Transcript of Conversation of Washington Conference with Regard to Request for Military Assistance from Western Union Countries
Images (5)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
183390326
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 5110
2
n
5
TOP SECRET
DECLASSIFIED
E. O. 11652, Sec. 3(E) and 5(D) or E
Dept. of State letter, Aug.9,1973 7-23-25
Copy of Verbatim Transcript of
WASHINGTON CONFERENCE WITH REGARD TO
NLT- HL. NARS Date 4.2776
REQUEST FOR MILITARY ASSISTANCE FROM
WESTERN UNION COUNTRIES
and
(April 4, 1949)
ARCHIVES AND
'NATIONAL RECORDS SERVICE
CHAIRMAN (SECRETARY ACHESON): I understand that you have "been
working working hard today and that you have reached a tentative
proposal, at any rate, which you have submitted to us and we have gone
over a draft of our reply. We have gone over those documents and they
are entirely satisfactory to us. I understand that you have suggested
some alterations in the roply which we should make and that is also
satisfactory to us. These documents are entirely agreeable to uso I
also understand that perhaps you would like to have some fuxther tall
about these documents and 11 you would like to do that perhaps we might
withdraw while you do it.
MR. BEVIN: There is only one point. I think everyone has done
very well in this. But this is just one little worry. It is a question
of procedure in the Houge of Commons that affects me. Will you look at
paragraph 6 of the document, please. It is the middle words, Mr. Achegon.
It says: #In the event of a favourable raply in relation to the above
request, a detailed statement of the specific needs of the signatories of
the Brusgels Treaty for the year 1949/1950*, and then you go on to say
nof which the United States has had informal knowledge through its Obm
severs in the various defence committees of the Brussels Treaty organies
zations" Well, I have never owned up that I have given you any treaty
And while the observers agree, I have not said they have and I have not
said they have not. Do you desire the observers to be mentioned in thi B
document? Could you take the words "In the event of a favourable reply
in relation to the above request, a detailed statement of the specific
needs of the signatories of the Brussela Treaty for the yeax 1949/1950
will be transmitted to the United States Government at the earliest
posaible date"? And leave that other phrase out?
CHAIRMAN: That is all right.
MR. BEVIN: Could you take that other out?
CHAIRNAN: Yes.
MR. BEVIN: That suits me. I°m sorry for our present rules. Thank
you very much.
CHAIRMEN: We agres, Mr. Bevin.
MR. BEVIN: Thank you very much. There is one word that is suggested
to me by Mr. Jebb in paragraph 2. that is, that the word "situation* should
TOP SECRET
be put
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to