Memorandum of Conversation with Secretary of State Dean Acheson and President Harry S. Truman
Images (2)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
183390126
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2file
IAD for SECKET
61
c
March 2, 1949
Memorandum of Discussion with
The President
ARCKIVES s NATIONAL AND
a
RECORDS
-
SERVICA*
Subject: North Atlantic Pact
I told the President that it was necessary to raise with him
again the question we had discussed on Monday of the relationship
of Italy to the North Atlantic Pact. I brought the President up to
date on the Tuesday meeting with the Ambassadors and on the two
meetings, one on Monday the other on Tuesday evening with Senators
Connally, George and Vandenberg.
I then went over with the President the reasons for and against
the inclusion of Italy in the Atlantic Pact as contained in the attached
memorandum. The President had and wished to keep the ribbon copy
of this memorandum. [SEE C.F. you Boy 34-2194844, FOLDER 6"]
I then said that it seemed to me that the real issue was not at the
present time on the merits of the arguments outlined in the memorandum.
The real issue grew out of the position into which we now found ourselves.
There had never been a well thought out United States position on the
inclusion or exclusion of Italy from the Atlantic Pact which had received
the approval of General Marshall or Mr. Lovett and the matter had never
been presented for Presidential decision. Nevertheless, in the course
of the negotiations, the United States negotiators had drifted into the
position that the European nations must take a position upon Italy. This
position had now crystallized. France was so emphatically in favor of
Italian participation that she had stated, and we believed she meant it,
that she would have to reconsider her whole relation to the Pact if Italy
was not to be included. Canada now took an affirmative attitude in favor
of Italian inclusion. The Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg, although
not as positive as Canada, were novpositive rather than merely non-
objecting. The British had stated that they would withdraw their ob-
jections if the other nations around the table were in favor of Italian
inclusion and we thought that at the next meeting the British objection
would be withdrawn. Therefore, the United States would find itself in
the position of either accepting the European judgment or rejecting it.
I believe that if we reject it we would have serious difficulty with
France, considerable delay in the conclusion of the treaty and a good
deal of publicity about a split among the Western powers. It seemed
TOP SECRET
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to