Memorandum of Conversation with F. S. Tomlinson, U. Alexis Johnson, and Louis Henkin
Images (2)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
519784952
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2USUT
DE/R
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Memorandum of Conversation
DATE: May 27, 1952
SUBJECT: Korcan Armistice Negotiations.
PARTICIPANTS: Mr. Tomlinson, UK Embassy
of
Mr. Johnson, FE
Mr. Henkin, UNP
FAR Bureau AFFAIRS
Tex
COPIES TO:
EUR
y
NEA
DECLASSIFIED
FE
USUN
Authority
FRUS 1952-54
UNA
11.249-251
DC/R
By DEBNLT
Date 2-28-85
Mr. Tomlinson called to inform me, with some embarrassment, that
contrary to his assurances of yesterday that the Indian-UK formula would
not be transmitted to Peiping for some time, New Delhi had jumped ahead
and had in fact instructed its Ambassador to transmit it to the Communists
According to the telegram which London received from New Delhi, Nehru had
Panikkar transmit the formula as suggested, i.e., as the kind of proposal
which Nehru is prepared to make to the UK and to ask the UK to discuss
with the U.S. Panikkar has reported that the initial reaction of the
Communists "warrants some hope. The matter is to be discussed again by
Panikkar on June 1st. The UK will keep us fully informed.
The UK Foreign Office further suggested that if the Communists in
fact prove receptive to the formula, there were several possibilities for
following it up: a.) The same channel, i.e., India, might be used to
reach agreement with the Communists on behalf of all the UN participating
nations. Introducing this new channel might prove a desirable new factor
leading to more easy agreement; of course it would be important to give
Panikkar very specific and limited instructions. b.) In the alternative,
the UNC might make this suggestion at Panmunjon.
In regard to the timing of the making of the proposal, the UK ForeignT
Office thought that the offer should not be made until the possibility of
a pre-armistice screening had been exhausted, but should be made as soon
after that as possible.
DC/R
Anal 5
I to
SECRET SECURITY INFORMATION
Rev
X 095389
Cat
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to