Images (2)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
196816646
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2NLT ( Maval Aide)162
OFFICE OF
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
WASHINGTON
12065, Sec. 3-402
DECLASSIFIED
State By DEB Dept. NLT, Date
E.O. Guidelines, March 9-4-85 6, 1982
January 26, 1951
TOP SECRET
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
UNITED NATIONS
We have informed our UN delegation that
we believe the Asian-Arab resolution
would appeal to a large number of delegations and that an effort to give
it priority over the US resolution might receive substantial support. In
our view we must oppose this resolution and make an effort to discour -
age having it brought to a vote. At the same time we should not make
our opposition of such a character as to stake our influence and prestige,
so that passage of the resolution would be a blow to US leadership and
jeopardize passage of the US resolution.
We have instructed our delegate to state
in the Political Committee that the US does not agree to any conference
so long as the Chinese Communists continue hostilities. He is to point
out that if the purpose of the Asian-Arab resolution is to obtain further
elucidation of the Peiping position, that can be achieved without devia- -
tion from the five principles. The US has no opposition to any
individual member seeking amplification of Peiping's views or making
a
further appeal to the Chinese. The cease-fire group is still techni- -
cally in existence and if it sees any purpose it can again approach
Peiping for further elaboration of its attitude. If Peiping indicates it is
prepared to discontinue hostilities, steps to arrange a satisfactory
cease-fir could be taken immediately, but it seems clear to us that the
proposed seven-power conference is not the proper agency to make
arrangements for a cease-fire If a cease-fire is agreed to inprinciple,
arrangements should be made by the military commanders along lines
accepted by the Entezam group in its report.
The US statement could also indicate that
passage of the US resolution would not close the door to an honorable
peace settlement. The good offices group provided in the US resolution
would be available to make any further approach to Peiping for amplifica-
-
tion of its position. In consultations with the Canadian representative,
TOP SECRE T