Ask the Scholar
Page 7 of 14
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
5/15/54: Reel 3, Track 2, Page 7
Before that, we had not had any direct difficulty, but from this time
on we began to have a great deal. The Iranians closed the British
Consulates in January; that raised the temperature. From then on for
quite a few months we had a period where we had to fool around denying
things which we couldn't do and trying to do things which seemed possible.
And there there were four main points about which we talked; the Irn ians
1)
wanted a large loan which would finance then during their struggle with
the British. That we declined to give, and that caused difficulty with
2) them. We felt that we could go forward with Point Four help, and we were
quite willing to stretch the idea of Point Four so that it wouldn't-
didn't conform to its original ideas; but we used it for the purpose of
financing various imports. And we negotiated about that for quite a while.
Then there was the matter of military aid. We thought it important
3)
to support as far as we could the Shah and the maintenance of some sort
of order; we thought that this gâve us sone sort of a whole standing in
a country where we wanted to remain as long as we could. And in the
4)
fourth place we had to struggle with the British legal embargo. The British
had put out a notice that anyone who bought any oil from Iran would be sub-
ject to suit. We had a lot of people who I think more for the purpose of
causing agitation than for any business purpose would come to us and ask
us where we stood on this-what would we do. Our attitude publichy was one
the
g
of not trying to take a position, but privately we advised our people
U.S.
that it was unwise to get into this business because they would probably
get into trouble and we couldn't help them, and we didn't think it was very
helpful of them to get into this thing. That went on, largely through 1952,
until the fall of 1952. Then a whole lot of things began to happen all at
the same time. One of them was that this legal question came to a head.
We were being pressed more and more to say what our position was; the British
Page data
- Page
- 7
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- d5bc9b1aa70bf60e
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 75852016
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "75852016",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75852016",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Transcript of Princeton Seminar Discussion, Reel 3, Track 2",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75852016",
"collections": [
"Dean Acheson Papers",
"Princeton Seminars Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722169-06-01.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722169-06-01.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722169-06-01.jpg",
"imageCount": 14,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "75852016",
"label": "Transcript of Princeton Seminar Discussion, Reel 3, Track 2",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75852016"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "75852016",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75852016",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Transcript of Princeton Seminar Discussion, Reel 3, Track 2",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75852016",
"collections": [
"Dean Acheson Papers",
"Princeton Seminars Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722169-06-01.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722169-06-01.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722169-06-01.jpg",
"imageCount": 14,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75852016",
"naId": 75852016,
"levelOfDescription": "item",
"productionDates": [
{
"day": 15,
"logicalDate": "1954-05-15",
"month": 5,
"year": 1954
}
],
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 7,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722169-06-07.jpg",
"mediaId": "d5bc9b1aa70bf60e",
"ocrText": "5/15/54: Reel 3, Track 2, Page 7\nBefore that, we had not had any direct difficulty, but from this time\non we began to have a great deal. The Iranians closed the British\nConsulates in January; that raised the temperature. From then on for\nquite a few months we had a period where we had to fool around denying\nthings which we couldn't do and trying to do things which seemed possible.\nAnd there there were four main points about which we talked; the Irn ians\n1)\nwanted a large loan which would finance then during their struggle with\nthe British. That we declined to give, and that caused difficulty with\n2) them. We felt that we could go forward with Point Four help, and we were\nquite willing to stretch the idea of Point Four so that it wouldn't-\ndidn't conform to its original ideas; but we used it for the purpose of\nfinancing various imports. And we negotiated about that for quite a while.\nThen there was the matter of military aid. We thought it important\n3)\nto support as far as we could the Shah and the maintenance of some sort\nof order; we thought that this gâve us sone sort of a whole standing in\na country where we wanted to remain as long as we could. And in the\n4)\nfourth place we had to struggle with the British legal embargo. The British\nhad put out a notice that anyone who bought any oil from Iran would be sub-\nject to suit. We had a lot of people who I think more for the purpose of\ncausing agitation than for any business purpose would come to us and ask\nus where we stood on this-what would we do. Our attitude publichy was one\nthe\ng\nof not trying to take a position, but privately we advised our people\nU.S.\nthat it was unwise to get into this business because they would probably\nget into trouble and we couldn't help them, and we didn't think it was very\nhelpful of them to get into this thing. That went on, largely through 1952,\nuntil the fall of 1952. Then a whole lot of things began to happen all at\nthe same time. One of them was that this legal question came to a head.\nWe were being pressed more and more to say what our position was; the British"
}