Memorandum of Telephone Conversation with Secretary of State Dean Acheson and Secretary of Agriculture Charles Brannan
Images (2)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
183391664
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2314
CENFIDENTIAL
3.
90
AND
RECORDS
: SERVICEM
March 22, 1950
Secretary Brannan called me today and said that he wanted me
to know that he was solidly behind me and thought the California
speeches were very successful. He said he had three ideas in
which he thought he could be helpful.
1) He said he was schedule to speak before the ADA meeting
and would like to make some complimentary references to me
and perhaps take a vigorous approach of attack upon my crities
rather than just say something in defense. He wanted to have
his people check with someone in the Department and I suggested
they check whatever he wanted to say with Mr. Webb or Mr. B arrett,
or both. (In connection with the ADA meeting, I am under the im
pression I was invited to speak to this meeting and refused. I
wonder if it would be a good or a bad idea for me to make a brief
appearance and say that I was "speeched out'' for the moment, but
just wanted to greet my old friends. May I have a recommendation
on this?)
2) Secretary Brannan said that he was talking with Mr. Bill
Thatcher who controls a network of radio stations from St. Paul
through Montana which reach a large audience of farmers. He was
going to get Mr. Thatcher to try to use the radio stations to defend
me. He thought that a great many of the attacks that were being
made were directed at these people and that Mr. Thatcher was a
good friend and supporter of his and he felt quite sure he would be
willing to turn in and help me in the present difficulties.
3) He said that in connection with the billion dollar cut in the
ECA, he was drafting a statement which would take the following
line: The billion dollar cut was not welcomed by the Agriculture
Department for if the Congress made that cut, they would have to
appropriate the same amount of money for the Department of Agri
culture because if they take the agricultural commodities for ECA
out of surplus commodities instead of out of the normal channels of
trade, then the surplus commodities will increase by the same amount
and this would not be helpful to the agricultural program. Secretary
Brannsn wanted to know when it would be most helpful to release
DECLASSIFIED
E. o. 11652, Sec. 3(E) and 5(D) or (B)
Dept. of State letter,
SONFIDENTIAL
By NLT- He NARS Date 6-4-26
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to