Images (2)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
519784459
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2T(KOREA/SD) #6742
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
DECLASSIFIED
STATE LTR. 3.2.79
Memorandum of Conversation
PROJECT NLT 78.2
tepa
NARS, Date P.29.79
DATE: April 6, 1951
SUBJECT:
PARTICIPANTS: Mr. Hume Wrong, Ambassador of Canada
Mr. J. H. van Roijen, Ambassador of the Netherlands
Baron Silvercruys, Ambassador of Belgium
Mr. Joaquin M. Elizalde, Ambassador of the Philippines
Mr. Millet, Counselor of French Embassy
COPIES TO:
Mr. John Hickerson, Assistant Secretary of State
S-The Secretary; FE-Mr. Rusk; G-Mr. Matthews; S/P-Mr. Nitze; UNP
$3.363
At the end of the regular briefing session today with the representatives
of countries having military forces in Korea, the above mentioned gentlemen
cornered me after the others had left and asked about the President's
statement at his press conference yesterday in response to a question as to
whether General MacArthur had been given authority to bomb bases in Manchuria
in the event of an air attack on UN troops.
Mr. Millet lead off with the questioning and said that the French
Government had understood that the countries with military forces in Korea
would be consulted before any such instructions were given. I replied that
during the month of January we gave a number of governments, including the
French Government and I believed, practically all of the countries with
military forces in Korea, assurances that the proposed Chinese aggression
resolution did not confer any additional authority for military action
beyond that already covered in various other resolutions; I added that we
carefully pointed out that in the event of a massive air attack against UN
forces, the Unified Command must reserve the right to take counter-measures
including bombing of the bases from which the attacking planes came. I
added that at that time we gave assurances that we would, if possible,
consult in advance with the interested governments but that we could not be
absolutely sure that there would be time for this for military reasons. I
added that those assurances still were valid and that the situation inthat
regard had not changed.
DCI.
Anal 23 The
Rev
015618
TOP SECRET
Cat
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to