Images (2)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
122659763
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2Meeting With The Labor Group
About 1:30 Dr. Steelman and Mr. Stowe met with union representatives
and presented them with the memorandum which the industry group had spent
most of the morning preparing, copy of which is attached. After reading
the memorandum the union representatives concluded that the offer was
a repetition of the second offer in New York (the industry members had
admitted this), though they were most interested in the last paragraph
of the memorandum which reads as follows:
"Each of the two offers above set forth was authorized by the
executive officers of the companies in reliance upon definite
assurances made by responsible government officials as to
price increases that would be permitted which, while not
fully compensatory, were acceptable to the industry in the
spirit of sacrifice by both sides to settle the controversy
and permit uninterrupted production."
It was at this point that the union felt that it was quite clear
that no matter what type or kind of bargaining was entered into ither
by management or by labor any result would necessarily have to be
contingent upon what the industry construed to be an appropriate price
increase.
As far as the union representatives were concerned, this represented
final and conclusive evidence that the industry was not bargaining in
good faith. They pointed out that not only would the industry group
insist that all matters on which the WSB had ruled with the industry
no longer be considered as possible bargaining points but that in
addition the industry in their memorandum had eliminated Board
Recommendations 6, 7, 8, 9 and 11 and had in addition placed their
own interpretation on when and how to bargain the WSB recommendations
Terms
विषय
Labor disputes
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to