Images (2)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
196816640
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2OFFICE OF
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
WASHINGTON
DECLASSIFIED
12065, Sec. 3-402
January 19, 1951
Dept. E.O. Guidelines, March 9-4-85 6, 1982
S R E T
State By DEB NLT, Date
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
UN ACTION
Embassy London reports the UK Foreign
ON CHINA
Office has just telegraphed instructions to its
UN delegation stating that the UK finds the
terms of the Chinese reply to the cease-fire resolution unacceptable and
authorizing Jebb to "have a good smack at it". The UK hopes that the
US will not insist on introducing a new resolution today, but if the US
does insist, and if the resolution is along the lines of the draft contained
in our circular telegram 387 (attached) the UK would wish to have it
amended. The UK would prefer to have any condemnatory resolution
handled separately from any resolution calling for further UN action,
and not combined in one document.
Ambassador Bruce in Paris has discussed the
matter with M. Schuman who said he felt that the US had been wise in
agreeing to the latest UN cease-fire proposal, and he added that this fact
now placed the US and other interested governments in a much stronger
position than they would have been in otherwise. Schuman has still to
discuss the whole situation with Bonnet, Chauvel, Massigli and Francois-
Poncet, and the French position on further UN steps will not be clear
until then.
Embassy Ottawa reports that Canada feels
action should be taken immediately by the UN to condemn Chinese aggres.
sion, but feels that the cease-fire offer should be kept open for acceptance.
SOVIET NOTE
Embassy Paris reports the French Foreign
Office has cabled instructions to Mr. Bonnet
in Washington which are tantamount to acceptance of our draft reply to
the Soviets concerning a meeting of the four Foreign Ministers, with the
exgeption of a single sentence stating that the Prague Declaration "has
also been rejected by the majority of the German people as is now evi-
denced anew by the statement of the Federal Chancellor on January 15. "
The French do not believe it desirable to refer to Adenauer's attitude and
they also question the expression "the majority of the German people. "
In commenting to Mr. Bonnet on the US draft the French Foreign Office