Images (2)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
202444108
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2NLT (Navel Aide)HIG
OFFICE OF
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
the
WASHINGTON
DECLASSIFIED
E.O. Guidelines, March 6, 1982
12065, Sec. 3-402
November 14, 1950
State Dept. DEB NLT, Date G-10-25 TOP
SECREI
By
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
KOREA
We have sent to Ambassador Austin in New York our
views on the handling of the Korean case in the UN,
which stress that we must play our hand in the UN with some care in
order to achieve the objectives we seek to obtain from UN consideration,
particularly since there is no reliable and accurate picture of ultimate
Chinese Communist objectives and since the immediate military situa-
tion in Korea is unclear. These objectives are: 1) to localize the Korean
conflict, to bring about withdrawal of Chinese forces, and prevent a
world war or a general engagement between the Chinese Communists and
UN forces with all of the consequences that might follow; 2) to obtain the
maximum support from the international community for such action as
may be required under various contingencies if the character and extent
of Chinese intervention change for the worse; and 3) to bring about a
final settlement of the Korean question along the lines of the October 7
resolution. We pointed out to Austin that while it would be comparatively
simple to brand the Chinese Communists as aggressors in the UN, our
overall national interest does not permit this course and we must be care- -
ful in the political field not to run substantially ahead of the situation on
the gr ound in such a way as to commit us to a heavy involvement in Asia,
which we should try to avoid. We informed Austin that: 1) the speed with
which we should push Security Council consideration depends to some ex-
tent on planned military operations and on the timing of the arrival of the
Chinese Communist representatives at the UN; and 2) we should not make
now a firm public commitment that the Korea case will be brought imme- -
diately to the General Assembly following the anticipated Soviet veto in
the Council, although the present prospect is that we will want Assembly
consideration. We indicated that if the Chinese Communist position is
"negotiable" we may find some move on their part or by other govern-
ments to find a negotiating procedure which would be more effective than
a full debate in the Assembly.
Meanwhile, we have instructed certain of our
Ambassadors to discuss with the Foreign Ministers in the countries to
which they are accredited the grave problem confronting US forces in
Korea through the use of Manchuria by the enemy as a sanctuary for
forces which are in fact attacking UN forces in Korea itself. Since the
use of Manchuria in this manner could easily impose an intolerable
R