Ask the Scholar
Page 78 of 159
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
Page 12
Federal News Service, MARCH 1, 1996
father of a 16 and 14-year-old daughters and 7 and 5-year-old sons. And in that
broad spectrum, I have seen some remarkable differences in attitude and
behaviors towards what they see on television and what they listen to, only
within that generational gap in my own family.
These are powerful influences. Television is an extraordinary media, one that
we should be very, very pleased that we have access to that technology, because
children have learned enormous things and have benefitted greatly. But with
the good side of technology there is the potential risk, and it is that risk
that I and the scientific community have become particularly concerned about
because we know without balancing that risk, without paying attention to the
ways in which children learn, the kinds of violent images that sometimes are
seen on television in which violent acts go unpunished, in which violence may be
masked in humor in which there is no pain -- you know I evaluated someone in a
hospital down south not too long ago who looked at me from his bedside, having
been involved in a homicide in which he was shot, and he said to me, "Doc, I
never realized it was going to hurt to be shot."
These are powerful statements coming from our children. And these are the kinds
of images that we, as parents, at the very least need some help in making
determinations as to what children are exposed to, at what age, and what
frequency. What my 16 and 14-year- old watch may be quite different from what I
think my 7 and 5-year-old ought to watch.
And I think what the two of you have done has really helped facilitate the
industry and parents to work together on creating a stronger and more healthy
environment in which children can use television in a productive and useful way.
PRESIDENT CLINTON: Hillary, do you want to comment on that based on what you
said
MRS. CLINTON: No, that was incredible. I mean; I think that if we could get
every parent to hear that and understand it, then the rating system and the
V-chip would be even more effective because, of course, one of our challenges is
to convince parents to use the rating system and to take the time and energy
that will be required to implement it in their own homes, and then when the
V-chip comes along, to be ready to use that as well.
And the information they can get, such as the doctor is explaining, about what
we know is the linkage between what they see on television and how they behave,
I think the more willing parents will be to act.
PRESIDENT CLINTON: I want to get to this to the young people here.) But let
me tell you it's okay if you disagree with us about this. (Laughter.) We want
to hear what you really think. But I want to ask the doctor one more question.
Before I had this job -- as I used to say, back when I had a life -- (laughter)
-- I -- I used to -- I was a governor of my state, when I ran a big prison
system and a big criminal justice system, obviously. And then I was attorney
general. And before that, I taught criminal law. So I've been following issues
of crime and violence closely, from that perspective, for more than 20 years
now.
For most of my time, it was an article of (faith ?) that 75 percent of all the
violence crimes in America were created by people between the ages of 17 and 26,
and that there was almost a hormonal problem. If you could, literally, just get
violent people and put them somewhere until they were 27, you could let them out
(chuckling) and they would not do that again; that there really almost
seemed to be sea changes.
Now we see an astonishing thing, with the crime rate going down among people 18
and over -- and I might add, with drug use going down among people over 18 --
and violence going up among people under 18 and -- (well ?) as well as casual
Page data
- Page
- 78
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- b29c20f02cd54dd2
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 158698564
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "158698564",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/158698564",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Early Childhood Development #1: Early Childhood Development [3]",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/158698564",
"collections": [
"Records of the First Lady's Office (Clinton Administration)",
"Melanne Verveer's Subject Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/2068127/42-t-2068127-20060198F-Seg4-017-001-2014-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/2068127/42-t-2068127-20060198F-Seg4-017-001-2014-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/2068127/42-t-2068127-20060198F-Seg4-017-001-2014-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 159,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "158698564",
"label": "Early Childhood Development #1: Early Childhood Development [3]",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/158698564"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "158698564",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/158698564",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Early Childhood Development #1: Early Childhood Development [3]",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/158698564",
"collections": [
"Records of the First Lady's Office (Clinton Administration)",
"Melanne Verveer's Subject Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/2068127/42-t-2068127-20060198F-Seg4-017-001-2014-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/2068127/42-t-2068127-20060198F-Seg4-017-001-2014-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/2068127/42-t-2068127-20060198F-Seg4-017-001-2014-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 159,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/158698564",
"naId": 158698564,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"otherTitles": [
"42-t-2068127-20060198F-Seg4-017-001-2014"
],
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 78,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/clinton/2068127/42-t-2068127-20060198F-Seg4-017-001-2014-078.jpg",
"mediaId": "b29c20f02cd54dd2",
"ocrText": "Page 12\nFederal News Service, MARCH 1, 1996\nfather of a 16 and 14-year-old daughters and 7 and 5-year-old sons. And in that\nbroad spectrum, I have seen some remarkable differences in attitude and\nbehaviors towards what they see on television and what they listen to, only\nwithin that generational gap in my own family.\nThese are powerful influences. Television is an extraordinary media, one that\nwe should be very, very pleased that we have access to that technology, because\nchildren have learned enormous things and have benefitted greatly. But with\nthe good side of technology there is the potential risk, and it is that risk\nthat I and the scientific community have become particularly concerned about\nbecause we know without balancing that risk, without paying attention to the\nways in which children learn, the kinds of violent images that sometimes are\nseen on television in which violent acts go unpunished, in which violence may be\nmasked in humor in which there is no pain -- you know I evaluated someone in a\nhospital down south not too long ago who looked at me from his bedside, having\nbeen involved in a homicide in which he was shot, and he said to me, \"Doc, I\nnever realized it was going to hurt to be shot.\"\nThese are powerful statements coming from our children. And these are the kinds\nof images that we, as parents, at the very least need some help in making\ndeterminations as to what children are exposed to, at what age, and what\nfrequency. What my 16 and 14-year- old watch may be quite different from what I\nthink my 7 and 5-year-old ought to watch.\nAnd I think what the two of you have done has really helped facilitate the\nindustry and parents to work together on creating a stronger and more healthy\nenvironment in which children can use television in a productive and useful way.\nPRESIDENT CLINTON: Hillary, do you want to comment on that based on what you\nsaid\nMRS. CLINTON: No, that was incredible. I mean; I think that if we could get\nevery parent to hear that and understand it, then the rating system and the\nV-chip would be even more effective because, of course, one of our challenges is\nto convince parents to use the rating system and to take the time and energy\nthat will be required to implement it in their own homes, and then when the\nV-chip comes along, to be ready to use that as well.\nAnd the information they can get, such as the doctor is explaining, about what\nwe know is the linkage between what they see on television and how they behave,\nI think the more willing parents will be to act.\nPRESIDENT CLINTON: I want to get to this to the young people here.) But let\nme tell you it's okay if you disagree with us about this. (Laughter.) We want\nto hear what you really think. But I want to ask the doctor one more question.\nBefore I had this job -- as I used to say, back when I had a life -- (laughter)\n-- I -- I used to -- I was a governor of my state, when I ran a big prison\nsystem and a big criminal justice system, obviously. And then I was attorney\ngeneral. And before that, I taught criminal law. So I've been following issues\nof crime and violence closely, from that perspective, for more than 20 years\nnow.\nFor most of my time, it was an article of (faith ?) that 75 percent of all the\nviolence crimes in America were created by people between the ages of 17 and 26,\nand that there was almost a hormonal problem. If you could, literally, just get\nviolent people and put them somewhere until they were 27, you could let them out\n(chuckling) and they would not do that again; that there really almost\nseemed to be sea changes.\nNow we see an astonishing thing, with the crime rate going down among people 18\nand over -- and I might add, with drug use going down among people over 18 --\nand violence going up among people under 18 and -- (well ?) as well as casual"
}