Images (2)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
196064645
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2OFFICE OF
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
DECLASSIFIED
WASHINGTON
E.O. 12065, Sec. 3-402
State Dept. Guidelines, March 6, 1982
By DEB NLT, Date 9-10-85
July 10, 1952
SECRET SECURITY INFORMATION
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
EGYPT The British have reacted very sharply against an off-hand US
suggestion we made yesterday in regard to their new position
paper on Egypt--namely that they should designate some outstanding indi-
vidual to undertake further consultation with the Sudanese over recognition
of Farouk as king. A Foreign Office official told an officer of Embassy
London that this would merely be going through the motions since all indica- -
tions are that the Sudanese will not accept Farouk's title; moreover the
Egyptians would never accept a verdict reached by a British subject and
would inevitably charge that the consultations were conducted unfairly. Our
Embassy officer pointed out that this would depend largely on how the con-
sultations were carried out. The British might ask, explain, urge or use
pressure with the Sudanese; "asking" would undoubtedly not bring about the
desired results and the UK maintains that "pressure" would raise domestic
problems in the UK, but perhaps "explaining" or "urging" would bring about
the desired results. To this the Foreign Office official replied most firmly
that the UK could not even "give the Sudanese a lead" on this question, because
of domestic difficulties it would raise in the UK and because of the reactions
in the Sudan. The most that might be done would be to suggest the nature of
guarantees which the Sudanese should ask for in return for recognition, but
these would undoubtedly not be acceptable to the Egyptians and it is doubtful
that the Sudanese would be willing to accept the title even with such guarantees.
The Foreign Office spokesman particularly stressed his concern
regarding present Anglo-American differences on this question, which he felt
perhaps were even more important from the point of view of Anglo-American
relations than the Anglo-Egyptian aspect. He stressed the importance of our
maintaining a common front vis-a-vis the Egyptians, without which he felt
there was not much prospect of a settlement. He said that the Foreign Office
is very apprehensive lest the whole situation is drifting toward a return of the
nationalistic Wafd party and that only a strong, coordinated intervention by
the US and the UK can halt that trend and bring about a settlement.
SECRET SECURITY INF ORMATION