Harry S. Truman, Final Exam for Criminal Law, Kansas City School of Law
Images (4)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
286235455
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 4Harry STruman (1)
Final Examination C. Lair
Nov 23.1923
I (a) That the sentence of fine years was greater than
the low allowed when A committed the cime and no
law can he part increasing -a sentence as punish
ment for a cume already committed against to
year sented us Because the Mo statute says that
a law then only the looks (b) A is entitled to a two
defendant is entitled to profit by it provided
if the performent for a cime is dimished a
lair had feen repealed enticle after proceedings
the procedure hase started in the trial. If the
started depaint A, lair. he could base been consided
II under I would four puper year a efange of 1st dyees munder
the part of all to commit a febony A's one
against A, B,C, D. Their intas aleoaspuricy and was on
message the flanking in of the other X all
actually committed starting with three phone
the first ble fee and Aan accestary the munda
week equally guilty BCr of being principals before the
and finally endine in the munder of in
fact Unided statutes all guilty
III
of think X that Accould he counted The fact that
he had a mother had flouished show a meapon intent. and
made threat if apaint B would an B's
wife was ferdantly a whitness A he credited the
B's remains were identified Regard a douty, and
all the o the evidence pointed to Aar guilty
party.
Relations
belongs_to