Images (14)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
75851215
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 1412/13/53 - Reel 6, Track 2, Page 1
MR. ACHESON:
They set up a group with Dana Wilgress [sounds like ] on it and various
we
people who were knowledgable in this field and I don't know who he
had I don't know whether we he had anyone, or whether they
working wi th them.
underedving this on their own.
were our
MR. NITZE:
No we had some people who cooperated with this effort. I think they are
intelligence people and, both from the State Department and the military
establishments, because it out coordinated NATO presentation.
came as a
MR. PERKINS:
Well Chuck Spafford was our repr sentative in the group, but he got his
information both from A1 Guenther's people and Washington military and
State Department.
MR. NITZE:
That's right.
MR. PERKINS:
And we had a great deal to do with writing the report, as I remember it,
but I've forgotten who actually did the detail work.
MR. ACHESON:
As I recall it, we went along with the reports pretty well. There was
N NATIONAL A
one part of it which I think we did not like and we had a substitute.
We were going to say we would agree with this report except a certain
ADMIN'
t's another
part of it and as to that the U.S. views are thus and so. I think they
not
of one of the meetings
were quite anxi ous not have that happen. During the reached a
compromise by which they reached a good part of ours and modified some
of theirs and it was put together. I have afeeling that that was done
in Rome.
MR. HARRIMAN:
In the TCC discussions this question, as I recall, didn't come up. There
was acceptance by the ministers that NATO should develop substantial
forces and the discussion, of course, surrounded what each country, what
in
the specific country we were analysing was able to contribute and--to
the force, and you had definitely done a good job of that at Ottawa
because there was no argument as to whether the NATO forces should or
should not be expanded. They all agreed that they should be expanded
and the discussion was what was possible and fair for each country to
do.
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to