Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
obj
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Source Description

Holograph.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
7s75fv38k
label
Letter from Maria Weston Chapman, Boston, [Mass.], June 12th, 1843
core
obj
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
7s75fv38k
contentType
document
stage
normalized
title
Letter from Maria Weston Chapman, Boston, [Mass.], June 12th, 1843
description
Holograph.
date
["June 12, 1843"]
year
1843
rights
No known copyright restrictions.
rightsUri
No known restrictions on use.
reuseAllowed
no restrictions
language
English
identifierLocal
3132955
creators
Chapman, Maria Weston, 1806-1885
institution
Boston Public Library
collections
Anti-Slavery Collection
subjects
Antislavery movements--United States--History--19th century
Women abolitionists--Massachusetts--Boston--19th century--Correspondence
Antislavery movements--United States
Women abolitionists--United States
Third parties (United States politics)
Birney, James Gillespie, 1792-1857
Chapman, Maria Weston, 1806-1885
subjectsGeographic
Boston
Massachusetts
North and Central America
Suffolk (county)
United States
genreBasic
Correspondence
Manuscripts
typeOfResource
Text
country
United States
state
Massachusetts
county
Suffolk
city
Boston
pageCount
1
source
import
extent
1 leaf (4 p.) ; 9 7/8 x 7 7/8 in.
hasTranscription
yes
Source extras
institutionArkId
sf268508b
collectionArkId
ht24xg10q
schema:latitude
42.35
schema:longitude
-71.05
notes
Holograph.
This unsigned manuscript is presumably by Maria Weston Chapman. She begins the letter by telling of the correspondence with the executive committee in New York, which amounts to 50 pages. Chapman writes: "We thought that the loss of time & tide---the misapprehension & constitutional scruples---& the evidently wounded feelings on their part, were sufficient reasons whey we should not contest our claim." They are not resigning in a body, lest enemies of the cause should "misrepresent it as a division of heart, when in fact there is only a division of opinion." She regrets "that our views cannot prevail." She wishes that the addressee could take a higher ground on political action, and come out of the government, which is pro-slavery. She argues against the third party. Chapman comments: "James G. Birney is a bad man. That's reason enough against the 3'd party."
pubPlace
Boston, [Mass.]
dcId
7s75fv38k
type
document
Single page context