Images (2)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
16618822
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2Vatican:
CONTINUED
ans. drapted 7/6/44-
THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TO HIS HOLINESS THE POPE
Rome June 23.1944
My Dream Mr President
The matters in this letter are pladged
by me to the Pape Abr hear in strictes
Confidence of, the President and Gerdany
Huce -
Jamines without incident monday
afternoon. my first audience with the
Pope occurred Mednesday morning and
Hundad to one and one quarting house.
thank an hour first the
Cardinal Decretary oz state Has Holiness
Expersed qreat- juy in the firedom of Rome
the safety of its population and the preser-
ration 7 its religious and Litorical, particted
moments. He appreciate fully and is
qualiful for the Effects of the Recident and
Incretary X state to Jack the city.
His Holmess Enquired with much concern
after your Lealth. reasoured him.
He Expressed queat bleasurer air your
meet telegram upon the allies occupation
on Rame, Incriprocated reparding him
Mrsfouse.
The problem Z the Persian attitude toward
the (atholic church, lack oz faith in Stabins
lond and particulare The dauger of
Camminem in Italy qies Has Halue
great concern. (I has confirmed in
a mmeber z discriming quartere that
Commustion activities an nide-spresd
and form a mal and growing daugh-
other smphanize the spered of socialism
in mies and in radical from - Ishall
pursue Sugrivira in These scoul dir-
Ection.)
His Holinass unged that & a any time
the presence X allered particularly the
american force in reasmable mush
throughout the Country is Essential to
pressure order and to discourage radical
actistias which mughs upset the
Smithol government, this doning
3
mean queat forces burn spread about
metil mereet subside and Emonie
Condition in Their main aspects frame more
stabilized The mark oz people mis has
Engandered a freeing on tearnity through
their presence. This might be accomplished
on a voluter basic at in Stheme oz the
Italian nation.
I referred to the Poher last Sheech caparding
place and indicated at leug th that destruction
of the German arrery or its Uu. conditions
Incorreder remained the policy of am gov-
Summer that Then Excelled no Eemar
which me cared recognize
and Durrander m a military function
Than conditions comer thereapter be inc-
pares(rephat impore) for to breased and
humanand the princhment
of The guilty, restitution 2 state property
imporation political and sen-
omie, are territorial conditions, as the alline
determined upon, on a basin of justies.
That Lease much be present in the
loner by an International organization
4
in which ace state nught join welending
Germany When the has decemetrated her
Eligability te breame a member of a peace
loning and heace presering state
Ince embident I helled any hope that
h my atiation liading to are armistice
Comed h anticipated in The first include,
That Tennuary cover not be heated as M
had tried that in 1919 and had learnes
a tragic leason- the present world man
me Pohe referred oth Ensuan people
as district from the army and the present
political require! Indicated that a
nation of 60 or 70 million industrious people
as capable as the Germans, mis develop and
procer if it observed the rule ox check
cincigns Community of nations and their
International life, cover become in time
a respected member of the faming on rations
but in must decreastrate it abaudon-
Imeat Z policies h External aggression
and conquest, I strassed the importance
on am International Organization to main-
tain beace with justice and in quaral
tenne skatched a trial outling on the
formula, all mithin the birts of your
THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TO HIS HOLINESS THE POPE
Price release fine interested both
in the case X the Pare and the Candinal
tueretary on state to observe This reaction
to There Duggestions and to 16 frature ahr
informement, Both accepted in with
Satrifaction. I your no details %
the formula for novel organization.
I enesider The imme diate reaction there
famral matters to be satisfactory.
me Vation has has toes that trunty pir
million Catholics in the lunter States are in
four on a negotiated heare- My that sevent
oh this froture Irms inversiated to dispel
in as intruk. that new heard is hpr.
of 7am mean the Pokes land speach before
on into Rome you nick note the
disturbing peragedph. G-m recessary
to lead their minds away form the Loke
X a negotiated heace I bilian I fuceeded
Fallowing the percedent of Grant - LEE
which your resited to me led-mrk
I fret or Dolis ground in taking the
6. pasition Idea sent quote you or Frant
Lee,
The Pope raised the question of Palish
territory as respects Ressian aims.
This territory Contain many Roman Catholics.
from hespand for This question. and ref-
Erras to possible compensively adjustments
Inch as for Example in due time East
Pressia X, X filedin h-i sidually 200
the load which dis hubs The Vation but
that part on the population which is Catholic
and in which they under Russian occu-
patin her from persented and devid
the free practice of The faith. this is a
print on which Atalin cauld que Leep
ful reasturace and take permpt action
if he is sincere. this is my much douth
here to the question remove Over statine
fn trusted?
mr dis current ciriline what In they
and particula if now as Rome is admitted
by all here Th in a my for State. Ince
review the relief Actualism When there
had further opportunity to Enquire suts it.
Will her for. Poletti tomorrow and Lue
already tacked mith General when
7
Initiary Jonnuar er Rame. Brefne
learning newyor sproponed to Leveral
Hindring the Judge Marchisis, Executive
Vice President of are creatity organizated
ausansan Reliaf for Maly - and Colonel
Rounds of Guil Hisedrding stoff visit
Rome an the Earliad moment to survey
the fined on the ground I urge that as
apractical step to accomplish improvement
and to End conflicting and di tubing
rumars an home and abroad
Bach the Pobe and Cardinal
of state indicated a desire to reserved
the discussion of all the above water.
28 suggrated next mak, allowing an
apportunity for them to dis casse away
themselves thene ntap matters
Bita Rundent cegards Irlease no
time
I.
Myroutar
"n. Preduct
White Home
Washing In.
Personal and Crifidential
To of openns one by The President
To
The President of the
United States.
White House
From
markington
Myon layler
Rone.
3266
myron Jaylor folder 4.44
LB
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
I
July 13, 1944
MEMORANDUM FOR
SECRETARY HULL
To reply to.
F. D. R.
State Dept. dispatch Naples, July 10
for the President from Myron Taylor
DECLASSIFIED
By Deputy Archivist 01 the U.S.
By W. J. Stewart Date
PSFVatican Vatican m.Jaylor forder file
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
July 18, 1944.
The latest I have in regard
to the King of the Belgians is
this:
"This source, which is
dependable, is an intimate con-
fidant of the Crown Princess,
who exerts an astonishing in-
fluence in higher quarters here
(meaning Rome), and is an
exceedingly clever person --
more so in fact than the Crown
Prince. She is now in Switzerland
and, for the moment, unable to
return to Italy. I am told that
her influence in the change of
the Mussolini regime and beginning
to war against the Germans was
considerable. Her brother, as
you know, the King of Belgium,
is in captivity in Germany. The
Belgian Ambassador here says
they know nothing of his where-
abouts".
(Quoted from Myron Taylor's
letter of June 28, 1944)
PSF Natican m Jaylor freang-44
Bx 20
free mal
m Dunn
n mather
THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HSF SF
(Original) TO HIS HOLINESS THE POPE
Inc. 1944.4
In dear Mr President
juz
In m lost tack your Enquired about
the am Price, now finateurant guaral,
oh Hag and his family
on triday lost I received am invitation
for tia at th have th as friend. The
Crom Prince nos the me, other quest -
apter a cup ten m mure bfl alone for
an hour- no plan may bne spring /-
a commission that with the Pape 9 few
days before. that Known the Crown Previous
and his amt the durre z martinego
Brih 7 whom had visited on Villa in
part yours.
the communition m quick querral but as
and air installed in the "Kamp" inlla.
to a plan for a further tack when auabe
which is Quiled to private meetings.
the Crom Pricess, her 5m and two dasghter
an in switzhrlan! near Brows. His tister
the Insurance oz Bulgaria (Siovani) mider %
King Baris and this in Balparia. He has had
no news oh them for many month
His situ Country Calvi di Bergalo and two
children an in Eeneva. Price manfalda
as Hear, and two children act in confinement
in Germany. or in frison in Varona he
does not Know where they are. Pricers
Marie on Baurbon Parent is with in fraver
or Serving he does not Reserved where
me C.P. has qualty in proud during
the past Try ing you and responds to
his wereased is modest
has an orderly comprehension on the position
of his country. fan such you mmd
Enjoy a visit mich him, the dresses as
an ordinary civilian with no diably
of military chander. The king is ah
one of his Estabe near noples.
The C.P. fauls that lonk mil In the
Inevation Z his people. may of whom
mer like to Volunteer for military
trince with the allies. Recreating is
permitted one in a small my
many Italian ful humlisted thos-they
an not permitted to fight for this
am likration -Sopecially as Hack
african" are an then front Indian
american Samms, and other
remaral clark toed me they had not much
stainna a as fighters.
Issumb me day Root mull with Emeral
Clark at Head quarter - nsiting three hospital
at which the one that affected me modiquite
a longs one, where men who har collapsed
under fire are cared for the treatment
is to put Then under complete narcosis
for 2 to 3 days - after a work 80% air
currd and return other front- they nure
Know what haskened to them and there
is seeden a reciurrance. near Parto-
Fino, no a large Evacuation hospital
about 1000 bids, 40 surgroms, and internises
are of whom operate in Emergencia
this with handled Vooro. case since
in came musear, has bran formal and
straped - oney me lose has lost breh
Eyes. I visited the Pal, laken pm
the mey 8 days before. so skiller
are one army Enguinees, that on the
8th day, they had improvisal shipping and
melooding facilition that Toor tons on
munitions and Fupplers will toher
ashme and delivered to the deempt
preparatory to the attack on Leghom-
(which do Denite is in 1th army hand
today) the steet work at Printing
me completely Hasted 8, one fombers
and articlery that the Village at one,
I'de mar hartbly damaged. Then
teem many skilful Engineering operations
in the part Fut Prom find compares with
the beat copecing as no blue prints on
Ouch an operation is provible in advance
and are is improvised on th spot Forward
plaining howine moher available the
heavy Equip ment an The right moment
contact which nothing prefertantial covel
G done.
Inner met Privee Dona on several
assasions - (He is now mayor 2 Rome)
the new dome Hither or
Mussobini, mas amerted and imprisioned
me then there years ago. He asked no
quartu- the revembles Daute, is Bry
filent and like martyrs does not nees
to say my much any may
Than given left This Holuiers the
Pohe after a fourth audience, one
THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TO HIS HOLINESS THE POPE
Each make time arrioving has.
m dis cased again the for major
questions
I Communism -
II. Ruliger freedom in Russia.
III Auremeder of Th Genera any
Consequent di armoment re as
recomber in my huran letter.
IV International Maring ahin.
Ibiliam these constined discussions
are helpful to the Pape. His interest
Seem imabated Shne not ht him
and quoh am whole program for
Fermary or world organing alim. fuh
hm led him along am assiste
on emailering There matters,
Peaceer upon the Cardinal Secretary 12
State mag lains. - nho N leaving today
for his Villa an naple He more too
ice. to dis was any thing tereins - I
again Anyguated that he emould
american Doctor as hoppen
Where Roosench Hospital 2 kensyork
hure a sig are unit, In the
first trice he indicated an cultrast
I gan a teether to the surpor
Guneral
me Spaning amberaadrho
give toes me that he ho a thereal
message from his government
indicating have grantly pleased they
mra mich my former noit and
Importery that a remained visit
al this trick
lomes be most meaner Loss
had tro comminations &
Ambamador Hoyrs suggrobing
that and Mrs Hoyes med the
pleased if I came to Madrid
En write toor from Rome
other smiler duggestions
caused me to telegroph this
to you at information toyrou a last mak,
mit Kind reques Inlia see
Anicaly
B.B Peen Exceess por mk, pru- and
MT
PSF.
Vaticary,
Tayler
THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TO HIS HOLINESS THE POPE
July 14, 1944
My dear Mr. President
In our last talk you enquired about the Crown Prince,
now Lieutenant General, of Italy and his family.
On Friday last I received an invitation for tea at the
house of a friend. The Crown Prince was the only other
guest. After a oup of tea we were left alone for an hour.
The plan may have sprung from a conversation I had with
the Pope a few days before. I had known the Crown Princess
and his aunt, the Queen of Montenegro, both of whom had
visited our Villa in Florence in past years.
The conversation was quite general but led to a plan
for a further talk when Anabel and I are installed in the
"Kemp" villa, which is suited to private meetings. The
Crown Princess, her son and two daughters are in Switzerland,
near Bearue. His sister, the Queen of Bulgaria (Giovanni),
widow of King Boris are still in Bulgaria. He has had no
news of them for many months. His sister, Countess
Colvi di Bergolo, and two children are in confinement in
Germany - or in prison in Verona, he does not know where they
are. Princess Marie of Bourbon-Parine is either in France
or Germany - he does not know where. The C.P. has greatly
improved during the past trying years and responds to his
increased responsibilities, 1s modest, has an orderly
comprehension of the position of his country. I am sure
you would enjoy a visit with him. He dresses 8.8 an ordinary
civilian with no display of military character. The King
1s at one of his estates near Naples.
The C.P. feels that work will be the salvation of his
people, many of whom would like to volunteer for military
service with the Allies. Recruiting 1s permitted only in
a small way. Many Italians feel humiliated that they are
not permitted to fight for their own liberation - especially
as "black Africans" are at the front with Indians, Americans,
Japanese, Goums, and others. General Clark told me they had
not much stamina as fighters.
I spent one day last week with General Clark at
Headquarters - visiting three hospitals of which the one
that affected me most, quite a large one, where men who
have
-2-
have collapsed under fire are cared for. The treatment
1s to put them under complete narcosis for 2 to 3 days.
After a week 80% are cured and return to the front. They
never know what happened to them and there 18 seldom a
recurrence. Near Portofino, now a large evacuation hospital
about 1000 beds, 40 surgeons, and internes all of whom
operate in emergencies. This unit has handled 50,000
cases since it came overseas, has been bombed and strafed -
only one case has lost both eyes. I visited the Port,
taken from the enemy 8 days before. So skilled are our
Army Engineers, that on the 8th day, they had improvised
shipping and unloading facilities that 7000 tons of
munitions and supplies were taken ashore and delivered to
the dumps preparatory to the attack on Leghorn (which as I
write 1s in 5th Army hands today). The steel works at
Piombino was completely blasted by our bombers and artillery
though the Village at one side was hardly damaged. I have
seen many skillful engineering operations in the past but
Piombina compared with the best - especially as no blue
prints of such an operation 1s possible in advance and all
1s improvised on the spot. Forward planning however makes
available the heavy equipment at the right moment without
which nothing substantial could be done.
I have met Prince Doria on several occasions (He is
now Mayor of Rome). He never knuckled down to Hitler or
Mussolini, was arrested and imprisoned more than three years
ago. He asked no quarter. He resembles Dante, is very
silent and like martyrs does not need to say very much
anyway.
I have just left His Holiness the Pope after a fourth
audience, one each week since arriving here. We discussed
again the four major questions:
1. Communism.
II. Religious freedom in Russia.
III. Surrender of the German Army. Consequent
disarmament, 1.e., as recounted in my
previous letter.
Iv. International organization.
I believe these continued discussions are helpful to
the Pope. His interest seems unabated, I have not let
him grasp our whole program for Germany or world organization
but have led him along our avenues of considering these
matters.
I called
-3-
I called upon the Cardinal Secretary of State Maglione -
who 1e leaving today for his villa at Naples. He was too
111 to discuss anything serious - I again suggested that he
consult American doctors at Naples where Roosevelt Hospital
of New York have a sizable unit. For the first time he
indicated an interest. I gave him a letter to the Surgeon
General.
The Spanish Ambassador has just told me that he has a
special message from his Government indicating how greatly
pleased they were with my former visit and suggesting that
a renewed visit could be most welcome at this time. I have
had two communications from Ambassador Hayes suggesting that
he and Mrs. Hayes would be pleased if I came to Madrid en
route to or from Rome. Other similar suggestions caused me to
telegraph this information to you last week.
With kind regards, believe me
Sincerely,
Myron Taylor
N.B. Please excuse poor ink, pen and penmanship.
MT
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
WASHINGTON
August 26, 1944
MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT
A reply to Mr. Taylor's letter of July 14 has been drafted in
accordance with your memorandum of August 15, 1944, and 1s attached
hereto for your signature, if you approve, along with Mr. Taylor's
letter and a. copy thereof.
Enclosures:
1. To Mr. Taylor.
2. From Mr. Taylor,
with extra copy.
CH
Dear Myron:
Thank you for your interesting letter of July 19
giving me a. comprehensive report of your various activ-
ities and conversations in Rome and in Vatican City. It
is good to know that you are on the job. I shall look for-
ward to your further reports.
Sincerely yours,
The Honorable
Myron C. Taylor,
Personal Representative of the
President at the Vatioan,
Vatioan City.
M. folder
(3321)
hmo
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 15, 1944.
MEMORANDUM FOR
THE SECRETARY OF STATE:
FOR PREPARATION OF REPLY FOR MY
SIGNATURE.
F.D.R.
Letter from Hon. Myron Taylor, 7/19/44, to the
President, in re the Crown Prince, now
lit Lieutenant Ceneral, of Italy and his
family.
PARTMENT
INCOMING
DIVISION OF
OF
COMMUNICATIONS
STATE
13/
TELEGRAM
AND RECORDS
LL-455
Rome
This telegram must bE
clostly paraphrased bE-
Dated July 24, 1944
fore being communicated
to anyone.
Rec'd 3:01 p.m,25th.
Secretary of State,
Washington.
59, July 24, Midnight.
PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL FOR THE PRESIDENT AND
SECRETARY FROM MYRON TAYLOR.
No. 246.
At your request, and after much effort, WE over-
came, as you know, many obstacles in setting up American
Relief for Italy. I am now advised by Judge Marchisio,
president of the organization, of the following facts:
One. That up to July 7th his organization had
collected between six and SEVEN million pounds of good,
usable, clean, new clothing and that the War Department
has ruled that no shipping space is available until 60
and probably 90 days.
Two. That Judge Marchisio, President of American
Relief for Italy, bE not permitted to visit Italy.
Three. That all the material for American RElief
for Italy must bE consigned to the Army and deposited
in a combined
DECLASSIFIED
SECRET
State Dept. Letter, 1-11-72
By J. Schauble Date
FEB 22 1972
-2- #59, July 24, Midnight, from ROME.
in 8. combined pool of supplies, and that such material
is to be allocated for distribution by the Army through
such indigenous authorities and agencies 0.3 it deemed
advisable.
I should like to reply to the Department's telegram
No. 332 of July 8 and say:
"With reference to your telegram No. 332, July 8,
the list of clothing and other items in my telegram No.
212 of June 26 was furnished me by Colonal Poletti and
his staff after several conferences and, 0.8 indicated
in my telegram No. 221 of June 27, the list of medicines
and so forth was provided by Dr. Castellani of the
Ospadale Policlinico."
For the pruposes of clarification I believe that
Judge Marchisio furnished you a copy of his letter to
me dated July 7 just received end I draw your particular
attention to the section which would SEEM to indicate
that all contributed supplies are to be placed in an
Allied pool. It has been intimated to me that these
contributions might then be diverted to countries other
than the one for which the gifts WEYE intended. I
hope
-3- #59, July 24, Midnight, from ROME.
hope there is no thought of such diversion, but if the
rumor of it 1s current in America I believe it would
do a great deal of harm and should be immediately denied.
KIRK
JT
WWC
PSFValism
8-7-441
SEGRETERIA DI STATO
DI SVA SANTITA
N.4988/44
The Secretariat of State of H1s Holiness respectfully
requests His Excellency Mr. Myron Taylor to be 80 kind as to
communicate to His Excellency Mr. Franklin Delano Roosevelt,
President of the United States of America, the enclosed Message
from His Holiness Pope Pius XII.
The Secretariat of State avails itself of this opportunity
to express to Mr. Taylor sentiments of its highest consideration.
THE VATICAN, August 7. 1944.
STATO
10
TRANSPORT OF SUA
To His Excellency
MR. MYRON C. TAYLOR
Personal Representative of the President
of the United States of America
to the Holy See
We are deeply appreciative of your cordial comforting
message. We pray that soon in God's providence peace with
justice will come to our heart-broken world, that christian
civilization will be preserved as the basis and incentive
of world-order, and that love of God and neighbor will be
the governing principles both of nations and of men. We
are asking Mr. Taylor who is always most considerate to tell
you of some of Our concerns and problems. With heartfelt
prayer We beg God's blessingson Your Excellency and the people
of the United States.
PIUS PP. XII
vation folder 4-44
PERSONAL AND CONFIDE TIAL FOR THE PRESIDENT
8/7/44
file from Myr 9F C. Taylor, Rome
His Excel lency
Franklin Delano Roosevelt,
President of the United States of America
Washington.
m. Jay in
THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TO HIS HOLINESS THE POPE
Rome, August 7, 1944.
1
My dear Mr. President:
I am sending you herewith copy of a statement
which I received this morning from Prof. Dr. Lobo
d'Avila Lima, portuguese Ambassador at Rome. The
document speaks for itself. Obviously it is sent
to me because of the facts stated by Signor Dino
Grandi in the first few paragraphs of this memo-
randum.
In due course, perhaps, in acknowledging
receipt, you will make any observations which
you consider desirable.
With kindest regards, believe me
Sincerely yours,
Enclosure:
Statement dated
July 15, 1944.
His Excellency
Franklin Delano Roosevelt
president of the United States
Washington.
Lisbon, July 15,1944
Dear Ambassador,
In November 1931, my wife and I had the privilege
and the pleasure of being your guests in your lovely
home in New York, during the unforgettable visit I paid
as Italian Minister for Foreign Affairs, to the President
of the United States, and to the Secretary of State in
Washington.
I have always cherished the recollection of how kind
Mrs. Taylor and yourself were to us on that occasion and
of the good friendship that you both showed to us. The
invaluable encouragement that I received from you person-
ally helped me greatly in making that visit a success. I
returned to Italy not only with the hope, but also with
the conviction that, aided as I had been by the frank sup-
port and by the general sympathy I had met with in the
United States, I could have easily overcome all political
difficulties at home, assuring on firm and solid bases
that close understanding and far-reaching cooperation be-
tween Italy and the United States which had been the cor-
nerstone of my foreign policy from the day I had been ap-
pointed Italian Foreign Minister.
I sincerely hope that the fateful events of these
last years have not made you completely forget the rela-
tions of personal esteem and friendship that our happy
meeting in New York had then established between us. This
hope encourages me to write to you to-day. I feel that
I must let you know a few things about events in Italy
both before and after July 25th, and the part I played in
them, as inaccurate reports have been circulating on the
subject.
As you will perhaps know, on January 10th, I have
been condemned to death by Mussolini's expressed will
together with the eighteen members of the Italian Grand
council who in the night of July 24th, 1943, brought about
Mussolini's fall, and therefore laid the necessary pre-
mise for the armistice with the Allies. Five have already
been executed. The sentence had been pronounced by an
extra-ordinary court, created by the purpose, acting with-
out any judicial guarantee and in open violation of the
law. It has simply been a sinister and premeditated mur-
der, and with it Mussolini has wanted to satisfy his per-
sonal vengeance against those who, acting within the
frame of our Constitution, were instrumental in freeing
Italy from Fascist dictatorship and the German Alliance.
I take the whole responsibility for what happened on
the night of July 24-25th. I personally took the initia-
tive of the action for Mussolini's overthrow, and obtained
from the members of the Grand Council, through an eleven-
hour dramatic debate against Mussolini and his supporters,
to approve a motion which I had prepared long time before
and which meant a full condemnation of Mussolini's home
and foreign policy.
The
of TORT
sug power To Hom Scares
HIOY the ens az
Der /
-2-
The events of July 25th, that brought about the
fall of Mussolini and Fasciam were no improvisation, nor
were they influenced by any popular movement or inter-
vention of theanti-fascist parties which were to appear
on the political scene only after July 25th. Our action,
long meditated and prepared, was the consequence of an
attitude maintained for twenty years in front of Mussolini
and his supporters.
As you perhaps remember, I was dismissed in July 1932,
as Minister for Foreign Affairs, immediately after 8 speech
I made at Geneva, when, unhesitatingly and alone among
all foreign representatives at the Disarmament Conference,
I accepted fully and inconditionally for Italy, and on my
personal responsibility, the plan proposed by the Presi-
dent of the United States for disarmament and general
peace. I thought in fact that that was the last chance
offered by the United States to the Nations of the world
to join willingly their forces, and put into operations
those high principles of international peace and coopera-
tion which would have spared to the world the danger of
a war. A few months before (January 1932), I had/in op-succeeded
posing a meeting between the Italian Prime Minister and
Herr Hitler, head of the new and already strong Nazi move-
ment in Germany.
The swift rise of the Nazi movement in Germany made
Mussolini think that the time was ripe for getting rid of
me, and with me of the policy he had tolerated but never
shared. So my dismissal came at the very moment when I
was reaching with |.Herriot (head of the newly-formed ra-
dico-socialist Government in France) the full understanding
for which I had worked so hard and which was to remove once
and for all the age-old difficulties between France and
Italy. Mussolini disavowed the action taken by me at
Geneva and sent me as Ambassador to London, resuming him-
self the full control of the Italian foreign policy. The
Italian cooperation with the other fellow-members of the
Lengue of Nations was practically interrupted at that
time, the anti-Geneva attitude reasserted itself once
more, and the Italian policy followed more and more the
German pattern.
During my seven years in London as Italian Ambas-
sador, whenever official duties compelled me to act ac-
cording to distasteful instructions, I always did my best
follow them in such a way as not to endanger the policy of
close collaboration and friendship with Great Britain
and full indipendence of Germany. Very often, however,
I had to run counter those instructions. During the
Abissynian war I made every effort in order to avoid 8
final split between Great Britain and Italy, and after-
wards to reach (April 1938) that Gentlemen's Agreement
which secured the withdrawal of Italian volunteers from
Spoin, and should have meant a new start in the Italian
foreign policy. It gratifies me to remember that the
British Prime Minister gave me credit in the House of
Commons for all the work done in order to rench the agree-
ment, and to assure the restauration of the old friendly
relations
aug 2011
act E enge TOUR ?
Insual facialing 20 Infrowed address 20 your holdney eas ent To
OTOM Line DOB
-3-
relations between Great Britain and Italy.
But suddenly, in May 1939, Mussolini concluded a
military allinnce with Germany, and a few days afterwards,
rollowing bitter attacks against my activities as Ambas-
sador to London and upon Cerman request, I was recalled and
appointed, without my previous knowledge, Minister for Jus-
tice and President of the Chamber of Deputies, both offices
being considered as having no influence on the Government
policy.
In the event, those offices proved to be of no little
importance, as they gave me the opportunity of renewing
once again from the juridical and the legal aspects my
efforts in the defense of the Constitution, which Fascist
dictatorship had in the meantime violated but not yet al-
together obliterated. During my tenure of office (Musso-
lini got rid of me again in February 1943), I availed my-
self many times, much to the irritation of the fascist
"revolutionaries" and Mussolini himself, of the privilege
of the Justice Minister to refuse to validate with the Seal
of the State laws and decrees deemed inconsistent with the
Constitution. The defence of the latter was in fact an
essential premise for slowly preparing the ground for the
restauration of our perliamentary system, and for the over-
throw of the ill-fated dictatorship which had taken our
country's political life in its iron grip and made priso-
ners of the whole Italian people. From that moment (June
1939), I slowly resumed the direction of the political
group which Mussolini and his gang had tried to disperse,
during the p. evious years.
When in August 1939, Germany invaded Polend, my polit-
ical friends and I did all in our power to prevent Italy's
entry into the war on Germany's side, es was Mussolini's
intention. At the cabinet meeting which approved Italy's
non-belligerency (September 1st, 1939), I demanded a pub-
lic denunciation of our military alliance with Germany and
a declaration of full neutrality. Mussolini refused and
asked me not to interfere any longer with the Italian for-
eign policy. Nevertheless, during the nine months of our
non-belligerency, I did all I could to keep Italy out of
the war. The British statesmen with whom I was in touch
encouraged me in my efforts; but in June 1940, Mussolini
declared war without even informing the cabinet, whose men-
bers, with the only exception of the Foreign Minister Ciamo,
learned it from the radio. He intended in that way to
administer a final blow to our constitutional machinery.
By means of the war Mussolini planned to get rid of Moner-
ohy and Constitution, installing in its place 8 permanent
"de jure" dictatorship on the lines of German Nazism, as he
is doing in North Italy, now that he is free at last of
his internal opposition.
We were convinced that war meant ruin for our country
both in the national and international fields. Not having
been successful in preventing it, we believed that no means
should be ignored in order to shorten it, end thus free
Italy from the German alliance, taking advantage of any fa-
vorable opportunity. In the days preceding the 25th of
July, there were no signs of any popular or political
rising
LOT
-4-
fising in Italy. it was a misfortune that the decisive
action could take place only much too late for our coun-
try to benefit from it without passing through to-day's
tremendous experience. We had twice arranged the action
which finally took place in July 1943; in May 1941, 1m-
mediately following the criminal Greek campaign, and
again in autumn 1942, at the time of the Allied landing
in North Africa. The obstacles we had to overcome com-
pelled us to desist both times. We were Mussolini's
prisoners just as the anti-Fascists he confined on the
islands.
What we had tried at first was to foster an active
movement in Parliament in order to bring about a const-
tutional crisis which would put the King in the necessity
of taking action. But we came to the realization that it
was impossible to act through such large bodies as the
Chamber and the Senate. The Grand Council was the only
possible body, created as it had been by a law introduced
by Mussolini with the aim of limiting the influence of Par-
liament. But the law required that the meeting should be
called by the Head of the Government who, conscious as he was
of our opposition (Mussolini's and Hitler's speeches after
September 8th, 1943, bear the full evidence of this fact)
had always refused to let it meet since December 8th, 1939,
when the Grand Council asked and endorsed, in its last sitting,
a policy of full abstention from war at the side of Germany.
When he finally called a meeting for July 24th, he did so
only to challenge us, and free himself once and for all of
those who were an obstinate obstacle to his policy.
Many stories have circulated about that meeting in
the night of July 24th, but they are full of inexactitude
and fantasy. I led the attack, and finally succeeded in
bringing the Grand Council to approve a motion (See Annex I)
which meant the end of dictatorship, end asked the King to
avail himself of all powers conferred upon him by the
Constitution. My friends and I risked our lives (at the
beginning of the meeting our chances of success were scant
indeed) in this last attempt.
On the same morning of July 25th, immediately after the
meeting, and before knowing what the decision of the King
would be, I stressed the urgency of asking an armistice to
the Allies, offering myself to go to Madrid or Lisbon in
order to approach the British and American authorities. I
was convinced that not a single minute should be lost,
so that Germany could have no time to take strong military
measures. After two weeks I was allowed on my personal
responsibility, to approach the British and American Ambas-
sadors in Madrid. The difficulties in obtaining the "visa"
from the Spanish Government, and the necessity of eluding
the German surveillance (the Germans were after me since
July 25th) account for further delay, so that when I arrived
in Spain and Portugal (August 18th), official contacts be-
tween Allied and Italian military authorities had already
been established. There was nothing I could do but to re-
main here, ready to do what might be required from me in
the service of my country, and of the common cause, at
long last uniting Italy to the Allies against Germany.
In
BOD
⑉5⑉
In my conscience I feel I have done all in my
power to be of some service to my country, to save it from
anarchy, and the total disaster connected with a military
collapse, and to resume, some day in the future and with-
in the reality of a military defeat, the position of a
respectable member of the community of countries which
will arise from this war. Someone said that I struck out
too late, and someelse else that I struck too soon. The
fact is that I struck when I could. How great the diffi-
culties were that I had to dispose of has been proved
by the course events have subsequently taken. But events
have also shown that opposition to Fascist dictatorship
from without was powerless. I chose to work from within,
keeping alive there an opposition which proved to be at
last successful. My policy involved difficulties, risks,
setbacks, even mistakes and temporary compromises. But I
still believe that that was the only way to a final success.
It wes clear that, even had we not acted on July 25th,
Mussolini's regime would have been destroyed by the armed
forces of the United Nations. Everyone realizes that. But
the problem was to shorten a war which the Italian people
had not wanted, to weaken Germany's military strength by
withdrawing its ally, to bring the Italians themselves to
regain their constitutional liberties, and 88 the Allies
had always asked us to do, to oust Mussolini, breaking the
chains holding us, so that the cooperation of the great
majority of the Italian people might be willingly and con-
fidently assured to the cause of Democracy.
Somebody has said afterwards that in doing what we
did on July 25th, we intended to get rid of Mussolini's
dictatorship, but to save the Fascist regime. This is
utterly untrue. For too many years Fasciam had identi-
fied itself with Mussolini's dictatorship, and both had to
be destroyed in order to save Monarchy and Constitution
which we believed and still believe today are the supreme
guarantees for our national unity, for establishing a true
democracy in Italy, and preserving our country from the
danger of going back either to anarchy or to dictatorship
again.
I feel sure you will forgive for going into the
story of Italian events and the part I played in them.
I truly think it difficult to understand Italian events
1f some light is not thrown on what appears to be only
a personal case, but is rather the case of the many
Italians whose ideas I tried to interpret and represent.
Mussolini wants today, through terror, murders, and
falsehood, to create his historical alibi and vainly to
strengthen in Northern Italy a position which is ob-
viously doomed. Falsifying facts and documents, he
tries to prove that the military defeat that the Fascist
dictatoship has met is nothing but the result of military
plots which supposedly have found a complacent instrument
in the Grand Council. Nothing could be more false. My
hope is that some day the entire truth will be told, if in
the meantime the Gestapo agents will not have succeeded in sup-
pressing one of the few witnesses of events as they did really
happen.
You
and my
D2 USAG STEO
ony LOOF the combo spous MUS CHEF
1,3883 I sads stow bas sada edal " fltw 003
20 nidd eatis ods as
B HONDS DO & 8 R FORTH E DOB: I
-6-
You followed my work in the international field and
know the difficulties I had to overcome at home to assure
the loyal and active contribution of Italy to a policy of
neace and international cooperation. I indeed am greatly
indebted to American Statesmen, and to their invaluable assis-
tance and personal encouragement if for many years my for-
eign policy prevailed in Italy. The principles in which I
always believed were stressed by me to the American public
opinion in speeches I made in Washington, New York and Phil-
adelphia in November 1931. In these principles I put my
faith to-day more firmly than ever. In doing what I have
done in trying to save Italy from the total disaster where
Mussolini was driving it, I was not thinking of building
up a new political platform whatsoever. As I said to the
King, I meant only to accomplish the last duty of my active
political life, and to serve those which had been my ideals
through all my life.
I thought I had to let you know all this. I would
like to say many more things, many more indeed, which are
impossible to express in a few pages. There are people
to-day who have obvious interest, as you will find out
yourself, in distorting the truth. Personal experience
has taught me how difficult it is to re-establish the truth
about past events, when war is still raging. This is why
I nm confident that in writing to you I shall find that
understanding which is otherwise not so easy to find when
war is stirring so many human passions and when so many
political interests are involved.
I send you, dear Ambassador, all my heartfelt wishes
for the success of your mission. The cause of the Allies
is the cause of Italy, and my hope is to see my unhappy
country emerge from her present ruins aligned again at the
side of the Allies, fighting against Germany which is our
traditional enemy and reconquering her lost liberties.
Very sincerely yours,
(Signed) Dino Grandi
OF
NOAGI
Reb-of
2
to bovel bewollor swo. india 19915 ban tind 07 bne Das intol besdennt ens NOY 99883 nate
COCTOR FTOR
R
PPO begge
KUOM
I)
Text of the motion introduced by Dino Grandi and
approved by the majority of the Grand Council at
the meeting in Rome on July 25th, 1943:
"The Grand Council, having taken in considem-
tion the internal and international situation and
the political and military leadership of the war,
emphasises the duty for all Italians to stand
together in this present grave and fateful hour
for the future of the fatherland; decides that
all functioning or the constitutional bodies be
immediately re-enacted and the Crown, the Govern-
ment, and Parliament resume the task and responsi-
bility conferred upon them by our Constitution and
by our laws; invites the Head of the Government
to ask the King, to whom the whole nation turns
in faith and confidence, to assume the effective
command of the armed forces; and to take conse-
quently, in compliance with article 5 of the Con-
stitution, all supreme initiative of decision
that our institutions confer upon him and which has
alsays been, in our national history, the heritage
of our Royal House of Savoy."
2)
Extract of the sentence pronounced on January 10th
1944, by the Fascist Extraordinary Tribunal at
Verona against Dino Grandi, former President of
the Italian Chamber :
"
Condemned to death for the crime of
high treason, for having given help to the
enemy, endangered the military resistance of
the country and of the Italian Army, giving
cause to the illusion of a separate peace with
the enemy."
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
WASHINGTON
August 26, 1944
MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT
A reply to Mr. Taylor's letter of August 7 has been drafted in
accordance with your memorandum of August 18, 1944, and is attached
hereto for your signature, if you approve, along with Mr. Taylor's
letter and the enclosure thereto.
Enolosures:
1. To Mr. Taylor.
2. From Mr. Taylor,
with enclosure.
CH
Dear Myron:
I have your letter of August 7, 1944, enclosing a copy
of a letter dated July 15, 1944 from Count Grandi to you.
Our Legation at Lisbon has received various of Grandi's re-
ports concerning events leading up to the overthrow of Musso-
lini last year. Colonel Stimson has also received a letter
written in a similar vein from Count Grandi. It is interest-
ing to have the story from one of the principal participants
of the last meeting of the Fascist Grand Council.
Regarding his personal position, there is, of course,
nothing we can do. His relations with his government would
appear to be purely an internal Italian affair. He 18 pre-
sumably safe enough in Portugal if he is willing to remain
there.
Sincerely yours,
The Honorable
Myron C. Taylor,
Personal Representative of the
President at the Vatican,
Vatican City.
m. Taylor folder
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 18, 1944.
MEMORANDUM FOR
THE SECRETARY OF STATE:
FOR PREPARATION OF REPLY
FOR MY SIGNATURE.
F.D.R.
Letter to the President, 8-7-44 from Hon.
Myron Taylor, enclosing copy of a statement
which he recd. from Prof. Dr. Lobo d'Avila Lima,
Portuguese Ambassador at Rome, dated July 15,
and sent to the Ambassador by Signor Dino Grandi,
who gives an account of what actually happened
during the over-throw of Mussolini.
m. Taylor File 4-44
THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
personal
TO HIS HOLINESS THE POPE
Rome, August 14, 1944.
PERSONAL AND
Dear Mr. President:
Admiral Standley and Hugh Wilson called on us last week and
we iscussed a number of matters, and arranged an audience for
them with the Holy Father which took place on Saturday. Prior
to the audience we talked with them again and indicated the pos-
sible field which the Pope would propose for a discussion in order
that they might be prepared.
The attached memorandum was written after their audience and
you will be pleased to observe, I am sure, that the subjects which
we anticipated were brought up by the Pope and that they supported
us in the several matters which we have taken up as indicated in
our special correspondence.
we similarly arranged an audience for Under Secretary Patterson,
General Somervell and General Larkin, with nine members of their
staff. We again anticipated the trend of the discussion which might
be undertaken in the private audience which took place between the
Holy Father and Under Secretary Patterson, General Somervell and
General Larkin. The principal topic which the Pope brought up in
this was his gratitude for the saving of Rome without more
serious damage, and the feeding of the population of both Sicily
and Italy since the invasion, particularly the relief accorded to
the city of Rome itself in that respect. He then talked briefly of
the German people and his concern about their ultimate welfare but
did not engage in any political discussion, and expressed his grati-
tude at seeing so many officers and men with the armed forces.
We suggested to the Under Secretary that he prepare a brief memorandum
on this audience which - when received - will be forwarded to you.
Mr. and Mrs. Tittmann and their two boys, Mrs. Taylor and myself
will spend the day at General Clark's beadquarters tomorrow. This will
be another interesting experience and one which - at a later date and in
a more
His Excellency
Franklin Delano Roosevelt
President of the United States of America
Washington.
State DECLASSIFIED Dept. Letter, 1-11-72
By J. Schauble Date FEB 22 1972
-2-
a more advanced headquarters I hope sometime to have the pleasure
of joining you.
With kindest regards in which we all join, believe me
Sincerely yours,
Enclosure:
Memorandum of audience
August 11, 1944.
COPY
12 August 1944
MEMORANDUM for Mr. Myron Taylor.
Interview with the Holy Father on Saturday, August 12, 1944,
by Admiral Standley and Hugh Wilson.
The Pope had a paper in front of him and greeted us by stating
that one was from Russia and one from Germany. He started talking
about Germany.
I. His remarks about Germany were of a somewhat superficial
nature. He stated that he had respect for the people; fortheir many
admirable qualities; for their development of science; but that they
had the fatal capacity of being badly led. Wilson acquiesced in these
remarks and merely added that it was lamentable that these people had
permitted their leaders to create a situation where they, themselves,
inescapably had to BY the penalty. In no way did the Pope raise the
question of a negotiated peace, or intimate the possibility of a termination
of hostilities.
II. He questioned Admiral Standley concerning Russia and whether
there was a possibility of freedom of religion in that country. Admiral
Standley stated that Stalin had recreated the Orthodox Church; had in-
corporated it, however, as a part of government administration. Admiral
Standley felt that Stalin has his vanity. He is desirous of being
as great a man before the Russian people as Lenin. Now the Russian
people are essentially religious in spite of the atheism of the party
members. Stalin has so far yielded to the pressure as to recreate the
Orthodox Church. Admiral Standley is inclined to believe that the
pressure of events will cause Stalin eventually to permit freedom of
religion. The Pope return ed again and again to the atheism of the
party, citing individual instances of this. Wilson then stated that
the history of the Church has often shown that non-religious rulers
recognized the political necessity of dealing with the Church. For
example: Napoleon recognized the necessity and signed concordats which
enabled the Church to function well during his regime and under his
domain. Admiral Standley then continued the discussion by stating that
he felt that the Russians were dominated by the thought of security. If
they could attain that security through collaboration with the great
powers, Stalin will be content with this. Stalin had every reason to
cooperate with the great powers, as he needs to give the people consumers'
goods and a long period of rest and recuperation after this battle. There
DECLASSIFIED
State Dept. Letter. 1-11-72 FEB 22 1972
again
By J. Schauble Date
-2-
again his vanity will play its part. He will desire to stami well with
the people, particularly after the formidable ordeal through which they
have past.
The interview lasted some forty minutes. At its close, we presented
Colonel Rodrigo and Lt. Waughope to His Holiness.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
file
THE SECRETARY
August 15, 1944
MEMORANDUM FOR MISS TULLY
Mr. Myron C. Taylor wrote and asked
the Secretary personally to see to it
that the attached letter was placed in
the President's hands. The Secretary
said he would appreciate it if you would
do this for him.
Cur W. Gray
myron Taylor folder 4-44
COPY FOR THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA
Rome, August9, 1944.
PERSONAL AND
file?
Dear Mr. Secretary:
We have indicated in a personal letter to the President that
the statement has been made that 30,000,000 Catholics in the
United States were favorable to concluding the war by negotiation
to avoid further loss of life and destruction of property. you
Subsequently, in my telegrams Nos. 268 and 270 of August 7
we indicated that Archbishop Spellman who was in Rome had made a
similar statement in substance to the British Minister to the Holy
see, Sir D'Aroy 0sborne. The next day an editorial appeared in the
official Vatican Organ, the OSSERVATORE ROMANO, posing the question
why the war should be continued with consequent loss of life and
destruction of property. The article concluded with a statement
in substance that it was desired to have peace as soon es possible.
We further advised that an inquiry from London had been made here
in regard to the time of arrival of Archbishop Spellman in London.
In answer to our inquiry the Archbishop advised us that he would
arrive in London August 22nd or 23rd.
Last night at a dinner given in honor of Secretary of the Navy
Forrestal, whichwe attended, he indicated that before Archbishop
Spellman left America he called upon him (Forrestal) and made sub-
stantially the same statement, to which be - Forrestal - replied in
disagreement.
We are quoting these several matters so that you may be apprised
of incidents which may indicate a movement to bring about a negotiated
peace, along lines undisclosed to us directly, end 80 that you may be
governed in the conduct of affairs related to the war with the fullest
possible information that is available to us.
In our recent audiences with the Pope we continued to insist that
there is no possibility of a negotiated peace and that the only terms
that will be offered to the German Army are unconditional surrender.
will you be good enough to put into the hands of the President
personally the copy of this letter which is enclosed for his personal
and private information.
Sincerely yours
The Honorable
Cordell Hull
(signed) Myron Taylor
Secretary of State
DECLASSIFIED
Washington.
State Dope Letter, 1-11-72
FEB 22 1972
By J. Schauble Date
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF STATE 1944.
MEMORANDUM FOR
AUG 2 situal RECORITY - 8/19
DIVISION of
THE SECRETARY
TO READ AND RETURN FOR
MY FILES.
F.D.R.
PSF
THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
Vatican
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TO HIS HOLINESS THE POPE
Rome, August 4, 1944. Taylor
Mydear Mr. President:
At my fifth sudience with the Pope, on August 3,
after presenting a copy of the paragraph of your recent
letter intended for His Holiness, discussion was resumed
of the trend of war as it related particularly to the
possible Russian ambitions in Europe, the ultimate
situation of Poland, and of Germany.
I continued to meet these questions in the manner
previously indicated and referred generally to the
prospects for the ultimate development of Germany shorn
of its armament and war potentials. The reaction to these
statements was favorable. I believe that no opposition to
rendering Germany unable of future aggression will be met
from these sources, the principal preoccupation being
concern for the future welfare of the German people, and
not in any sense the protection of the present leaders or
the military class. The fear continues that Russia is
animated by excessive territorial and political ambitions,
and that view persists quite generally in all conservative
circles, whether they be spiritual, civil, Italian, or
international groups reflected by the diplomatic represen-
tatives with many of whom I have talked.
On Thursday, Major General Joao Mascarenhas, Commander
of the Brazilian Expeditionary Forces was received in audience,
at our instance, by His Holiness. Lt. Col. Carroll Peeke who
accompanied him, requested us to make the arrangements, but we
referred him to the Brazilian Ambassador who - after the au-
dience - gave a luncheon at which Mr. and Mrs. Tittmann and I
were present. We emphasized the importance of the initial
appearance in the European war theater of the South American
forces as indicating solidarity of Western hemisphere action.
We also encouraged the press to make an important feature of
the event.
His Excellency
Sincerely yours,
Franklin Delano Roosevelt
President of the United States
Washington.
m. Jaylor freder 4-44
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 18, 1944.
MEMORANDUM FOR
THE SECRETARY OF STATE:
TO READ AND RETURN FOR MY
FILES.
F.D.R.
Letter to the President (Personal and
Confidential) 8-11-44 from Hon. Myron Taylor
enclosing a memorandum re his audience with
Pope Pius XII, on August 11, 1944.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
DIVISION OF PROTOCOL
August 15, 1944.
MEMORANDUM FOR MISS TULLY:
I am transmitting herewith two sealed communications
addressed to the President by the Honorable Myron C.
Taylor, Special Representative of the President at the
Vatican.
George T. Summerlin
Chief of Protocol
Enclosures:
Two sealed communications.
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
RECEIPT VIED
August 18, 1944.
AUG 28 1944
MEMORICATIONS COME AND FOR RECORDS
DIVISION OF
Boad-8/19
THE SECR TARY OF STATE:
TO READ AND RETURN FOR MY
FILES.
F.D.R.
OFFICE OF CTURED AFFAIRS
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
AUG 2. 1944
DEPARTMENT MR MATTHEW:
JH STATE
n =
THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TO HIS HOLINESS THE POPE
Rome, August 11, 1944
PERSONAL AND
My dear Mr. President:
I enclose herewith a memorandum which I dictated
immediately after leaving my audience with His Holiness
this morning at 9.45. I have found a way of sending
this to you by special army messenger and it will be
delivered to you therefore through army channels.
I think it is important that the information I am
sending you be reserved to yourself and to Secretary
Hull, because of obligations I have undertaken at the
beginning to keep these discussions secret. This is
obvious for reasons which you will appreciate.
I hope your trip to the Pacific has not only been
successful in enabling you to chart the future action in
that area, but has also given you an opportunity for a
bit of rest which - in view of the tribulations ahead -
I am sure will be very useful in building up a supply
of energy with which to meet the problems as they occur.
Among the outstanding visitors we have seen during
the past week was Secretary Forrestal who spent a short
time in Rome yesterday, having tea with us in the after-
noon. We had a good visit. We also attended a small
staff dinner in his honor on the night of his arrival
here.
Admiral Standley and ex-Ambassador Hugh Wilson also
called upon us on Thursday and are returning here Saturday
when we have arranged an audience for them with the Pope.
Mrs. Anne O'Hare McCormick and her husband Charles
Francis
His Excellency
Franklin Delano Roosevelt
President of the United States of America
The White House
Washington
DECLASSIFIED
State Dept. Letter, 1-11-72
By J. Schauble Date
FEB 22 1972
-2-
Francis McCormick have arrived in Rome and we are arranging
an audience for them at an early day next week.
Honorable William Bullitt spent a few days in Rome
busily engaged in interviewing the highest-placed officials.
We gained the impression that his chief preoccupation was
the Polish-Russian problem.
We expect to spend the day at General Mark Clark's head-
quarters next Tuesday.
With kindest regards, I em
Sincerely yours,
Enclosure:
Myonetator
Memorandum.
P.S. (August 12) Prime Minister Churchill arrived here
today. Under Secretary of War Patterson is expected here
tonight.
MEMORANDUM on Mr. Taylor's audience with Pope Pius XII
at the Vatican, August 11, 1944.
The audience occurred at 9.45 this morning. His Holiness
first inquired if I had received his memorandum in reply to
that portion of the President's recent letter of which I had
previously given the Pope a copy as follows:
"please be good enough to convey to His Holiness
my warm personal regards and the assurame of my
desire to cooperate with Him as fully as possible
in all matters of mutual concern and interest. I
should like you to take the occasion to express to
His Holiness my deeply-felt appreciation of the fre-
quent action which the Holy See has taken on its own
initiative in its generous and merciful efforts to
render assistance to the victims of racial and reli-
gious persecutions".
In reply, I advised His Holiness that I had received his
memorandum and that it had been forwarded immediately to the
President at the White House, Washington. The Pope's message
was as follows:
"We are deeply appreciative of your cordial comfort-
ing message. We pray that soon in God's providence
peace with justice will come to our heart-broken world,
that Christian civilization will be preserved as the
basis
-2-
basis and incentive of world order, and that love of God
and neighbor will be the governing principles both of
nations and of men. We are asking Mr. Taylor who is al-
ways most considerate to tell You of some of our concerns
and problems. With heartfelt prayer We beg God's bless-
ings on Your Excellency and the people of the United
States".
The Pope expressed his appreciation at the President's message and
his regard and esteem for him personally. As it had been published
in "THE STARS AND STRIPES" that the Preside nt had been in Honolulu,
I advised His Holiness to that effect, to which he replied that he
hoped Mr. Roosevelt had found an opportunity for rest and recuperation.
We again alluded to the progress of the war, to the difficulties
of providing food for the armed forces in so many parts of the world,
and in many cases to the civilian population; to the prospect of con-
tinued assistance to Italy and the likelihood of similar need for
France, The Low Countries, and many other parts of Europe which have
been under Nazi occupation. I paid a well deserved tribute to the
knowledge and skill in handling these important matters by the
Apostolic Delegate in Washington, and indicated how constantly and
faithfully he had supported His Holiness's views in all these mat-
ters, particularly in respect to the safety of Rome and the feeding
of its population after its liberation. His Holiness was very much
pleased with the report in respect to the activities of His repre-
sentative. (While I did not mention it, I am of the opinion that
Archbishop
-3-
Archbishop Cicognani would competently fill the post of Cardinal
Secretary of State in case Cardinal Maglione, now 111, became
incapacitated).
Concern is felt here for the fuel supply in Italy, particular-
ly for the winter. Our reply is that if Germany surrenders before
winter, the burden of shipping would be gradually reduced 80 that
supplies might be available. It is well to inform His Holiness on
such problems.
Reverting to the situation of Germany and the problem of polit-
ical, economic and armament questions, and in order to dispel complete-
ly the idea that all these questions would be matters for discussion
at the time of surrender, I indicated that the most vital of these
questions would probably be imposed rather than negotiated. At this
juncture it is not desirable, as I view it, to give encouragement to
any thought that unconciditional surrender might mean an invitation
to sit around the table and negotiate upon question which - if we pur-
sue the policy thus far indicated - can only be successfully carried
into effect and preserve the peace of the world and make Germany in-
capable of using force toward her neighbors, if they are arbitrarily
imposed at the time of unconditional surrender and during the period
of military occupation which must follow it. I believe that in this
atmosphere it is not wise to whow any sign of compromise, nor is
it wise to be too specific in respect to conditions to be imposed.
I might say that I think that rule might also hold good
in other
in other areas as well.
I called the attention of His Holiness to an item in THE STARS
AND STRIPES of today's date which I quote:
KREMLIN SEEKING VATICAN MEETING
London, August 10. The Russi an Government, in an un-
precedented political move, has sent a memorandum to the
Vatican proposing coordinated action between Moscow and
the Vatican in the postwar solution of moral social
problems, Reuter declared today.
The report said that Marshal Joseph Stalin had suggested
to Pope Pius XII that they exchange views to facilitate ac-
tion at the peace conference. The Russian Premier is re-
ported to have assured the Pope that Russia has no desire
to create a social order anywhere by force and even would
oppose such measures.
The Soviet memorandum asserted that Russia hopes to reach
its goal only through democratic and legal principles.
The Vatican's attitude, Reuter declared, is not yet known
but it was reported that Monsignor Cortesi, Papal Nuncio to
the Polish Government, will proceed to Warsaw as soon as
the Polish capital is liberated.
This decision, the London Daily News Chronicle said,
would indicate that the Vatican had reconciled itself to
the fact that Poland, predominantly a Catholic country,
will be on close terms of friendship in the postwar world
with Russia.
The Pope immediately characterized the article as false and
stated that nothing whatever had been proposed by the Russians and
that the Vatican would be called upon to declare that the statement
was without foundation in fact. We discussed several forms of denial,
and I
and I indicated one or two that might be the least likely to close
the door on such an approach by Russia. This led to my inquiry as
to the form of a statement by Stalin with respect to "Freedom of
Religion" in Russia which I submitted two weeks earlier. That state-
ment was as follows:
"Because of the loyal participation in the defense of the
Fatherland by all Russian people under the direction of the
constituted authority in the State, the Soviet Government,
by interpreting and applying Article 124 of the U. S. S. R.
Constitution publicly proclaims complete freedom of reli-
gion, including freedom of worship in all Soviet territory.
Any abuse of these privileges, either to organize move-
ments or incite the people toward the overthrow of the
Government, will be dealt with in each individual case ac-
cording to law".
In His Holiness's opinion such a statement by itself would mean
very little. I indicated that the Russian Member of the Advisory
Council for Italy (M. Bogolomov) had arrived by plane two days ago
when we happened to be at the airport, and suggested it might tran-
spire that he would open conversations with the Vatican. I recalled
the fact that Russia, at the time of the Czars, had a representative
at the Papal Court and that it might not be unlikely, with the
Polish question becoming ever more acute, that the Roman Catho-
lic Church in Poland and the Orthodox Church in Russia might
be led into a very difficult conflict in the future
unless
-6-
unless the Russi an situation vis-á-vis the Church was liberalized
and clarified. The Pope replied that he would be glad to welcome
such an understanding, but that it must be based upon good faith
and that practical evidence of sincerity must be shown; that up
to the present there had been in practice no relaxation of the
attitude of the Russian Government toward the Catholic Church,
particularly in the occupied Baltic countries, in Poland, or in
that segment which exists in Russi a proper. It is natural to
suppose that there may be some who would feel that the relations
on a religious level between those countries and the Vatican were
not a matter of general political importance, but a careful student
of the European political arena must yield to the conclusion that a
harmonious religious basis would promote a better political and
economic understanding.
In this connection I touched upon the possibility of a "Euro-
pean Commonwealth of Nations", first on a restricted European group-
ing of the Eastern European States west of Russia and east of Ger-
many, and second on a complete European Union, excluding, of course,
Russia and Great Britain. The general allusion to this often debated
question called for an exhibition of great interest on the part of
His Holiness. While we had in our State Department during the past
two and a half years studied both these fields to some extent, I
did not see fit to enlarge in any detail upon these projects. I do,
however,
-7-
however, expect at an early audience to have some reaction from
these suggestions.
On leaving the Pope he, with greatest warmth, assured me
of the interest and satisfaction in the discussions we have had
on a basis of "sincerity and helpfulness" which has developed.
The Pope invited me to frequent future audiences.
ROME, August 11, 1944
ADDRESS OFFICIAL COMMUNICATIONS TO
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
WASHINGTON, D.C.
m Jaylor filesmal freder 4-44
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
WASHINGTON
September 19, 1944
MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT
Thank you for letting me see Myron Taylor's
letters of August 4 and 11, the latter containing
an account of his audience with the Pope on
August 11. I have had copies made for the Depart-
ment's files and I am returning the originals here-
with.
Enclosures:
Letter from Myron Taylor,
August 4, 1944.
Letter from Myron Taylor,
August 11, 1944, enclosing
memorandum of conversation.
FOR VICTORY
BUY
UNITED
STATES
SAVINOR
BONDS
AND
STAMPS
CH
m. Taylor folder
(3398)
original of this telegram, approved by the President, returned to the
4.44
had
Secretary of State, 8/29/44.
DRAFT TELEGRAM
ANDEL,
ROME.
FOR MYRON TAYLOR FROM THE PRESIDENT.
Your 286, August 21.
For your confidential information, I feel that at this particular
phase of our discussions with the British on the whole problem of
Italian relief, we might jeopardize the success of the program of
American Relief for Italy, Inc. by insisting just now that the com-
bined military authorities, despite their current directives from
the Combined Chiefs of Staff, authorize Marchisio to visit Italy.
Your recommendations will, however, be kept in mind and acted
upon just as soon as possible. I am sure that meanwhile you, as
Chairman of American Relief for Italy, will be able to organize
matters at that end with your usual skill, taot and efficiency.
(Signed)
ROOSEVELT
of
"
PARTMENT
INCOMING
DIVISION OF
OF
COMMUNICATIONS
STATE
TELEGRAM
AND RECORDS
BJR - 759
ROME
This telegram must be
closely paraphrased bE-
Dated August 21, 1944
fort being communicatel
to anyone.
(
Rec'd 9:47 a.m.
SECRETARY of State,
Washington.
216, August 21, 7 p.m.
THIS IS TAYLOR'S 286 FOR THE PRESIDENT
Procedure regarding distribution of material con-
tributed to American relief for Italy cannot bE wisely
arranged to meet views of AMG, ACC, Vatican and Italian
Government and a reorganized Italian REd Cross without
prompt presence here of Judge Marchisio who has been
denied permission by General Hilldring to visit Italy
though I recommended it before and since leaving
Washington.
I urge it as a protection against possible future
complaints of inefficiency and favoritism. To avoid
this American relief for Italy sho ld have its own
competent representative on the ground to supervise
distribution. Marchisio should bring such representative
with him. Please act at ONCE. Sending full report
by air.
KIRK
CSB
DECLASSIFIED
State Dent. Tetter, 1-11-72
By J. Schauble Date FEB 22 1972
/ talder
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
WASHINGTON
August 28, 1944
MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT
As requested in your memorandum of August 24, 1944, there is
attached for your approval a draft reply to Mr. Myron Taylor's tele-
gran no. 286 of August 21, 1944, concerning Judge Marchisio's proposed
visit to Italy.
Enclosures:
1. Telegram from
Mr. Taylor.
2. Draft reply.
C.A.
department of #tate
BUREAU
SE
DIVISION
ENCLOSURE
TO
Letter drafted 8-26-44
ADDRESSED TO
The President
-- - - -
1
m. Taylor focar 4-44
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
Secret
August 24, 1944
MEMORANDUM FOR
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
Please let ne see your
proposed reply.
F.D.R.
Enclosure
State Dept. dispatch, 216, August 21,
from Rome "Taylor's 286 for the
President" from Kirk
*
m. Taylor folder 4-44
August 22, 1944.
Dear Myron:-
It is grand to get your letters. I
take it that the many American "visiting firemen"
are keeping you more than busy. I begin to
realize the old saying "that all roads lead to
Rome".
Keep up the good work. My best to you.
As ever yours,
Monorable Myron C. Taylor,
The Personal Representative of the
President of the United States of America
to Ris Holiness the Pope,
Rome,
Italy.
PSF: Jayler freder vouv
SECRET
war DEPARTMENT
sign
WASHINGTON, D.C.
August 26, 1944
MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT:
Subject: Civilian Relief Supplies for Italy Furnished by
American Relief for Italy, Incorporated.
In response to your memorandum of August 10, 1944 requesting
that reply be prepared to the attached cable from Mr. Myron Taylor dated
July 24, 1944, you are advised that on August 3, 1944 the Acting Secre-
tary of State made reply by cable, a paraphrase of which reply is likewise
attached. The cable dispatched by the Acting Secretary of State was 00-
ordinated with the appropriate staff division in the War Department prior
to its dispatch and reflects the view of the War Department as well as that
of the State Department with respect to the matter raised in Mr. Taylor's
cable.
At the present time the War Department is experiencing some
difficulty in obtaining an agreement with the British military authorities
that supplies provided by American Relief for Italy, Incorporated may be
introduced into Italy for free distribution. It is the British view that
all supplies in this combined Theater, 80 long as the military remain re-
sponsible for civilian relief therein, should be distributed by the mili-
tary through ordinary channels, which, in this case, are commercial ohan-
nels. The War Department is maintaining the view that the supplies made
available by American Relief for Italy, Incorporated should be forwarded
to the Theater with military assistance and there distributed without cost
through channels mutually agreeable to American Relief for Italy, Incor-
porated and the military. In the event the result desired by the War De-
partment cannot be accomplished through the present negotiations, you will
be advised.
uslay Secretary of War
Franklin D. Roosevelt Library
Incl.
Cable 7-24-44
BECLASSIFIED
Cable 8-3-44
DOD DIR. 5200.9 (9/27/58)
Date- 7-21-66
Signature-
SECRET
Clarl L Spicer
Y P 0
PARAPHRASE OF TELEGRAM SENT
FROM:
Secretary of State, Washington.
TO:
American Delegation, Rome.
DATED:
31.
The following message for Myron Taylor is transmitted.
We refer to message dated July 24, Number 59, from you.
A copy of letter dated July 7 from Judge Marchisio to you
has neither been received nor seen by the Department. We are told by
the War Relief Control Board of the President that, with reference to
the statement made by Judge Marchisio regarding the amount of clothing
collected up to the date July 7th, the earliest date at which Judge
Marchisio's organization and Judge Marchisio himself would be able, and
all, to get together and deliver any appreciable amount of clothing ready
for shipment to Italy would be September lst. In addition, we are told
that the ruling of the War Department was that that Department would
ship, within 90 days of the date when it was consigned to the War Depart-
ment, amounts of clothing put at its disposal suitably packed and at
certain designated stations and ports. Of course this ruling is subject
to agreement to the proposed arrangements by the commander of the theater.
The War Department has asked for the views and the approval of the theater
commander in this matter.
It is understood that Judge Marchisio is coming soon to
Washington to take up the discussions again, but the War Department is
still of the opinion that his visit to Italy would not be timely.
With reference to the method in which the clothing is consigned,
DECLASSIFIED
State Dept. Letter, 1-11-72
By J. Scheuble Date FEB 22 1972
Dejectment
of -
INTERNATE OF
ABOVE
the Var Department's position is as you set it forth in Point 3 of your
message: this, also, is subject to the recommendations and views of the
theater commander 88 to the most suitable manner of handling the clothing
which the War Department has requested. The cause of the delay, and the
chief difficulty in accomplishing the arrangements is said to be the
insistance on free distribution of the clothing.
In the last paragraph of your message you made reference to
a statement about all supplies which were contributed being put in an
Allied pool and being turned aside to other countries. This statement
is not correct: the supplies of clothing will be shipped to the areas
or the countries for which they were intended or for which they were con-
tributed. Untrue rumors and statements on this subject have been cir-
culated, for the purpose of making mischief, according to the War Relief
Control Board. The correct facts about the distribution of clothing
will be published very soon in Italy and elsewhere; arrangements are now
being nade for this.
With reference to the activities and the status of private
relief agencies on a voluntary basis, such agencies as the American Relief
for Italy, Incorporated, the State Department, after consulting the
President's War Relief Control Board and other agencies that are interested,
has taken the position that relief in freed areas during the period of the
emergency should be carried out through governmental channels, and that
voluntary private rolief agencies should complement end supplement action
of the government BO far as such complementary activities are possible
within the limits of the supplies available and other facilities essential
to relief operations, such as shipping space, port acceptances, and others.
Also, this is the view of the Department with reference to American Relief
for Italy, Incorporated, and the nature and extent of its present plans
for operations in Italy and its plans for the future operations.
It is requested that Murphy be informed of the above.
STETTIBIUS
(Acting)
LA:RT
PARAPHRASED BY
DCR:LOW 8/9/44
705)"
7ill Jayles penn
has
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 10, 1944.
MEMORANDUM FOR:
THE SECRETARY OF WAR.
For preparation of a reply.
F.D.R.
Missographed telegram to the Secretary of
State, received from "Strk", dated "Rome,
July 24, 1964, quoting mercage from Myron
Taylor for the President In re setting up
American Relief for Italy.
Ams
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 1, 1944.
MEMORANDUM FOR
HON, JONATHAN DANIELS:
What do you think we should do
next about Judge Marchisio? We might
take it up with the Secretary of State.
I have no objection to telling the Army
to send him over for a couple of weeks.
F.D.R.
Memorandum for the President from Hon.
Jonathan Daniels, 8/31/44, asking that
Judge Juvenal Marchisio, President of American
Relief for Italy, Inc., be permitted to go to
Italy. Attached is memorandum for the President
from Gen. Watson, 8/31/44, with attached memorandum
from the Acting Secretary of War, 8/31/44,
a copy of which has been retained for our files.
AUG 31 1944
MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT:
Subject: Proposed Trip by Judge Juvenal Marchisio.
1. I an advised that you desire that the Nar Department
make arrangements for the travel of Judge Juvenal Marchisio to
Italy for the purpose of making a survey of civilian relief
problems on behalf of the American Relief for Italy, Inc., of
which organization Judge Marchisio is the President. I believe
this decision involves certain considerations which should be
brought to your attention.
2. The War Department is continually in receipt of re-
quests from individuals and organizations in the United States
for permission to visit theaters of operations for the purpose
of making observations on the ground. These requests have come
from all types of relief, religious and welfare groups. On ad-
vice of theater commanders that the conditions in military areas,
including Italy, are not sufficiently stabilised to permit the
introduction of such persons into the areas, the War Department
has uniformly resisted such applications. To relax this posi-
tion in the case of Judge Marchisie will, in my opinion, make
it extremely difficult to maintain our policy. Only recently,
on the advice of the Chief of Staff, has permission been denied
to the introduction of clerical personnel into Italy whose only
purpose was to engage in spiritual ministrations.
3. In spite of the most active efforts it has not yet been
possible to obtain British agreement to introduction into Italy
for free distribution through non-military channels of relief
supplies provided by American Relief for Italy, Inc. The British
Army Staff, on advice from London, has maintained that during
the military period of responsibility the distribution of relief
supplies in Italy should be limited to those provided on a com-
bined basis through military channels. It now appears that a
basis for agreement with the British military on this point may
be agreed in the near future. I an fearful that to permit Judge
Marchisio to go to Italy at this time as a representative of
private American charity will jeopardize the success of the
Army's efforts to obtain distribution in Italy of the relief sup-
plies provided by Judge Marchisio's organisation.
4. In view of the foregoing considerations I respectfully
urge you to reconsider your decision to permit Judge Marchisio
to go to Italy at this time.
(Signed) ROBERT P. PATTERSON
ACTING Secretary of War.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
tile
THE SECRETARY
V
August 29, 1944
Personal and Confidential 1
MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT
Attached is a letter of
August 3 from Mr. Myron C.
Taylor, together with its
enclosure. Mr. Taylor asked
that they be brought to your
personal attention.
UFCLASSIFIED
State Dept. Letter, 1-11-72
By J. Scheuble Date FEB 22 1972
CH
COPY:S:ARK
m.Jaylor forder 4-44
THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TO HIS HOLINESS THE POPE
2 Via Boncompagni
Rome, August 3, 1944.
PERSONAL AND TRENTAL
Dear Mr. Secretary:
During the last few years I have sent you from time
to time the letters that I have received from a dis-
tinguished correspondent in London. These letters had
to do with settlements during and after the war and the
creation of an international organization to preserve
the peace of the world.
Some little time before I left home for my present
destination I wrote my British correspondent inquiring
whether - because of the progress of the war - the
views he had expressed in previous letters had been
modified or expanded. I have now had forwarded from my
office the enclosed private and confidential letter
which I think will be of interest to you. The President
and yourself have had access to the previous correspon-
dence; no copies of it, however, are on file either at
the White House or at the State Department, and it is
not desired that the present letter should reach the
files or be offered for reading by others than the
President and yourself. I have eliminated the name and
title of the author.
I assume that the President 1s absent and that you
will bring this letter to his attention upon his return.
I am not sending a copy to him personally because of his
absence.
With kindest regards, believe me
Sincerely yours,
Enclosure:
MYRON C. TAYLOR
Copy of letter dated
June 6, 1944.
The Honorable
Cordell Hull,
DECLASSIFIED
Secretary of State,
State Dept. Letter, 1-11-72
Washington.
FEB 22 1972
By J. Scheuble Date
C o py
Personal and Private
6th June 1944.
My dear Myron Taylor,
I received your letter of May 22nd a few days ago, in
which you wondered how far the views I had put to you in
previous letters had been modified or expanded owing to the
events of the war or the lapse of time itself. I have
accordingly refreshed my memory with copies of these letters
and am interested to find how little I should be inclined to
change any of their general conclusions.
As regards the European situation I still believe that
the right ultimate solution 1s some sort of loose Federation
or Commonwealth of the main body of European nations west
of the Russian frontier. In such a Commonwealth a chastened
and regenerated Germany must obviously play her part, and
that is why I am all against long term punishment and all in
favor of drastic punishments, economic and territorials, to
be carried out at the moment of victory. A good deal of that
will be looked after by those who have been the victims of
German oppression, as well as by internal trouble in Germany
itself. But I would not, for instance, wait for any peace
treaty before expelling the German population of East Prussia
and other districts which are to go to Poland, and beginning
to colonize them with the Poles whom Russia 1s I gather
willing to release.
I fully realise that the conception of a European
Commonwealth, which Churchill and almost every speaker in the
recent House of Commons debate have blessed, may not be very
palatable to the Russians, and that there may be an initial
stage in which we may be mainly concerned in bringing to-
gether the states of Western Europe and letting them form a
nucleus of the future European Union. But that should be
only a transitory stage and should not be allowed, by the
consistent exclusion or depression of Germany, to drive her
into Russia's arms. The Russian system expanding to the
Rhine might very well become a menace to Western civiliza-
tion such as Mackinder has envisaged in his book. In any
case I still feel as strongly as ever that neither this
country, nor Russia nor the United States, could, for vary-
ing reasons, become actual members of a European Common-
wealth though concerned actively in facilitating and spon-
soring it during the early years of its growth. You will
find the argument on this developed in a recent lecture by
Sir Walter Layton which I think has been freely published
on your side, as well as in Coudenhove-Kalergi's latest
book, and also in one of the chapters in my little book
"The Framework of the Future" which I sent you some time
ago.
There
-2-
There 1s, however, one aspect of the matter which may
confront us whether we like it or not. Judging from what
1s happening in the Balkans, I think also in Italy, and
probably, when the time comes, in Germany and in her satel-
lites, there 1s very little immediate vitality or energy
in the Democratic Parties as compared with the enthusiasm
and ruthless aggressiveness of the Communist Parties, who
will certainly not miss the opportunity afforded by the
breakdown of Germany in order to seize power at the criti-
cal moment. In this they may be helped by the very fact
that there 1s no real essential difference between Fascism,
Nazism and Communism in that the kind of young men who
have been ardent Nazis or Fascists may many of them easily
become ardent Communists. We may therefore have to face
the possibility of a preliminary stage of widespread
Communism, or something near it, followed no doubt in time
by a reaction towards more moderate and democratic policies.
Meanwhile both the movement towards the Extreme Left and
the subsequent reaction may all help to tone down the
extreme Nationalism which has broken up Europe and in that
way ease the path towards European reconstruction.
One thing, as I said in my letter of February of last
year, that it is really important for you to realise, is that
economic policy in these matters cannot be divorced from the
political objective. If there 18 to be any form of European
Union it cannot be on the basis of maintaining the Most
Favoured Nation Clause, but only on the assumption that the
European nations, like those of the British Empire, are
entitled to give each other whatever special economic terms
they wish in order to promote and encourage their Union, and
that that cannot be any ground for complaint by any nation
outside. I will go even further in expressing my strong
personal views that the present economic outlook of your
Government bears very little relation to the economic trend
in the world as a whole and looks much more, as seen from
this end, like an attempt to restore nineteenth century
individualist economics in a world which has inevitably
become nationalist, even though the process 1s to some ex-
tent concealed from American eyes by the immense development
of the United States behind a nationalist economic policy in
the past. It may well be in the interest of the United
States themselves, as it was in ours a hundred years ago,
to lower their tariffs, possibly even to indulge in Free
Trade. But that doesn't mean that there is the least likeli-
hood of other countries following their example, or indeed
that it would be for their benefit or for that of the world
as a whole that they should do 80.
You
-3-
You will, I daresay, have studied the valuable monograph
entitled "The United States in the World Economy" published
by your Department of Commerce. From that it is clear that
the great European depression between the two wars was not
due, as current legend sometimes asserts, to high tariffs,
quotas and exchange restrictions, even if your 1930 Hawley-
Smoot tariff may have accentuated it. It was due primarily
to the nations, more particularly of Europe, getting back
onto the gold standard with the help of lavish American
lending and 80 having the whole basis of their economic life
pulled away from under them when Americans, first for the
sake of their own boom and secondly because of their own
slump, withdrew their support. The Most Favoured Nation
Clause prevented them from giving each other mutual prefer-
ence and 80 keeping trade and credit circulating within
their own borders, and was therefore a main contributory
cause of the disaster. The memorandum points out that the
only possibility for a world of free multilateral trading
and investment depends on the future internal as well as
external stability of the American economic system. But
who can guarantee that? The memorandum on the other hand
also points out that the other countries recovered even
quicker than the United States, or Canada which was closely
tied up with you, as a result of the various measures which
may have impeded world trade but stimulated domestic produc-
tion.
I think you will find that all the nations practically
after this war will want to build up their own economics on
the basis of stability of employment and maintenance of their
domestic standards. For that purpose they will have to keep
their hands free to impose whatever regulations may at any
moment be convenient and will be very reluctant to commit
themselves to any far-reaching agreement tending in the direc-
tion of freer international trade. In our own case we shall
have tremendous difficulties, for many years I think, in pay-
ing our way in the world, 1.0., in being able to export
enough to cover our immediate requirements in the shape of
raw materials and such food stuffs as we cannot reasonably
produce in this country. But that means that we shall have
to give vigorous protection to our domestic agriculture and
keep out unnecessary luxuries and manufactured goods, and
that we can only afford to relax that policy in return for
definite concessions in other markets, and not merely on the
off-chance of increasing our export trade in the world at
large under a regime of low tariffs and Most Favoured Nation
Clause.
I would go even further and express my own grave
doubts
-4-
doubts whether anything in the nature of the proposed Mone-
tary Fund is either likely to come off or to be of benefit to
the world if it did. It 18 after all based on the assump-
tion that the maximum of international trade is the main
object and that parity of exchange is an important contribu-
tory factor in international trade and investment. But for
countries which base their policy, as most countries will
in future, on stability of employment and production and
consequently also on the stability of the price level in-
ternally, it will be far more important to be free to exer-
cise complete control over exchange and investment than to
enjoy the minor convenience of international parity of
exchange.
In all these matters we here seem to be in a state of
considerable uncertainty. The Government has just issued
a While Paper on Employment which is based entirely on the
principle that stability of employment depends on the regula-
tion and control of expenditure and investment. But it only
applies the principle with regard to domestic expenditure
and investment and makes no attempt to follow it up in its
application to the control of imports or of foreign invest-
ments. I have just come across an article in your New York
Times which draws attention to this lack of illogical coher-
ence on our part and enclose a copy of it in case you may
not have seen it.
I see Mr. Cordell Hull has been raising the question of
a world organization to preserve peace, as indeed has
Mr. Churchill. My own profound conviction 1s that 80 long
as it is clearly understood that the world organization
exists for conference and conciliation and, as such, definitely
excludes coercion from its purview, it may fulfil a very use-
ful function in creating world opinion in favour of peace and
in helping to adjust many minor differences, which, if allowed
to develop, might become more serious. On the other hand, if
the world organisation professes, again as such, to enforce
peace it will inevitably break down and by its very existence
paralyse the action of individual nations who might be pre-
pared to preserve peace. The League of Nations played a very
useful part during the years between 1925, when we definitely
rejected the Geneva protocol, and 1935, when we committed
outselves to the coercion of Italy by sanctions. During
those ten years British policy made it quite clear that it
did not believe in the use of sanctions and only regarded
the League as an instrument of conciliation. If that policy
had been followed it might have been quite easy for France
and ourselves together quietly to tell Italy that we could
not allow her to swallow Abyssinia, and to arrive at some
reasonable
-5-
reasonable compromise. As it was, once the thing was referred
to the League of Nations, the first step was to hamstrong
the Abyssinians, by saying that arms should not be sent to
either disputant. After that it was quite obvious to
Mussolini that the League never meant real business and he
got away with it. On the other hand the pinpricking policy
of the League 80 exasperated him that it drove him straight
into Hitler's arms, whereas in the spring of that year he
had been prepared at Stresa to cooperate with France and
ourselves in setting definite limits to Hitler's restless
ambition. So I definitely take the view that those who
favoured "putting the teeth into the League" were mainly
responsible for the present war, and that any similar policy
18 far more likely to promote a world war than to prevent it.
In all that I have dictated above I have been frankly
expressing my personal opinions. They are very far indeed
from being the opinions of the British Government as a
whole or of Mr. Churchill, or of the main body of British
public opinion. All the same I believe the event will
prove them right. Anyhow, I have stated them with uncom-
promising frankness.
You must have been greatly relieved to know that Rome
has not only been liberated but liberated intact.
With every good wish,
Yours sincerely,
The Hon. Myron Taylor.
m. Vatican Jaylor peacer 44
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
WASHINGTON
August 29. 1944
MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT
A reply to Mr. Taylor's letter of July 17 has been drafted in
accordance with your memorandum of August 15, 1944, and is attached
hereto for your signature, if you approve.
CH
Enclosures:
1. From Mr. Taylor,
July 17, 1944.
2. Draft reply.
Department of State
BUREAU
DIVISION
}
SE
ENCLOSURE
TO
8-28-44
Letter drafted
ADDRESSED TO
The President
- . - --- -
1
-
m Thnu
THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
Ma mallens
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TO HIS HOLINESS THE POPE
Rome, Italy, July 17, 1944
&
rg
My dear Mr. Presiden t:
I have the honor to submit herewith an account of my audience
with His Holiness, Pope Pius XII, which took place at the Vatican
on July 12, 1944.
In my previous audiences (two at which discussions occurred,
the third accompanied by Secretary Stimson, which was formal in
character and presented no questions for serious discussion) at-
tention was directed to the following questions:
The possibility of the spread of communium in Europe and a
very real danger of its development in a strong way in Italy,
especially in the period of political and social reconstruction.
The hope was expressed that Allied Armies would not leave
Italy for a long time to come. That their presence would have
a stabilizing influence upon the people and the politicians. I
expressed the opinion that in Italy as in all liberated countries
I believed it to be the policy of the American Government to lend
its assistance until such times as, in accord with the principles
of the
TO His Excellency
Franklin Delano Roosevelt
President of the United States of America
Washington.
-2-
of the Atlantic Charter, a stable government expressing the will
of the people could be constituted.
The subject of Communism raises the question of the Russian
attitude toward Poland. I assume the principal preoccupation of
the Holy See in the Polish boundary question arises from the fact
that within the territory east of the projected Curzon Line a
portion of the population is of Roman Catholic religious persua-
sion. The concern of the Holy See naturally follows to protect
its children in the free exercise of their faith, and that assur-
ance by Russia must be given and acted upon to guarantee them
therein. The question then arises how could such guarant oes be
expressed and could they be relied upon?
In viewing the broader question of the Russian attitude re
freedom of religion generally - following my discussion with His
Holiness in 1941 and 1942, I carried on a lengthy discussion in
London with Russian Ambassador Maisky. We reached a point where
the Ambassador enquired what form of statement of assurance to be
made by Marshal Stalin would be acceptable. I did not feel competent
to phrase such a vital statement without consultation. I informed
His Holiness that I discussed the subject with the President of the
United States, with Secretary Hull end others, including members of
the Roman Catholic Hierarchy in America. The following statement
was evolved:
I. "Because of the loyal participation in the defense of
the Fatherland by all Russian people under the direction
of constituted authority in the State, the Soviet
Government by interpreting and applying Article 124
of the U. S. S. R. constitution publicly proclaims
complete freedom of religious teaching and freedom
of worship in all Soviet territory.
II. "Any abuse of these privileges, either to organize
movements or incite the people to overthrow the Go-
vernment, will be dealt w. th in each case according
to law".
I did not feel in a position to make use of this statement
- anticipating as we did that I would soon be returning to the
Vatican and that I would present the suggestion to His Holiness
in person for his consideration.
It was hardly a subject for telegraphic correspondence.
Events prevented my return until the present time.
It would seem timely to discuss this subject now, when the
British, Russian and Chinese diplomatic representatives are be-
ginning conversations in Washington, on a preliminary draft of
a plan for on International Organization to preserve the peace
of the world.
I alluded in general terms to this plan in my first and
second audiences with His Holiness. It would seem that in the
early stages of that discussion the question of religious freedom
might well be put forward. Good faith on which such E. great under-
taking will need rest and on which its permanency will depend is
a primary religious precept.
What, then, can one suggest to Marshal Stalin? One cannot
negotiate in a vacuum: a. formula is essential. The dangers of
inaction are often greater than mistaken methods chosen.
Many of the great questions which confront the world today
are interdependent. For example, one of the most essential is
lisarmament of certain nations to prevent a relapse into war -
this can lead to reduction of armaments by all nations, curtail-
ing the crushing burden of armanents upon the backs of the people.
Another armament race would breed another war. The present war
has drained the economic world to its dregs. All nations have
suffered as never before. The burden of war debt will be borne
by generations unborn. The need for control of armaments produc-
tion and reduction seems obvious.
The developed strength of Russia and its greater potential
due to unlimited natural resources, a great and growing population,
its ctorious position in Europe, must be realized, and extension
of cooperative arrangements already accomplished must be undertaken
in the interest of world peace.
Prompt creation of a world organization, even while the war
progresses, will pave the way, future security being guaranteed,
to solve many of the problems created by the present war and aid
in earlier reconstruction and rehabilitation.
-50
Admitting the German Army cannot win the war, the earlier the
army surrenders, not only will lives and property be spared but the
earlier can the processes be set up for political stability and
economic improvement for the people of Germany and of the world.
The world organization has then become the medium for the determi-
nation of war problems - its first members, the United and Associated
Nations - become an active and potent body for the peaceful settle-
ment of disputes, its judicial arm determining justiciable questions,
its security and enforcement arm maintaining order and stability.
The moment is opportune - it may never come again in so promising a
form. The opportunity promptly to create an international organiza-
tion, to preserve peace with justice, should not be ignored or ne-
glected. It is the best hope of mankind.
His Holiness followed this discussion with increasing interest
and favorable comment. On each occasion I advanced these and other
points to bear on the main question of the surrender of Germany, hoping
that by indicating in general terms, that plans are already laid to
deal with all phases of Axis problems and the practical necessity for
a world organization promptly created to deal with such problems at
proper moments, as orderly military procedure takes the place of
active warfare.
Following my last audience ith the Pope, I had a long discus-
sion with Monseigneur Tardini, Political Adviser to the Pope, who
has very pronounced ideas on Russia and the spread of Communism. He
-6-
objected to item II in the formula recited on page 3 hereof,
but approved item I, as did His Holiness. I have promised to give each
a copy of the formula and of the accompanying statement attached here-
to (marked "A").
I attach hereto a translation of a portion of a speech made by
a communist member of the Italian Government, July 10, 1944 (marked
"B").
I attach a memorandum regarding Communism which the Pope dis-
cussed briefly in our first endience, but which was rewritten by
Monseigneur Tardini (marked "C").
A further audience will be accorded me on Wednesday, July 19.
As you will have noted, my principal efforts are directed
First: to convince the Pope and other Vation authrities
that the German army must surrender unconditionally;
second: that cooperation with Russia in the interest of
victory and permanent world peace is essential;
Third: that an International Organization must be created
at as early a date as possible to implement the settlement of war
problems and to insure future peace. I have not felt free to use
specific details of any such project.
With highest regards, believe 200
Sincerely yours,
Enclosures.
Enclosure "A"
"Provided the Russians would make and mean it, what is needed
is a constructive suggestion as to what kind of statement concerning
religious freedom would be satisfactory.
"Any specific reference to past events would not necessarily
have to be included in such a statement. Any attempt to justify
past events would not gain acceptanc e, and a confession can hardly
be expected in the circumstances. As for the face saving require-
ments of the situation, they could be met by the following, and
if sincerely made, it might constitute a meaningful declaration:
"Because of the loyal participation in the defense of the
Fatherland by all Russian people under the direction of the
constituted authority in the State, the Soviet Government by
interpreting and applying Article 124 of the U.S.S.R. consti-
tution publicly proclaims complete freedom of religion, in-
cluding freedom of worship in all Soviet territory.
"Any abuse of these privileges, either to organize move-
ments or incite the people towards the overthrow of the
Government, will be dealt with in each individual case ac-
cording to law".
"Any action taken by the Soviet Government which would justify
such a statement would greatly contribute to present morale and
future harmony among the nations united in this war. If the Soviet
-2-
(Enclosure "A" continued)
Union will not take such action, it would be better not even to
imply a commitment regarding the acceptability of an ambiguous
statement which, by having on the record just another untrustworthy
declaration, would only aggravate the difficulty of postwar dis-
cussions".
Enclosure "B"
Excerpt from a speech made in Rome by the Communist
Member of the Italian Government, July 10, 1944 (translation):
"We are aware that in the past there have been psychological
and organized obstacles to this unity of action (e.g. between the
Communists, Socialists and Catholics). We have now done the ne-
cessary to eliminate these obstacles. Above all I have stated,
as the spokesmen of the Communist Party, and I repeat it here in
Rome, the Capital of the Catholic World, this declaration, namely
that we are respecting the Catholic faith, the traditional faith
of the majority of the Italian people".
(The speaker added that heexpected reciprocal comprehension
on the part of the Catholics).
COPY
Enclosure "0"
1. In the U. S. S. R. the situation as regards the Catholic
Church does not show any substantial improvement from what it was
before the war.
The anti-religious Soviet legislation always remains in vigour.
Besides, the now very few survivors of the Catholic Clergy who
had been arrested in Russian territory since the Soviet Revolution,
were not set free nor were they afforded any possibility of exercising
their sacred ministry. Only a certain number of Catholic priests,
through an agreement with the Polish Government, in the second half
of 1942, could leave the U. S. S. R., together with the Polish Army
which was then leaving those regions. Also in this case not all the
priests, previously imprisoned and deported from Poland, were set
free, nor does it appear that they wore set free after that date.
It has never been possible to learn of the fate of Archbishop
Edward Profittlich, Apostolic Administrator of Esthonia, arrested in
Tallin in June 1941 and deported towards the Urals.
2. Neither have certain events which have happened within the
last two years, any value in modifying the above stated judgment about
the religious situation in Russia.
It is true that, even before the death (December 1940) of the
well-known director of the Godless organization - Jaroslawsk (Gubelmann)-
the atheistic propaganda had practically been suspended. Butthis sus-
pension, which did not at all mean the suppression of existing anti-
religious litterature, is very far from constituting a positive
recognition of religious liberty, and it is not difficult to find an
explanation for it in the desire to take into account the obvious
reasons of political and military opportuneness and the psychological
needs of a people in war.
-2-
The publication of a book entitled "The Truth about Religion
in Russie", is due also to propaganda purposes. This book, very
widely diffused abroad in its various translations, and almost impos-
sible to find in the U. S. S. R.,, is reticent, inexact and sometimes
contains falsehoods.
The following information given by the "United Nations News",
June 28, is a proof of the kind of propaganda which is being carried
on in this sense. According to the wookly review, "Colliers", Russia
has at the moment more than four millions of religious who care regu-
larly for about 5,000 Orthodox Churches, 1,800 Roman Catholic Churches,
1,300 Mahomedan Mosques, 1,100 Protestant Churches, and 1000 Synagogues.
For what regards the Roman Catholic Church this information is complete-
ly false.
Even the world press brought out the propaganda side of the
resppezrance of the Patriarchate of Mosca (September 1943).
3. The Soviet Communism - even after the suppression of the
Comintern (May 1943) - continues to be the propagating center of a most
active Communist Propaganda throughout the world. All leads one to
believe that this propaganda aims at diffusing those principles and
doctrines, which remain today as the foundation of Soviet Communism,
since they have never been renounced. These principles are essentially
materialistic and the doctrines based on them destroy the personality
of the individual to the advantage of the State, proclaim class-war,
tend to the dictatorship of the proletariate and antagonize Religion.
This propaganda is carried on especially in countries through
which the war has passed or is passing, and avails itself of the very
miserable conditions of these peoples. It is well known how it is also
being carried on in Italy, which unfortunately presents, because of
the actual economical political and social situation, a very favorable
congan
"TPTe
PC
-3-
ground.
Such propaganda is indeed very cleverly carried on, nor does it
reveal to the inexperienced the erroneous principles from which it
springs and on which it bases itself; in fact it rather proclaims oven
a tollerance and en understanding for the Catholic Religion, respect
for the Faith and religious practice and offers collaboration. Thus
is renewed the policy of the "Extended Hand", already tried in other
countries. However, because of the sad consequences which it has had,
one cannot but entertain very serious concern.
4. Even recently there have been authoritative and not unimportant
declarations by prominent persons and by representatives of various
sections of the press, expressing from time to time, optimistic judg-
ments on the religious situation in Russia and on the character of
Soviet Communism at the present time and on its forms of propaganda.
Notwithstanding all this, in view of what has been stated above
and after the sad experiences of the past, it is necessary to follow
a policy of watchful expectation and reserve.
JULY 13, 1944.
in
/ i E / / in 8 1 Zop ! : / & :
#
E
They / Room R / / ! : / / / R I Dry / in 11
21. Jaylor you wavy
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 15, 1944.
MEMORAN DUM FOR
THE SECRETARY OF STATE:
FOR PREPARATION OF REPLY FOR
MY SIGNATURE.
F.D.R.
Letter from Son. Myron Taylor, Rome, Italy,
7/17/44, to the President, transmitting
an account of his audience with His Holiness,
Pope Plus YII, which took place et the Vatican
on 7/12/44.
August 29. 1944.
MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT
A reply to Mr. Taylor's letter of July 17 has been drafted in
accordance with your memorandum of August 15, 1944, and is attached
hereto for your signature, if you approve.
Enclosures:
1. From Mr. Taylor,
July 17, 1944.
2. Draft reply.
My dear Myron:
Your letter of July 17 on your interview with His
Holiness on July 12, 1944 and subsequent conversation with
Monsignor Tardini was most interesting. I trust that you
will continue to keep me informed of Vatican thinking on
these important problems which are of 80 much concern to
us all.
I have considered at length the question of obtaining
some Soviet assurance on the religious question but have
reached the reluctant conclusion that at this particular
moment it would be unwise to raise the issue openly. Our
Russian allies, as well you know, are most sensitive, and
for us to press for a. commitment from them now might be in-
terpreted as an affront in view of the various statements
they have made during the past year concerning freedom of
worship in the Soviet Union. For the same reason I fear
it would be highly dangerous to inject the question of
religious freedom into the Dumbarton Oaks discussions, in-
asmuch as such discussion could be directed toward only
one participant.
This is an issue which perhaps we cannot and should
not attempt to force by any frontal assault. Might it not
be preferable to exert our influence quietly and constantly
and, instead of seeking to obtain a formal commitment to
respect freedom of religion, to use our good offices when-
ever possible in the practical tests of Soviet respect for
that principle? The Vatican itself, from your report, is
wary of statements and intent upon concrete application.
I am looking forward to your further reports and shall
be interested in having your reaction to the foregoing.
Sincerely yours,
The Honorable
Myron C. Taylor,
Special Representative of the
President at the Vatican,
Vatioan City.
Relations
belongs_to