Images (3)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
519785341
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 31564
INCOMING TELEGRAM
Department of State
TELEGRAPH BRANCH
26
2001
Action
Control: 8100
Rec'd: August 15, 1951
UNA
FROM: New York
6:18 p.m.
Info
TO:
Secretary of State
SS
DECLASSIFIED
a
NO: 230, August 15, 4:57 p.m.
STATE LTR. 4-25-79
L
PROJECT NLT 78.13
EUR
NARS, Date 7-24-79
FE
PRIORITY.
DCR
Re Korea; Indonesia; New Guinea; presidency GA.
Luns, temporarily in charge Netherlands del, at his request
called on Ross yesterday and left aide memoire quoted below,
expressing "preliminary views" his FONOFF concerning post-
armistice UN action re Korea.
Ross explained tentative thinking Dept in favor combination
SC and GA action, and outlined briefly and in general terms
reasons for this tentative conclusion. explained present
tentative thinking subject to change in light of (A) con-
sultation with our close friends, and (B) circumstances as
they may develop. Luns appeared convinced our thinking thus
THOMAC
far on right track and observed without commitment he thought
Dutch Govt would not find much difficulty in falling in with
this thinking. Text of aide memoire follows:
"In view of the possibility of an agreed cease -fire in Korea
and the subsequent need for official approval of and further
political action by the UN, the following reasons plead,
in the opinion of the Netherlands Govt, for consideration
of this problem of the GA rather than by the SC:
"1. The Korean problem was removed from the SC's agenda on
31 Jan 1951 and has since been on the agenda of the GA on
which agenda it still figures at the present time. During
the period since 31st Jan the GA has repeatedly taken action,
first by condemning the People's Rep of China of aggression
in Korea and secondly by recommending a limited embargo on
the shipment of strategic materials to areas under the control
of the CPG of the PRC and of the NK authorities.
"Consideration of a cease-fire agreement by the council
would mean reintroduction of the issue on the council's agenda.
"2. It would not seem that the Soviet Union would approve
more readily a cease-fire res in the SC than in the Assembly.
The USSR have always maintained that all action of the
council in connection with the hostilities in Korea was
illegal, not only because of the absence of the Soviet rep
and occupation of the Chi seat by the rep of the Nationalist
REPRODUCTION OF THIS
Chi Govt
SECRET
ESSAGE IS PROHIBITED
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to