Statement by Dillon Myer, Constitutional Principles Involved in the Relocation Program
This is a statement by Dillon S. Myer, director of the War Relocation Authority, before a subcommittee of the House Committee on Un-American Activities.
Images (4)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
40020128
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 4Statement by Dillon S. Myer
Director, War Relocation Authority
Constitutional Principles Involved in the Relocation Program
The evacuation and relocation program raise important questions
NATIONAL
of constitutionality. This is so because two-thirds of the persons of
Japanese ancestry evacuated from West Coast military areas are citizens of
SERVICE
the United States, and the great majority of the remainder are law-abiding
aliens.
It is the position of the War Relocation Authority that its Leave
Regulations are essential to the legal validity of the evacuation and reloca-
tion program. These Leave Regulations establish a procedure under which the
loyal citizens and law-abiding alions may leave a relocation center to become
reestablished in normal life.
We believe, in the first place, that the evacuation was within the
constitutional power of the National Government. The concentration of the
Japanese-Americans along the West Coast, the danger of invasion of that Coast
by Japan, the possibility that an unknown and unrecognizable minority of them
might have greater allegiance to Japan than to the United States, the fact that
the Japanese-Americans were not wholly assimilated in the general life of
communities on the West Coast, and the danger of civil disturbance due to fear
and misunderstanding--all these facts, and related facts, created a situation
which the National Government could, we believe, deal with by extraordinary
measures in the interest of military security. The need for speed created the
unfortunate necessity for evacuating the whole group instead of attempting to
determine who were dangerous among them, so that only those might be evacuated.
That same need made it impossible to hold adequate investigations or to grant
hearings to the evacuees, before evacuation,
When the evacuation was originally determined upon, it was contemplated
that the evacuees would be free immediately to go anywhere they wanted within
the United States SO. long as they remained outside of the evacuated area.
Approximately 8,000 evacuees left the evacuated area voluntarily at that time
and 5,000 of these have never lived in relocation centers. The demision to
provide relocation centers for the evacuees was not made until some six weeks
after evacuation was decided upon, and was made largely because of a recognition
of the danger that the hasty and unplanned resettlement of 112,000 people
might create civil disorder.
Detention within a relocation center is not, therefore, a necessary part
of the evacuation process. It is not intended to be more than a temporary stage
in the process of relocating the evacuees into new homes and jobs.
C-0237-P1 of 3-BU-COS-WP
Terms
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to