Images (2)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
197025982
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2OFFICE OF
THE SECRETARY-QF STATE
DECLASSIFLED
12065, Sec. March 3-402 6,
WASHINGTON
1982
State DEB Dept. E.O. Guidelines, NLT, Date 9-6-85 SECRET
December 14, 1951
SECURITY INF ORMATION
By
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
USSR
We haye transmitted to Embassy Moscow a re-
ply to the Soviet note of November 24th concern-
ing the establishment of the Middle East Command. Our Charge is to
present it today after consulting with his British, French and Turkish col-
leagues concerning the presentation of their replies to similar notes which
they receivedat the same time. Our note rejects the allegation that the
MEC or the NATO is aggressive in intent, mentions the inherent right of
self-defense set forth in Article 51 of the UN Charter, and expresses sur-
prise at the Soviet assertion that the idea that any threat exists to the Mid-
dle Eastern states is "absolutely groundless". Expanding on this astpoint,
the note reminds the Soviets of Molotov's proposal of November 25, 1940
to German Ambassador Schulenburg to agree on spheres of influence be-
tween the USSR and the Axis powers which provided, among other things,
that the USSR be enabled to establish "a base for land and naval forces"
within the range of the Turkish straits and that "the area south of Batum
and Baku in the general direction of the Persian Gulf is recognized as the
center of the aspirations of the Soviet Union. 11 The note adds that in the
light of the Soviet attitude toward the Middle East area since the end of
World War II the US can only assume that the aims set forth by Mr. Molotov
in 1940 remains the policy of the Soviet Government. The note concludes
by blaming the present world situation on the Soviet Union and reiterating
the right of the various states to take measures of self-defense, either in- -
dividually or collectively, in the interest of their own security and of inter- -
national peace.
IRAN
We have pointed out to Embassy Tehran that if
Iran proceeds to sell petroleum to Iron Curtain
countries such as Poland and Czechoslovakia, as they have recently threaten-
ed to do, it would create serious problems in connection with Public Law
213 (the Battle Act) which forbids US aid to all countries exporting strategic
material to the Soviet bloc. The Department is contemplating delivering to
the Iranian Embassy here an aide-memoire explaining this legislation and
containing lists of commodities whose export to the Soviet bloc would make
the exporting country ineligible for any US aid subsequent to January 24, 1952.
SECRET SECURITY INEORMATION