Memorandum, "Supplementary Comments on Budget Bureau Summary of the Major Provisions of the McCarran and Walter Omnibus Immigration and Nationality Bills"

Extracted text

OCR Page 1 of 12
SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS ON BUDGET BUHEAU SUMMARY OF THE MAJOR PROVISIONS OF THE McCARRAN AND WALTER OMNIBUS IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY BILLS In commenting on the staff momorandum prepared in the Bureau of the Budget, the Department of State has endeavored to limit its observations to those provisions of the McCarran and Walter Bills which are included in H.R. 5678 as it has emerged from the Conference Committee of the Congress. The Department believes that its appreisal and recommendation, to be constructive, should be made from the point of view of action which the President may take on this bill. The Bureau of the Budget's analysis concerned mony aspects of the Bills which are not primarily the responsibility of this Department, and it has been deened preferable not to express either approval OF disapproval of most of the provisions which are of marginal interest from the point of view of foreign relations. Each of the numbered paragraphs below summarizes a specific point made or opinions set forth by the Bureau of the Budget, followed by a paragraph containing the comments of the Department of State, The comments below follow the order of presentation in the Burcau of the Budget staff memorandum. 1. The bill would not remove racial discrimi nation from our immigration laws. Comment: It should be recognized in the first place that the removal of all racial discrimination from our naturalization laws secomplished by the bills, is a very great improvement from the foreign relations point of view. In the field of immigration, certain important improvements would be made by the bills; they would eliminate exclusion of immigrants by reason of Pass; all peoples of Asian origin would be permitted for the first time to immigrate under the established quota system. It should be noted that the quota system has always been applied differently in three major areas; (1) the independent countries of the Americas are on a nonquota basis, (2) Europe and its colonies all over the world are subjected to quota limitations; and (3) the peoples of most of Asia have been excluded under the clause "aliens ineligible to citizenship in the Immigration Act of 1924, so that Asian quotas were available only to white persons and negross born in those countries, with certain executions beginning in 1943 as noted below. Under the Asia-Pacific triangle provision of the bill, immigrants of Asian origin would be charged to Asian quotas, to be sure, but this is not a new principle. It was incorporated in the Chinese Quota Act of 1943 and again in the India Quota Act of 1946 as an indispensable NARA