Images (2)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
196064637
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2OFFICE OF
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
DECLASSIFIED
WASHINGTON
E.O. 12065, Sec. 3-402
State Dept. Guidelines, March 6, 1982
By DEB NLT, Date 7-29-85
June 27, 1952
SECRET SECURITY INF ORMATION
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
DENMARK
Ambassador Anderson again saw the Danish Foreign
Minister, Mr. Kraft, yesterday afternoon concerning
the impending delivery of a new Danish-built tanker to the USSR, in ful-
fillment of a 1948 trade agreement between the two countries under which
Denmark was to build two tankers for the Soviets. Ambassador Anderson
once more went over with Mr. Kraft the possible consequences of this
action, namely termination of US aid to Denmark under the Battle Act,
and she urged several weeks delay in delivery of the ship. Mr. Kraft
said that although he is fully apprised of the seriousness with which we
view the situation, he considers it impossible to delay delivery at this
juncture. He reported that the tanker had returned the previous evening
from its trial run which had demonstrated that the ship was in perfect
order. The Soviet crew on board had wished to take possession at once,
but the builders, by arrangement with the Government, had given some
pretext for refusal. Kraft says that the ship will not go before early next
week, but the Government*s position is firm that it cannot do anything
further to delay delivery. Mr. Kraft will go to London to discuss the
matter with the Secretary; he indicated that he wanted to discuss measures
to avoid delivery of the second tanker and also to clarify the Danish
position. We have advised Ambassador Anderson that if she is convinced
in further conversation with Kraft that there is no hope for further delay
in delivery of the first tanker, she should pursue with him what assurances
he can give us in regard to the second tanker. A firm assurance of non-
delivery of the second tanker would be helpful to us in considering terms
on which aid, if terminated, could be renewed, or in considering the
possibility of an exception. Such assurances would have to be in a form
which we would use at least with Congress and probably publicly.
KOREA
We have recently received disturbing reports that the UN Com- -
mission in Korea (UNCURK) has become so discouraged over
its position there that various members have been requesting their home
governments to intercede in favor of withdrawal of the Commission. As
a part of our efforts to dissuade the Commission from any such move
Ambassador Muccio yesterday received the Dutch member, Mr. Van
Ittersum, and his political assistant, Mr. Kethel, and sought to convince
SECRET SECURITY INF FORMATION