Images (2)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
202440523
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2OFFICE OF
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
DECLASSIFIED
WASHINGTON
State Dept. Guidelines, March 6, 1982
E.O. 12065, Sec. 3-402
September 29, 1950
NLT, Date 6-10-85
By DEB
TOP
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
KOREA
In view of the swift development of the military
campaign in Korea the Department feels that it is
imperative for the General Assembly to take an early stand on the
further steps to be taken in that country, in order to maintain and
solidify the opinion of the free world. Although the US position is
that the UN Command already possesses UN authorization by virtue
of the June 27th resolution to take action north of the 38th parallel
if this proves necessary in order to "repel the invaders and restore
peace and security in the area", we feel that the political future of
Korea north of the parallel still depends on UN action. The Depart-
ment believes it is important that no action by the General Assembly
should cast doubts on the present status of the Republic of Korea, as
its government is unquestionably a freely chosen government
established through elections observed by the UN Commission and
approved by the General Assembly. On the other hand we do not
want to give the impression to our Allies that we desire to force the
present government down their throats. We hope to be able to per -
suade the ROK to cooperate with the UN and to show by its conduct
during the coming days that it merits confidence and consideration.
In view of the fact that UN observed elections were held in South
Korea as late as May 31st of this year and in view of strong ROK
objections to repeating these elections in the near future, we feel
that it might be best to postpone elections both in the North and in
the South for a considerable period of time, until the scars of war
are no longer uppermost in the minds of the people, perhaps a year,
or until President Rhee's term of office expires in May 1952.
From reports from Ambassador Henderson in
New Delhi and from British UN sources it is apparent that the
Government of India has been frightened by the pace of developments
in Korea, fearing that the situation might explode into a general war.
India has suddenly altered its previously expressed belief that Com-
munist China would not intervene militarily in Korea, and now
reports that it fears such intervention may be likely. The UK has
replied to these Indian warnings, and we are inclined to agree with
the UK reply, that India is falling prey to a war of nerves and that
TOP SECREPI