Memorandum of Conversation with Secretary of State Dean Acheson, Senator Alexander Smith, and Jack McFall
Images (3)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
183391139
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 3app a
SCURE
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
-
Memorandum of Conversation
305
DATE: November 30, 1949
SUBJECT:
Senator Alexander Smith's Observations re Far Eastern Developments.
CHAIR
PARTICIPANTS:
Senator Alexander Smith
The Secretary
ARCHIVES "NATIONAL RECORDS AND
Conf
H - Mr. McFall
.
SERVICE"
COPIES TO:
G - Mr. Rusk
FE - Mr. Butterworth
s/A - Dr. Jessup
A - Mr. Hulten
S/P - Mr. Kennan
1-1493
Senator Smith opened the conversation by stating that he had come to see
the Secretary just to give him the benefit of some observations that he felt
quite strongly about in connection with Far Eastern developments.
He first made reference to what he considered to be a "divided military
authority in the Far East. " It was pointed out that General MacArthur had com-
plete control of both the economic and military problems in Japan and the
surrounding islands and that the U.S. Navy was apparently in control in China,
and in his and several other's opinions this provoked a state of affairs that was
most undesirable and inefficient. The Senator did not appear to be too clear in
his own mind as to what he thought should be done, but the Secretary gave him to
understand that we had no military control of any kind in China now (the Navy
having withdrawn) and that any military decisions affecting China rest in
the Pentagon Building. The Secretary told Senator Smith that we were giving con-
sideration to the possibility of establishing an ambassador-at-large somewhere in
the general area of the Far East who might be used to tie in loose ends and serve
as a focal point for representing our interest in that area. It was emphasized,
however, that no decision had been made on this subject as yet.
The Senator next expressed his serious concern about the disadvantages that
would accrue to the United States in the recognition of China. He stated that it
was his considered opinion that the ground for the current Chinese development
had been laid in Russia as long as 20 years ago and that the Russians had worked
assiduously
DECLASSIFIED
E. O. 11652, Sec. 3(E) and 5(D) or (B)
Dept. of State letter, Aug. 2.28.75 9, 1973,
By NLT HC NARS Date 5-476
SECHED
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to