Images (4)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
519785019
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 4INCOMING TELEGRAM
Department of State
RE
TELEGRAPH BRANCH
11 H
TOP SECRET SECURITY INFORMATION
Action
Control:
14216
Rec'd:
June 30, 1952
UNA
FROM: New York
12:40 p.m.
Info
TO:
Secretary of State
SS
G
NO: 986, June 30, 11:58 a .m.
EUR
FE
L
PRIORITY.
DCR
DCRM
Re Korean truce talks.
At Malik SC dinner June 27, I had following conversation with
Zinchenko (UNASYG) on Korea:
While chatting about summer vacation plans, I commented that
it did not look as if the SC would have to meet in August.
Zinchenko at once said in a questioning manner, "unless perhaps
Korea?" I'replied that I thought an armistice in Korea was
not possible so long as the Communists insisted on forcible
repatriation of POW 's and that I could not understand how the
Sov Govt could support the Chi and NK contention in view of
principle adopted by Sov Govt regarding German POW 's.
Zinchenko, who perhaps expected this question, replied that
although he did not know too much about what I -had called a
"principle", it was necessary for us to realize there was an
"important difference between repatriation during a war and
after an armistice". The Geneva Convention "had to be applied"
after the end of hostilities. Furthermore, during the war
against Nazi Germany, it was "necessary to do everything to
disintegrate the Nazis". Moreover, the Sov Govt found great
difficulties put in the way of their attempts to get in touch
with Russian POW's held in various parts of Europe. He implied
the Sov position was taken in the hope of facilitating the
return home of Russian POW 's.
I said I could not see how these matters affected the fact
that the Sov Govt had taken the position that it was a humane
principle to allow POW's to go where they desired at end of
hostilities. I disagreed with his interpretation of the Geneva
Convertion and insisted it was not intended under any circum-
stances to require forcible repatriation. This whole question
was one we felt deeply about and would not retreat from. I
added that representatives of Asian, Middle East, and other
countries had expressed to us their full support of this issue,
in addition to the public statements which have been made by
many govts.
Zinchenko replied that he understood the difficulty for us but
"we must also realize how difficult it is for the other side".
He
REPRODUCTION FROM THIS
-12
TO SECRET SECURITY INFORMATION
COPY, IF CLASSIFIED, IS
PROHIBITED
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to