans often must be or a qualified investment if It supports addressing §§ .12(i) and 563e.12(h) counted as loans to small businesses or an organization or activity that covers in the 1997 Interagency Questions and small farms rather than community an area that is larger than, but is located Answers states that there does not need development loans, depending on the in, the broader statewide or regional to be a direct benefit to the Institution's type of property securing the loan. area that Includes the Institution's Q&A1 addressing § .12(u) addresses assessment area(s) to satisfy the assessment area(s). The institution's instances in which loans to nonprofit regulation's requirement that qualified assessment area need not receive an investments and community organizations may be considered as Immediate or direct benefit from the community development loans. development loans or services benefit Institution's specific participation in the The number and dollar amount of an institution's assessment area(s) or a broader organization or activity, community development loans is a broader statewide or regional area that provided the purpose, mandate, or includes the institution's assessment criterion under the lending test that is function of the organization or activity meant to capture any loans for a area, provided the purpose, mandate, or includes serving geographies or community development purpose that function of the organization or activity individuals located within the statewide are otherwise not reported as home includes serving geographies or or regional area that includes the mortgage, small business or small farm individuals located within the institution's assessment area. loans. Institutions may wish to highlight institution's assessment area. Furthermore, the regulations permit a the community development purpose of The Q&A addresses organizations and wholesale or limited purpose institution particular loans that are considered as activities, operating statewide or to consider community development home mortgage, small business or small regionally, that may ultimately have a loans, community development farm loans during an examination. Such direct benefit on an assessment area. services, and qualified investments information may be relevant to the However, It does not specifically wherever they are located, as long as the examiners' evaluation of qualitative address local community development Institution has otherwise adequately lending test criteria or to the organizations or activities serving a addressed the credit needs within its performance context within which locale somewhere in the broader assessment area(s). community development loans are statewide or regional area surrounding In addition to general comments evaluated. The regulation is clear, an institution's assessment area(s), agreeing or disagreeing with the however, that, except for loans for which may not benefit low- and proposed revisions to this Q&A, we multifamily housing targeted for low- moderate-income areas or individuals would like comments on whether and moderate-income individuals, home located inside the assessment area(s). community development organizations mortgage, small farm. and small We are proposing to revise that Q&A to and programs that operate on a local, business loans may not be reported as address both types of organizations or statewide, or even multi-state basis community development loans. activities. The proposed Q&A would ultimately provide benefit to all Assessment areas and non-branch clarify that an Institution's assessment surrounding areas. delivery systems. We received several area(s) need not receive an Immediate or May an institution receive letters requesting clarification of how direct benefit from the institution's consideration under the investment test examiners evaluate a retail institution's specific participation in a community for mortgage-backed securities backed lending, Investment, and service development organization or activity by home mortgages that the same activities outside the Institution's provided the purpose, mandate, or institution originated or purchased? We assessment area(s) and the broader activity benefits the broader statewide have received inquiries about whether statewide or regional area that Includes or regional area by servicing geographies examiners will consider as qualified its assessment area(s). This question has or individuals located somewhere Investments mortgage-backed securities been of special concern to commenters within the broader statewide or regional backed by home mortgages to low- and Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 34/Monday, May 3, 1999/Notices 23625 moderate-income individuals that the note Is written. Distinguishing loans outstanding. The text of the first investing institution initially originated refinancings and renewals on this basis alternative proposed Q&A follows: or purchased. is consistent with the guidance Section .42(a)-Alternative I: The revised regulations. at 12 CFR provided by the Board in connection .23(b). provide that activities with home mortgage loan data reporting Proposed Q5: Should institutions considered under the lending or service pursuant to the Home Mortgage collect and report data about small tests may not be considered under the Disclosure Act (HMDA) regulation (12 business and small farm loans that are investment test. Examiners consider the CFR part 203). refinanced or renewed? home mortgages underlying mortgage- Commenters asserted that small Proposed A5: No. When an Institution backed securities, If originated or business and small farm lending extends the term of one of Its existing purchased by the institution, under the practices are sufficiently different from small business or small farm loans in lending test when they examine an home mortgage lending practices that the same or a lesser amount as the institution. Therefore, examiners would renewals and refinancings of small existing obligation, the institution not be permitted also to consider as business and small farm loans should be should not report this event as a small qualified Investments mortgage-backed treated differently from renewals and business or small farm loan origination. securities, purchased or securitized by refinancings of home mortgage loans for If an institution increases the amount of an institution, that are backed primarily CRA reporting and evaluation purposes. a small business or small farm loan or exclusively by loans that the Further, they suggested that there is when it extends the term of the loan, institution originated or purchased. very little distinction between however, it should report the amount of because the examiners would be refinancings and renewals of small the increase as a small business or small considering the same activities under business and small farm loans. Based on farm loan origination. The institution both the lending and investment tests. these comments and other inquiries should report only the amount of the To clarify our opinion, we are from financial institutions. we propose increase; the original or remaining proposing. and requesting public that refinancings and renewals of small amount of the loan is not reported again comment specifically on, the following business and small farm loans be treated as an origination. For example. a question and answer: uniformly for CRA purposes. To that financial institution extends a loan (as Section .23(b) end, we are proposing two alternative opposed to a line of credit) for $25,000; revised Q&A5s addressing § .42(a). principal payments have resulted in a Proposed Q2: If home mortgage loans to low-and moderate-income borrowers Alternative I: The first proposed Q&A present outstanding balance of $15,000. have been considered under an states that, for CRA purposes, financial The customer requests an additional institution's lending test, may the institutions should report neither $5,000. which is approved, and a new institution that originated or purchased renewals nor refinancings of small note is written for $20,000. In this business and small farm loans as loan example, the institution should report them also receive consideration under originations. However, If institutions the $5,000 increase. the investment test if it subsequently purchases mortgage-backed securities increase the amount of a small business An institution may provide "other that are primarily or exclusively backed or small farm loan or line of credit, the loan data," including information about by such loans? amount of the increase should be small business or small farm loans Proposed A2: No. Because the reported as a loan origination. outstanding, to examiners for institution received lending test Institutions should continue to report consideration as part of the institution's consideration for the loans that underlie home mortgage loans according to the lending test performance evaluation. the securities, the institution may not instructions provided In 12 CFR part Alternative II: Several Institutions also receive consideration under the 203. have stressed that ongoing credit Investment test for its purchase of the Reporting neither renewals nor availability is important to the economic securities. Of course, an institution may refinancings of small business or small condition of small businesses and small receive investment test consideration for loans reflects that the lending test's farms, as well as the community as a purchases of mortgage-backed securities performance criteria emphasize loan whole. These institutions suggested that that are backed by loans to low-and originations and purchases. Renewals both refinancings and renewals of small moderate-income individuals as long as and refinancings, especially If made business and small farm loans should be the securities are not backed primarily frequently, would Inflate the actual considered by examiners when or exclusively by loans that the same amounts of small business and small evaluating an institution's small institution originated or purchased. farm lending. In addition, we believe business and small farm lending Should renewals and refinancings of that recordkeeping and reporting burden performance. The second alternative small business and small farm loans be of large institutions will be lessened If proposed Q&A would take these collected and reported? Six commenters they need not collect and report concerns into consideration. inquired whether loans to small information about small business and Because small business and small businesses and small farms, when small farm loan refinancings and farm loan refinancings and renewals are renewed or refinanced, should be renewals. nearly indistinguishable, Alternative II, reported for CRA purposes. The 1997 If this proposed Q&A is adopted, like Alternative I, would not treat small Interagency Questions and Answers, at institutions would not collect or report business and small farm refinancings Q&A5 addressing § .42(a), provided as loan originations data on either small and renewals differently. Institutions guidance that "refinancing" such loans business and small farm loan would collect and report data about should be reported as originations, but refinancings or renewals. However, any both reflnancings and renewals as loan that "renewing" them should not. institution could bring to its examiners' originations. However, because According to the guidance, the primary attention data on small business and institutions often write small business distinction between "refinancing" and small farm loan refinancing or renewals and small farm loans for short terms and "renewing" a loan Is that, in connection by providing "other loan data" pursuant refinance or renew them at the end of with a loan refinancing, the existing to § 22(a)(2), including Information the term, in order to avoid Inflation of obligation or note is satisfied, and a new about its small business and small farm amounts actually lent, Institutions 23626 Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. /Monday, May 3, 1999/Notices would be limited to reporting only one institutions? Which alternative is less provide clear, understandable origination per year. burdensome? regulations and to comply with the The text of the second alternative Which alternative (including the spirit of the SBREFA, the agencies have proposed Q&A follows: guidance currently in effect) best compiled the Interagency Questions and Section 42(a)-Alternative II: promotes accurate data that reflects the Answers. The Interagency Questions Proposed Q5: Should institutions actual lending activity of financial and Answers serve the same purpose as collect and report data about small institutions? the compliance guide described in the business and small farm loans that are Depending on what final guidance we SBREFA by providing guidance on a refinanced or renewed? eventually adopt, we understand that variety of issues of particular concern to Proposed A5: An institution should we may have to make conforming small banks and thrifts. collect information about small business changes to other Q&As. and small farm loans that they refinance Until a new Q&A has been adopted The text of the Interagency Questions and Answers follows: or renew as loan originations. (A through publication in the Federal refinancing generally occurs when the Register, the existing Q&A5 addressing Text of the Interagency Questions and existing loan obligation or note is § .42(a) remains in effect. This Answers satisfied, and a new note is written, means that, for the time being, financial institutions will continue to collect and Interagency Questions and Answers while a renewal refers to an extension report data about small business and Regarding Community Reinvestment of the term of a loan.) When reporting small farm loan refinancings, but not Table of Contents small business and small farm loan data, renewals. however, an institution may only report This document provides answers to one origination per loan per year unless General Comments questions pertaining to the following an increase In the loan amount Is provisions and topics of the CRA regulations: In addition to the specific request for granted. comments on the proposed questions § .11-Authority, Purposes, and Scope If an Institution increases the amount and answers, we invite public comment § .11(c) Scope of a small business or small farm loan on the new and revised questions and 25.11(c)(3), 228.11(c)(3) & 345.11(c)(3) when it extends the term of the loan, it answers. We also Invite public comment Certain special purpose banks should always report the amount of the on a continuing basis on any issues § 12-Definitions increase as a small business or small raised by the CRA and these Interagency farm loan origination. The institution § .12(a) Affiliate Questions and Answers. If, after reading should report only the amount of the §§ .12(f) & 563e.12(e) Branch the Interagency Questions and Answers, increase If the original or remaining §§ .12(h) & 563e.12(g) Community financial institutions, examiners, amount of the loan has already been development community organizations, or other §§ .12(h)(1) & 563e.12(g)(1) Affordable reported one time that year. For interested parties have unanswered housing (Including multifamily rental example, a financial Institution makes a questions or comments about the housing) for low- or moderate-Income loan (as opposed to a line of credit) for agencies' community reinvestment Individuals $25,000; principal payments have regulations, they should submit them to §§ 12(h)(3) & 563e.12(g)(3) Activities resulted in a present outstanding the agencies or the FFIEC. We will that promote economic development by balance of $15,000. The customer consider addressing such questions in financing businesses or farms that meet requests an additional $5,000. which is future revisions to the Interagency certain size eligibility standards approved, and a new note is written for §§ .12(i) & 563e.12(h) Community Questions and Answers. $20,000. In this example, the institution development loan should report the $5,000 increase. The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement §§ .12(j) & 563e.12(i) Community bank may also report the renewal or Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA) development service §§ .12(k) & 563e.12(j) Consumer loan refinancing of the $15,000 balance one The SBREFA requires an agency, for §§ .12(m) & 563e.12(1) Home mortgage time that year. each rule for which it prepares a final loan An institution may provide "other regulatory flexibility analysis, to publish §§ .12(n) & 563e.12(m) Income level loan data," including information about one or more compliance guides to help §§ .12(o) & 563e.12(n) Limited purpose small business or small farm loans small entities understand how to Institution outstanding, to examiners for comply with the rule. §§ .12(s) & 563e.12(r) Qualified consideration as part of the institution's Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Investment lending test performance evaluation. Regulatory Flexibility Act, the agencies § .12(t) Small Institution In addition to general comments certified that their proposed CRA rule § 12(u) Small business loan about these proposed questions and would not have a significant economic § .12(w) Wholesale institution answers, we would also appreciate impact on a substantial number of small § .21-Performance Tests, Standards, receiving your views on the following entities and invited public comments on and Ratings, in General questions: that determination. See 58 FR 67478 § .21(a) Performance tests and standards Are there other fair and meaningful (Dec. 21, 1993): 59 FR 51250 (Oct. 7, § .21(b) Performance context alternative methods of collecting data 1994). In response to public comment, § .21(b)(2) Information maintained by on small business and small farm loan the agencies voluntarily prepared a final the institution or obtained from renewals and reflnancings? If so, please regulatory flexibility analysis for the community contacts describe. joint final rule, although the analysis § .21(b)(4) Institutional capacity and Does allowing collection and was not required because it supported constraints reporting data of one renewal or the agencies' earlier certification § 21(b)(5) Institution's past performance and the performance of refinancing per year make sense? regarding the proposed rule. Because a similarly situated lenders Will these proposed questions and regulatory flexibility analysis was not answers increase or decrease required, section 212 of the SBREFA § .22-Lending Test substantially the data collection and does not apply to the final CRA rule. § 22(a) Scope of test reporting burden of financial However, in their continuing efforts to § .22(a)(1) Types of loans considered Federal Register/ 64, No. Monday, May 3, 1999/Notices 23627 § 22(a)(2) Loan originations and § 41-Assessment Area Delineation correspondent banks, trust companies, purchases/other loan data § 41(a) In general or clearing agents or engage only in § 22(b) Performance criteria § .41(c) Geographic area(s) for specialized services, such as cash § 22(b)(1) Lending activity institutions other than wholesale or management controlled disbursement § .22(b)(2) & (3) Geographic limited purpose institutions services. A financial institution, distribution and borrower characteristics § .41(c)(1) Generally consist of one or however, does not become a special § 22(b)(4) Community development more MSAs or one or more contiguous purpose bank merely by ceasing to make lending political subdivisions § .22(b)(5) Innovative or flexible loans and, instead, making investments § .41(d) Adjustments to geographic lending practices area(s) and providing other retail banking § 22(c) Affiliate lending § .41(e) Limitations on delineation of an services. § .22(c)(1) In general assessment area Q2. To be a special purpose bank, § 22(c)(2) Constraints on affiliate § .41(e)(3) May not arbitrarily exclude must a bank limit its activities in its lending low- or moderate-income geographies charter? § .22(c)(2)(i) No affiliate may claim a $ .41(e)(4) May not extend A2. No. A special purpose bank may, loan origination or loan purchase If substantially beyond a CMSA boundary but is not required to, limit the scope of another Institution claims the same loan or beyond a state boundary unless its activities in its charter, articles of origination or purchase located In a multistate MSA association or other corporate § .22(c)(2)(II) If an institution elects to § .42(a) Loan information required to be have its supervisory agency consider collected and maintained organizational documents. A bank that loans within a particular lending § .42(a)(2) Loan amount at origination does not have legal limitations on its category made by one or more of the § .42(a)(3) The loan location activities, but has voluntarily limited its institution's affiliates in a particular § 42(a)(4) Indicator of gross annual activities, however, would no longer be assessment area, the Institution shall revenue exempt from Community Reinvestment elect to have the agency consider all § .42(b) Loan information required to be Act (CRA) requirements if it loans within that lending category In that reported subsequently engaged in activities that particular assessment area made by all of § .42(b)(1) Small business and small involve granting credit to the public in the institution's affiliates farm loan data the ordinary course of business. A bank § .22(d) Lending by a consortium or a § .42(b)(2) Community development third party loan data that believes it is exempt from CRA as § 42(b)(3) Home mortgage loans a special purpose bank should seek § .23-Investment Test § 42(c) Optional data collection and confirmation of this status from its § .23(a) Scope of test maintenance supervisory agency. § 23(b) Exclusion § 42(c)(1) Consumer loans .23(e) Performance criteria § § .12-Definitions § 42(c)(1)(iv) Income of borrower § .42(c)(2) Other loan data § .24-Service Test § 12(a) Affiliate § .42(d) Data on affiliate lending § 24(d) Performance criteria-retail Q1. Does the definition of "affiliate" banking services § .43-Content and Availability of Public include subsidiaries of an institution? § .24(d)(3) Availability and File A1. Yes, "affiliate" includes any effectiveness of alternative systems for § .43(a) Information available to the company that controls, is controlled by. delivering retail banking services public or is under common control with § .43(a)(1) Public comments § .25-Community Development Test for .43(b) Additional Information available another company. An institution's § Wholesale or Limited Purpose Institutions to the public subsidiary is controlled by the § .25(d) Indirect activities § .43(b)(1) Institutions other than small Institution and is, therefore, an affiliate. § .25(e) Benefit to assessment area(s) Institutions §§ .12(f) & 563e. 12(e) Branch § .25(f) Community development § .43(c) Location of public information performance rating Q1. Do the definitions of "branch," § 44-Public Notice by Institutions "automated teller machine (ATM)." and § .26-Small Institution Performance § .45-Publication of Planned Standards "remote service facility (RSF)" include Examination Schedule mobile branches, ATMs, and RSFs? § 26(a) Performance criteria § 26(a)(1) Loan-to-deposit ratio -Ratings A1. Yes. Staffed mobile offices that Appendix A to Part are authorized as branches are § .26(a)(2) Percentage of lending within Appendix B to Part -CRA Notice assessment area(s) considered "branches" and mobile § .26(a)(3) and (4) Distribution of The body of the Interagency ATMs and RSFs are considered "ATMs" lending within assessment area(s) by Questions and Answers Regarding and "RSFs." borrower income and geographic Community Reinvestment follows: Q2. Are loan production offices location § .11-Authority, Purposes, and (LPOs) branches for purposes of the § 26(b) Performance rating Scope CRA? § .27-Strategic Plan A2. LPOs and other offices are not § .11(c) Scope "branches" unless they are authorized § 27(c) Plans in general § .27(f) Plan content 25.11(c)(3), 228.11(c)(3) & as branches of the institution through § .27(f)(1) Measurable goals 345.11(c)(3) Certain special purpose the regulatory approval process of the § .27(g) Plan approval banks. institution's supervisory agency. § .27(g)(2) Public participation Q1. Is the list of special purpose §§ 12(h) & 563e.12(g) Community banks exclusive? § .28-Assigned Ratings A1. No, there may be other examples Development § 28(a) Ratings in general of special purpose banks. These banks Q1. Are community development § 29-Effect of CRA Performance on engage in specialized activities that do activities limited to those that promote Applications not Involve granting credit to the public economic development? § .29(a) CRA performance in the ordinary course of business. A1. No. Although the definition of § .29(b) Interested partles Special purpose banks typically serve as "communIty development" includes 23628 Federal Register / 64, No. Monday, May 3, 1999 Notices activities that promote economic that funds affordable housing for farms that meet these size eligibility development by financing small middle-income people or areas, as well standards considered to be community businesses or farms, the rule does not as low- and moderate-income people or development? limit community development loans areas, has as its primary purpose A1. No. To be considered as and services and qualified investments community development. "community development" under to those activities. Community §§ 12(h)(3) and 563e.12(g)(3), a §§ 112(h)(1) & 3e.12(g)(1) development also includes community- loan, Investment or service, whether or tribal-based child care, educational, Affordable Housing (Including made directly or through an Multifamily Rental Housing) for Low- or health, or social services targeted to intermediary, must meet both a size test Moderate-Income Individuals low- or moderate-income persons, and a purpose test. An activity meets affordable housing for low- or moderate- Q1. When determining whether a the size requirement if it finances income individuals, and activities that project is "affordable housing for low- or entities that either meet the size revitalize or stabilize low- or moderate- moderate-income individuals, thereby eligibility standards of the Small income areas. meeting the definition of "community Business Administration's Development Q2. Must a community development development," will it be sufficient to use Company (SBDC) or Small Business activity occur inside a low- or moderate- a formula that relates the cost of Investment Company (SBIC) programs, income area in order for an institution ownership, rental or borrowing to the or have gross annual revenues of $1 to receive CRA consideration for the income levels in the area as the only million or less. To meet the purpose activity? factor, regardless of whether the users, test, the activity must promote A2. No. Community development likely users, or beneficiaries of that economic development. An activity is includes activities outside of low- and affordable housing are low- or considered to promote economic moderate-income areas that provide moderate-income individuals? development if it supports permanent affordable housing for, or community A1. The concept of "affordable job creation, retention, and/or services targeted to, low- or moderate- housing" for low- or moderate-Income improvement for persons who are income individuals and activities that individuals does hinge on whether low- currently low- or moderate-income, or promote economic development by or moderate-income individuals benefit, supports permanent job creation, financing small businesses and farms. or are likely to benefit, from the retention, and/or improvement either in Activities that stabilize or revitalize housing. It would be inappropriate to low- or moderate-Income geographies or particular low- or moderate-income give consideration to a project that In areas targeted for redevelopment by areas (including by creating. retaining, exclusively or predominately houses Federal, state, local or tribal or improving Jobs for low- or moderate- families that are not low- or moderate- governments. The agencies will income persons) also qualify as income simply because the rents or presume that any loan to or investment community development, even if the housing prices are set according to a in a SBDC or SBIC promotes economic activities are not located in these low- particular formula. development. or moderate-income areas. One example For projects that do not yet have In addition to their quantitative is financing a supermarket that serves as occupants, and for which the income of assessment of the amount of a financial an anchor store in a small strip mall the potential occupants is not knowable institution's community development located at the edge of a middle-income in advance, examiners will review activities, examiners must make area, if the mall stabilizes the adjacent factors such as demographic, economic qualitative assessments of an low-income community by providing and market data to determine the institution's leadership in community needed shopping services that are not likelihood that the housing will development matters and the otherwise available In the low-income "primarily" accommodate low- or complexity, responsiveness, and impact community. moderate-income individuals. For of the community development Q3. Does the regulation provide example, examiners may look at median activities of the institution. In reaching flexibility in considering performance in rents of the assessment area and the a conclusion about the Impact of an high-cost areas? project; the median home value of either institution's community development A3. Yes, the flexibility of the the assessment area, low- or moderate- activities, examiners may, for example, performance standards allows Income geographies or the project; the determine that a loan to a small examiners to account in their low- or moderate-income population in business in a low- or moderate-income evaluations for conditions in high-cost the area of the project; or the past geography that provides needed jobs areas. Examiners consider lending and performance record of the and services in that area may have a services to individuals and geographies organization(s) undertaking the project. greater impact and be more responsive of all income levels and businesses of Further, such a project could receive to the community credit needs than all sizes and revenues. In addition, the consideration if its express, bona fide does a loan to a small business in the flexibility in the requirement that intent, as stated, for example, In a same geography that does not directly community development loans, prospectus, loan proposal or community provide additional jobs or services to community development services, and action plan, is community development. the community. qualified investments have as their "primary" purpose community §§ 12(h)(3) and 563c. 12(g)(3) §§ 12(i) and 563e. 12(h) Community Activities That Promote Economic development allows examiners to Development Loan account for conditions in high-cost Development by Financing Businesses Q1. What are examples of community areas. For example, examiners could or Farms That Meet Certain Size development loans? take into account the fact that activities Eligibility Standards A1. Examples of community address a credit shortage among middle- Q1. "Community development" development loans include, but are not income people or areas caused by the includes activities that promote limited to, loans to: disproportionately high cost of building, economic development by financing Borrowers for affordable housing maintaining or acquiring a house when businesses or farms that meet certain rehabilitation and construction, determining whether an Institution's size eligibility standards. Are all including construction and permanent loan to or Investment in an organization activities that finance businesses and financing of multifamily rental property Federal Register 64, No. /Monday, May 3, Notices 23629 serving low- and moderate-income Multifamily dwelling loans, however, even multi-state basis. Therefore, an persons; may be considered as community institution's activity is considered a Not-for-profit organizations serving development loans as well as home community development loan or service primarily low- and moderate-income mortgage loans. See also Q&A2 or a qualified Investment if it supports housing or other community addressing § .42(b)(2). an organization or activity that covers development needs; Q3. Do secured credit cards or other an area that is larger than, but includes, Borrowers to construct or credit card programs targeted to low- or the institution's assessment area(s). The rehabilitate community facilities that moderate-income individuals qualify as institution's assessment area need not are located In low- and moderate- community development loans? receive an immediate or direct benefit income areas or that serve primarily A3. No. Credit cards issued to low- or from the institution's specific low- and moderate-income individuals; moderate-Income individuals for participation in the broader organization Financial intermediaries including household, family, or other personal or activity, provided the purpose, Community Development Financial expenditures, whether as part of a mandate, or function of the organization Institutions (CDFIs). Community program targeted to such Individuals or or activity includes serving geographies Development Corporations (CDCs), otherwise, do not qualify as community or individuals located within the minority- and women-owned financial development loans because they do not institution's assessment area. institutions, community loan funds or have as their primary purpose any of the Furthermore, the regulations permit a pools, and low-income or community activities included in the definition of wholesale or limited purpose Institution development credit unions that "community development." to consider community development primarily lend or facilitate lending to Q4. The regulation indicates that loans, community development promote community development. community development includes services, and qualified investments Local, state, and tribal governments "activities that revitalize or stabilize wherever they are located, as long as the for community development activities; low- or moderate-income geographies." institution has otherwise adequately and Do all loans in a low- to moderate- addressed the credit needs within its Borrowers to finance environmental income geography have a stabilizing assessment area(s). clean-up or redevelopment of an effect? Q6. What is meant by a "regional industrial site as part of an effort to A4. No. Some loans may provide only area" in the requirement that a revitalize the low- or moderate-income indirect or short-term benefits to low- or community development loan must community in which the property is moderate-income individuals in a low- benefit the institution's assessment located. or moderate-income geography. These area(s) or a broader statewide or The rehabilitation of affordable loans are not considered to have a regional area that includes the housing or community facilities, community development purpose. For institution's assessment area(s)? referred to above, may include the example, a loan for upper-income A6. A "regional area" may be as small abatement of environmental hazards, housing in a distressed area is not as a city or county or as large as a such as lead-based paint. that are considered to have a community multistate area. For example, the "mid- present in the housing or facilities. development purpose simply because of Atlantic states" may comprise a regional Q2. If a retail institution that is not the indirect benefit to low- or moderate- area. When examiners evaluate required to report under the Home income persons from construction jobs community development loans that Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) makes or the Increase in the local tax base that benefit a regional area that Includes the affordable home mortgage loans that supports enhanced services to low- and institution's assessment area, however, would be HMDA-reportable home moderate-Income area residents. On the the examiners will consider the size of mortgage loans if it were a reporting other hand, a loan for an anchor the regional area and the actual or institution, or if a small institution that business in a distressed area (or a potential benefit to the institution's is not required to collect and report loan nearby area), that employs or serves assessment area(s). In most cases, the data under CRA makes small business residents of the area, and thus stabilizes larger the regional area, the more diffuse and small farm loans and consumer the area, may be considered to have a the benefit will be to the Institution's loans that would be collected and/or community development purpose. For assessment area(s). Examiners may view reported if the institution were a large example, in an underserved, distressed loans with more direct benefits to an institution, may the institution have area, a loan for a pharmacy that institution's assessment area(s) as more these loans considered as community employs, and provides supplies to, responsive to the credit needs of the development loans? residents of the area promotes area(s) than loans for which the actual A2. No. Although small Institutions community development. benefit to the assessment area(s) Is are not required to report or collect Q5. Must there be some immediate or uncertain or for which the benefit is information on small business and small direct benefit to the institution's diffused throughout a larger area that farm loans and consumer loans, and assessment area(s) to satisfy the includes the assessment area(s). some institutions are not required to regulations' requirement that qualified Q7. What is meant by the term report information about their home investments and community "primary purpose" as that term is used mortgage loans under HMDA, if these development loans or services benefit an to define what constitutes a community institutions are retail institutions, the institution's assessment area(s) or a development loan, a qualified agencies will consider in their CRA broader statewide or regional area that investment or a community evaluations the institutions' originations includes the institution's assessment development service? and purchases of loans that would have area(s)? A7. A loan, investment or service has been collected or reported as small A5. No. The regulations, for example, as its primary purpose community business, small farm, consumer or home recognize that community development development when it is designed for the mortgage loans, had the institution been organizations and programs are express purpose of revitalizing or a collecting and reporting institution frequently efficient and effective ways stabilizing low- or moderate-income under the CRA or the HMDA. Therefore, for Institutions to promote community areas, providing affordable housing for, these loans will not be considered as development. These organizations and or community services targeted to, low- community development loans. programs often operate on a statewide or or moderate-income persons, or 23630 Federal Register 64, No. Monday, May 3, /Notices promoting economic development by finances affordable housing is related to Providing other financial services financing small businesses and farms the provision of financial services. with the primary purpose of community that meet the requirements set forth in Providing technical assistance about development, such as low-cost bank §§ .12(h) or 563e.12(g). To financial services to community-based accounts, including "Electronic Transfer determine whether an activity is groups. local or tribal government Accounts" provided pursuant to the designed for an express community agencies, or intermediaries that help to Debt Collection Improvement Act of development purpose, the agencies meet the credit needs of low- and 1996, or free government check cashing apply one of two approaches. First, if a moderate-income individuals or small that increases access to financial majority of the dollars or beneficiaries of businesses and farms is also providing services for low- or moderate-income the activity are identifiable to one or financial services. By contrast, activities individuals. more of the enumerated community that do not take advantage of the Examples of technical assistance development purposes, then the activity employees' financial expertise, such as activities that might be provided to will be considered to possess the neighborhood cleanups, do not involve community development organizations requisite primary purpose. the provision of financial services. include: Alternatively, where the measurable Q2. Are personal charitable activities Serving on a loan review portion of any benefit bestowed or provided by an institution's employees committee; dollars applied to the community or directors outside the ordinary course Developing loan application and development purpose is less than a of their employment considered underwriting standards; majority of the entire activity's benefits community development services? Developing loan processing or dollar value, then the activity may A2. No. Services must be provided as systems; still be considered to possess the a representative of the institution. For Developing secondary market requisite primary purpose if (1) the example, if a financial institution's vehicles or programs; express, bona fide intent of the activity, director. on her own time and not as a Assisting in marketing financial services, including development of as stated, for example, in a prospectus, representative of the Institution, advertising and promotions, loan proposal, or community action volunteers one evening a week at a local plan, is primarily one or more of the publications, workshops and community development corporation's conferences; enumerated community development financial counseling program, the Furnishing financial services purposes; (2) the activity is specifically institution may not consider this training for staff and management; structured (given any relevant market or activity a community development Contributing accounting/ legal constraints or performance context service. bookkeeping services; and factors) to achieve the expressed Q3. What are examples of community Assisting in fund raising, including community development purpose; and development services? soliciting or arranging Investments. (3) the activity accomplishes, or is A3. Examples of community reasonably certain to accomplish, the development services include, but are § .12(k) & 563e.12(j) Consumer Loan community development purpose not limited to, the following: Q1. Are home equity loans considered involved. The fact that an activity Providing technical assistance on "consumer loans"? provides indirect or short-term benefits financial matters to nonprofit, tribal or A1. Home equity loans made for to low- or moderate-income persons government organizations serving low- purposes other than home purchase, does not make the activity community and moderate-income housing or home improvement or refinancing home development, nor does the mere economic revitalization and purchase or home Improvement loans presence of such Indirect or short-term development needs; are consumer loans If they are extended benefits constitute a primary purpose of Providing technical assistance on to one or more individuals for community development. Financial financial matters to small businesses or household, family, or other personal institutions that want examiners to community development organizations, expenditures. consider certain activities under either including organizations and individuals Q2. May a home equity line of credit approach should be prepared to who apply for loans or grants under the be considered a "consumer loan" even demonstrate the activities' Federal Home Loan Banks' Affordable if part of the line is for home qualifications. Housing Program: improvement purposes? Lending employees to provide A2. If the predominant purpose of the §§ .12(j) and 563e.12(i) Community financial services for organizations line is home improvement, the line may Development Service facilitating affordable housing only be reported under HMDA and may Q1. In addition to meeting the construction and rehabilitation or not be considered a consumer loan. definition of "community development" development of affordable housing: However, the full amount of the line in the regulation, community Providing credit counseling. home- may be considered a "consumer loan" If development services must also be buyer and home-maintenance its predominant purpose is for related to the provision of financial counseling. financial planning or other household, family. or other personal services. What is meant by "provision of financial services education to promote expenditures, and to a lesser extent financial services"? community development and affordable home improvement, and the full amount A1. Providing financial services housing: of the line has not been reported under means providing services of the type Establishing school savings HMDA. This is the case even though generally provided by the financial programs and developing or teaching there may be "double counting" because services industry. Providing financial financial education curricula for low- or part of the line may also have been services often involves informing moderate-income individuals; reported under HMDA. community members about how to get Providing electronic benefits Q3. How should an institution collect or use credit or otherwise providing transfer and point of sale terminal or report information on loans the credit services or information to the systems to improve access to financial proceeds of which will be used for community. For example, service on the services, such as by decreasing costs, for multiple purposes? board of directors of an organization low- or moderate-income Individuals; A3. If an institution makes a single that promotes credit availability or and loan or provides a line of credit to a Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. /Monday, May 3, 1999/Notices 23631 customer to be used for both consumer this service as a retail banking service. area median family incomes or an order and small business purposes, consistent Examiners will consider an institution's form through the FFIEC's home page on with the Call Report and TFR mortgage brokerage services when the Internet at "http://www.ffiec.gov/". instructions, the institution should evaluating the range of services § .12(o) & Limited determine the major (predominant) provided to low-, moderate-, middle- Purpose Institution component of the loan or the credit line and upper-income geographies and the and collect or report the entire loan or degree to which the services are tailored Q1. What constitutes a "narrow credit line in accordance with the to meet the needs of those geographies. product line" in the definition of regulation's specifications for that loan Alternatively, an institution's mortgage "limited purpose institution"? A1. An Institution offers a narrow type. brokerage service may be considered a community development service If the product line by limiting its lending § .12(m) & 563e. Home primary purpose of the service is activities to a product line other than a Mortgage Loan community development. An institution traditional retail product line required Q1. Does the term "home mortgage wishing to have its mortgage brokerage to be evaluated under the lending test loan" include loans other than "home service considered as a community (i.e., home mortgage, small business, purchase loans"? development service must provide and small farm loans). Thus, an A1. Yes. "Home mortgage loan" sufficient information to substantiate institution engaged only in making includes a "home improvement loan" as credit card or motor vehicle loans offers that its primary purpose is community well as a "home purchase loan," as both development and to establish the extent a narrow product line, while an terms are defined In the HMDA of the services provided. institution limiting its lending activities regulation, Regulation C. 12 CFR part to home mortgages is not offering a 203. This definition also includes § .12(n) & 563e.12(m) Income Level narrow product line. multifamily (five-or-more families) Q1. Where do institutions find income Q2. What factors will the agencies dwelling loans, loans for the purchase of level data for geographies and consider to determine whether an manufactured homes, and refinancings individuals? institution that, if limited purpose, of home improvement and home A1. The Income levels for makes loans outside a narrow product purchase loans. geographies, i.e., census tracts and block line, or, if wholesale, engages in retail Q2. Some financial institutions broker numbering areas, are derived from lending, will lose its limited purpose or home mortgage loans. They typically Census Bureau information and are wholesale designation because of too take the borrower's application and updated every ten years. Institutions much other lending? perform other settlement activities; may contact their regional Census A2. Wholesale institutions may however, they do not make the credit Bureau office or the Census Bureau's engage In some retail lending without decision. The broker institutions may Income Statistics Office at (301) 763- losing their designation If this activity is also initially fund these mortgage loans, 8576 to obtain Income levels for incidental and done on an then immediately assign them to geographies. See Appendix A of these accommodation basis. Similarly. limited another lender. Because the broker Interagency Questions and Answers for purpose institutions continue to meet institution does not make the credit a list of the regional Census Bureau the narrow product line requirement if decision, under Regulation C (HMDA), offices. The income levels for they provide other types of loans on an they do not record the loans on their individuals are derived from infrequent basis. In reviewing other HMDA-LARs, even if they fund the information calculated by the lending activities by these institutions, loans. May an institution receive any Department of Housing and Urban the agencies will consider the following consideration under CRA for its home Development (HUD) and updated factors: mortgage loan brokerage activities? annually. Institutions may contact HUD Is the other lending provided as an A2. Yes. A financial Institution that at (800) 245-2691 to request a copy of incident to the institution's wholesale funds home mortgage loans but "FY [year number, e.g., 1996] Median lending? immediately assigns the loans to the Family Incomes for States and their Are the loans provided as an lender that made the credit decisions Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan accommodation to the institution's may present information about these Portions." wholesale customers? loans to examiners for consideration Alternatively, institutions may obtain Are the loans made only under the lending test as "other loan a list of the 1990 Census Bureau- infrequently to the limited purpose data." Under Regulation C, the broker calculated and the annually updated institution's customers? Institution does not record the loans on HUD median family Incomes for Does only an insignificant portion its HMDA-LAR because it does not metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) of the institution's total assets and make the credit decisions, even if it and statewide nonmetropolitan areas by income result from the other lending? funds the loans. An institution electing calling the Federal Financial Institution How significant a role does the to have these home mortgage loans Examination Council's (FFIEC's) HMDA Institution play in providing that type(s) considered must maintain information Help Line at (202) 452-2016. A free of loan(s) in the institution's assessment about all of the home mortgage loans copy will be faxed to the caller through area(s)? that it has funded in this way. the "fax-back" system. Institutions may Does the institution hold itself out Examiners will consider this other loan also call this number to have "faxed- as offering that type(s) of loan(s)? data using the same criteria by which back" an order form, from which they Does the lending test or the home mortgage loans originated or may order a list providing the median community development test present a purchased by an institution are family income level, as a percentage of more accurate picture of the evaluated. the appropriate MSA or institution's CRA performance? Institutions that do not provide nonmetropolitan median family income, Q3. Do "niche institutions" qualify as funding but merely take applications of every census tract and block limited purpose (or wholesale) and provide settlement services for numbering area (BNA). This list costs institutions? another lender that makes the credit $50. Institutions may also obtain the list A3. Generally, no. Institutions that are decisions will receive consideration for of MSA and statewide nonmetropolitan in the business of lending to the public, 23632 Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. /Monday, May 3, 1999 Notices but specialize in certain types of retail Institutions (CDFIs). Community provided the loan at below-market loans (for example, home mortgage or Development Corporations (CDCs), interest rates or "bought down" the small business loans) to certain types of minority- and women-owned financial interest rate to the borrower. Is the lost borrowers (for example, to high-end institutions, community loan funds, and income resulting from the lower interest Income level customers or to low- income or community rate or buy-down a qualified corporations or partnerships of licensed development credit unions) that investment? professional practitioners) ("niche primarily lend or facilitate lending in A6. No. The agencies will, however, institutions") generally would not low- and moderate-income areas or to consider the innovativeness and qualify as limited purpose (or low- and moderate-income individuals complexity of the community wholesale) institutions. in order to promote community development loan within the bounds of development, such as a CDFI that safe and sound banking practices. § 12(s) & 563e.12(r) Qualified promotes economic development on an Q7. Will the agencies consider as a Investment Indian reservation; Organizations qualified investment the wages or other Q1. Does the CRA regulation provide engaged in affordable housing compensation of an employee or authority for institutions to make rehabilitation and construction, director who provides assistance to a investments? including multifamily rental housing; community development organization A1. No. The CRA regulation does not Organizations, including, for on behalf of the institution? provide authority for Institutions to example, Small Business Investment A7. No. However, the agencies will make investments that are not otherwise Companies (SBICs) and specialized consider donated labor of employees or allowed by Federal law. SBICs, that promote economic directors of a financial institution in the Q2. Are mortgage-backed securities or development by financing small service test if the activity is a municipal bonds "qualified businesses; community development service. investments"? Facilities that promote community A2. As a general rule, mortgage- $ .12(t) Small Institution development in low- and moderate- backed securities and municipal bonds income areas for low- and moderate- Q1. How are the "total bank and thrift are not qualified investments because income individuals, such as youth assets" of a holding company they do not have as their primary programs, homeless centers, soup determined? purpose community development, as kitchens, health care facilities, battered A1. "Total banking and thrift assets" defined in the CRA regulations. women's centers, and alcohol and drug of a holding company are determined by Nonetheless, mortgage-backed securities recovery centers; combining the total assets of all banks or municipal bonds designed primarily Projects eligible for low-income and/or thrifts that are majority-owned to finance community development housing tax credits; by the holding company. An institution generally are qualified investments. State and municipal obligations, is majority-owned If the holding Municipal bonds or other securities such as revenue bonds, that specifically company directly or indirectly owns with a primary purpose of community support affordable housing or other more than 50 percent of its outstanding development need not be housing- community development; voting stock. related. For example, a bond to fund a Not-for-profit organizations serving Q2. How are Federal and State branch community facility or park or to provide low- and moderate- income housing or assets of a foreign bank calculated for sewage services as part of a plan to other community development needs, purposes of the CRA? redevelop a low-income neighborhood such as counseling for credit, home- A2. A Federal or State branch of a is a qualified Investment. Housing- ownership, home maintenance, and foreign bank is considered a small related bonds or securities must other financial services education; and institution if the Federal or State branch primarily address affordable housing Organizations supporting activities has less than $250 million in assets and (including multifamily rental housing) essential to the capacity of low- and the total assets of the foreign bank's or needs in order to qualify. moderate-income individuals or its holding company's U.S. bank and Q3. Are Federal Home Loan Bank geographies to utilize credit or to thrift subsidiaries that are subject to the stocks and membership reserves with sustain economic development, such as, CRA are less than $1 billion. This the Federal Reserve Banks "qualified for example, day care operations and job calculation includes not only FDIC- investments"? training programs that enable people to Insured bank and thrift subsidiaries, but A3. No. Federal Home Loan Bank work. also the assets of any FDIC-insured (FHLB) stock and membership reserves Q5. Will an institution receive branch of the foreign bank and the with the Federal Reserve Banks do not consideration for charitable assets of any uninsured Federal or State have a sufficient connection to contributions as "qualified branch (other than a limited branch or community development to be qualified investments"? a Federal agency) of the foreign bank investments. However, FHLB member A5. Yes, provided they have as their that results from an acquisition institutions may receive CRA primary purpose community described in section 5(a)(8) of the consideration for technical assistance development as defined in the International Banking Act of 1978 (12 they provide on behalf of applicants and regulations. A charitable contribution, U.S.C. 3103(a)(8)). recipients of funding from the FHLB's whether in cash or an in-kind contribution of property, is included in § .12(u) Small Business Loan Affordable Housing Program. See Q&A 3 addressing §§ .12(j) and the term "grant." A qualified investment Q1. Are loans to nonprofit Q4. What are examples of qualified is not disqualified because an organizations considered small business investments? institution receives favorable treatment loans or are they considered community A4. Examples of qualified for it (for example, as a tax deduction development loans? investments include, but are not limited or credit) under the Internal Revenue A1. To be considered a small business to, investments, grants, deposits or Code. loan, a loan must meet the definition of shares in or to: Q6. An institution makes or "loan to small business" in the Financial Intermediaries (including, participates in a community Instructions In the "Consolidated Community Development Financial development loan. The institution Reports of Conditions and Income" (Call Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 84/Monday, May 3, 1999/Notices 23633 Report) and "Thrift Financial Reports" business, small farm, or consumer loans the business opportunities addressed by (TFR). In general, a loan to a nonprofit to retail customers? lenders not subject to the CRA. organization, for business or farm A1. The agencies will consider Institutions are not required, however, purposes, where the loan is secured by whether: to prepare a needs assessment. If an nonfarm nonresidential property and The institution holds Itself out to institution provides information to the original amount of the loan is $1 the retail public as providing such examiners, the agencies will not expect million or less, if a business loan, or loans; and information other than what the $500,000 or less, if a farm loan, would The institution's revenues from institution normally would develop to be reported in the Call Report and TFR extending such loans are significant prepare a business plan or to identify as a small business or small farm loan. when compared to Its overall potential markets and customers, If a loan to a nonprofit organization is operations. including low- and moderate-income reportable as a small business or small A wholesale institution may make persons and geographies in its farm loan, It cannot also be considered some retail loans without losing its assessment area(s). The agencies will as a community development loan, wholesale designation as described not evaluate an institution's efforts to except by a wholesale or limited above in Q&A2 addressing §§ .12(o) ascertain community credit needs or purpose Institution. Loans to nonprofit and 563e.12(n). rate an institution on the quality of any organizations that are not small business information it provides. § 21-Performance Tests, or small farm loans for Call Report and Q2. Will examiners conduct Standards, and Ratings, in General TFR purposes may be considered as community contact interviews as part of community development loans if they § .21(a) Performance Tests and the examination process? A2. Yes. Examiners will consider meet the regulatory definition. Standards Information obtained from interviews Q2. Are loans secured by commercial Q1. Are all community development real estate considered small business with local community, civic, and activities weighted equally by government leaders. These interviews loans? examiners? provide examiners with knowledge A2. Yes, depending on their principal A1. No. Examiners will consider the regarding the local community, Its amount. Small business loans include responsiveness to credit and community economic base, and community loans secured by "nonfarm development needs, as well as the development initiatives. To ensure that nonresidential properties," as defined in innovativeness and complexity of an information from local leaders is the Call Report and TFR, in amounts institution's community development considered-particularly in areas where less than $1 million. lending, qualified investments, and the number of potential contacts may be Q3. Are loans secured by nonfarm community development services. limited-examiners may use residential real estate to finance small These criteria include consideration of information obtained through an businesses "small business loans'? the degree to which they serve as a interview with a single community A3. No. Loans secured by nonfarm catalyst for other community contact for examinations of more than residential real estate that are used to development activities. The criteria are one institution in a given market. In finance small businesses are not designed to add a qualitative element to addition, the agencies will consider included as "small business" loans for the evaluation of an institution's information obtained from Interviews Call Report and TFR purposes. The performance. conducted by other agency staff and by agencies recognize that many small businesses are financed by loans § .21(b) Performance Context the other agencies. In order to augment contacts previously used by the agencies secured by residential real estate. If Q1. Is the performance context and foster a wider array of contacts, the these loans promote community essentially the same as the former agencies will share community contact development, as defined in the regulation's needs assessment? information. regulation, they may be considered as A1. No. The performance context is a community development loans. broad range of economic, demographic, § .21(b)(4) Institutional Capacity Otherwise, at an Institution's option, the and institution- and community-specific and Constraints institution may collect and maintain information that an examiner reviews to Q1. Will examiners consider factors data separately concerning these loans understand the context in which an outside of an institution's control that and request that the data be considered institution's record of performance prevent it from engaging in certain in its CRA evaluation as "Other Secured should be evaluated. The agencies will activities? Lines/Loans for Purposes of Small provide examiners with much of this A1. Yes. Examiners will take into Business." information prior to the examination. account statutory and supervisory Q4. Are credit cards issued to small The performance context is not a formal limitations on an Institution's ability to businesses considered "small business or written assessment of community engage in any lending, investment, and loans"? credit needs. service activities. For example, a savings A4. Credit cards issued to a small association that has made few or no § .21(b)(2) Information Maintained business or to Individuals to be used, by the Institution or Obtained From qualified investments due to Its limited with the institution's knowledge, as investment authority may still receive a business accounts are small business Community Contacts low satisfactory rating under the loans if they meet the definitional Q1. Will examiners consider investment test if it has a strong lending requirements in the Call Report or TFR performance context information record. instructions. provided by institutions? AI. Yes. An institution may provide § .21(b)(5) Institution's Past § .12(w) Wholesale Institution Performance and the Performance of examiners with any information it Q1. What factors will the agencies deems relevant, including information Similarly Situated Lenders consider in determining whether an on the lending, Investment, and service Q1. Can an institution's assigned institution is In the business of opportunities in its assessment area(s). rating be adversely affected by poor past extending home mortgage, small This Information may include data on performance? 23634 Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. /Monday, May 3, Notices A1. Yes. The agencies will consider performance If consumer loans were manipulate business operations or an institution's past performance in its excluded. present information in an artificial light overall evaluation. For example, an that does not accurately reflect an § .22(a)(2) Loan Originations and institution's past performance may institution's overall record of lending Purchases/Other Loan Data support a rating of "substantial performance. noncompliance" If the institution has Q1. How are lending commitments (such as letters of credit) evaluated § .22(b)(1) Lending Activity not improved performance rated as "needs to improve." under the regulation? Q1. How will the agencies apply the Q2. How will examiners consider the A1. The agencies consider lending lending activity criterion to discourage performance of similarly situated commitments (such as letters of credit) an institution from originating loans lenders? only at the option of the institution. that are viewed favorably under CRA in A2. The performance context section Commitments must be legally binding the institution itself and referring other of the regulation permits the between an institution and a borrower loans, which are not viewed as performance of similarly situated in order to be considered. Information favorably, for origination by an affiliate? lenders to be considered, for example, about lending commitments will be A1. Examiners will review closely as one of a number of considerations in used by examiners to enhance their institutions with (1) a small number and evaluating the geographic distribution of understanding of an institution's amount of home mortgage loans with an an institution's loans to low- performance. unusually good distribution among low- moderate-, Q2. Will examiners review application and moderate-Income areas and low- middle-, and upper-income geographies. data as part of the lending test? and moderate-income borrowers and (2) This analysis, as well as other analyses, A2. Application activity is not a a policy of referring most, but not all, of may be used, for example, where groups performance criterion of the lending their home mortgage loans to affiliated of contiguous geographies within an test. However, examiners may consider institutions. If an institution is making institution's assessment area(s) exhibit this information in the performance loans mostly to low- and moderate- abnormally low penetration. In this context analysis because this income individuals and areas and regard, the performance of similarly Information may give examiners insight referring the rest of the loan applicants situated lenders may be analyzed if such on, for example, the demand for loans. to an affiliate for the purpose of an analysis would provide accurate Q3. May a financial institution receive receiving a favorable CRA rating, insight into the Institution's lack of consideration under CRA for examiners may conclude that the performance in those areas. The modification, extension, and Institution's lending activity is not regulation does not require the use of a consolidation agreements (MECAs), in satisfactory because it has specific type of analysis under these which it obtains loans from other inappropriately attempted to influence circumstances. Moreover, no ratio institutions without actually purchasing the rating. In evaluating an institution's developed from any type of analysis is or refinancing the loans, as those terms lending, examiners will consider linked to any lending test rating. have been interpreted under CRA? legitimate business reasons for the A3. Yes. In some states, MECAs, allocation of the lending activity. § .22-Lending Test which are not considered loan refinancings because the existing loan § .22(b)(2) & (3) Geographic § .22(a) Scope of Test Distribution and Borrower obligations are not satisfied and § .22(a)(1) Types of Loans Characteristics replaced, are common. Although these Considered transactions are not considered to be Q1. How do the geographic Q1. If a large retail institution is not purchases or refinancings, as those distribution of loans and the required to collect and report home terms have been interpreted under CRA, distribution of lending by borrower mortgage data under the HMDA, will the they do achieve the same results. An characteristics interact in the lending agencies still evaluate the institution's institution may present Information test? home mortgage lending performance? about its MECA activities to examiners A1. Examiners generally will consider A1. Yes. The agencies will sample the for consideration under the lending test both the distribution of an Institution's institution's home mortgage loan files in as "other loan data." loans among geographies of different order to assess its performance under Q4: Do institutions receive income levels and among borrowers of the lending test criteria. consideration for originating or different Income levels and businesses Q2. When will examiners consider purchasing loans that are fully of different sizes. The importance of the consumer loans as part of an guaranteed? borrower distribution criterion, institution's CRA evaluation? A4: Yes. The lending test evaluates an particularly in relation to the geographic A2. Consumer loans will be evaluated institution's record of helping to meet distribution criterion, will depend on if the institution so elects; and an the credit needs of its assessment area(s) the performance context. For example, institution that elects not to have its through the origination or purchase of distribution among borrowers with consumer loans evaluated will not be specified types of loans. The test does different income levels may be more viewed less favorably by examiners than not take into account whether or not important in areas without identifiable one that does. However, if consumer such loans are guaranteed. geographies of different income loans constitute a substantial majority of categories. On the other hand, the institution's business, the agencies § .22(b) Performance Criteria geographic distribution may be more will evaluate them even if the Q1. How will examiners apply the important in areas with the full range of institution does not so elect. The performance criteria in the lending test? geographies of different Income agencies Interpret "substantial majority" A1. Examiners will apply the categories. to be so significant a portion of the performance criteria reasonably and Q2. Must an institution lend to all institution's lending activity by number fairly, in accord with the regulations, portions of its assessment area? or dollar volume of loans that the the examination procedures, and this A2. The term "assessment area" lending test evaluation would not Guidance. In doing so, examiners will describes the geographic area within meaningfully reflect its lending disregard efforts by an institution to which the agencies assess how well an Federal Register Vol. 64, No. 84 Monday, May 3. 1999 Notices 23635 institution has met the specific Loans to low- and moderate-income A1. Yes. When evaluating the performance tests and standards in the persons and small businesses and farms Institution's record of community rule. The agencies do not expect that outside of an institution's assessment development lending under simply because a census tract or block area(s), however, will not compensate § .22(b)(4), it is appropriate to give numbering area is within an for poor lending performance within the greater weight to the amount of the loan institution's assessment area(s) the institution's assessment area(s). that is targeted to the intended institution must lend to that census tract Q5. Under the lending test, how will community development purpose. For or block numbering area. Rather the examiners evaluate home mortgage example, consider two $10 million agencies will be concerned with loans to middle- or upper-income projects (with a total of 100 units each) conspicuous gaps in loan distribution individuals in a low- or moderate- that have as their express primary that are not explained by the income geography? purpose affordable housing and are performance context. Similarly, if an A5. Examiners will consider these located in the same community. One of institution delineated the entire county home mortgage loans under the these projects sets aside 40% of Its units in which It Is located as its assessment performance criteria of the lending test, for low-income residents and the other area, but could have delineated its i.e., by number and amount of home project allocates 65% of its units for assessment area as only a portion of the mortgage loans, whether they are inside low-income residents. An institution county, it will not be penalized for or outside the financial institution's would report both loans as $10 million lending only in that portion of the assessment area(s), their geographic community development loans under county. so long as that portion does not distribution, and the Income levels of the § .42(b)(2) aggregate reporting reflect illegal discrimination or the borrowers. Examiners will use obligation. However, transaction arbitrarily exclude low- or moderate- information regarding the financial complexity, Innovation and all other income geographies. The capacity and institution's performance context to relevant considerations being equal, an constraints of an institution, its business determine how to evaluate the loans examiner should also take into account decisions about how it can best help to under these performance criteria. that the 65% project provides more meet the needs of its assessment area(s). Depending on the performance context, affordable housing for more people per including those of low- and moderate- examiners could view home mortgage dollar expended. income neighborhoods, and other loans to middle-income individuals in a Under $ .22(b)(4), the extent of aspects of the performance context, are low-income geography very differently. CRA consideration an institution all relevant to explain why the For example, if the loans are for homes receives for its community development institution is serving or not serving or multifamily housing located in an loans should bear a direct relation to the portions of its assessment area(s). area for which the local, state, tribal, or benefits received by the community and Q3. Will examiners take into account Federal government or a community- the innovation or complexity of the loans made by affiliates when based development organization has loans required to accomplish the evaluating the proportion of an developed a revitalization or activity. not simply to the dollar amount institution's lending in its assessment stabilization plan (such as a Federal expended on a particular transaction. By area(s)? enterprise community or empowerment applying all lending test performance A3. Examiners will not take into zone) that includes attracting mixed- criteria, a community development loan account loans made by affiliates when income residents to establish a of a lower dollar amount could meet the determining the proportion of an stabilized, economically diverse credit needs of the Institution's institution's lending in its assessment neighborhood, examiners may give more community to a greater extent than a area(s), even if the institution elects to consideration to such loans, which may community development loan with a have its affiliate lending considered in be viewed as serving the low- or higher dollar amount, but with less the remainder of the lending test moderate-income community's needs as innovation, complexity, or impact on evaluation. However, examiners may well as serving those of the middle- or the community. consider an institution's business upper-income borrowers. If, on the other § .22(b)(5) Innovative or Flexible strategy of conducting lending through hand, no such plan exists and there is an affiliate in order to determine no other evidence of governmental Lending Practices whether a low proportion of lending in support for a revitalization or Q1. What is the range of practices that the assessment area(s) should adversely stabilization project in the area and the examiners may consider in evaluating affect the institution's lending test loans to middle- or upper-income the innovativeness or flexibility of an rating. borrowers significantly disadvantage or institution's lending? Q4. When will examiners consider primarily have the effect of displacing A1. In evaluating the innovativeness loans (other than community low- or moderate-income residents. or flexibility of an institution's lending development loans) made outside an examiners may view these loans simply practices (and the complexity and institution's assessment area(s)? as home mortgage loans to middle- or Innovativeness of its community A4. Consideration will be given for upper-income borrowers who happen to development lending). examiners will loans to low- and moderate-income reside in a low- or moderate-income not be limited to reviewing the overall persons and small business and farm geography and weigh them accordingly variety and specific terms and loans outside of an institution's in their evaluation of the Institution. conditions of the credit products assessment area(s). provided the themselves. In connection with the institution has adequately addressed the § .22(b)(4) Community Development evaluation of an Institution's lending, needs of borrowers within its Lending examiners also may give consideration assessment area(s). The agencies will Q1. When evaluating an institution's to related innovations when they apply this consideration not only to record of community development augment the success and effectiveness loans made by large retail institutions lending, may an examiner distinguish of the institution's lending under its being evaluated under the lending test, among community development loans community development loan programs but also to loans made by small on the basis of the actual amount of the or, more generally, its lending under its Institutions being evaluated under the loan that advances the community loan programs that address the credit small institution performance standards. development purpose? needs of low- and moderate-income 23636 Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 84/Monday, May 3, /Notices geographies or individuals. For However, an institution can count as a required to include all home mortgage example: purchase a loan originated by an loans in Its assessment area of another In connection with a community affiliate that the institution affiliate institution subject to the CRA. development loan program, a bank may subsequently purchases, or count as an However, all loans of a particular type establish a technical assistance program origination a loan later sold to an made by any affiliate in the Institution's under which the bank, directly or affiliate, provided the same loans are assessment area(s) must either be through third parties, provides not sold several times to inflate their counted by the lending Institution or by affordable housing developers and other value for CRA purposes. another affiliate institution that is loan recipients with financial consulting § .22(c)(2)(ii) If an institution subject to the CRA. This reading reflects services. Such a technical assistance elects to have its supervisory agency the fact that a holding company may, for program may. by itself, constitute a consider loans within a particular business reasons, choose to transact community development service lending category made by one or more different aspects of its business in eligible for consideration under the of the institution's affiliates in a different subsidiary institutions. service test of the CRA regulations. In particular assessment area, the However, the method by which loans addition, the technical assistance may institution shall elect to have the agency are allocated among the institutions for be favorably considered as an consider all loans within that lending CRA purposes must reflect actual innovation that augments the success category in that particular assessment business decisions about the allocation and effectiveness of the related area made by all of the institution's of banking activities among the community development loan program. affiliates. institutions and should not be designed In connection with a small business Q1. How is this constraint on affiliate solely to enhance their CRA evaluations. lending program in a low- or moderate- lending applied? A1. This constraint prohibits "cherry- § .22(d) Lending by a Consortium or income area and consistent with safe and sound lending practices, a bank picking" affiliate loans within any one a Third Party may implement a program under which, category of loans. The constraint Q1. Will equity and equity-type in addition to providing financing, the requires an institution that elects to investments in a third party receive bank also contracts with the small have a particular category of affiliate consideration under the lending test? lending In a particular assessment area A1. If an institution has made an business borrowers. Such a contracting considered to include all loans of that arrangement would not, standing alone, equity or equity-type investment in a qualify for CRA consideration. However, type made by all of its affiliates in that third party, community development it may be favorably considered as an particular assessment area. For example, loans made by the third party may be assume that an institution has one or innovation that augments the loan considered under the lending test. On program's success and effectiveness, more affiliates, such as a mortgage bank the other hand, asset-backed and debt and improves the program's ability to that makes loans in the institution's securities that do not represent an assessment area. If the institution elects serve community development purposes equity-type interest in a third party will not be considered under the lending test by helping to promote economic to include the mortgage bank's home development through support of small mortgage loans, It must include all of unless the securities are booked by the business activities and revitalization or mortgage bank's home mortgage loans purchasing institution as a loan. For made in its assessment area. The stabilization of low- or moderate-income example, if an institution purchases institution cannot elect to Include only stock in a community development geographies. those low- and moderate-income home corporation ("CDC") that primarily § .22(c) Affiliate Lending mortgage loans made by the mortgage lends in low- and moderate-income § bank affiliate and not home mortgage areas or to low- and moderate-Income .22(c)(1) In General loans to middle- and upper-income individuals in order to promote Q1. If an institution elects to have individuals or areas. community development, the institution loans by its affiliate(s) considered, may Q2. How is this constraint applied if may claim a pro rata share of the CDC's it elect to have only certain categories of an institution's affiliates are also loans as community development loans. loans considered? insured depository institutions subject The institution's pro rata share is based A1. Yes. An institution may elect to to the CRA? on its percentage of equity ownership in have only a particular category of its A2. Strict application of this the CDC. Q&A1 addressing § .23(b) affiliate's lending considered. The basic constraint against "cherry-picking" to provides information concerning categories of loans are home mortgage loans of an affiliate that is also an consideration of an equity or equity- loans, small business loans, small farm Insured depository institution covered type investment under the Investment loans, community development loans, by the CRA would produce the test and both the lending and and the five categories of consumer anomalous result that the other investment tests. loans (motor vehicle loans, credit card institution would, without its consent, Q2. How will examiners evaluate loans, home equity loans, other secured not be able to count its own loans. loans made by consortia or third parties loans, and other unsecured loans). Because the agencies did not intend to under the lending test? § .22(c)(2) Constraints on Affiliate deprive an institution subject to the A2. Loans originated or purchased by Lending CRA of receiving consideration for its consortia in which an institution own lending, the agencies read this participates or by third parties in which § 22(c)(2)(i) No Affiliate May Claim constraint slightly differently in cases an Institution Invests will only be a Loan Origination or Loan Purchase if involving a group of affiliated considered if they qualify as community Another Institution Claims the Same institutions, some of which are subject development loans and will only be Loan Origination or Purchase to the CRA and share the same considered under the community Q1. How is this constraint on affiliate assessment area(s). In those development criterion of the lending lending applied? circumstances, an institution that elects test. However, loans originated directly A1. This constraint prohibits one to include all of its mortgage affiliate's on the books of an institution or affiliate from claiming a loan origination home mortgage loans In Its assessment purchased by the institution are or purchase claimed by another affiliate. area would not automatically be considered to have been made or Federal Register 64, No. 84/Monday, May 3, 23637 purchased directly by the institution, individuals in the Institution's evaluating an institution's record of even if the institution originated or assessment area(s) or a broader making qualified investments. For purchased the loans as a result of its statewide or regional area(s) that Instance, an examiner should take into participation In a loan consortium. includes the Institution's assessment account that a targeted mortgage-backed These loans would be considered under area(s). security that qualifies as an affordable all the lending test criteria appropriate housing issue that has only 60% of Its § .23(b) Exclusion to them depending on the type of loan. face value supported by loans to low- or Q3. In some circumstances, an Q1. Even though the regulations state moderate-income borrowers would not institution may invest in a third party, that an activity that is considered under provide as much affordable housing for such as a community development the lending or service tests cannot also low- and moderate-income individuals bank, that is also an insured depository be considered under the investment test, as a targeted mortgage-backed security institution and is thus subject to CRA may parts of an activity be considered with 100% of its face value supported requirements. If the investing institution under one test and other parts be by affordable housing loans to low- and considered under another test? requests its supervisory agency to moderate-income borrowers. The consider its pro rata share of community A1. Yes, in some Instances the nature examiner should describe any development loans made by the third of an activity may make it eligible for differential weighting (or other consideration under more than one of party, as allowed under 12 CFR adjustment), and its basis In the Public .22(d), may the third party also the performance tests. For example, Evaluation. However, no matter how a receive consideration for these loans? certain investments and related support qualified investment is handled for A3. Yes, as long as the financial provided by a large retail institution to purposes of § .23(e)(1), it will also institution and the third party are not a CDC may be evaluated under the be evaluated with respect to the affiliates. The regulations state, at 12 lending, investment. and service tests. qualitative performance criteria set forth Under the service test, the institution CFR .22(c)(2)(i), that two affiliates in § .23(e)(2), (3) and (4). By may not both claim the same loan may receive consideration for any applying all criteria, a qualified origination or loan purchase. However, community development services that it investment of a lower dollar amount if the financial institution and the third provides to the CDC. such as service by may be weighed more heavily under the an executive of the institution on the party are not affiliates, the third party Investment Test than a qualified CDC's board of directors. If the may receive consideration for the investment with a higher dollar amount, institution makes an investment in the community development loans it but with fewer qualitative CDC that the CDC uses to make originates, and the financial Institution enhancements. that invested in the third party may also community development loans, the Q2: How do examiners evaluate an receive consideration for its pro rata Institution may receive consideration institution's qualified investment in a under the lending test for its pro-rata share of the same community fund, the primary purpose of which is development loans under 12 CFR share of community development loans community development, as that is .22(d). made by the CDC. Alternatively, the defined in the CRA regulations? institution's investment may be A2. When evaluating qualified § 23-Investment Test considered under the investment test, investments that benefit an institution's § assuming It is a qualified investment. In assessment area(s) or a broader .23(a) Scope of Test addition. an institution may elect to statewide or regional area that includes Q1: May an institution receive have a part of Its investment considered its assessment area(s), examiners will consideration under the CRA under the lending test and the look at the following four performance regulations if it invests indirectly remaining part considered under the criteria: through a fund, the purpose of which is investment test. If the investing (1) The dollar amount of qualified community development, as that is institution opts to have a portion of its investments; defined in the CRA regulations? investment evaluated under the lending (2) The innovativeness or complexity A1. Yes, the direct or Indirect nature test by claiming a share of the CDC's of qualified Investments; of the qualified Investment does not community development loans, the (3) The responsiveness of qualified affect whether an institution will amount of investment considered under Investments to credit and community receive consideration under the CRA the investment test will be offset by that development needs; and regulations because the regulations do portion. Thus, the institution would (4) The degree to which the qualified not distinguish between "direct" and only receive consideration under the investments are not routinely provided "indirect" investments. Thus, an Investment test for the amount of its by private investors. institution's investment in an equity investment multiplied by the percentage With respect to the first criterion. fund that, in turn, invests in projects of the CDC's assets that meet the examiners will determine the dollar that, for example, provide affordable definition of a qualified investment. amount of qualified investments by housing to low- and moderate-income relying on the figures recorded by the individuals, would receive § .23(e) Performance Criteria institution according to generally consideration as a qualified investment Q1. When applying the performance accepted accounting principles (GAAP). under the CRA regulations, provided the criteria of § .23(e), may an examiner Although institutions may exercise a investment benefits one or more of the distinguish among qualified investments range of Investment strategies, including institution's assessment area(s) or a based on how much of the investment short-term investments, long-term broader statewide or regional area(s) actually supports the underlying investments, investments that are that includes one or more of the community development purpose? immediately funded, and investments institution's assessment area(s). A1. Yes. Although § .23(e)(1) with a binding, up-front commitment Similarly, an institution may receive speaks in terms of the dollar amount of that are funded over a period of time, consideration for a direct qualified qualified Investments, the criterion institutions making the same dollar Investment in a nonprofit organization permits an examiner to weight certain amount of investments over the same that, for example, supports affordable Investments differently or to make other number of years, all other performance housing for low- and moderate-income appropriate distinctions when criteria being equal, would receive the 23638 Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. /Monday, May 3, 1999/Notices same level of consideration. Examiners institution participation in IDA party community development will include both new and outstanding programs comes in a varlety of forms, organizations may be considered as investments in this determination. The including providing retail banking qualified Investments or as community dollar amount of qualified investments services to IDA account holders, development loans or both (provided also will include the dollar amount of providing matching dollars or operating there is no double counting), at the legally binding commitments recorded funds to an IDA program, designing or institution's option, as described above by the institution according to GAAP. implementing IDA programs, providing in the discussion regarding §§ .22(d) The extent to which qualified consumer financial education to IDA and .23(b). investments receive consideration, account holders or prospective account § .25(e) Benefit to Assessment however, depends on how examiners holders, or other means. The extent of Area(s) evaluate the Investments under the financial institutions' involvement in remaining three performance criteria- IDAs and the products and services they Q1. How do examiners evaluate a innovativeness and complexity, offer in connection with the accounts wholesale or limited purpose responsiveness, and degree to which the will vary. Thus, subject to § .23(b), institution's qualified investment in a investment is not routinely provided by examiners evaluate the actual services fund that invests in projects nationwide private investors. Examiners also will and products provided by an institution and which has a primary purpose of consider factors relevant to the in connection with IDA programs as one community development, as that is institution's CRA performance context, or more of the following: community defined in the regulations? such as the effect of outstanding long- development services, retail banking A1. If examiners find that a wholesale term qualified investments, the pay-In services, qualified investments, home or limited purpose institution has schedule, and the amount of any cash mortgage loans, small business loans, adequately addressed the needs of its call, on the capacity of the institution to consumer loans, or community assessment area(s), they will give make new investments. development loans. consideration to qualified Investments, as well as community development § .24-Service Test § .24(d)(3) Availability and loans and community development Effectiveness of Alternative Systems for § .24(d) Performance Criteria- services, by that institution nationwide. Retail Banking Services Delivering Retail Banking Services In determining whether an institution Q1. How do examiners evaluate the Q1. How will examiners evaluate has adequately addressed the needs of availability and effectiveness of an alternative systems for delivering retail its assessment area(s), examiners will institution's systems for delivering retail banking services? consider qualified Investments that banking services? A1. The regulation recognizes the benefit a broader statewide or regional multitude of ways in which an area that includes the institution's A1. Convenient access to full service institution can provide services, for assessment area(s). branches within a community is an important factor in determining the example, ATMs, banking by telephone § availability of credit and non-credit or computer, and bank-by-mail .25(f) Community Development services. Therefore, the service test programs. Delivery systems other than Performance Rating branches will be considered under the Q1. Must a wholesale or limited performance standards place primary regulation to the extent that they are purpose institution engage in all three emphasis on full service branches while effective alternatives to branches in categories of community development still considering alternative systems, such as automated teller machines providing needed services to low- and activities (lending, investment and moderate-income areas and individuals. service) to perform well under the ("ATMs"). The principal focus is on an institution's current distribution of The list of systems in the regulation is community development test? not intended to be inclusive. A1. No, a wholesale or limited branches; therefore, an Institution is not required to expand its branch network Q2. Are debit cards considered under purpose institution may perform well or operate unprofitable branches. Under the service test as an alternative delivery under the community development test the service test, alternative systems for system? by engaging in one or more of these delivering retail banking services, such A2. By themselves, no. However, if activities. debit cards are a part of a larger as ATMs, are considered only to the § .26-Small Institution extent that they are effective alternatives combination of products, such as a Performance Standards comprehensive electronic banking in providing needed services to low- service, that allows an institution to § .26(a) Performance Criteria and moderate-income areas and deliver needed services to low- and individuals. Q1. May examiners consider, under moderate-income areas and individuals Q2. How do examiners evaluate an one or more of the performance criteria institution's activities in connection In its community, the overall delivery of the small institution performance with Individual Development Accounts system that includes the debit card standards, lending-related activities, feature would be considered an (IDAs)? such as community development loans A2. Although there is no standard alternative delivery system. and lending-related qualified IDA program, IDAs typically are deposit § .25 Community Development Test investments, when evaluating a small accounts targeted to low- and moderate- for Wholesale or Limited Purpose institution? income families that are designed to Institutions A1. Yes. Examiners can consider help them accumulate savings for "lending-related activities," including education or job-training. down- § .25(d) Indirect Activities community development loans and payment and closing costs on a new Q1. How are investments in third lending-related qualified investments, home, or start-up capital for a small party community development when evaluating the first four business. Once participants have organizations considered under the performance criteria of the small successfully funded an IDA, their community development test? institution performance test. Although personal IDA savings are matched by a A1. Similar to the lending test for lending-related activities are specifically public or private entity. Financial retail institutions, Investments in third mentioned In the regulation In Federal Register 64, No. /Monday, May 3, 1999/Notices 23639 connection with only the first three § .26(a)(1) Loan-to-deposit Ratio performance only under this criterion. criteria (i.e., loan-to-deposit ratio, Q1. How is the loan-to-deposit ratio The effect on the overall performance percentage of loans in the institution's calculated? rating of the institution, however, is assessment area, and lending to A1. A small institution's loan-to- considered in light of the performance borrowers of different incomes and deposit ratio is calculated in the same context, including information businesses of different sizes), examiners manner that the Uniform Bank regarding economic conditions, loan can also consider these activities when demand, the institution's size, financial Performance Report/Uniform Thrift they evaluate the fourth criteria- Performance Report (UBPR/UTPR) condition and business strategies, and geographic distribution of the determines the ratio. It is calculated by branching network and other aspects of Institution's loans. the institution's lending record. dividing the institution's net loans and Q2. What is meant by "as leases by its total deposits. The ratio is § .26(a)(3) & (4) Distribution of appropriate" when referring to the fact found in the Liquidity and Investment Lending Within Assessment Area(s) by that lending-related activities will be Portfolio section of the UBPR and Borrower Income and Geographic considered, "as appropriate," under the UTPR. Examiners will use this ratio to Location various small institution performance calculate an average since the last criteria? Q1. How will a small institution's A2. "As appropriate" means that examination by adding the quarterly performance be assessed under these lending-related activities will be loan-to-deposit ratios and dividing the lending distribution criteria? considered when it is necessary to total by the number of quarters. A1. Distribution of loans, like other determine whether an institution meets Q2. How is the "reasonableness" of a small institution performance criterla, is or exceeds the standards for a loan-to-deposit ratio evaluated? considered in light of the performance satisfactory rating. Examiners will also A2. No specific ratio is reasonable in context. For example, a small Institution consider other lending-related activities every circumstance, and each small is not required to lend evenly Institution's ratio is evaluated In light of at an institution's request. throughout its assessment area(s) or in Q3. When evaluating a small information from the performance any particular geography. However, in institution's lending performance, will context, including the institution's order to meet the standards for examiners consider, at the institution's capacity to lend, demographic and satisfactory performance under this request, community development loans economic factors present in the criterion, conspicuous gaps in a small originated or purchased by a consortium assessment area, and the lending institution's loan distribution must be in which the institution participates or opportunities available in the adequately explained by performance by a third party in which the institution assessment area(s). If a small context factors such as lending has invested? institution's loan-to-deposit ratio opportunities in the institution's A3. Yes. However, a small institution appears unreasonable after considering assessment area(s), the institution's that elects to have examiners consider this information, lending performance product offerings and business strategy, community development loans may still be satisfactory under this and Institutional capacity and originated or purchased by a consortium criterion taking into consideration the constraints. In addition, it may be or third party must maintain sufficient number and the dollar volume of loans impracticable to review the geographic Information on its share of the sold to the secondary market or the distribution of the lending of an community development loans so that number and amount and Innovativeness institution with few demographically the examiners may evaluate these loans or complexity of community distinct geographies within an under the small institution performance development loans and lending-related assessment area. If sufficient criteria. qualified investments. information on the income levels of Q4. Under the small institution Q3. If an institution makes a large individual borrowers or the revenues or performance standards, will examiners number of loans off-shore, will sizes of business borrowers is not consider both loan originations and examiners segregate the domestic loan- available, examiners may use proxies purchases? to-deposit ratio from the foreign loan-to- such as loan size for estimating A4. Yes. consistent with the other deposit ratio? borrower characteristics, where assessment methods in the regulation, A3. No. Examiners will look at the appropriate. examiners will consider both loans Institution's net loan-to-deposit ratio for the whole institution, without any § .26(b) Performance Rating originated and purchased by the institution. Likewise, examiners may adjustments. Q1. How can a small institution consider any other loan data the small achieve an "outstanding" performance § .26(a)(2) Percentage of Lending institution chooses to provide, rating? Within Assessment Area(s) including data on loans outstanding, Al. A small institution that meets commitments and letters of credit. Q1. Must a small institution have a each of the standards for a "satisfactory" Q5. Under the small Institution majority of its lending in its assessment rating and exceeds some or all of those performance standards, how will area(s) to receive a satisfactory standards may warrant an qualified investments be considered for performance rating? "outstanding" performance rating. In purposes of determining whether a A1. No. The percentage of loans and, assessing performance at the small institution receives a satisfactory as appropriate, other lending-related "outstanding" level, the agencies CRA rating? activities located in the bank's consider the extent to which the A5. The small institution performance assessment area(s) is but one of the institution exceeds each of the standards focus on lending and other performance criteria upon which small performance standards and, at the lending-related activities. Therefore, institutions are evaluated. If the institution's option, its performance in examiners will consider only lending- percentage of loans and other lending making qualified investments and related qualified investments for the related activities in an institution's providing services that enhance credit purposes of determining whether the assessment area(s) is less than a availability in its assessment area(s). In small institution receives a satisfactory majority, then the institution does not some cases, a small Institution may CRA rating. meet the standards for satisfactory qualify for an "outstanding" 23640 Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 4/Monday, May 3, 1999/Notices performance rating solely on the basis of A2. The agencies will coordinate resulting in a higher level of its lending activities, but only if its review of and action on the joint plan. performance rating. performance materially exceeds the Each agency will evaluate the Q2. How is performance under the standards for a "satisfactory" rating, measurable goals for those affiliates for quantitative and qualitative particularly with respect to the which it is the primary regulator. performance criteria weighed when penetration of borrowers at all income examiners assign a CRA rating? § .27(f) Plan Content levels and the dispersion of loans A2. The lending, Investment, and throughout the geographies in its § .27(f)(1) Measurable Goals service tests each contain a number of assessment area(s) that display Income performance criteria designed to Q1. How should "measurable goals" variation. An institution with a high measure whether an institution is be specified in a strategic plan? loan-to-deposit ratio and a high effectively helping to meet the credit percentage of loans in its assessment A1. Measurable goals (e.g., number of needs of its entire community, area(s), but with only a reasonable loans. dollar amount, geographic including low- and moderate-income penetration of borrowers at all income location of activity. and benefit to low- neighborhoods, in a safe and sound and moderate-income areas or levels or a reasonable dispersion of manner. Some of these performance individuals) must be stated with loans throughout geographies of criteria are quantitative, such as number differing Income levels in its assessment sufficient specificity to permit the and amount, and others, such as the use area(s), generally will not be rated public and the agencies to quantify what of innovative or flexible lending "outstanding" based only on its lending performance will be expected. However, practices, the innovativeness or performance. However, the institution's institutions are provided flexibility in complexity of qualified investments, specifying goals. For example, an and the innovativeness and performance in making qualified investments and Its performance in institution may provide ranges of responsiveness of community providing branches and other services lending amounts in different categories development services, are qualitative. and delivery systems that enhance of loans. Measurable goals may also be The performance criteria that deal with credit availability in its assessment linked to funding requirements of these qualitative aspects of performance area(s) may augment the institution's certain public programs or indexed to recognize that these loans, qualified satisfactory rating to the extent that it other external factors as long as these investments, and community may be rated "outstanding." mechanisms provide a quantifiable development services sometimes require standard. Q2. Will a small institution's qualified special expertise and effort on the part investments, community development § .27(g) Plan Approval of the institution and provide a benefit loans, and community development to the community that would not § .27(g)(2) Public Participation services be considered if they do not otherwise be possible. As such, the directly benefit its assessment area(s)? Q1. How will the public receive notice agencies consider the qualitative aspects of an institution's activities when A2. Yes. These activities are eligible of a proposed strategic plan? for consideration if they benefit a measuring the benefits received by a A1. An institution submitting a broader statewide or regional area that community. An institution's strategic plan for approval by the includes a small institution's performance under these qualitative agencies is required to solicit public assessment area(s). as discussed more criteria may augment the consideration comment on the plan for a period of fully in Q&A6 addressing §§ .12(i) given to an institution's performance thirty (30) days after publishing notice and 563e.12(h). under the quantitative criteria of the of the plan at least once in a newspaper regulations, resulting in a higher level of § .27-Strategic Plan of general circulation. The notice should performance and rating. be sufficiently prominent to attract § .27(c) Plans in General public attention and should make clear § .28(a) Ratings in General Q1. To what extent will the agencies that public comment is desired. An Q1. How are institutions with provide guidance to an institution institution may, in addition, provide domestic branches in more than one during the development of its strategic notice to the public in any other manner state assigned a rating? plan? it chooses. A1. The evaluation of an institution A1. An institution will have an that maintains domestic branches in § .28-Assigned Ratings opportunity to consult with and provide more than one state ("multistate information to the agencies on a Q1. Are innovative lending practices, institution") will Include a written proposed strategic plan. Through this innovative or complex qualified evaluation and rating of its CRA record process, an institution is provided investments, and innovative community of performance as a whole and in each guidance on procedures and on the development services required for a state in which it has a domestic branch. Information necessary to ensure a "satisfactory" or "outstanding" CRA The written evaluation will contain a complete submission. For example, the rating? separate presentation on a multistate agencies will provide guidance on A1. No. Moreover, the lack of institution's performance for each whether the level of detail as set out in innovative lending practices, innovative metropolitan statistical area and the the proposed plan would be sufficient to or complex qualified investments, or nonmetropolitan area within each state, permit agency evaluation of the plan. innovative community development If it maintains one or more domestic However, the agencies' guidance during services alone will not result in a branch offices in these areas. This plan development and, particularly. "needs to improve" CRA rating. separate presentation will contain prior to the public comment period, will However, the use of innovative lending conclusions, supported by facts and not include commenting on the merits practices, innovative or complex data, on performance under the of a proposed strategic plan or on the qualified investments, and innovative performance tests and standards in the adequacy of measurable goals. community development services may regulation. The evaluation of a Q2. How will a joint strategic plan be augment the consideration given to an multistate institution that maintains a reviewed if the affiliates have different institution's performance under the domestic branch in two or more states primary Federal supervisors? quantitative criteria of the regulations, in a multistate metropolitan area will Federal Register / 64, No. 84 Monday, May 3, 1999 Notices 23641 include a written evaluation (containing COMPOSITE RATING POINT financially troubled institution is being the same information described above) REQUIREMENTS-Continued acquired. and rating of its CRA record of [Add points from three tests] § .29(b) Interested Parties performance in the multistate metropolitan area. In such cases, the Rating Total points Q1. What consideration is given to statewide evaluation and rating will be comments from interested parties in adjusted to reflect performance in the Satisfactory 11 through 19. reviewing an application? portion of the state not within the Needs to Improve 5 through 10 A1. Materials relating to CRA multistate metropolitan statistical area. Substantial Noncompliance 0 through 4. performance received during the Q2. How are institutions that operate Note: There is one exception to the Com- applications process can provide within only a single state assigned a valuable information. Written posite Rating matrix. An institution may not re- rating? ceive a rating of "satisfactory" unless it re- comments, which may express either A2. An institution that operates ceives at least "low satisfactory" on the lend- support for or opposition to the within only a single state ("single-state ing test. Therefore, the total points are capped application, are made a part of the at three times the lending test score. institution") will be assigned a rating of record in accordance with the agencies' its CRA record based on its performance § .29-Effect of CRA Performance procedures, and are carefully within that state. In assigning this on Applications considered in making the agencies' rating, the agencies will separately decision. Comments should be § .29(a) CRA Performance present a single-state institution's supported by facts about the applicant's performance for each metropolitan area Q1. What weight is given to an performance and should be as specific in which the institution maintains one institution's CRA performance as possible in explaining the basis for or more domestic branch offices. This examination in reviewing an supporting or opposing the application. separate presentation will contain application? These comments must be submitted conclusions, supported by facts and A1. In cases in which CRA within the time limits provided under data, on the single-state institution's performance is a relevant factor, the agencies' procedures. performance under the performance information from a CRA performance Q2. Is an institution required to enter tests and standards in the regulation. examination of the institution is a into agreements with private parties? Q3. How do the agencies weight particularly important consideration in A2. No. Although communications performance under the lending, the applications process because it between an institution and members of investment and service test for large represents a detailed evaluation of the its community may provide a valuable retail institutions? institution's CRA performance by its method for the institution to assess how A3. A rating of "outstanding." "high Federal supervisory agency. In this best to address the credit needs of the satisfactory,' "low satisfactory.' "needs light, an examination is an important, community, the CRA does not require to improve, or "substantial and often controlling, factor in the an institution to enter into agreements noncompliance," based on a judgment consideration of an institution's record. with private parties. These agreements supported by facts and data, will be In some cases, however, the are not monitored or enforced by the assigned under each performance test. examination may not be recent or a agencies. Points will then be assigned to each specific Issue raised In the application § .41-Assessment Area rating as described in the first matrix set process, such as progress in addressing Delineation forth below. A large retail institution's weaknesses noted by examiners, overall rating under the lending. progress in implementing commitments § .41(a) In General investment and service tests will then previously made to the reviewing Q1. How do the agencies evaluate be calculated in accordance with the agency. or a supported allegation from "assessment areas" under the revised second matrix set forth below. which a commenter. Is relevant to CRA CRA regulations compared to how they Incorporates the rating principles in the performance under the regulation and evaluated "local communities" that regulation. was not addressed in the examination. institutions delineated under the In these circumstances, the applicant original CRA regulations? POINTS ASSIGNED FOR PERFORMANCE should present sufficient information to A1. The revised rule focuses on the UNDER LENDING, INVESTMENT AND supplement its record of performance distribution and level of an Institution's SERVICE TESTS and to respond to the substantive issues lending, investments, and services raised in the application proceeding. rather than on how and why an Lend- Invest- Service Q2. What consideration is given to an institution delineated Its "local ing ment institution's commitments for future community" or assessment area(s) in a Outstanding 12 6 6 action in reviewing an application by particular manner. Therefore, the High Satisfactory 9 4 4 those agencies that consider such agencies will not evaluate an Low Satisfactory 6 3 3 commitments? institution's delineation of its Needs to Im- A2. Commitments for future action assessment area(s) as a separate prove 3 1 1 are not viewed as part of the CRA record performance criterion as they did under Substantial Non- of performance. In general, institutions the original regulation. Rather, the compliance 0 0 0 cannot use commitments made in the agencies will only review whether the applications process to overcome a assessment area delineated by the COMPOSITE RATING POINT seriously deficient record of CRA institution complies with the limitations REQUIREMENTS performance. However, commitments set forth in the regulations at for improvements in an institution's § 41(e). [Add points from three tests] performance may be appropriate to Q2. If an institution elects to have the Rating Total points address specific weaknesses in an agencies consider affiliate lending, will otherwise satisfactory record or to this decision affect the Institution's Outstanding 20 or over. address CRA performance when a assessment area(s)? 23642 Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 4/Monday, May 3, 1999/Notices A2. If an Institution elects to have the entire political subdivisions. Because CMSA. Similarly, an assessment area lending activities of Its affiliates census tracts and block numbering areas may not extend substantially across considered in the evaluation of the are the common geographic areas used state boundaries unless the assessment institution's lending, the geographies in consistently nationwide for data area is located in a multistate MSA. An which the affiliate lends do not affect collection, the agencies require that Institution may not delineate a whole the Institution's delineation of assessment areas be made up of whole state as its assessment area unless the assessment area(s). geographies. If including an entire entire state is contained within a CMSA. Q3. Can a financial institution political subdivision would create an These limitations apply to wholesale identify a specific ethnic group rather area that Is larger than the area the and limited purpose Institutions as well than a geographic area as its assessment institution can reasonably be expected as other institutions. area? to serve, an Institution may, but is not An institution shall delineate separate A3. No, assessment areas must be required to, adjust the boundarles of its assessment areas for the areas inside based on geography. assessment area to Include only portlons and outside a CMSA (or MSA if the of the political subdivision. For MSA is not located in a CMSA) if the § .41(c) Geographic Area(s) for example, this adjustment is appropriate area served by the institution's branches Institutions Other Than Wholesale or if the assessment area would otherwise outside the CMSA (or MSA) extends Limited Purpose Institutions be extremely large, of unusual substantially beyond the CMSA (or § .41(c)(1) Generally Consist of One configuration, or divided by significant MSA) boundary. Similarly, the or More MSAs or One or More geographic barriers (such as a river, institution shall delineate separate Contiguous Political Subdivisions mountain, or major highway system). assessment areas for the areas inside When adjusting the boundaries of their and outside of a state If the institution's Q1. Besides cities, towns, and counties, what other units of local assessment areas, Institutions must not branches extend substantially beyond government are political subdivisions arbitrarily exclude low- or moderate- the boundary of one state (unless the for CRA purposes? Income geographies or set boundaries assessment area is located in a that reflect illegal discrimination. multistate MSA). In addition, the A1. Townships and Indian Institution should also delineate reservations are political subdivisions § .41(e) Limitations on Delineation separate assessment areas If It has for CRA purposes. Institutions should of an Assessment Area branches in areas within the same state be aware that the boundaries of § townships and Indian reservations may .41(e)(3) May Not Arbitrarily that are widely separate and not at all not be consistent with the boundaries of Exclude Low- or Moderate-income contiguous. For example, an institution the census tracts or block numbering Geographies that has its main office in New York City and a branch in Buffalo, New York, areas ("geographies") In the area. In Q1. How will examiners determine and each office serves only the these cases, institutions must ensure whether an institution has arbitrarily immediate areas around it, should that their assessment area(s) consists excluded low- or moderate-income delineate two separate assessment areas. only of whole geographies by adding geographies? Q2. Can an institution delineate one any portions of the geographies that lie A1. Examiners will make this assessment area that consists of an MSA outside the political subdivision to the determination on a case-by-case basis and two large counties that abut the delineated assessment area(s). after considering the facts relevant to MSA but are not adjacent to each other? Q2. Are wards, school districts, voting the institution's assessment area A2. As a general rule, an institution's districts, and water districts political delineation. Information that examiners assessment area should not extend subdivisions for CRA purposes? will consider may include: substantially beyond the boundary of an A2. No. However, an Institution that Income levels in the institution's MSA If the MSA Is not located in a determines that it predominantly serves assessment area(s) and surrounding CMSA. Therefore, the MSA would be a an area that is smaller than a city, town geographies; separate assessment area, and because or other political subdivision may Locations of branches and deposit- the two abutting counties are not delineate as its assessment area the taking ATMs; adjacent to each other and, In this larger political subdivision and then, in Loan distribution in the example, extend substantlally beyond accordance with § .41(d), adjust the Institution's assessment area(s) and the boundary of the MSA, the boundarles of the assessment area to surrounding geographies; Institution would delineate each county include only the portion of the political The institution's size; as a separate assessment area (so, in this subdivision that It reasonably can be The Institution's financial example, there would be three expected to serve. The smaller area that condition: and assessment areas). However, If the MSA the institution delineates must consist The business strategy, corporate and the two counties were in the same of entire geographies, may not reflect structure and product offerings of the CMSA, then the institution could illegal discrimination, and may not institution. delineate only one assessment area arbitrarily exclude low- or moderate- § .41(e)(4) May Not Extend including them all. income geographies. Substantially Beyond a CMSA Boundary § .42-Data Collection, Reporting, § .41(d) Adjustments to Geographic or Beyond a State Boundary Unless and Disclosure Area(s) Located in a Multistate MSA Q1. When must an institution collect Q1. When may an institution adjust Q1. What are the maximum limits on and report data under the CRA the boundaries of an assessment area to the size of an assessment area? regulations? include only a portion of a political A1. An institution shall not delineate A1. All Institutions except small subdivision? an assessment area extending institutions are subject to data collection A1. Institutions must Include whole substantially across the boundaries of a and reporting requirements. A small geographies (i.e., census tracts or block consolidated metropolitan statistical Institution is a bank or thrift that, as of numbering areas) In their assessment area (CMSA) or the boundaries of an December 31 of either of the prior two areas and generally should include MSA, If the MSA Is not located In a calendar years, had total assets of less Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 84/Monday, May 3, 1999/Notices 23643 than $250 million and was independent Q4. Should renewals of lines of credit A7. No. However, small institutions or an affiliate of a holding company be reported? must be prepared to identify those that, as of December 31 of either of the A4. No. Similar to loan renewals, loans, Investments and services to be prior two calendar years, had total renewals of lines of credit are not evaluated under the community banking and thrift assets of less than $1 considered loan originations and should development test. billion. not be reported. § .42(a) Loan Information Required For example: Q5. When should merging institutions to be Collected and Maintained collect data? Data collection A5. Three scenarios of data collection Q1. Must institutions collect and Institution's required for fol- Date asset size lowing calendar responsibilities for the calendar year of report data on all commercial loans ($ million) year? a merger and subsequent data reporting under $1 million at origination? (million) responsibilities are described below. A1. No. Institutions that are not Two institutions are exempt from exempt from data collection and 12/31/94 $240 No. CRA collection and reporting reporting are required to collect and 12/31/95 260 No. requirements because of asset size. The report only those commercial loans that 12/31/96 230 No. 12/31/97 280 No. Institutions merge. No data collection is they capture in the Call Report, 12/31/98 260 Yes, beginning required for the year In which the Schedule RC-C, Part II, and in the TFR, merger takes place, regardless of the Schedule SB. Small business loans are 1/01/99. resulting asset size. Data collection defined as those whose original All institutions that are subject to the would begin after two consecutive years amounts are $1 million or less and that data collection and reporting in which the combined institution had were reported as either "Loans secured requirements must report the data for a year-end assets of at least $250 million by nonfarm or nonresidential real or was part of a holding company that estate" or "Commercial and Industrial calendar year by March 1 of the subsequent year. In the example, above, had year-end banking and thrift assets of loans" in Part I of the Call Report or the institution would report the data at least $1 billion. TFR. collected for calendar year 1999 by Institution A, an institution Q2. For loans defined as small March 1. 2000. required to collect and report the data, business loans, what information should The Board of Governors of the Federal and Institution B, an exempt institution, be collected and maintained? Reserve System is handling the merge. Institution A is the surviving A2. Institutions that are not exempt processing of the reports for all of the institution. For the year of the merger, from data collection and reporting are primary regulators. The reports should data collection is required for Institution required to collect and maintain in a be submitted in a prescribed electronic A's transactions. Data collection is standardized, machine readable format format on a timely basis. The mailing optional for the transactions of the information on each small business loan address for submitting these reports is: previously exempt institution. For the originated or purchased for each Attention: CRA Processing. Board of following year, all transactions of the calendar year: Governors of the Federal Reserve surviving institution must be collected A unique number or alpha-numeric System, 1709 New York Avenue, N.W., and reported. symbol that can be used to identify the 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20006. Two Institutions that each are relevant loan file; Q2. Should an Institution develop its required to collect and report the data The loan amount at origination; The own program for data collection, or will merge. Data collection is required for loan location; and the regulators require a certain format? the entire year of the merger and for An indicator whether the loan was A2. An institution may use the free subsequent years so long as the to a business with gross annual software that is provided by the FFIEC surviving Institution is not exempt. The revenues of $1 million or less. to reporting institutions for data surviving institution may file either a The location of the loan must be collection and reporting or develop its consolidated submission or separate maintained by census tract or block own program. Those institutions that submissions for the year of the merger numbering area. In addition, develop their own programs must but must file a consolidated report for supplemental Information contained in follow the precise format for the new subsequent years. the file specifications includes a date CRA data collection and reporting rules. Q6. Can small Institutions get a copy associated with the origination or This format may be obtained by of the data collection software even purchase and whether a loan was contacting the CRA Assistance Line at though they are not required to collect originated or purchased by an affiliate. (202) 872-7584. or report data? The same requirements apply to small Q3. How should an institution report A6. Yes. Any Institution that is farm loans. data on lines of credit? interested in receiving a copy of the Q3. Will farm loans need to be A3. Institutions must collect and software may send a written request to: segregated from business loans? report data on lines of credit in the same Attn.: CRA Processing. Board of A3. Yes. way that they provide data on loan Governors of the Federal Reserve Q4. Should institutions collect and originations. Lines of credit are System, 1709 New York Ave, N.W., 5th report data on all agricultural loans considered originated at the time the Floor. Washington, DC 20006. under $500,000 at origination? line Is approved or Increased; and an They may also call the CRA A4. Institutions are to report those increase is considered a new Assistance Line at (202) 872-7584 or farm loans that they capture in the Call origination. Generally, the full amount send Internet e-mail to Report, Schedule RC-C, Part II and of the credit line is the amount that is [email protected]. Schedule SB of the TFR. Small farm considered originated. In the case of an Q7. If a small institution is designated loans are defined as those whose Increase to an existing line, the amount a wholesale or limited purpose original amounts are $500,000 or less of the Increase is the amount that is Institution, must it collect data that it and were reported as either "Loans to considered originated and that amount would not otherwise be required to finance agricultural production and should be reported. collect because it is a small Institution? other loans to farmers" or "Loans 23644 Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 84/Monday, May 3, 1999/Notices secured by farmland" In Part I of the on the entire line as a community Information available, It should assign a Call Report and TFR. development loan. If the line does not census tract or block numbering area to Q5. Should institutions collect and qualify as a community development that location (geocode) and report that report data about small business and loan, the Institution has the option of Information as required under the small farm loans that are refinanced or collecting and maintaining (but not regulation. renewed? reporting) the entire line of credit as For loans originated or purchased in A5. An Institution collects and reports "Other Secured Lines/Loans for 1998 or later, If the institution cannot information about refinancings but does Purposes of Small Business." determine the borrower's street address, not collect and report Information about Q8. When collecting small business and does not know the census tract or renewals. A refinancing typically and small farm data for CRA purposes, block numbering area, the institution Involves the satisfaction of an existing may an institution collect and report should report the borrower's state, obligation that is replaced by a new information about loans to small county, MSA, If applicable, and "NA," obligation undertaken by the same businesses and small farms located for "not available," in lieu of a census borrower. When an Institution outside the United States? tract or block numbering area code. refinances a loan, it is considered a new A8. At an Institution's option, It may origination, and loan data should be collect data about small business and § .42(a)(2) Loan Amount at collected and reported, If otherwise small farm loans located outside the Origination required. Consistent with HMDA, United States; however, it cannot report Q1. When an institution purchases a however, If under the original loan this data because the CRA data small business or small farm loan, agreement, the institution is collection software will not accept data which amount should the institution unconditionally obligated to refinance concerning loan locations outside the collect and report-the original amount the loan, or Is obligated to refinance the United States. of the loan or the amount at purchase? loan subject to conditions within the Q9. Is an institution that has no small A1. When collecting and reporting borrower's control, the Institution farm or small business loans required to information on purchased small would not report these events as report under CRA? business and small farm loans, an originations. A9. Each institution subject to data institution collects and reports the For purposes of the CRA data reporting requirements must, at a amount of the loan at origination, not at collection and reporting requirements, minimum, submit a transmittal sheet, the time of purchase. This is consistent an extension of the maturity of an definition of its assessment area(s), and with the Call Report's and TFR's use of existing loan is a renewal, and is not a record of Its community development the "original amount of the loan" to considered a loan origination. loans. If the Institution does not have determine whether a loan should be Therefore, Institutions should not community development loans to reported as a "loan to a small business" collect and report data on loan report, the record should be sent with or a "loan to a small farm" and in which renewals. "0" in the community development loan size category a loan should be Q6. Does a loan to the "fishing loan composite data fields. An reported. When assessing the volume of industry" come under the definition of institution that has not purchased or small business and small farm loan a small farm loan? originated any small business or small purchases for purposes of evaluating A6. Yes. Instructions for Part I of the farm loans during the reporting period lending test performance under CRA, Call Report and Schedule SB of the TFR would not submit the composite loan however, examiners will evaluate an Include loans "made for the purpose of records for small business or small farm Institution's activity based on the financing fisheries and forestries, loans. amounts at purchase. including loans to commercial Q10. How should an Institution Q2. How should an Institution collect flshermen" as a component of the collect and report the location of a loan data about multiple loan originations to definition for "Loans to finance made to a small business or farm If the the same business? agricultural production and other loans borrower provides an address that A2. If an institution makes multiple to farmers." Part II of Schedule RC-C of consists of a post office box number or originations to the same business, the the Call Report and Schedule SB of the a rural route and box number? loans should be collected and reported TFR, which serve as the basis of the A10. Prudent banking practices as separate originations rather than definition for small business and small dictate that an institution know the combined and reported as they are on farm loans in the revised regulation, location of its customers and loan the Call Report or TFR, which reflect capture both "Loans to finance collateral. Therefore, Institutions loans outstanding, rather than agricultural production and other loans typically will know the actual location originations. However, if Institutions to farmers" and "Loans secured by of their borrowers or loan collateral make multiple originations to the same farmland." beyond an address consisting only of a business solely to inflate artificially the Q7. How should an institution report post office box. number Or volume of loans evaluated for a home equity line of credit, part of Many borrowers have street addresses CRA lending performance, the agencies which is for home improvement In addition to post office box numbers may combine these loans for purposes purposes, but the predominant part of or rural route and box numbers. of evaluation under the CRA. which is for small business purposes? Institutions should ask their borrowers Q3. How should an institution collect A7. The institution has the option of to provide the street address of the main data pertaining to credit cards issued to reporting the portion of the home equity business facility or farm or the location small businesses? line that is for home improvement where the loan proceeds otherwise will A3. If an institution agrees to issue purposes under HMDA. That portion of be applied. Moreover, in many cases in credit cards to a business' employees, the loan would then be considered which the borrower's address consists all of the credit card lines opened on a when examiners evaluate home only of a rural route number or post particular date for that single business mortgage lending. If the line meets the office box, the Institution knows the should be reported as one small regulatory definition of a "communIty location (i.e., the census tract or block business loan origination rather than development loan," the Institution numbering area) of the borrower or loan reporting each individual credit card should collect and report Information collateral. Once the Institution has this line, assuming the criteria in the "small Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. /Monday, May 3, 1999/Notices 23645 business loan" definition in the information may not be included in the numbering area in which the institution regulation are met. The credit card loans to businesses and farms with gross originated or purchased at least one program's "amount at origination" is the annual revenues of $1 million or less small business or small farm loan sum of all of the employee/business when reporting this data. during the prior year: credit cards" credit limits opened on a Q3. What gross revenue should an The number and amount of loans particular date. If subsequently issued Institution use In determining the gross originated or purchased with original credit cards Increase the small business annual revenue of a start-up business? amounts of $100,000 or less; credit line, the added amount is A3. The institution should use the The number and amount of loans reported as a new origination. actual gross annual revenue to date originated or purchased with original § .42(a)(3) The Loan Location (Including $0 if the new business has amounts of more than $100,000 but less had no revenue to date). Although a than or equal to $250,000; Q1. Which location should an start-up business will provide the The number and amount of loans institution record if a small business Institution with forma projected originated or purchased with original loan's proceeds are used in a variety of revenue figures, these figures may not amounts of more than $250,000 but not locations? accurately reflect actual gross revenue. more than $1 million, as to small A1. The institution should record the Q4: When collecting and reporting the business loans, or $500,000. as to small loan location by either the location of gross annual revenue of small business farm loans; and the business headquarters or the or farm borrowers, do institutions To the extent that information is location where the greatest portion of collect and report the gross annual available, the number and amount of the proceeds are applied, as Indicated revenue or the adjusted gross annual loans to businesses and farms with gross by the borrower. revenue of its borrowers? annual revenues of $1 million or less § .42(a)(4) Indicator of Gross A4: Institutions collect and report the (using the revenues the institution Annual Revenue gross annual revenue, rather than the considered in making its credit adjusted gross annual revenue, of their Q1. When indicating whether a small decision). small business or farm borrowers. The business borrower had gross annual purpose of this data collection is to § .42(b)(2) Community Development revenues of $1 million or less, upon enable examiners and the public to Loan Data what revenues should an institution judge whether the institution is lending Q1. What information about rely? to small businesses and farms or A1. Generally, an institution should community development loans must rely on the revenues that it considered whether It is only making small loans to institutions report? in making Its credit decision. For larger businesses and farms. A1. Institutions subject to data example, in the case of affiliated The regulation does not require reporting requirements must report the Institutions to request or consider businesses, such as a parent corporation aggregate number and amount of revenue information when making a and its subsidiary, If the Institution community development loans considered the revenues of the entity's loan; however, if Institutions do gather originated and purchased during the this Information from their borrowers, parent or a subsidiary corporation of the prior calendar year. parent as well, then the institution the agencies expect them to collect and Q2. If a loan meets the definition of would aggregate the revenues of both report the borrowers' gross annual a home mortgage, small business, or corporations to determine whether the revenue for purposes of CRA. The CRA small farm loan AND qualifies as a revenues are $1 million or less. regulations similarly do not require community development loan, where Alternatively, if the institution institutions to verify revenue amounts; should It be reported? Can FHA, VA and considered the revenues of only the thus, institutions may rely on the gross SBA loans be reported as community annual revenue amount provided by entity to which the loan is actually development loans? extended, the Institution should rely borrowers in the ordinary course of A2. Except for multifamily affordable business. If an institution does not solely upon whether gross annual housing loans, which may be reported revenues are above or below $1 million collect gross annual revenue by retail Institutions both under HMDA Information for its small business and for that entity. However, If the as home mortgage loans and as small farm borrowers, the Institution Institution considered and relied on community development loans, In order would not indicate on the CRA data revenues or income of a cosigner or to avoid double counting, retail collection software that the gross annual guarantor that is not an affiliate of the institutions must report loans that meet revenues of the borrower are $1 million borrower, the institution should not the definitions of home mortgage, small adjust the borrower's revenues for or less. (See Q&A2 regarding business, or small farm loans only in § .42(a)(4).) reporting purposes. those respective categories even If they Q2. If an institution that is not exempt § .42(b) Loan Information Required also meet the definition of community from data collection and reporting does to be Reported development loans. As a practical not request or consider revenue matter, this is not a disadvantage for § .42(b)(1) Small Business and information to make the credit decision retail Institutions because any affordable Small Farm Loan Data regarding a small business or small farm housing mortgage, small business, small loan, must the institution collect Q1. For small business and small farm or consumer loan that would revenue Information in connection with farm loan information that is collected otherwise meet the definition of a that loan? and maintained, what data should be community development loan will be A2. No. In those Instances, the reported? considered elsewhere in the lending Institution should enter the code A1. Each Institution that is not test. Any of these types of loans that Indicating "revenues not known" on the exempt from data collection and occur outside the institution's individual loan portion of the data reporting is required to report in assessment area can receive collection software or on an internally machine-readable form annually by consideration under the borrower developed system. Loans for which the March 1 the following information, characteristic criteria of the lending test. Institution did not collect revenue aggregated for each census tract or block See Q&A4 under § .22(b)(2) & (3). 23646 Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 84/Monday, May 3, 1999/Notices Limited purpose and wholesale collect data for one or more of the The regulation does not require Institutions also must report loans that following categories of consumer loans: institutions to request or consider meet the definitions of home mortgage, motor vehicle, credit card, home equity, income information when making a small business, or small farm loans in other secured, and other unsecured. If loan; however, If institutions do gather those respective categories; however, an institution collects data for loans in this information from their borrowers, they must also report any loans from a certain category, it must collect data the agencies expect them to collect the those categories that meet the regulatory for all loans originated or purchased borrowers' gross annual Income for definition of "community development within that category. The Institution purposes of CRA. The CRA regulations loans" as community development must maintain these data separately for similarly do not require institutions to loans. There is no double counting each category for which It chooses to verify Income amounts; thus, because wholesale and limited purpose collect data. The data collected and Institutions may rely on the gross Institutions are not subject to the maintained should include for each annual Income amount provided by lending test and, therefore, are not loan: borrowers in the ordinary course of evaluated on their level and distribution A unique number or alpha-numeric business. of home mortgage, small business, small symbol that can be used to identify the § .42(c)(2) Other Loan Data farm and consumer loans. relevant loan file: Q3. When the primary purpose of a The loan amount at origination or Q1. Schedule RC-C, Part II of the Call loan is to finance an affordable housing purchase; Report and schedule SB of the TFR do The loan location; and not allow financial institutions to report project for low-or moderate-income individuals, but, for example, only 40% The gross annual Income of the loans for commercial and industrial of the units in question will actually be borrower that the Institution considered purposes that are secured by residential in making its credit decision. real estate. Loans extended to small occupied by individuals or families with low or moderate incomes, should the Generally, guidance given with businesses with gross annual revenues entire loan amount be reported as a respect to data collection of small of $1 million or less may, however, be community development loan? business and small farm loans, secured by residential real estate. Is including. for example, guidance there a way to collect this information A3. Yes. As long as the primary regarding collecting loan location data, on the software to supplement an purpose of the loan is a community development purpose, the full amount and whether to collect data in institution's small business lending data of the Institution's loan should be connection with refinanced or renewed at the time of examination? included in its reporting of aggregate loans, will also apply to consumer A1. Yes. If these loans promote loans. community development, as defined in amounts of community development the regulation, the institution should lending. However, as noted in Q&A1 § .42(c)(1)(iv) Income of Borrower collect and report information about addressing § .22(b)(4), examiners Q1. If an institution does not consider these loans as community development may make qualitative distinctions income when making an underwriting loans. Otherwise, at an institution's among community development loans decision in connection with a consumer option, it may collect and maintain data on the basis of the extent to which the loan, must it collect income concerning loans, purchases, and lines loan advances the community information? of credit extended to small businesses development purpose. A1. No. Further, If the institution and secured by residential real estate for § .42(b)(3) Home Mortgage Loans routinely collects, but does not verify. a consideration in the CRA evaluation of borrower's Income when making a its small business lending. To facilitate Q1. Must Institutions that are not credit decision, it need not verify the this optional data collection, the required to collect home mortgage loan Income for purposes of data software distributed free-of-charge by data by the HMDA collect home maintenance. the FFIEC provides that an Institution mortgage loan data for purposes of the Q2. May an institution list "0" in the may collect this information to CRA? income field on consumer loans made supplement its small business lending A1. No. If an institution is not to employees when collecting data for data by choosing loan type, "Other required to collect home mortgage loan CRA purposes as the institution would Secured Lines/Loans for Purposes of data by the HMDA, the institution need be permitted to do under HMDA? Small Business," in the individual loan not collect home mortgage loan data A2. Yes. data. (The title of the loan type, "Other under the CRA. Examiners will sample Q3. When collecting the gross annual Secured Lines of Credit for Purposes of these loans to evaluate the institution's Income of consumer borrowers, do Small Business," which was found in home mortgage lending. If an institution institutions collect the gross annual the instructions accompanying the 1996 wants to ensure that examiners consider income or the adjusted gross annual data collection software, is being all of its home mortgage loans, the income of the borrowers? changed to "Other Secured Lines/Loans institution may collect and maintain A3. Institutions collect the gross for Purposes of Small Business" in order data on these loans. annual Income, rather than the adjusted to accurately reflect that lines of credit § .42(c) Optional Data Collection gross annual Income, of consumer and loans may be reported under this and Maintenance borrowers. The purpose of Income data loan type.) This information should be collection in connection with consumer maintained at the institution but should § .42(c)(1) Consumer Loans loans is to enable examiners to not be submitted for central reporting Q1. What are the data requirements determine the distribution, particularly purposes. regarding consumer loans? in the Institution's assessment area(s), of Q2. Must an institution collect data A1. There are no data reporting the institution's consumer loans, based on loan commitments and letters of requirements for consumer loans. on borrower characteristics, including credit? Institutions may, however, opt to collect the number and amount of consumer A2. No. Institutions are not required and maintain data on consumer loans. If loans to low-, moderate-, middle-, and to collect data on loan commitments an Institution chooses to collect upper-income borrowers, as determined and letters of credit. Institutions may, information on consumer loans, It may on the basis of gross annual Income. however, provide for examiner Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 4/Monday, May 3, 1999/Notices 23647 consideration information on letters of responding to comments may help to In a paper copy. or in another format credit and commitments. foster a dialogue with members of the acceptable to the requestor, within 5 Q3. Are commercial and consumer community or to present relevant calendar days, as required by leases considered loans for purposes of information to an institution's Federal § .43(c)(2)(ii). CRA data collection? financial supervisory agency. If an § .43(c) Location of Public A3. Commercial and consumer leases institution responds in writing to a Information are not considered small business or letter in the public file, the response small farm loans or consumer loans for must also be placed in that file, unless Q1. What is an institution's "main purposes of the data collection the response reflects adversely on any office"? requirements in 12 CFR § .42(a) & person or placing it in the public file A1. An Institution's main office is the (c)(1). However, If an Institution wishes violates a law. main, home, or principal office as to collect and maintain data about Q3. May an Institution include a designated In its charter. leases, the institution may provide this response to its CRA Performance § 44-Public Notice by Institutions data to examiners as "other loan data" Evaluation In its public file? under 12 CFR § .42(c)(2) for A3. Yes. However, the format and Q1. Are there any placement or size consideration under the lending test. content of the evaluation, as transmitted requirements for an institution's public § .42(d) Data on affiliate lending by the supervisory agency, may not be notice? altered or abridged in any manner. In A1. The notice must be placed in the Q1. If an institution elects to have an addition, an institution that received a institution's public lobby, but the size affiliate's home mortgage lending less than satisfactory rating during its and placement may vary. The notice considered in its CRA evaluation, what most recent examination must Include should be placed In a location and be of data must the institution make available in its public file a description of its a sufficient size that customers can to examiners? current efforts to improve its easily see and read it. A1. If the affiliate is a HMDA reporter, performance in helping to meet the § .45-Publication of Planned the institution must identify those loans credit needs of its entire community. Examination Schedule reported by its affiliate under 12 CFR The institution must update the part 203 (Regulation C. implementing Q1. Where will the agencies publish description on a quarterly basis. HMDA). At its option. the institution the planned examination schedule for may either provide examiners with the § .43(b) Additional Information the upcoming calendar quarter? affiliate's entire HMDA Disclosure Available to the Public A1. The agencies may use the Federal Statement or just those portions § .43(b)(1) Institutions Other Than Register, a press release, the Internet, or covering the loans in its assessment Small Institutions other existing agency publications for area(s) that it is electing to consider. If disseminating the list of the institutions the affiliate is not required by HMDA to Q1. Must an institution that elects to scheduled to for CRA examinations report home mortgage loans, the have affiliate lending considered during the upcoming calendar quarter. include data on this lending in its Institution must provide sufficient data Interested parties should contact the concerning the affiliate's home mortgage public file? appropriate Federal financial loans for the examiners to apply the A1. Yes. The lending data to be supervisory agency for information on contained in an Institution's public file performance tests. how the agency is publishing the covers the lending of the Institution's planned examination schedule. § .43-Content and Availability of affiliates, as well as of the Institution Q2. Is inclusion on the list of Public File itself, considered in the assessment of institutions that are scheduled to the Institution's CRA performance. An § .43(a) Information Available to the undergo CRA examinations in the next institution that has elected to have Public calendar quarter determinative of mortgage loans of an affiliate considered whether an institution will be examined § .43(a)(1) Public Comments must Include either the affiliate's in that quarter? Q1. What happens to comments HMDA Disclosure Statements for the A2. No. The agencies attempt to received by the agencies? two prior years or the parts of the determine as accurately as possible A1. Comments received by a Federal Disclosure Statements that relate to the which Institutions will be examined financial supervisory agency will be on institution's assessment area(s), at the during the upcoming calendar quarter. file at the agency for use by examiners. Institution's option. However, whether an Institution's name Those comments are also available to Q2. May an institution retain the appears on the published list does not the public unless they are exempt from compact disc provided by the Federal conclusively determine whether the disclosure under the Freedom of Financial Institution Examination institution will be examined during that Information Act. Council that contains its CRA quarter. The agencies may need to defer Q2. Is an institution required to Disclosure Statement in its public file, a planned examination or conduct an respond to public comments? rather than printing a hard copy of the unforeseen examination because of A2. No. All institutions should review CRA Disclosure Statement for retention scheduling difficulties or other comments and complaints carefully to in its public file? circumstances. determine whether any response or A2. Yes, if the Institution can readily other action is warranted. A small print out from the compact disc (or a Appendix A to Part -Ratings institution subject to the small duplicate of the compact disc) its CRA Q1. Must an institution's performance institution performance standards is Disclosure Statement for a consumer fit each aspect of a particular rating specifically evaluated on Its record of when the public file is requested. If the profile in order to receive that rating? taking action, if warranted, in response request is at a branch other than the A1. No. Exceptionally strong to written complaints about Its main office or the one designated performance in some aspects of a performance in helping to meet the branch in each state that holds the particular rating profile may credit needs In Its assessment area(s) complete public file, the bank should compensate for weak performance in (§ .26(a)(5)). For all Institutions, provide the CRA Disclosure Statement others. For example, a retail Institution 23648 Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 84/Monday, May 3, 1999/Notices that uses non-branch delivery systems Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas must be received not later than May 18, to obtain deposits and to deliver loans Denver 1999. may have almost all of its loans outside A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (303) 969-7750 the institution's assessment area. (Philip Jackson, Applications Officer) Assume that an examiner, after Arizona, Colorado, Nebraska, New Mexico, 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, consideration of performance context North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming Illinois 60690-1413: and other applicable regulatory criteria, Detroit 1. Edward Salomon, Chicago, Illinois concludes that the institution has weak (313) 259-1875 and Salvatore Scambiatterra (also performance under the lending test known as Sam Scott), Park Ridge, criteria applicable to lending activity. Michigan, Ohio, West Virginia Illinois, individually and as voting geographic distribution, and borrower Kansas City trustees of shares in a voting trust), to characteristics within the assessment (913) 551-6711 acquire additional voting shares of area. The Institution may compensate Greater Chicago Financial Corp., for such weak performance by Arkansas, lowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Chicago, Illinois, and thereby indirectly exceptionally strong performance in Missouri, Oklahoma acquire Austin Bank of Chicago, community development lending in its Los Angeles Chicago, Illinois. assessment area or a broader statewide (818) 904-6339 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve or regional area that includes its California System, April 28, 1999. assessment area. Robert deV. Frierson, New York Appendix B to Part -CRA Notice Associate Secretary of the Board. (212) 264-4730 [FR Doc. 99-11033 Filed 4-30-99; 8:45 am] Q1. What agency information should New York, Puerto Rico BILLING CODE 6210-01-F be added to the CRA notice form? A1. The following information should Philadelphia be added to the form: (215) 597-8313 or (215) 597-8312 FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM OCC-supervised Institutions only: The Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, Pennsylvania Formations of, Acquisitions by, and address of the deputy comptroller of the Mergers of Bank Holding Companies district in which the institution is Seattle located should be Inserted in the (206) 728-5314 The companies listed in this notice appropriate blank. These addresses can have applied to the Board for approval, be found at 12 CFR 4.5(a). Alaska, Hawali, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Oregon, Washington OCC-, FDIC-, and Board-supervised Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.) institutions: "Officer in Charge of End of Text of the Interagency (BHC Act). Regulation Y (12 CFR Part Supervision" is the title of the Questions and Answers 225), and all other applicable statutes responsible official at the appropriate Dated: April 27, 1999. and regulations to become a bank Federal Reserve Bank. holding company and/or to acquire the Keith J. Todd, assets or the ownership of, control of, or Appendix A-Regional Offices of the Bureau Executive Secretary, Federal Financial the power to vote shares of a bank or of the Census Institutions Examination Council. bank holding company and all of the To obtain median family Income levels of [FR Doc. 99-10841 Filed 4-30-99; 8:45 am] banks and nonbanking companies census tracts, MSAs, block numbering areas BILLING CODE 4810-33-P; 6210-01-P; 6714-01-P; owned by the bank holding company, and statewide nonmetropolitan areas, contact 6720-01-P including the companies listed below. the appropriate regional office of the Bureau The applications listed below. as well of the Census as Indicated below. The list as other related filings required by the shows the states covered by each regional FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Board, are available for Immediate office. Change in Bank Control Notices; Inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank Atlanta indicated. The application also will be Acquisitions of Shares of Banks or (404) 730-3833 available for inspection at the offices of Bank Holding Companies the Board of Governors. Interested Alabama, Florida, Georgia The notificants listed below have persons may express their views in Boston applied under the Change in Bank writing on the standards enumerated in (617) 424-0510 Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 proposal also involves the acquisition of Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank a nonbanking company, the review also holding company. The factors that are includes whether the acquisition of the Charlotte considered in acting on the notices are nonbanking company complies with the (704) 344-6144 set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 standards in section 4 of the BHC Act. U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking District of Columbia, Kentucky, North The notices are available for activities will be conducted throughout Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, immediate inspection at the Federal the United States. Virginia Reserve Bank indicated. The notices Unless otherwise noted, comments Chicago also will be available for Inspection at regarding each of these applications (708) 562-1740 the offices of the Board of Governors. must be received at the Reserve Bank Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin Interested persons may express their Indicated or the offices of the Board of views in writing to the Reserve Bank Governors not later than May 28, 1999. Dallas indicated for that notice or to the offices A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (214) 640-4470 or (800) 835-9752 of the Board of Governors. Comments (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 104 Peter A. Weissman CRAS 05/04/99 04:33:17 PM Record Type: Record To: See the distribution list at the bottom of this message CC: Subject: 1999-5-4 Remarks by the President on Financial Privacy and Consumer Protection Forwarded by Peter A. Weissman/OPD/EOP on 05/04/99 04:32 PM Jason H. Schechter 05/04/99 04:04:42 PM Record Type: Record To: See the distribution list at the bottom of this message CC: Subject: 1999-5-4 Remarks by the President on Financial Privacy and Consumer Protection THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release May 4, 1999 REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT ON FINANCIAL PRIVACY AND CONSUMER PROTECTION Presidential Hall 2:54 P.M. EDT THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much, Mari. I just wish we could have found someone with a little energy to make this presentation. (Laughter.) Hillary and I are really delighted to have all of you here, and delighted to be part of this announcment today, because it's SO important. And I would like to say a special word of appreciation to Secretary Rubin. You know, most people think of a Treasury Secretary as someone who's out there trying to keep the economy going, and he's done a reasonable job of that, I think. (Laughter.) And they think of Bob Rubin as this sort of big, Wall Street-type brilliant person. But one of the reasons that I wanted him to come and work here is that he actually understands how big economic decisions affect individual people at all levels of income and all different circumstances in life. And I think it's a good thing for a country to have a Treasury Secretary that understands the big issues, and then cares about how they impact individual citizens. And I'm very grateful for that. (Applause.) I want to thank Senator Bryan and Congressmen Bentsen, Gonzalez, Inslee, Kanjorski, Markey, Lee, Roybal-Allard, and Waters for being here and Senator Sarbanes, who can't be here, and Congressman LaFalce, who's done so much on this, who is here today. And I thank Chairman Levitt, Chairman Pitofsky, Commissioner Thompson, Assistant Attorney General Jim Robinson. Before I get into the substance of our proposals today, I would like to say just a few words about the terrible tornado devastation in Oklahoma and Kansas, which I'm sure all of you have seen the reports of, and perhaps even the gripping pictures of. Some of the most powerful tornadoes ever recorded swept through these states last night. At least 45 people are dead, and the wreckage is still being examined. Whole communities have been leveled. Homes and possessions have been turned into splinters and rubble. I have already spoken with the governor of Oklahoma, Frank Keating, to tell him that I've declared Oklahoma a federal disaster area, and we have just completed a similar declaration for the state of Kansas, and I look forward to talking to Governor Graves later today. I had a good talk with James Lee Witt, our FEMA director -- who is now in Oklahoma, with Buddy Young, his regional director and they are working on what we can do to provide all the necessary support for people. We have to make sure everyone's accounted for and that the beginning cleanup can start. Local and state officials, fire and police, emergency services, National Guard personnel have already worked through the night, and are doing a terrific job of dealing with an incredibly difficult situation. We're here talking about how people feel when something has been stolen from them. A lot of our fellow Americans have had everything taken from them in those two states, and I know that they will be in your prayers. The people of Oklahoma City, in particular, have suffered too much devastation in recent years, and they've been hit very, very hard by this. So we'll have more to say about that in the days ahead. I would like to just put this issue briefly into historical perspective, to emphasize the importance that I feel the entire Congress, without regard to party, should attach to this matter. We've been at this experiment in Government for 223 years now. We started with a Constitution that was rooted in certain basic values and written by some incredibly brilliant people who understood that times would change, and that definitions of fundamental things like liberty and privacy would change, and that circumstances would require people to rise to the challenges of each new era by applying the old values in practical ways. This happened at the dawn of the 20th Century. Mari mentioned Justice Brandeis. He said, when we change from being an agricultural to an industrial society that laws built under simpler conditions of living could not handle the complex relations of the modern industrial world. He and the leaders of the Progressive movement, about 100 years ago, therefore, fought to adapt our institutions to new markets - - to update vital protections for our citizens, to uphold the right to privacy, which Brandeis said was the right most valued by civilized men. Now, that's what's happening today; we're in the midst of another vast economic transformation. Once again, the laws that govern dynamic markets - - markets so dynamic they could not have been imagined 200 years ago - - are out of date. I just read just parenthetically - - I read yesterday a quote that said that 60 years ago, the prices in London for most basic commodities were the same that they were in 1660, before the outbreak of the great London fire. In the last 60 years, most of us have seen prices go up a thousand-fold. Thank goodness it hasn't happened in the last six years, we're (laughter) maybe in a different thing. But the pace of change is very different - - not just the nature of change, but the very pace of it. So once again, we have to respond, applying our oldest values in practical ways that allow them to be preserved and enhanced in modern times. We all know that technology and competition have revolutionized the financial services industry. I think most of us believe that, by and large, these changes have been very good. But many people, as you've heard, don't have the knowledge to properly evaluate what is truly a dizzying array of options. Some are falling victim to new abusive practices. Others are being left out of the financial marketplace altogether. That is why today I am proud to announce our new Financial Privacy and Consumer Protection Initiative, to give all Americans both the tools and the confidence they need to fully participate in a thriving but highly complex 21st century economy. This initiative is based on five key principles, and it draws on several important proposals developed by the members of Congress who are here today, and some who are not, whom Hillary mentioned. The first, clearly, is that we have to do more to protect every American's financial privacy. The Vice President led our efforts to identify areas where privacy is at risk, and financial areas came up over and over and over again as a matter of great concern. The technological revolution now makes it easier than ever for people to mine your private, financial data for their profit. While some of your private financial information is protected under existing federal law, your bank or broker or insurance company could still share with affiliated firms information on what you buy with checks and credit cards or sell this information to the highest bidder. This law, to put it mildly, is outdated and should be changed to give you the right to control your financial information, to let you decide whether you want to share private information with anyone else. I look forward to working with members in the House and the Senate on this issue. To enhance financial privacy, we must also protect the sanctity of medical records. With the growing number of mergers between insurance companies and banks, lenders potentially can gain access to the private medical information contained in insurance forms. So we propose to severely restrict the sharing of medical information within financial services conglomerates. You should not have to worry that the results of your latest physical exam will be used to deny you a home mortgage or a credit card. There are many other important protections for medical records that ought to be put in place. Because Congress has given me the authority to act if it does not do SO by August, one way or another, we will protect the privacy of medical records this year. Second, we must require greater public disclosure and enhance every consumer's right to know. As the First Lady just pointed out although everyime I hear it I shake my head consumers received nearly four billion credit card solicitations last year. Some offers contain new traps for the unwary. For example, sometimes credit card companies advertise low interest rates known as teaser rates, to reel in consumers who then are surprised with unexpected interest rate hikes. We believe any marketing of teaser rates for credit cards should include equally prominent notice of their expiration date, their eventual annual percentage rate, and any penalties, that apply. Millions of consumers have also found out the hard way that making only minimum payments rarely helps retire debt and almost always results in very large interest payments. So we will require clear notice of how long and how costly repayment would be if the consumer makes only the minimum payment. Third, we have to do more to combat consumer fraud. As Mari Frank discovered the hard way, it is remarkably easy now for a thief to take out huge loans in someone else's name, run up enormous credit card debts, and tap into bank accounts. Last October, Congress passed - - and I was pleased to sign - - the Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act. It's a good law, but we need to give it sharp teeth. So today I'm instructing the Treasury and Justice Departments to give higher priority to cases involving identity theft, particularly those involving organized crime groups, with the goal of increasing the number of prosecutions, both at the state and federal levels. And Treasury will convene a national summit on identity theft and work with the private sector to make it harder to steal someone else's identity in the first place. We'll also crack down on fraud committed over the Internet. If we want to seize the Internet's full potential we have to stay ahead of those who would use this open medium to manipulate stock prices, commit fraud in on-line auctions or perpetuate any other type of financial scam. That's why I've asked the Justice Department to step up prosecutions, to develop a national center for tracking Internet fraud, and to train state, local and federal law enforcement officers on how to recognize and root out these schemes. I find that law enforcement, compared to people who are doing criminal activity in this area, are rather like parents trying to keep up with their children on the computer. (Laugter.) It is an endless effort, and we need to organize and systematize a continuous training and retraining effort so that we can stay ahead of the curve. Chairman Levitt is launching an expanded effort to arm investors with the information they need to protect themselves against online securities fraud. Listen to this: complaints of Internet fraud have tripled in the past six months. Just in the last six months. Therefore, I will work with the congress and Chairman Levitt to provide the additional resources for the SEC necessary for enforcement, beyond what I have already requested in our balanced budget. Fourth, we must provide financial services for those who have been denied access to credit and basic banking services for too long. Today I'm proud to announce that the Treasury Department will soon make available, through private banks, low-fee bank accounts for those who receive federal benefits like Social Security. Unfortunately, there are some in Congress who would have us effectively limit, rather than expand, access to financial services in underserved communities. As the Senate debates this issue this week, I want to reiterate what I said in my veto letter to Congress. We will oppose any effort to weaken or undermine the continued relevance of the Community Reinvestment Act. (Applause.) While that act has been on the law for well over 20 years now, over 90 percent of the lending under it has occurred in the last six years, in our administration. I'm very proud of that. It has not done anything to hurt bank profits, and we ought to stay with it. (Applause.) I know that leaders of the civil rights community spoke today on this subject, and I just want to applaud them and to encourage them to stay at it. Finally, as has already been said, we have to increase the financial literacy of the American people. It's no enough to know how to balance a check book anymore. Even those fortunate to have the help of accountants sometimes have a hard time understanding all the ins and outs of investing in an IRA, paying off credit card debt, or refinancing a mortgage. So today I'm directing my National Economic Council Gene Sperling is here today with us -- to work with our agencies to develop a plan to help all Americans improve their financial literacy. I think Hillary said, it adds a year of income to people if they have this kind of training in high school. School is, of course, the best place to start learning about personal finance. The Department of Education will help all our schools find effective lesson plans and other tools to integrate financial literacy into their basic curriculum. So that's what we're trying to do: protect privacy, enhance disclosure, combat fraud, increase access, expand education. These principles are the same ones we used to harness the power and benefits of the industrial revolution. They are just as vital today, if not more so, than they were a century ago. It's time now to use them to seize the enormous potential of the information revolution for every American citizen. If we work together we can help all our families have the benefits of new choices and new technologies. We can help our people thrive in the 21st Century, and all we have to do is to remember how we got here over the last 200 plus years. Thank you very much. (Applause. ) END 3:08 P.M. EDT Message Sent To: LISA GREEN ONLY 6- 2230 34 4 pres aly pges only NATL_ECONOMIC_COUNCIL 002 10/14 19 20:35 T202 6220605 TAX POLICY 002 TAX INCENTIVES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA "RISING TIDE" te proposed incentives would provide windfall benefits for investment already made, would lostly benefit large businesses already located in DC, and would be inefficient in revitalizing resent Law arious Federal tax incentives already are available to stimulate redevelopment in the District of olumbia. The incentives are generally available through December 31, 2002. An employment credit is provided equal to 20 percent of the first $15,000 of wages paid to residents who work within the DC Zone. Small DC Zone businesses are permitted to deduct up to $20,000 in additional expenses per year for certain equipment costs. DC Zone businesses may borrow up to $15 million of the proceeds of tax-exempt private activity bonds issued by the District of Columbia to finance capital costs in the DC Zone. A zero-percent tax rate applies to capital gains on the sale of certain DC business property and assets held for more than five years. Individuals are entitled to a $5,000 tax credit for the purchase of a principal residence anywhere in DC. Proposal To qualify, a business must invest at least $25 million on real and tangible property in the DC Zone, employ 400 or more people, pay either property or income taxes to the District, and locate the corporate headquarters in the DC Zone. A qualified business would be eligible for: Tax-exempt bond financing without the $15 million project and $150 million State caps, including a rifle shot provision allowing investment already made in the MCI Center, and An expanded wage credit at a 20 percent rate for employees working in the DC EZ (with a $2 million annual cap). These incentives would be available only through December 31, 2003. General Talking Points The MCI Center rifle shot provides tax-exempt financing under conditions not available to any other such facility in the country because there is no commitment of public funds to pay for the project, no public ownership of the land and facility, and financing is for a land already owned and a structure that already exists. This is a pure windfall with no economic stimulus likely to result. NATL ECONOMIC COUNCIL 003/004 10/14 is 20:35 202 6220605 TAX POLICY 003 Rifleshot provisions typically have been rejected this decade by the tax-writing committees and the Treasury as poor policy. Also, the Administration has criticized special interest provisions in recent tax bills. It is conceivable that these incentives would shift some other economic activity into the DC Zone, but the combined qualifications of 400 employees, $25 million of investment and headquarters in the DC Zone are significant restrictions. Also, given the lead times necessary for large commitments of capital and the proposal's sunset date of 2003, it is likely only investment already planned would benefit. As a result, the incentive is likcly mostly to benefit only large businesses already located in the DCZone for activity that they're already undertaking. Not surprisingly, the large businesses that could benefit include many of the private sector supporters listed on the executive summary. The provisions are all retroactive to January 1, 1999 and are thus pure windfalls for early 1999 activities. Background on Abe Pollin t is unclear that Mr. Pollin needs any tax incentive to make his venture financially viable, based n the following information: When Pollin bought bis professional basketball team, he paid a then-record $1.1 million for the Baltimore Bullets of the National Basketball Association. He added to his empire in 1972 by buying the National Hockey League expansion franchise Capitals for $6 million. According to Financial World magazine's annual survey, Pollin's $1 million investment in the Bullets was worth $129 million in 1997. The renamed Wizards franchise, Financial World estimates, posts an operating income of more than $4 million a year. The average franchise value in the NBA is $148 million, according to Financial World, with an average operating income of $11 million The Capitals are worth $84 million and are marginally profitable at about $500,000 a year, according to the magazine. By comparison, the average NHL franchise is worth $90 million and has an operating income of $3.5 million. The MCI Center cost $200 million to build. MCI Communications Corp. is paying Pollin $44 million over 10 years for the right to attach its name to the arena, according to Financial World. The arena's 10 "founders suites," priced at $1 million each, were the first to sell. Also, 110 luxury suites, priced between $100,000 and $175,000 a year, and 3,000 club seats. priced at $7,500 each a year, have been sold In 1997, the Wizards raised ticket prices to a range between $19 and $75. compared with $12 to $50 the previous year in US Airways Arena. Capitals' ticket prices now range from $19 to $60, compared with $12 and $45. NATL ECONOMIC COUNCIL 004/004 10/1 39 20:38 202 6220605 TAX POLICY 004 Georgetown University's men's basketball team also will play at MCI Center, and Pollin has a lease agreement with a WNBA franchise that will help fill seats in the dead of summer. In addition, the arena will host dozens of concerts and other events such Bruce Springsteen concerts. Tickets are priced from $15 to $100. Pollin also benefits from revenue from the arena's retail leases, signage and concessions. According to Financial World, the net value of the Portland Trail Blazers jumped to $179 million from $137 million after the team opened its new 21,000-seat arena in 1995. Mr. Pollin recently sold the Washington Capitals and a small minority stake in the MCI Center and the Wizards to Ted Leonsis for $200 million. At the time of the sale, Mr. Pollin's son was quoted as saying his father's holdings made economic sense. "He's got a lot of debt, but he's doing o.k." Mr. Pollin used personal funds and private debt financing to build the MCI Center. Apparently, according to news reports, efforts to have the arena built with public funds were scuttled when Robert Johnson offered to build a downtown arena himself in exchange for an option on the two teams. COUNCIL LISA GREEN ONLY 6- - 2230 34 pges only NATL ECONOMIC COUNCIL I 002 10/14 19 20:35 202 6220605 TAX POLICY I 002 TAX INCENTIVES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA "RISING TIDE" e proposed incentives would provide windfall benefits for investment already made, would stly benefit large businesses already located in DC, and would be inefficient in revitalizing resent Law arious Federal tax incentives already are available to stimulate redevelopment in the District of olumbia. The incentives are generally available through December 31, 2002. An employment credit is provided equal to 20 percent of the first $15,000 of wages paid to residents who work within the DC Zone. Small DC Zone businesses are permitted to deduct up to $20,000 in additional expenses per year for certain equipment costs. DC Zonc businesses may borrow up to $15 million of the proceeds of tax-exempt private activity bonds issued by the District of Columbia to finance capital costs in the DC Zone. A zero-percent tax rate applies to capital gains on the sale of certain DC business property and assets held for more than five years. Individuals are entitled to a $5,000 tax credit for the purchase of a principal residence anywhere in DC. Proposal To qualify, a business must invest at least $25 million on real and tangible property in the DC Zone, employ 400 or more people, pay either property or income taxes to the District, and locate the corporate headquarters in the DC Zone. A qualified business would be eligible for: Tax-exempt bond financing without the $15 million project and $150 million State caps, including a rifle shot provision allowing investment already made in the MCI Center, and An expanded wage credit at a 20 percent rate for employees working in the DC EZ (with a $2 million annual cap). These incentives would be available only through December 31, 2003. General Talking Points The MCI Center rifle shot provides tax-exempt financing under conditions not available to any other such facility in the country because there is no commitment of public funds to pay for the project, no public ownership of the land and facility, and financing is for a land already owned and a structure that already exists. This is a pure windfall with no economic stimulus likely to result. I 001 *** RX REPORT *** INCOMPLETE RECEPTION TX/RX NO 5937 CONNECTION TEL SUBADDRESS CONNECTION ID NATL ECONOMIC C0 ST. TIME 10/15 11:57 USAGE T 00'29 PGS. 2 RESULT NG ##106 START TIME 10/15 11:57 OTHER PARTY MAKER CODE 10001000 MACHINE CODE 11001010 00000000 RCV V.8 FRAME E0 81 85 D4 90 7E 00 00 SYMBOL RATE 3429 DATA RATE 26.4 TX LVL REDUCTION () ERR ABCODE 00 ERR SECTXB 84 ERR SECRAB 84 Rx : (bit 1) 00000000 01000000 00011111 00100001 00000001 00000001 00000001 (bit56) (bit57) 00000001 00000001 00000100 00000000 00000000 (bit96) Fx : (bit 1) 00000100 01110111 00010101 00100011 00000001 10101001 00000001 (bit56) (bit57) 00000001 00000001 00011100 00000000 00000000 (bit96) Rx NSS DCS PIX-264 PPS-MPS PIX-264 Tx NSF DIS CFR MCF 04/29/99 18:21 $ 481 L UD 9% D 13 +> 93956968 NO. 061 P001 US Dept of Brian Turetsky Housing & Special Assistant to the Secretary for Urban Policy & Programs Development 202/708-0614 x3981 Fax 708-0270 X 4348 To: Michael Dertch From: Janquie Lawing Fax: 395-6088 Pages: 3 Phone: Date: March 10, 1999 Re: CC: Urgent For Review Please Comment Please Reply Please Recycle Comments: CRA Draft 04/29/99 18:21 $ 481 U? IF 13 93956998 NO. 061 P002 MOUND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON DC 20410-0001 The Honorable Paul S. Sarbanes Banking Minority Member Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs United States Senate Washington, DC 20510-6075 Dear Senator Sarbanes: I am writing to express my very strong concems about provisions in the "Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999" as reported by the Banking Committee that would weaken the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). CRA is an important tool for stimulating the flow of capital to the residents of credit starved urban and rural areas. By improving access to mortgage credit for thousands of hard working modest income families, CRA has played a key role in boosting homeownership to record levels. Lenders tells us that the new loan activity CRA helps to generate is both prudent and profitable and occurs without virtually any cost to the taxpayer. When HUD provides public investment in low and moderate income areas through Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) and other programs, CRA often serves as a vital development partner. Public investment, combined with the "leveraging" of private funds encouraged by CRA, is a winning combination when it comes to housing and community development. The Committee bill would reduce CRA's effectiveness in three important respects. First, it would provide a "safe harbor" that effectively exempts banks and thrift institutions with a satisfactory or better CRA agency rating from public comment on their expansion plans. Second, it would exempt from CRA banks with less than $100 million in assets that operate in non- metropolitan areas. Third, it does not include the modest adjustments to the CRA statute that are in the House bill reported by the House Banking and Financial Services Committee, even bank holding companies that have banks with "unsatisfactory" CRA ratings and are not meeting the credit needs of their existing market areas would be allowed to expand their powers and affiliations under the legislation. In closing, CRA has played a vital role in improving the prospects for working families, minorities, and the residents of underserved areas. I am very concerned that any weakening of CRA could reverse the substantial progress we have made over the last five years. As President 04/29/99 18:21 t 2 07 9% b B + 93956988 NO.061 P003 Clinton and Secretary Rubin have made clear, the President will veto this legislation if it were presented to him in its current form. I encourage you to vigorously oppose the "safe harbor" and "small bank" provisions in the Committee bill and to work to include a CRA provision to help ensure that the new configurations created by the pending financial modernization bill do not diminish the effectiveness of this critically important statute. Sincerely, Andrew Cuomo Peter A. Weissman 04/28/99 01:03:05 PM Record Type: Record To: Barbara B. Hunt/WHO/EOP@EOP CC: Lisa Green/OPD/EOP@EOP, Sarah Rosen/OPD/EOP@EOP, Brian A. Barreto/OPD/EOP bcc: Subject: Re: for the CRA call Barbara- anytime b/w 2-3 pm is fine. you should also invite Gary Gensler, undersecretary at treasury to participate in the call (622-2035 - Anna Hart is his assistant) I want it very clear that Mickey or whoever else from IGA will run the call and Gene will get on for a few minutes, but as we discussed, I do not want the Mayors to have the expectation that Gene will be on for the whole call. thanks for all your help on this. You can use the NEC conference line 202-757-2104 code 3939 it has a capacity of 30 people. Barbara B. Hunt Barbara B. Hunt 04/28/99 11:53:30 AM Record Type: Record To: Peter A. Weissman/OPD/EOP@EOP CC: Subject: Re: for the CRA call Peter: Paul is available anytime between 2:00 and 3:00 and so is every one else. Would you give me a time to work and I will begin to call the Mayors Also, I was told to ask if we could use your number for the conference call instead of going throught the operator? please get back to me, thanks