Images (2)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
122659760
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2Meeting With Industry Group
At one o'clock the companies requested Dr. steelman to return
at which time they handed to him the document which they had been
preparing. Dr. steelman pointed out that this was the history of
the New York negotiations and inquired if it was still an offer on
the part of the companies. Mr. Fairless indicated that it was a
history and could not be considered as an offer unless the companies
had the same price understanding they had at the time they made the
offer. Mr. Stowe inquired for guidance what the price offer was.
Mr. Fairless at first was reluctant to discuss it but finally indicated
that it was $4.50.
THUNTAND
He further indicated that at one time a flat 15€ in lieu of
ARCHINES& "NATIONAL RECORUS ADMIN."
step-ups was considered. He said that a price increase of $5.50
Co COVERAGE
would have been necessary for this package. He made it clear that
no offer was ever made or no price commi ttment ever confirmed on that
basis. At this point Dr. Steelman recalled that he had asked Mr.
Fairless representatives whether the $5.50 price would settle the
thing and they had indicated to him that "they did not think it would".
Dr. Steelman again inquired if the paper we had before us could
be construed as a bona fide of fer to the union provided the price item
would be $4.50. The companies indicated it could; however, Mr. Stephens
pointed out there would have to be some changes made such as the contract
date proposed, April 1, 1952 - April 1, 1953, would now have to be
May 1, 1952 - May 1, 1953 and that the question of retroactivity would
have to be re-negotiated since they would not be disposed to return to
Terms
विषय
Labor disputes
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to