Report, United Nations General Assembly Seventh Session, First Committee, 511th Meeting
Images (7)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
519787253
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 7United Nations
GENERAL
FIRST COMMITTEE,
511th
MEETING
ASSEMBLY
Thursday, 23 October 1952, at 3p.m.
SEVENTH SESSION
Official Records
Headquarters, New York
CONTENTS
Page
Reports of the United Nations Commission for the Unification and Re-
habilitation of Korea (A/1881, A/2187, A/C.1/L.1 and A/C.1/L.2)
(continued)
11
Chairman: Mr. João Carlos MUNIZ (Brazil).
Reports of the United Nations Commission for the
4. Mrs. SEKANINOVA-CAKRTOVA (Czechoslo-
Unification and Rehabilitation of Korea
vakia) stated that it was the task of the United Nations
(A/1881,A/2187,A/C.1/L.land(A/C.1/L.2)
not merely to discuss the question but also to make a
(continued)
contribution to the immediate restoration of peace in
[Item 16 a]*
Korea, to the cessation of bloodshed and the horrors
of the Korean war, to a peaceful settlement of the
1. The CHAIRMAN recalled that, by General As-
Korean question and to the securing of Korea's inde-
sembly resolution 507 (VI), the sixth session of the
pendence. Bearing these tasks in mind, it was essential
Assembly postponed the consideration of the report of
that representatives of the people of Korea be present.
the United Nations Commission for the Unification and
Therefore the Czechoslovak delegation supported the
Rehabilitation of Korea. There were consequently two
USSR draft resolution.
reports under this item (documents A/1881 and A/
2187).
5. Mr. ACHESON (United States of America), in
supporting the Thailand draft resolution, recalled that
2. Mr. PUNYARATABHAN (Thailand), speaking
the Republic of Korea was the innocent victim of the
on a point of order, observed that Thailand was a mem-
aggression which the United Nations found had taken
ber of the United Nations Commission for the Unifica-
place and had been a partner in the struggle to resist it.
tion and Rehabilitation of Korea, the reports of which
The Republic of Korea had participated in the discus-
dealt at length with the political developments and the
sions in the past and it was only proper it should be
economic and financial situation of the Republic of
there now. The United States representative added that
Korea. His delegation was of the opinion that it would
the North Koreans, who had been found by the United
be only just that a representative of the Republic of
Nations to be the aggressors, had no place at the Gen-
Korea, an independent sovereign State, be invited to
eral Assembly. The proper place for the aggressor, if
participate, without the right to vote, in a discussion of
any place were proper for him, was in the tent at Pan-
that item on the agenda. He thereupon submitted a
munjom. He earnestly solicited the votes of his col-
draft resolution (A/C.1/L.1) to that effect.
leagues to reject the USSR draft resolution.
3. Mr. VYSHINSKY (Union of Soviet Socialist Re-
6. Mr. POLITIS (Greece) stated that his delegation
publics) said there was no need to stress the extent to
supported the Thailand draft resolution. With regard
which the Koreans themselves were interested in the
to the USSR draft resolution, he said it was inadmis-
discussions of this question on the agenda and he
sible not only for reasons of law but also for those of
quoted from a cablegram (A/C.1/L.2) dated 17 Octo-
elementary morality. It was inadmissible for reasons of
ber 1952 addressed to the President of the General As-
law because, in the present case, it was not simply a
sembly from the Government of the People's Democra-
distinction between the United Nations, on the one
tic Republic of Korea requesting permission to be heard.
hand, and a non-Member State on the other, but of the
The USSR delegation regarded the demand of the
United Nations and an aggressor. The Charter im-
People's Democratic Republic of Korea as just and
posed preliminary conditions for the admission of a
introduced a draft resolution (A/C.1/L.2) to invite its
third party when it was to be heard by the Organiza-
representatives to participate in the consideration of
tion. Therefore, the aggression must cease before any
the question. The USSR representative also said that
direct contact could be considered between the United
his delegation had no objection to the Thailand draft
Nations and the adversary.
resolution.
7. The United Nations had never concealed its desire
* Indicates the item number on the agenda of the General
to achieve an honourable cessation of hostilities, which
Assembly.
depended on the final success of the armistice negotia-
11
A/C.1/SR.511
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to