Foreign Service Despatch from Walter McConaughy to Department of State
Images (5)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
519786060
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 58
AIR POUCH
Security
FOREIGN SERVICE DESPATCH
846g.2321/1-2452
XR 446g.119
FROM: HONG KONG
Desp. No. 1530
: DEPARTMENT OF STATE
January 24, 1952
REF : Congentel 2175, January 14, 1952
del EVIFE oli
58 :Action
I Dept
For Dept: COMM
N
REP FE OLI E
mi
Rec'd
FEB 21
F Other
TAIPEI PUSAN
Use Only:
O
GOOM!
DPA MSA FRB TAR DMPA EPS
Subject: RAW COTTON FOR HONG KONG
Reference is made to the Consulate General's telegram 2175 of
January 14, 1952, reporting that the Hong Kong Government had
stated that it was unable to accept the conditions under which the
US was prepared to export US raw cotton to Hong Kong, as outlined
in the Department's telegram 1960 of November 13, 1951. The
government stated that the guarantees suggested by the US were
unacceptable for reasons explained to GIT by Mr. A. G. Clarke, then
Hong Kong Director of Commerce and Industry, when he visited Wash-
ington for talks in January, 1951. The Hong Kong Government stated
that it was prepared to certify that US raw cotton would not be
re-exported to China either as raw cotton or as the sole or substan-
tial constituent of any textiles fabricated in Hong Kong and that
terms of this guarantee were said to be outlined in an Aide-Memoire
transmitted by the British Embassy in Washington to the Department
during February, 1951. (Queried later as to the percentage the
government contemplated by the reference "substantial constituent",
no local official appeared competent or willing to comment.)
without giving any indication that it was prepared to discuss pro-
posals alternative to the general proposals said to have been
included in the reference Aide-Tencire, the government concluded
its reply to the Consulate General by expressing the hope that the
US would reconsider the matter and see its way clear to supplying
raw cotton to Hong Kong spinning mills. A copy of the Hong Kong
Government's letter dated January 8, 1952 is attached (Enclosure No.1).
Because the fact that the US has not licensed raw cotton for
shipment to Hong Kong mills since December 3, 1950 has provoked
considerable adverse criticism by the Economic officials of the Hong
Kong Government and expressions of keen disappointment by the
Governor and the Colonial Secretary, and because the press has
frequently featured stories implying that the industry's problems
could be attributed to the US restrictions, the Consulate General
has devoted much time to endeavoring to bring about some agreement
which would result in US raw cotton being licensed for Hong Kong.
FEB 8 1952
DECLASSIFIED
E.O. 12065, Sec. 3-402
Halph Hunt/ctp/n1
State Dept. Guidelines, March 6, 1982
Security
By DEB
NLT, Date 4-10
85
2
I
P
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to