Images (2)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
75849272
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2Reel I--p. 13
July 2
al .though I did not have the same degree of conviction about it that some of my brothron
Caliuntly
did. But it was quite interesting, toe the meetings of the Commission after the election
were rather different than before!
There was another aspect of the Commissi on's work which showed the same sort of
arthe
tendency.m Very early in the game, the question game up as to whether in our investigations
of the Executive Branch, we should go into the merits of legislation, and It was very
onter duty
clear to me that we should not do so, that what this Commission was set up to de was to
mida in provament in the or as they stuod.
balk about how you administenst the laws which were being administered by the government
9t
to say make recommund alions on the substance of legistation.
and/was not set cortain laws were not any good, because they involved the expendi-
job,
ture of a 1ot of money. That wasn t ourn cherge We had very sharp differences of opinion
princy
on that, some of which were never resolved. The whole question of government loan agencies,
the Anthich of debate
the agricultural policy, the power policy of the government, were entirely tangled up in
went into then mallers.
this business, and some of the Commission reports show there were strong dissents on that.
mathes
I think I dissented on half a dozen repor ts on the ground that they went into things which
collabor ated ou
were beyond our jurisdiction, gaying yhy, and Jim Rowe and I sort of split this, un.
I took
this
and ended; in a concurring disaunt
the legal view of it and dissented for that reason'/ and Jim was the fo llowwho went
attached the Comin mir's
on with the conourring opinion which said they were wrong anyway about thoir Kix criticism of
the legislation. Now that brings me to the next division of the notes which I have here,
which
have
to do with some attitudes of mine, some of the experiences which I had. Shall
ARCHINES
we go ahead with those now?
The next thing that I was going to talk about is some of the matters that I
carried in my head when I went back into the State Dep artment. The first one of those
are attitudes of mine having to do with the relationship of the United States to its
friends and to the rest of the world. In order to bring out some of that I have collected
a few speeches which I shall now read and hope that they will not be boring, but there
are some things here which are rather amusing. This is a speech which I made on Nov. 28,
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to