Images (3)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
196064659
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 3NIT(Noval Aide)378
DECASSIFIED
12356, Sec.3.4
OFFICE OF
88-17 - (StAte 1/4/89
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
AL
y
By co
NLT Date
WASHINGTON
UNCLASSIFIED
July 29, 1952
TOP SECRET SECURITY INFORMA TION
AND
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
IRAN
After receiving various hints during the past two days that Mosadeq
was ready to receive a call, Ambassador Henderson visited Mosadeq
on Sunday evening. Henderson describes the conversation, which lasted two
and a half hours, as "both exhausting and depressing". Henderson says: "As
I listened to him I could not but be discouraged at the thought that a person so
lacking in stability and so clearly dominated by emotions and prejudices should
represent the only bulwark left between Iran and Communism
I had the
feeling at times that I was talking with someone who was not quite sane and
that he should therefore be humored rather than reasoned with". The high-
lights of the conversation were the following: Henderson began by outlining
our dealings with the short-lived government of Qavam in order to show that
we had brought no pressure to bear on Qavam. He also told Mosadeq about
Qavam's request for short-term financial aid prior to the oil settlement which
Qavam envisaged bringing about in the very near future, and acknowledged that
he had personally recommended it to the Department. Mosadeq replied by say-
ing that he drew three conclusions from what Henderson had just told him:
1) the US had brought pressure on Qavam to bow to British demands and to per- -
mit the return of British rule to Iran; 2) the US was willing to lend money to
Qavam which it had refused on several occasions to lend to Mosadeq; and 3) the
US had encouraged Qavam by showing friendliness to him. Henderson denied
all these allegations in detail, but Mosadeq launched into a bitter attack on
US foreign policy. He said the US had no diplomacy. In the Middle East the
US was merely an agent of the British. Anti-American manifestations of the
past several days had shown how great had been the failure of the so-called US
diplomacy in Iran. The US had given a billion dollars of aid to Turkey and yet
when Iran was bankrupt and on the verge of Communism the US had refused to
help it, first because it feared that a settlement might damage US oil interests
in Saudi Arabia and second because it feared British displeasure. Henderson
pointed out that American interests in international oil were really of secondary
nature and did not govern our policies in Iran; we had felt that it would not be
in the interest of the free world for us to give Iran financial aid in circumstances
which might cause the British and American public to believe that the US was
subsidizing Iran's position in the oil dispute. At this point Mosadeq began to
chant that Iran would prefer to go Communist rather than for the US and the UK
to have differences of opinion with regard to it. Eventually, Henderson was
TOP SECRET SECURITY INF ORMATION