Ask the Scholar
Document scope · 1 page
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory.
For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.
Scholar Source Context
Document identity
localId
209205226
label
[07/30/1999]
core
doc
dtoType
document
citationUrl
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
209205226
contentType
document
title
[07/30/1999]
citationUrl
collections
Tape Restoration Project (TRP) Emails
Tape Restoration Project (TRP) Email from the White House Office (WHO) Bucket
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
209205226
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
otherTitles
42-t-26444828-20140316F-012-004-2019
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
abe34134f4f5a3a0
ocrText
RECORD TYPE: PRESIDENTIAL (TRP NOTES MAIL)
CREATOR: Marsha Moke ( Marsha Moke <[email protected]> [ UNKNOWN ])
CREATION DATE/TIME:30-JUL-1999 22:42:03.00
SUBJECT: Re: For Clearance: Steel Action Plan Draft 9- Comments back by
2:00 FridayPlease
TO: andrew_stephens ( [email protected] [ UNKNOWN 1)
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: bialosjp ( [email protected] [ UNKNOWN 1)
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: Charles.stark ( [email protected] [ UNKNOWN ])
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: Carlos E. Pascual ( CN=Carlos E. Pascual/OU=NSC/O=EOP [ NSC 1)
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: Carolyn T. Wu ( CN=Carolyn T. Wu/OU=WHO/O=EOP [ WHO 1)
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: Charles M. Brain ( CN=Charles M. Brain/OU=WHO/O=EOP [ WHO ])
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: Dario J. Gomez ( CN=Dario J. Gomez/OU=WHO/O=EOP [ WHO 1)
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: Joshua Gotbaum ( CN=Joshua Gotbaum/OU=OMB/O=EOP [ OMB ] )
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: Karen Tramontano ( CN=Karen Tramontano/OU=WHO/O=EOP [ WHO ])
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: Lael Brainard ( CN=Lael Brainard/OU=OPD/O=EOP [ OPD ])
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: Malcolm R. Lee ( CN=Malcolm R. Lee/OU=OPD/O=EOP [ OPD 1)
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: Melissa G. Green ( CN=Melissa G. Green/OU=OPD/O=EOP [ OPD ])
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: Miles M. Lackey ( CN=Miles M. Lackey/OU=NSC/O=EOP [ NSC ] )
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: Robert Z. Lawrence ( CN=Robert Z. Lawrence/OU=CEA/O=EOP [ CEA ])
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: Sharon H. Yuan ( CN=Sharon H. Yuan/OU=OPD/O=EOP [ OPD 1)
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: Tracey E. Thornton ( CN=Tracey E. Thornton/OU=WHO/O=EOP [ WHO ])
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: Victoria A. Greenfield ( CN=Victoria A. Greenfield/OU=CEA/O=EOP [CEA])
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: David W. Beier ( David W. Beier@OVP [ UNKNOWN ])
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: EBIEL ( [email protected] [ UNKNOWN 1)
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: ebtpp ( [email protected] [ UNKNOWN )
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: ESSERMAN_SUE ( [email protected] [ UNKNOWN ] )
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: FREIBERG_KEN ( [email protected] [ UNKNOWN ] )
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: Meg.Lundsager ( [email protected] [ UNKNOWN )
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: n ( [email protected] [ UNKNOWN ])
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: NOVICK_ROBERT ([email protected] [ UNKNOWN ] )
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: Richard M. Saunders ( Richard M. Saunders@OVP [ UNKNOWN ])
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: SAMET-ANDREW ( [email protected] [ UNKNOWN ])
READ:UNKNOWN
TEXT:
Sorry for the delay in providing comments. I was unable to reach
Gordana until now.
1. the language on Japan is fine (1.a.)
2. Regarding Russia (1.d.), as far as we know they are planning to
attend the November OECD steel meeting.
3. Regarding the ITC study (5): I think the first para is what Alan
wanted to steer clear of. Gordana did not see a problem with the new
language. However, she thought that we might want to discuss (in
general) with the ITC to see if this is doable. If the study needs to
be whittled down, we could have it focus on labor and the envrionment
(pts 4&5). I sent comments on Alan's latest proposals in a separate
email. Basically, options 1 & 3 are fine. We may need to be careful
with point 2 to ensure that we are not helping the steel industry at
the expense of other industries (i.e. wood).
4. Becker proposal (13). The OECD steel committee is not the
appropriate forum to conduct this study. Presumably, if we were to
adopt Wolf's proposal currently bracketed in the text, it deals with
labor standards and should take care of Becker's concerns. This
appears to be something that Alan and the unions support.
Alternatively, as I mentioned in a previous email, we could have the
OECD Labor Cmt study on labor and trade (which is currently being
updated) refered tot he steel committee for review. In any event, the
OECD steel committee is not the place for this study to be undertaken.
5. I need to float Becker's proposal in #14 by a few people here.
While I doubt we would have a problem, I need to find out if this
would somehow constitute a subsidy.
That's all for now.
Marsha
<[email protected]> 07/29/99 08:55PM
»
(See attached file: steelplan9.doc)
Here is the latest draft of the steel action plan for clearance.
Current
target date for rollout is August 5. The draft has NOT been shared
with
anyone outside the government. Revisions are italicized. New
proposals/requests by steelworkers and industry proposal on ITC study
are
identified for comment or clearance. Please shoot me comments by
2:00
Friday by e-mail or fax (6-9290).
After Friday, please cc: any steel-related communications to Lael
Brainard's confidential assistant Sharon Yuan as well, as I will be on
leave.
<[email protected]> 07/29/99 08:55PM
(See attached file: steelplan9.doc)
Here is the latest draft of the steel action plan for clearance.
Current
target date for rollout is August 5. The draft has NOT been shared
with
anyone outside the government. Revisions are italicized. New
proposals/requests by steelworkers and industry proposal on ITC study
are
identified for comment or clearance. Please shoot me comments by
2:00
Friday by e-mail or fax (6-9290).
After Friday, please cc: any steel-related communications to Lael
Brainard's confidential assistant Sharon Yuan as well, as I will be on
leave.