Extracted text

OCR Page 1 of 117
MEMORANDUM FOR FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: On March 6th, HUD released its annual actuarial review of the Mutual Mortgage Insurance (MMI) Fund of the Federal Housing Administration (FHA). The review, conducted by the independent auditing firm of Deloitte and Touche (D&T), suggested that receipts to the Fund might exceed the level shown in your FY 2001 Budget by a total of $5 billion over the next five years. On March 7th, you asked us to estimate the extent of any excess receipts, and to define how any additional resources could be used to best strengthen our affordable housing efforts. This memorandum provides our response. In brief, we agree that actuarial review provides sound evidence that the fiscal health of the Fund is improving. However, the increased profit per unit earned by the Fund will be offset by lower than expected volume loan activity. Taken together, the latest evidence suggests that budget receipts during the period FY 2002 2006 actually will be less than shown in FY 2001 Budget. On the other hand, the overall budget surplus will be far higher than anticipated by the FY 2001 Budget. As you know, your Mid-session review included a sharply higher estimate of the budget surplus, and set aside $XXX billion of that surplus for (future needs?). In the second part of this memorandum we outline an important new proposal for subsidizing the construction of affordable housing, and recommend that funding for this proposal be considered during development of the FY 2002 Budget. A. NEW ESTIMATES OF RECEIPTS TO THE MMI FUND The Actuarial Review FHA's MMI Fund protects private lenders against losses from defaults on FHA-insured mortgages. The Fund derives income from fees paid by mortgagees. The Fund incurs expenses when mortgagees default and lenders file claims against the Fund. D&T's actuarial review examined the Fund's 'economic value' at the end of FY 1999. 'Economic value' was defined as the sum of the Fund's cash reserves plus the present value of future cash flows associated with all outstanding mortgages (which can generate both income (from fees) and expenses (from claims against defaults) until they are paid in full). D&T estimated that the Fund had an economic at the end of FY 1999 that was $5 billion greater than the amount projected at the end of FY 1998. The increase stemmed from principally