Memo from Ann Whitman Regarding Events Surrounding Senator Joseph McCarthy
Images (2)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
16702984
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2Events leading up to so-called "break" made by Senator McCarthy
with the President, December 7th, 1954.
Late in the afternoon of December 1st Governor Adams called me,
said that he had been talking to Prescott Bush, who had said that
Arthur Watkins had taken a beating on the recent censure move,
had been pushed around, had handled a difficult job superbly, and
that he thought it would be nice for the President to give him sort
of nod of recognition. Governor Adams asked me what I thought;
I suggested President invite him to stag dinner planned for December
sixth. Governor Adams indicated that, or something similar, would
meet with his approval.
I suggested the idea to the President, who liked it, but asked Jim
Hagerty to check with Herbertr Brownell. Brownell thought some
sort of a move should be made, but felt that the suggestion (inviting
him to a stag dinner) would spotlight the thing too much. Alternatively
President suggested having Watkins come to his office Saturday
morning, to which Brownell agreed.
Tom Stephens set up the appointment for Saturday morning.
2
In talking to Jim Hagerty, either before or immediately after he saw
Wa tkins, President said he wanted to see him to tell him how superbly
he had handled a difficult job. President thought he was talking
to Jim confidentially, Jim thought it was what the President wanted
him to say to the press boys after Watkins came in.
Interview was on most of front pages of Sunday newspapers, with Jim's
comments, and with picture of Watkins at White House.
Monday morning President early called Jim in, told him that he had
not expected his remarks to be made public. Jim explained that he had
thought President had made them to be repeated. President had had
breakfast with Knowland that morning, which may explaind why he
felt he had to speak to jJim. On the other hand, it is difficult for me
to know why Jim made the remarks he did, in view of Brownell's
feeling that meeting should not be spotlighted certainly the way
Jim handled the thing gave it far more publicity than if the
Senator's name had appeared on a guest list for a dinner.
At any rate, Jim had the feeling that the President was not at all
displeased, despite his remarks, that the metting received the publicity
it did, and only talked to Jim for the record.
There the matter stood until the 7th, when McCarthy made his famous
"break.'
Relations
belongs_to