NSDD 284 United States Military Capabilities in Support of North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
Images (3)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
6879861
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 3CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIEENTIAL
- 2 -
process may require mid-course adjustment to respond in
a timely manner to the changing nuclear and
conventional force requirements of the Alliance.
If and when Senate consideration of an INF agreement
begins, the military implications of the agreement will
be a major issue. As a result of military analysis
developed for the negotiations, both SACEUR and the
Joint Chiefs of Staft have concluded that our relative
military posture facing the threat to NATO in a
post-INF environment could be degraded unless certain
identified measures are carried to fruition. A careful
review of our plans and programs is, therefore, in
order. (C)
In view of the foregoing, I direct the Secretary of Defense, in
coordination with the Secretary of Energy and the Director,
Office of Management and Budget, to undertake a prompt review of
ongoing U.S. and NATO force planning. This review should be
designed to ensure that we have identified the nuclear and
conventional capabilities most needed to support NATO's military
strategy as we anticipate making the transition to a post-INF
environment; and that such capabilities are included, as
appropriate, in the pending FY88-89 budget and associated FYDP.
The review should focus in particular on the appropriate phasing
of changes to J.S. military capabilities that will maintain our
contribution to the execution of Alliance military strategy
during and after the phaseout of INF forces. (U)
The Secretary of Defense will report to me by December 1, 1987,
on the results of this review and measures undertaken to
implement this Directive. (U)
Romella Reagon
\
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Relations
belongs_to