Images (2)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
196816943
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2NLT(Naval Aide/242
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
WASHINGTON
DECLASSIFIED
E.O. 12065, Sec. 3-402
September 12, 1951
State Dept. Guidelines, March 6, 1982
By DEB NLT, Date 9-5-85
TOP SECRET
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
IRAN
Following the Department's instructions, Ambassador
Grady yesterday communicated to Prime Minister
Mosadeq the Department's position on the Export-Import Bank loan to Iran:
namely, that we feel it is premature for Iran to send a mission here at
present to conclude the loan; that Iran's economic situation has changed con-
siderably since last year when the loan was offered and the question now
arises as to how local costs, upon which the success of the program depends,
would be financed; that the Eximbank cannot proceed with the loan in the ab- -
sence of Iran's ability to provide such funds. In an effort to dispel any idea
that we were using the loan as a political tool Grady also pointed out, on our
instructions, that we are proceeding to implement our Military Aid and Point
IV programs, and that we remain ready to proceed also with the loan when- -
ever Iran can show that plans have been perfected to meet local currency
and foreign exchange requirements.
Mosadeq became angry and said that our government
was working with the British Government to boycott Iran in order to force an
oil settlement. He said he would at once write to the Majlis (the lower house)
to drop the loan matter and would make a statement to the press. Grady
attempted to dissuade Mosadeq from such hasty action and reassured him,
to no avail, that his allegations were untrue. Mosadeq insisted that Grady
give him a written statement of what he had said in this conversation (which
Grad y later did).
USSR
M. Vyshinsky yesterday called the French Charge in
Moscow to the Foreign Office and handed him a lengthy
note protesting French policy directed toward the rebuilding of German mili-
tary might. The note says that this policy is contrary to both the Franco-
Soviet treaty of December 1944 and in violation of Potsdam. The principal
targets of the note were the Pleven Plan, which allegedly fostered remilitari-
zation of Germany, and the Schuman Plan, which allowed the development of
an economic military potential. The note criticized French cooperation with
the US and the UK on this trend of developments in West Germany, and re- -
ferred to the alleged American restoration of the German economy after World
War I and Anglo-French toleration of Hitler.
TOP SECRET