Memorandum of Conversation with Secretary of State Dean Acheson, Ambassador of Italy Alberto Tarchiani, Minister of National Defense of Italy Randolfo Pacciardi, and Ridgway Knight
Images (4)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
193225942
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 4Copy 2 of 16 Copies
TOP SECRET - SEGURITY INFORMATION
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Memorandum of Conversation
pt
135 1560
MA 28
DATE: November 3, 1952 344 944
354
SUBJECT:
Trieste and the Fortheoming Exploratory Military Talks in
Belgrade
PARTICIPANTS: The Secretary
Mr. Ridgway B. Knight, WE
His Excellency Randolfo Pacciardi, Italian Minister of National
Defense
COPIES TO:
Ambassador Tarchiani, Italian Embassy
S
Embassy, Rome
EUR (2)
London
= the
EE (1)
Paris
WE (2)
Belgrade
RA (1)
USPOLAD, FTT
USUN, Hr. Byington
Defense
u. s. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
16-61120-1
Mr. Pacciardi gave me a letter from Prime Minister de Gasperi stressing the
essential importance of a reasonable solution of the Trieste question before
there can be question of military and political cooperation on the part of any
Italian Government with Yugoslavia (the text of this letter is attached).
Mr. Pacciardi declared that while he had not come to Washington to solve
the Trieste question, he had come to do his best in order to avoid a further
complication of the solution of this question. Mr. de Gasperi had been deeply
impressed by the fact that the United States, British and French Ambassadors
had been instructed to call on the Italian Government to inform it of the forth-
coming military talks in Belgrade. This was taken by the Italians as an indication
of the importance which we placed on these talks and increased their concern
accordingly. Mr. Pacciardi repeated the well-known Italian line that the more
Yugoslavia is integrated with the West in all fields, regardless of what happens
in Trieste, the worse becomes Italy's bargaining position. On several occasions
Mr. Pacciardi made it clear that regardless of what we have said to date, the
Italians expect some kind of an agreement to come out of the Belgrade military
talks. On several occasions and in different words, Mr. Pacciardi asked why,
if the military situation did not require it, it was necessary for us to proceed
with these military talks with Yugoslavia at this precise time in view of the
critical situation facing the Italian Government at home and which might become
a real government crisis if the Belgrade conversations became known as would
presumably be the case. He stressed the full cooperation which the Italian
E.O. 12356, Sec. 3.4
OP-SECRET - SEGURITY INFORIATION ity
90-11
By to
NLT Date 10/11/90
By
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to